User talk:DanTD/Archive 12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This is a Wikimedia Commons user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DanTD/Archive_12.

العربية  azərbaycanca  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  Frysk  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  ລາວ  македонски  മലയാളം  Bahasa Melayu  မြန်မာဘာသာ  Nederlands  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  shqip  svenska  ไทย  Tagalog  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文  繁體中文  正體中文(臺灣)  +/−

Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons

Savage I-95 rest area[edit]

Not sure that name is appropriate since I don't think its in the CDP boundaries. Famartin (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure of that? Check out the borders on the map. I also saw an address somewhere indicating that Savage was on the northbound side and North Laurel was on the southbound side. ----DanTD (talk) 20:33, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:Redatalewife.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:33, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Carll house dix hills[edit]

i have an image of the house the one you have is of the 19th century add on . Email me at justinlewinter88@gmail.com Justinlewinter (talk) 00:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

County level sign cats[edit]

Thinking further... if you are gonna do county level sign gantry sub-divisions, then you need to do this for the road sign cat in general. That sounds like a very large undertaking. Famartin (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Road sign gantries[edit]

I'm not sure I know the definition of a road sign gantry. I thought a road sign gantry went across the road. Are these photos both of road sign gantries?

Just over the road but doesn't fully cross it
Stands straight up

--Mjrmtg (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I too always thought they went straight across. ----DanTD (talk) 11:08, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Since we both agree, I'll keep them just as road signs. --Mjrmtg (talk) 18:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What category name would you suggest?[edit]

There is a stretch where Interstate 75 and Interstate 85 merge together in the Atlanta area. What do you suggest this category be called?

There is a wikipedia page for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downtown_Connector

--Mjrmtg (talk) 18:20, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, tough choice. I'd either consider "Downtown Connector (Atlanta, Georgia)" or "Interstates 75 and 85 in Atlanta, Georgia..." or some variant of the two names. --DanTD (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I was leaning towards "Interstate 75/85 in Atlanta" but I like your suggestion of "Downtown Connector (Atlanta, Georgia). --Mjrmtg (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gantries[edit]

I've noticed you've removed some signs which are gantries out of the gantries category. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gantry_(road_sign) "Gantries may be cantilevered or one sided on the left, right and center (sometimes referred to as a half-gantry or Butterfly gantry), or they may be bridges with poles on each side." FYI. Famartin (talk) 07:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Would you mind if I merge your message with the discussion above? Either way, the specific sign categories I added are still correct. You've got your Interchange Advance Guide signs and Interchange Exit Directional Signs, and others. ----DanTD (talk) 09:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interchange Exit Direction signs in Florida and Exit ramp signs in Florida[edit]

I'm trying to understand the difference between the 2 categories and why isn't one the parent category of another. Could you explain the difference between the 2 categories? Thanks. --Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering about that myself. My best guess is that "Exit ramp signs" might also cover exit speed advisory signs or other relevant features of those ramps. --DanTD (talk) 13:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what changed here? What should I have done differently? I'm still learning about categories. Best, Philipp Michel Reichold (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved the category into alphabetical order. ----DanTD (talk) 14:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sign categorization pattern?[edit]

Hi there,

I'm just curious. I've seen you go through pictures I've taken and re-categorize them over time, with I believe the stated goal being to clear out the main "Road signs in (state)" category. However, your pattern in that seems quite... well, random. Is there a pattern or method to your madness, or is it indeed... random? No offense intended, as said... just curious. Famartin (talk) 22:25, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I try to go with whatever category has the most of one type and split them out. My most recent choices with county-specific categories are a little more random, in the sense that my choices aren't necessarily in alphabetical order. --DanTD (talk) 22:53, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What category?[edit]

These walls along the Interstate here are, I believe, sound-proofing walls (for the adjacent residential areas). Is there a category for these?

sound-proofing walls?

--Mjrmtg (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If there is, I know nothing about it. ----DanTD (talk) 04:59, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sound-proofing is the wrong term, noise-reduction would be better. I just found "Road noise barriers in the United States" - Thanks :) --Mjrmtg (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
File:SpringdaleRRstaMuralDinerSideStamfordCT07152007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:GlenbrookRRstaMuralStamfordCT07152007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]