Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gentle grip of a baby Toque macaque under its mother's care.jpg

File:Gentle grip of a baby Toque macaque under its mother's care.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Aug 2019 at 07:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gentle grip of a baby Toque macaque under its mother's care.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gentle grip of a baby Toque macaque under its mother's care.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
•  Info created by Senthiaathavan - uploaded by Senthiaathavan - nominated by A-wiki-guest-user -- A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 07:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- A-wiki-guest-user (talk) 07:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry but it doesn't work for me; the resolution is quite low and we can't really see too much of the subject - it should be zoomed out, IMO.--Peulle (talk) 08:18, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I know that the resolution is low but the power of the photo is so strong for me that it totally makes up for a few megapixels. --Podzemnik (talk) 08:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just not sharp enough and the lighting isn't great (nor the size). And is baby the correct description? Looks a few months old. Charles (talk) 11:14, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Podzemnik. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support Very much unusual for Commons, superb lights and motif, resolution is irrelevant. -- KennyOMG (talk) 13:12, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

• Out there you just try to keep up with the animals and get as much of them as possible in focus? I don't think so. Charles (talk) 17:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

• I've deleted my thoughts about the photo since there is always a danger someone will misunderstand when you use a conversational tone. --Cart (talk) 17:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

There was no misunderstanding. Charles (talk) 19:05, 31 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 16:28, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Podzemnik--Ermell (talk) 20:17, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support The resolution isn't high, but I don't really mind, this is a unique capture and we should consider ourselves lucky to have it on Commons. Cmao20 (talk) 20:46, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I already very much liked this other work of the photographer, despite certain technical shortcomings. The same applies here. -- B2Belgium (talk) 21:16, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Cmao--Boothsift 04:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --El Grafo (talk) 07:45, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:18, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ryan Hodnett (talk) 16:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 14:40, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 04:39, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:53, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 14:55, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20 --Aristeas (talk) 17:39, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
•  Support because photography is more than taking the passport photo of an animal for the top right of Wikipedia. -- Colin (talk) 19:25, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:05, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals