Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaflong Sylhet.jpg

File:Jaflong Sylhet.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2018 at 04:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Jaflong Sylhet.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaflong Sylhet.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
•  Info created by Abdul Momin - uploaded by Abdul Momin - nominated by RockyMasum -- Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- Masum-al-Hasan (talk) 04:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral I really like the composition, but IMO the focus is in front of the man. The man himself isn't sharp enough. --XRay ^talk 11:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support XRay may be right. Still... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral per XRay, andi it's just too noisy for me. Lovely scene, though, hence my neutral rather than oppose.--Peulle (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Good for me...isn't quality images here --Σπάρτακος (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support per Martin -- P999 (talk) 18:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support great light and composition Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:26, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 12:59, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Ideal moment, nice layering, interesting subject, well composed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Comment - I understand why everyone likes this picture, but before it's featured, would it be OK to smooth out the color noise a bit? Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Why don't you ask the photographer? This image has been processed from raw using Photoshop, so the result is their artistic creation, and perhaps their compromise between fixing the noise/posterisation issues and losing detail or over-smoothing the result. Also, one of our Photoshop experts could offer to attempt a reprocessing from raw, but it isn't always easy to achieve the same effect on an image like this. I'd really rather we didn't fiddle with the JPG. -- Colin (talk) 07:41, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
    • Abdul Momin, what do you think? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Has its defects, yes, but they're fixable and it's just so pretty. Daniel Case (talk) 23:15, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Neutral Because of the severe colour noise of the mountains --Llez (talk) 16:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colors, light and composition. --Laitche (talk) 00:54, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 07:01, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena