Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hummus Dip (30863436677).jpg

File:Hummus Dip (30863436677).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2019 at 21:18:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Hummus Dip (30863436677).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hummus Dip (30863436677).jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
•  Info created by Ella Olsson - uploaded & nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Pine (✉) 02:12, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The bowl on the left was cut off. --Boothsift 02:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
  • It is on purpose. Tomer T (talk) 05:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Oh, yes. Let's bring FPC kicking and screaming from the ideals of Baroque still-life food depiction into modern food presentation and food photography. The idea is to see every part/item of the composition as if they were elements in an abstract painting. Here the cut off circle(bowl of chickpeas) is a perfect balance for the larger circle(bowl of hummus) and the break-frame lines of the folded cloth. The compo is then fine-tuned by the bold red X(slices of bell pepper) and various color infusions made with yellow(oil in the hummus) and green(herbes). --Cart (talk) 06:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Bootshift.--Ermell (talk) 06:52, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Boothsift.--Peulle (talk) 07:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per above, unfortunately. Any alts available? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:43, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support There's nothing wrong with a cut bowl. -- KennyOMG (talk) 09:54, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support Excellent, and per Cart. Cut-off bowls and plates are absolutely normal in modern professional food photography, just as cropping off the top of someone's head is absolutely normal in modern professional portrait photography, though you'd never guess that looking at our very conservative choices at FP. Just stick "food photography" into a Google Image search, and you will find cut-off bowls and plates everywhere. This is a great photo and is making me hungry. Who's got some warm pita bread? -- Colin (talk) 10:49, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support per Colin. This is a textbook example of food photography done well. The cut bowl is a brave and successful compositional choice, not an error. Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support Yarl 💭  16:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Unpleasant top view and bad crop --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support What's wrong with the bowl? I think it's an excellent composition. --Podzemnik (talk) 21:51, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support That kind of crop is pretty much standard in food photography. I wish we had more food photographers contributing to Wikimedia Commons! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Strong support per Cart, Colin etc. --El Grafo (talk) 08:21, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 18:12, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition. Charles (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose The composition is OK for me, however, there are lots of clipped whites on the hummus and I have the impression that its colour on the photo is not quite true. --A.Savin 11:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - I agree with you. At anything larger than the size of my screen, it doesn't really look like hummus to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Yes, the color is kind of pale but the texture seems right; this is one of those food photos where whatever else you're doing you want to dig in. Daniel Case (talk) 13:42, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Gnosis (talk) 21:03, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others -- Karelj (talk) 18:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose but for the tight crop in left. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 09:18, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:27, 8 July 2019 (UTC)