User talk:Yarl

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Gallica parameter question[edit]

Hi Yarl- It looks like you might have been the creator of the above template. Can you tell me if there's a way to add a parameter to include a direct url to a work? I'm trying to avoid the "under the digital ID" language for a web address. This question came up when I wanted to add a direct url to the image at File:Marie_de_France_(1344-1404).png. Thanks in advance for any help. Eric talk 14:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Eric: hey, sorry for no response. Today I had some time to take a look at this, is this ok for you? Or maybe passing f38 as a second param is good enough? I would prefer it, but I'm not sure how Gallica is structured and how it will work for most of the pages. Yarl 💭  18:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks! How did you know that simply adding the pipe would work, and would produce the text "direct link"? I searched for options like that before I posted. Also tried adding my own parameters, but got errors. I think it would be useful to add that guidance to the template usage section, but I'm not sure what all to put there. I think it would also help to define what is called for by "ID" in the parameter description. But I hesitate to undertake that myself as I am new to the template. On the Marie de France page, I was at first tempted to populate parameter 1 with the direct url of page 38, but I didn't want to because of the "digital ID" language. Eric talk 19:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Eric: well, I simply added second param in the template :). Now I see it's rather redundant. I was searching for more examples and I see the easiest and simplest solution is adding page number in the ID. Works like a charm. Yarl 💭  17:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's certainly simpler. I just didn't know if "digital ID" was supposed to be a specific catalog number in the Gallica system. So do you think we should flesh out the guidance in the template usage section? Eric talk 18:19, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Commons - Design feedback request: Multilingual Captions[edit]

Hello! You are receiving this message because you signed up for the the community focus group for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons.

The Structured Data on Commons team has a new design feedback request up for Multilingual Captions support in the Upload Wizard. Visit the page for more information about the potential designs. Discussion and feedback is welcome there.

On a personal note, you'll see me posting many of these communications going forward for the Structured Data project, as SandraF transitions into working on the GLAM side of things for Structured Data on Commons full time. For the past six months she's been splitting time between the two roles (GLAM and Community Liaison). I'm looking forward to working with you all again. Thank you, happy editing. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RE Gwiazda dla Ciebie![edit]

Dziękuję :) Nie wiem jednak czy to nie za wcześnie. Na razie skategoryzowałem może ze 100-200 zdjęć na ponad 4 tysiące :) Pozdrawiam.Dreamcatcher25 (talk) 16:45, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamcatcher25: na zachętę :). Pracy dużo, chętnych dużo mniej :) Yarl 💭  17:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - What gets stored where (Ontology)[edit]

Greetings,

There is a new feedback request for Structured Data on Commons (link for messages posted to Commons: , regarding what metadata from a file gets stored where. Your participation is appreciated.

Happy editing to you. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 22:58, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons bot inactivity[edit]

Hello!

Your bot has been listed at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag 5 as being inactive for over two years. As a housekeeping measure we'd like to remove the bot flag from inactive bot accounts, unless you expect the bot will be operated again in the near future. If you wish for your bot to retain it's bot flag, please speak up on the deflag page. If you consent to the removal of the bot flag (or do not reply on the deflag page) you can re-request the bot flag at Commons:Bots/Requests should you need it again. Regards, ~riley (talk) 22:37, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First structured licensing conversation on Commons[edit]

Greetings,

The first conversation about structured copyright and licensing for Structured Data on Commons has been posted, please come by and participate. The discussion will be open through the end of the month (March). Thank you. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:26, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! Sorry for writing in English. The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

--WMF Surveys (talk) 01:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Borków (powiat kielecki)[edit]

Przed usunięciem sprawdzaj też linkujące w innych wiki. W haśle na pl wiki już poprawiłem na link do kategorii. Sławek Borewicz (talk) 20:44, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Sławek Borewicz: jasna sprawa. Ciężko mi się wytłumaczyć z edycji sprzed dwóch lat ;). Yarl 💭  14:12, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize again for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone.If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Wikimedia survey (corrected link)[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 26% of Wikimramedia contributors who Wikimedia programs like the Education program, editathons, or image contests. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed.Take the survey now.

If you are not fluent in English, I apologize for posting in English. If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks! —WMF Surveys (talk) 17:24, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you are not a native speaker of English, I apologize for writing in English. If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thank you!! --WMF Surveys (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multilingual captions testing is available[edit]

Greetings,

The early prototype for multilingual caption support is available for testing. More information on how to sign up to test is on Commons. Thanks, happy editing to you. - Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:06, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons IRC Office Hour, Tuesday 26 June[edit]

Greetings,

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Tuesday, 26 June from 18:00-19:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find more details, as well as date and time conversion, at the IRC Office Hours page on Meta.

Thanks, I look forward to seeing you there if you can make it. -- Keegan (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What properties does Commons need?[edit]

Greetings,

Structured Commons will need properties to make statements about files. The development team is working on making the software ready to support properties; the question is, what properties does Commons need?

You can find more information and examples to help find properties in a workshop on Commons. Please participate and help fill in the list, and let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikona madonny bytomskiej.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gower (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ich schreibe dir mal auf Deutsch, du kannst mir auch auf Englisch antworten, Polnisch kann ich leider nicht.
Die Attribute des Fotos sind leider falsch und es ist in my humble opion sehr zweifelhaft, ob hier ein public domain voriegt. Es steht dort

Es wird also behauptet, dass www.zeno.org / fotopolska.eu der Urheber sei. Oder der Rechteinhaber. Wie soll das gehen?

Der Autor des Fotos ist ein Ansichtskarten-Fotograf. Der anscheinend unbekannt ist.

Ein Foto eines unbekannten Fotografen könnte als c:Template:PD-old-assumed gelten, das setzt aber 120 Jahre voraus. c:Template:PD-Polish kommt imho auch nicht in Frage. Aber vielleicht hast du noch eine Idee, ansonsten werde ich einen deletion request stellen, dann sieht man weiter. Gruß --Goesseln (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinates of ASI monuments[edit]

Hi Yarl, Nice meeting you in Wikimania. Looking forward for your kind help to retrieve the coordinate data of ASI heritage monumnents from this website. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 09:05, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - Depicts statements draft requirements[edit]

Greetings,

A slide presentation of the draft requirements for depicts statements on file pages is up on Commons. Please visit this page on Commons to review the slides and discuss the draft. Thank you, see you on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:20, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Yarl. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2018 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you. – Kwj2772 (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data feedback - structured licensing and copyright[edit]

Mockups of structured licensing and copyright statements on file pages are posted. Please have a look over the examples and leave your feedback on the talk page. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:32, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New discussion on Commons talk:Structured data[edit]

Hello. I've started a new, important discussion about creating properties for Commons on Wikidata. Please come join in, if the process is something that interests you or if you can help. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:48, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - upcoming changes to viewing old file page revisions[edit]

How old revisions of file pages work are likely going to have to change for structured data. There is information about the change on the SDC hub talk page, please read it over and leave feedback if you have any. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hours today, 4 October[edit]

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 4 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 05:49, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - search prototype[edit]

There is a search prototype for structured data on Commons available. Please visit the search prototype page on the structured data hub for information on testing and feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:07, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November[edit]

There will be an IRC office hour for Structured Data on Commons today, 1 October 2018, from 17:00-18:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office. You can find date/time conversion, as well as a link to join the chat in your browser if needed, on the IRC Office hours page on Meta. I realize this may be short notice for some people; I am experimenting with advanced notice times to see what works best for the most people, I'll be giving more warning before the next office hour. I look forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - IRC office hour today, 1 November[edit]

The above message says 1 October in the body when it should say 1 November, as the subject line says. Apologies for making a new section by mass message, it's the only way to get this out quickly. See you in twenty minutes! -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - copyright and licensing statements[edit]

I've posted a second round of designs for modeling copyright and licensing in structured data. These redesigns are based off the feedback received in the first round of designs, and the development team is looking for more discussion. These designs are extremely important for the Commons community to review, as they deal with how copyright and licensing is translated from templates into structured form. I look forward to seeing you over there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:25, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Multilingual captions beta testing[edit]

The Structured Data on Commons team has begun beta testing of the first feature, multilingual file captions, and all community members are invited to test it out. Captions is based on designs discussed with the community[1][2] and the team is looking forward to hearing about testing. If all goes well during testing, captions will be turned on for Commons around the second week of January, 2019.

Multilingual captions are plain text fields that provide brief, easily translatable details of a file in a way that is easy to create, edit, and curate. Captions are added during the upload process using the UploadWizard, or they can be added directly on any file page on Commons. Adding captions in multiple languages is a simple process that requires only a few steps.

The details:

  • There is a help page available on how to use multilingual file captions.
  • Testing will take place on Beta Commons. If you don’t yet have an account set up there, you’ll need one.
  • Beta Commons is a testbed, and not configured exactly like the real Commons site, so expect to see some discrepancies with user interface (UI) elements like search.
  • Structured Data introduces the potential for many important page changes to happen at once, which could flood the recent changes list. Because of this, Enhanced Recent Changes is enabled as it currently is at Commons, but with some UI changes.
  • Feedback and commentary on the file caption functionality are welcome and encouraged on the discussion page for this post.
  • Some testing has already taken place and the team are aware of some issues. A list of known issues can be seen below.
  • If you discover a bug/issue that is not covered in the known issues, please file a ticket on Phabricator and tag it with the “Multimedia” tag. Use this link to file a new task already tagged with "Multimedia."

Known issues:

Thanks!

-- Keegan (WMF) (talk), for the Structured Data on Commons Team 20:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - file captions coming this week (January 2019)[edit]

Hi all, following up on last month's announcement...

Multilingual file captions will be released this week, on either Wednesday, 9 November or Thursday, 10 November 2019. Captions are a feature to add short, translatable descriptions to files. Here's some links you might want to look follow before the release, if you haven't already:

  1. Read over the help page for using captions - I wrote the page on mediawiki.org because captions are available for any MediaWiki user, feel free to host/modify a copy of the page here on Commons.
  2. Test out using captions on Beta Commons.
  3. Leave feedback about the test on the captions test talk page, if you have anything you'd like to say prior to release.

Additionally, there will be an IRC office hour on Thursday, 10 January with the Structured Data team to talk about file captions, as well as anything else the community may be interested in. Date/time conversion, as well as a link to join, are on Meta.

Thanks for your time, I look forward to seeing those who can make it to the IRC office hour on Thursday. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:22, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate detection in Pattypan[edit]

Hi Yarl, does Pattypan have an option to prevent it from uploading exact duplicates like File:John Singleton Copley - Nathaniel Hurd - 1915.534 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tif? How to enable it? Multichill (talk) 19:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Multichill: Was it exact duplicate? Currently it's relying on MediaWiki API error message only. Yarl 💭  13:27, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Same SHA1 hash. That's also what Mediawiki throws an warning for so I don't understand how that file could have been uploaded.
In Pywikibot I usually just locally calculate the SHA1 hash and ask the Mediawiki API if it already has that file (example code).
It's much faster (especially with local files) and prevents accidental duplicates. Maybe worth adding to Pattypan too? Multichill (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look at Special:DeletedContributions/Madreiling. All duplicates.... Multichill (talk) 22:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yarl? Multichill (talk) 11:51, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - development update, March 2019[edit]

This text is also posted on the Structured Data hub talk page. You can reply there with questions, comments, or concerns.

A development update for the current work by the Structured Data on Commons team:

After the release of multilingual file captions, work began on getting depicts and other statements ready for release. These were originally scheduled for release in February and into March, however there are currently two major blockers to finishing this work (T215642, T217157). We will know more next week about when depicts and statements can likely be ready for testing and then release; until then I've tentatively updated the release schedule.

Once the depicts feature is ready for testing, it will take place in two stages on TestCommons. The first is checking the very basics; is the design comfortable, how does the simple workflow of adding/editing/removing statements work, and building up help and process pages from there. The second part is a more detailed test of depicts and other statements, checking the edge-case examples of using the features, bugs that did not come up during simple testing, etc. Additionally we'll be looking with the community for bugs in interaction with bots, gadgets, and other scripts once the features are live on Commons. Please let me know if you're interesting in helping test and fix these bugs if they show up upon release, it is really hard to find them in a test environment or, in some cases, bugs won't show up in a testing environment at all.

One new thing is definitely coming within the next few weeks, pending testing: the ability to search for captions. This is done using the inlabel keyword in search strings, and will be the first step in helping users find content that is specifically structured data. I'll post a notice when that feature is live and ready for use.

Thanks, let me know if you have questions about these plans. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - early depicts testing[edit]

The Structured Data on Commons development team has the very basic version of depicts statements available for early testing on Test-Commons. You can add very basic depicts statements to the file page by going into the new “Structured Data” tab located below the "Open in Media Viewer button." You can use the Latest Files link in the left side nav bar to select existing images, or use the UploadWizard to upload new ones to test with (although those images won’t actually show up on the site). The test site is not a fully functional replica of Commons, so there may be some overall problems in using the site, but you should be able to get a general idea of what using the feature is like.

Early next week I will call for broad, community-wide testing of the feature similar to what we did for Captions, with instructions for testing, known bugs, and a dedicated space to discuss the feature as well as a simple help page for using statements. Until then, you're welcome to post on the SDC talk page with what you might find while testing depicts.

Thanks in advance for trying it out, you'll be hearing more from me next week. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 21:59, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ilustracja stacji kolejowej w Ińsku[edit]

Cześć, chciałbym przesłać grafiki ilustrujące stację kolejową w Ińsku i przejazd kolejowy tamże, ale zauważyłem, że może tego dokonać jedynie administrator lub zaufany użytkownik Wikimedia Commons po uprzednim potwierdzeniu licencji. Czy mógłbyś potwierdzić licencję i przesłać ten plik?

Pozdrawiam

Szczecinolog (talk) 08:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

location on map[edit]

Paweł, I started discussion at Template_talk:Wikidata_Infobox#bad_coordinates, but I am not sure I am getting anywhere. If you want you can continue the discussion. --Jarekt (talk) 13:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - testing qualifiers for depicts[edit]

As you might have seen, testing is underway for adding qualifiers to depicts statements. If you have not left feedback already, the Structured Data on Commons development team is very interested in hearing about your experience using qualifiers on the file page and in the UploadWizard. To get started you can visit Test-Commons and chose a random file to test out, or upload your own file to try out the UploadWizard. Questions, comments, and concerns can be left on the Structured data talk page and the team will address them as best as they can. Thank you for your time. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WLE Poland logo.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 04:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data on Commons - IRC office hours this week, 18 July[edit]

The Structured Data team is hosting an IRC office hour this week on Thursday, 18 July, from 17:00-18:00 UTC. Joining information as well as date and time conversion is available on Meta. Potential topics for discussion are the testing of "other statements", properties that may need to be created for Commons on Wikidata soon, plans for the rest of SDC development, or whatever you might want to discuss. The development team looks forward to seeing you there. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - testing other statements[edit]

You can now test using other statements for structured data on the file page on Test-Commons. Some datatypes are not yet available, such a coordinates, but further support will be extended soon. You can find more information about testing on the SDC talk page. The team looks forward to your feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 16:41, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019: it's Wiki Loves Monuments time again![edit]

Hi

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in the UK. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and help record our local built environment for future generations.

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments UK website. Or, if you have images taken in other countries, you can check the international options. This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

Many thanks for your help once more! MichaelMaggs (talk) 15:35, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Images_from_Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2017_in_Ireland_–_missing_category has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Smirkybec (talk) 20:41, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging[edit]

The development team is starting work on one of the last planned features for SDC v1.0, a lightweight tool to suggest depicts tags for images. I've published a project page for it, please have a look. I plan to share this page with everyone on Commons much more broadly in the coming days. The tool has been carefully designed to try to not increase any workload on Commons volunteers; for starters, it will be opt-in for auto-confirmed users only and will not generate any sort of backlog here on Commons. Additionally, the tool is highly privacy-minded for the contributors and publicly-minded for the third party being used, in this case Google. The implementation and usage notes contain more information about these and other potential concerns as a starting place. It's really important that the tool is implemented properly from the start, so feedback is welcome. Questions, comments, concerns are welcome on the talk page and I will get answers as quickly as possible as things come up. On the talk page you can also sign up to make sure you're a part of the feedback for designs and prototype testing. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 17:57, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - modeling data[edit]

As you may have seen, there are community discussions underway on how to best model structured data on Commons.

Direct links to pages created so far:

Please visit and participate in topics you might be interested in when you get some time. Thanks. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Structured Data - computer-aided tagging designs[edit]

I've published a design consultation for the computer-aided tagging tool. Please look over the page and participate on the talk page. If you haven't read over the project page, it might be helpful to do so first. The tool will hopefully be ready by the end of this month (October 2019), so timely feedback is important. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:09, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Email[edit]

Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 06:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dałoby się lepiej kategoryzować?[edit]

Cześć!

Dziękuję za Twoje edycje; przeglądałem Twoje przesłane pliki i mam wrażenie, że załadowane przez Ciebie zdjęcia dostają bardzo ogólnikowe kategorie i równie ogólnikowe nazwy. Czy nie mógłbyś na przyszłość dodawać je do odpowiednich kategorii i nazywać bardziej wyróżniająco? Np. wnętrze kościoła św. Trójcy nazwałeś: „Wrocław - Przedmieście Oławskie 69.jpg”, a kategorie to: „Cultural heritage monuments in Poland with unknown IDs”, „Przedmieście Oławskie, Wrocław” i „EthnoWiki spacer 2019” zamiast przede wszystkim: „Holy Trinity church in Wrocław” itd. Poprawiłem kilka kategorii w kilku plikach, ale jak zobaczyłem skalę zjawiska, to trochę wymiękłem. Pozdrawiam. --Gower (talk) 22:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gower: Tak, wiem, sporo tam bałaganu ale postaram się uprzątnąć moje i innych zdjęcia do poprawnych kategorii. Po prostu gdybym tego nie wrzucił na raz to by leżało niewiadomo ile na dysku. Yarl 💭  13:18, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nominacje do "Quality images"[edit]

Witam, jakiś czas temu spytałem się Natalii ze stowarzyszenia czy ktoś mógłby mi pomoc z nominacjami moich zdjęć do wyróżnienia "Quality images". Chodzi w szczególności o zdjęcia, które zrobiłem w Polsce w ramach konkursu Wiki Lubi Zabytki. Niestety (albo stety) zdjęć jest dużo i nie dam rady ich nominować sam — dany użytkownik może nominować tylko 5 zdjęć na dzień. A mam jeszcze mnóstwo zaległych zdjęć z 2018 roku. Dlatego chciałbym się zapytać czy pomógłbyś mi z nominowaniem tych zdjęć z Polski? Pozdrawiam i życzę miłego dnia :) Tournasol7 (talk) 09:53, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019! Please help with this survey.[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Yarl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 12:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in Wiki Loves Monuments 2019 Participant Survey (Reminder)[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Yarl,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2019, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 210K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 40 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2019.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team MediaWiki message delivery 03:42, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning (Feb 2020)[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Dear Yarl. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2020 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:07, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pattypan: Login failed[edit]

I have been using Pattypan for so long, and its a fantastic tool, looks like tailormade for me. Today I am not able to login to the program. Constantly prompts "login failed". Please help.--Vinayaraj (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Churches in Poland[edit]

W infoboxie dotyczącym tej kategorii, ktoś wstawił kościół ... z Macedonii. Nie mam pojęcia jak to zmienić, może masz chwilkę 77.3.159.120 15:44, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Montage[edit]

Widze ze jesteś jednym z autorów Commons:Montage. Czy sadzisz ze można by było ten program przystosować do co miesięcznego "Photo challenge", np. Commons:Photo challenge/2020 - April - Interior Clocks/Voting. --Jarekt (talk) 03:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons - Media Search[edit]

Greetings,

The Structured Data team is working on an alternative, image-focused prototype for media search on Commons. The prototype uses categories, structured data as well as wikitext from Commons, and Wikidata to find its results. The development team would like your feedback on the prototype, as they are looking to work to further enhance the search experience on Commons. If you have a moment, please look over the project page set up on Commons to find a link to the prototype and leave your feedback on the talk page. Thanks for your time, I'll be posting message similar to this one to other pages on Commons. The team is looking forward to reading what you think. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:47, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Familoks_in_Katowice-Nikiszowiec has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


MacQtosh (talk) 17:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons - Media Sarch, new feedback round[edit]

Greetings,

I'm following up on a message from earlier in the year about the prototype development for Special:MediaSearch. Based on community feedback, the Structured Data team has developed some new features for Special:MediaSearch and are seeking another round of comments and discussions about the tool. Commons:Structured_data/Media_search is updated with details about the new features plus some other development information, and feedback is welcome on Commons talk:Structured_data/Media_search. Media Search works in any language, so the team would especially appreciate input around support for languages other than English. I look forward to reading about what you think. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 20:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:World record icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.8.192.162 14:45, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Olympic record icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

194.8.192.162 14:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WG 2020-27[edit]

Cześć

W imieniu Komisji Wikigrantów uprzejmie informuję Cię, że Komisja rozpoznała Twój wniosek o grant i podjęła decyzję o przyznaniu dofinansowania. W sprawie szczegółów dotyczących rozliczenia skontaktuj się, proszę, z biurem Stowarzyszenia. Ankry (talk) 20:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bitey Badger (7670624694).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Nadpisywanie zdjęć[edit]

Cześć. Robię tak tylko w sytuacji, kiedy uznaję, iż stare zdjęcie jest na tyle brzydkie, że nie nadaje się do dalszego użytkowania w ramach projektów Wikimedia i jedyną sensowną rzeczą, którą można z nim zrobić jest po prostu podmienić je na ładniejszą wersję ilustracji tego samego obiektu, często również z tego samego punktu. Nie widzę w tym procederze nic jakoś szczególnie szkodliwego, a wręcz przeciwnie. Tym bardziej, że jest to dosyć powszechna tendencja na Commons. Pozdrawiam. Mach240390 20:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mach240390: Nie, nawet zupełnie nie. Zerknij na Commons:Overwriting existing files, to jest oficjalna zasada Commons. Stare zdjęcia mają dużą wartość bo dokumentują budynek w konkretnym ujęciu czasowym. Estetyka może wtedy zejść na drugi plan :). Yarl 💭  21:33, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Doprawdy. Nawet jeżeli przedmiot fotografii w czasie pomiędzy wykonaniem poszczególnych wersji nie uległ wielkiej zmianie... Jeżeli tak powinno być, to uwzględnię to w kolejnych poczynaniach. ;) Mach240390 (talk) 22:11, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail :-) --Z thomas 19:05, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

zdjęcia[edit]

Cześć kiedyś załadowałeś szereg zdjęć z fotopolska.eu autorstwa Neo Czy on wyraził zgodę na publikacje wszystkich swoch zdjęć z serwisu czy tylko tych wybranych? Mam takie zjęcie https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wroc%C5%82aw_-_fotopolska.eu_(150559).jpg i tak się zastanawiam jaki jest jego status. --Adamt 07:39, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎[edit]

Hello Yarl! I hope all is well :-) As you may be aware, OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions! SFauconnier (talk) 17:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pattypan nie działa[edit]

Ludzie zgłaszają, że nie działają narzędzia do masowych uploadów.

Jakbyś coś chciał wiedzieć, możesz mnie zapytać. Wargo (talk) 13:09, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads by BursztaBot in category:Village Museum, Bucharest[edit]

Hi Yarl, your bot has uploaded a few pictures in this category. Since they are sorted at the end of the category, I'm assuming you used some kind of unicode character instead of the ASCII "Muzeul Satului". There is also a typo ("Salutui" instead of "Satului"). Would it be OK to move them?--Strainu (talk) 18:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Madame Tussauds - Morgan Freeman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 07:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polona Upload[edit]

Not the end of the world if you don't, but the PD template Polona Upload used for Norddeutscher Ziegelbau 1944 (etc).jpg did not explain why the pages are PD in the US. Please replace them with {{PD-old-auto-1996|country=de|deathyear=1944}}. Thank you. Snowmanonahoe (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sinéad O'Connor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Justin (koavf)TCM 20:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pattypan[edit]

Example

Hi Yarl! Today I was using Pattypan after a long time and something goes wrong, maybe you can help me. Last time, I used the tool with my pro account: Patafisik (WMIT).

Today, I wanted to use it with my personal account. I was logged in on Commons with my personal account Patafisik, and in the column "author" (of the .xls file) I correctly wrote Patafisik. But files was uploaded with my pro account, and I don't understand why. Preview doesn't help to prevent this problem. What am I doing wrong? Where can I change the account that does the uploading?--Pạtạfisik 14:19, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


File:Копия Image p2 -08.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Vladislav Khebnikov.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 16:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File:Chopin Year in Poland - Lang Lang 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EleniXDD (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]