Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Notre-Dame de Paris and Île de la Cité at dusk 140516 1.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Notre-Dame de Paris and Île de la Cité at dusk 140516 1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 May 2014 at 02:20:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 02:20, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support -- Exceptional. Saffron Blaze (talk) 04:18, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Yann (talk) 05:45, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:39, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:46, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality, but the composition here does not say much to me. Maybe it's because it does not show a unified ensemble or a part of such. All it shows is the back side (!) of Notre-Dame, plus an unrelated building. Also, the lighting of the bridge at the right with the shadow like an upside-down triangle is really distracting for me. --A.Savin 09:26, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Thanks Paris 16. I have fixed the noise and also some perspective issues. I can see that the bridge lighting might irritate, and I think that whoever commissioned that wasn't thinking very far... I do not know how showing the back side of Notre-Dame would be bad (I find it far more interesting than the front which is a bit straightforward). IMO, the image shows the eastern Île de la Cité as some sort of ensemble with references to both sides of the river, but each to their own.--DXR (talk) 09:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- CommentI do not know how showing the back side of Notre-Dame would be bad (I find it far more interesting than the front which is a bit straightforward): +++1 ! --Jebulon (talk) 14:38, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support The flashy light of the Pont Saint-Louis (right) is a bit deflective, but nevertheless a outstanding picture. --Wladyslaw (talk) 17:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support I agree the bright bridge is a bit of a distraction. A 4:3 crop of the left hand side is good too, and avoids this. -- Colin (talk) 18:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support It's true the bridge is a bit distracting, but I like this one -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support--Godot13 (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose As Savin Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:15, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Not your fault, but the place does not work for a FP IMO. The embankment at left is busy by people an not really interesting. The right part with the triangle under the bridge is a no-go for me. What remains ? The cathedral, and a part of the Seine river. Maybe you could have another try with a tighter framing.--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)--Jebulon (talk) 20:18, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose As Savin. Pleclown (talk) 11:32, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but that triangle is way too dominating imho. Since you seem to live in that area: Might worth a try to re-visit the location and try to make the triangle the main subject. That probably wouldn't be very useful for Commons, but could be interesting from a more "artistic" point of view … --El Grafo (talk) 19:29, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, since today, I am no longer in Paris, therefore I cannot take more images. If it gets declined, it does, no worries. However I wonder why so few people have commented on the alt that has no triangle... --DXR (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- You left Paris, and we did not met ? What a pity ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- You're right, Jebulon... Somehow time was just flying during the last weeks and before I knew, I was already in the train back! --DXR (talk) 12:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
- You left Paris, and we did not met ? What a pity ! --Jebulon (talk) 21:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Well, since today, I am no longer in Paris, therefore I cannot take more images. If it gets declined, it does, no worries. However I wonder why so few people have commented on the alt that has no triangle... --DXR (talk) 20:10, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --JLPC (talk) 16:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support --P e z i (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
Alternative crop[edit]
- Info Based on Colin's and also A.Savin's comment, I have uploaded a 5x7 version that focuses on the left arm of the Seine and Notre-Dame. (please feel free to correct me if I handled the alt wrong, I have no experience with that...) --DXR (talk) 18:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support No ugly modern distraction here. -- Colin (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Whichever gets the most supports. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Support Also very nice. Yann (talk) 22:22, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose I support the not cropped version -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose --Paris 16 (talk) 07:34, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 10:26, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
The chosen alternative is: File:Notre-Dame de Paris and Île de la Cité at dusk 140516 1.jpg