User talk:Felix Koenig/Archive/2010
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mosta Dome 2009-RZ-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Azure Window Gozo 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church near Selmun Palace-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dingli 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kraftwerk Walheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Re my vote: It was a joke, as I had made clear. I know what Kraftwerk means. Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GKN Pano 1-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathausturm Worms 2009-Carschten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church St Julians-Carschten2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Red Tower Malta 2009-2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Staatstheater Mainz 2010 timm1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kraftwerk Marbach Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! MHKW Mannheim-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Datumsangabe auf Commons
[edit]Hallo!
Bitte in Commons die Datumsangabe wie folgt angeben: JAHR-MONAT-TAG => Beispiel: 2000-10-11 für den 11. Oktober 2000. Dies ist hinsichtlich der Internationalisierung von Commons höchst wünschenswert. Hier habe ich es bereits bei einem deiner Bilder umgesetzt. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 06:42, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
- In Ordnung, danke für den Hinweis. Werde ich zukünftig so machen. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:11, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kraftwerk Marbach III 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:-Leningrad Nuclear Power Plant 20JUL2010-FK.jpg was uncategorized on 23 July 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Beweisfoto Windsurfingzentrum.JPG was uncategorized on 24 September 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Xyz near Grüneggalm.JPG was uncategorized on 21 November 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
QI
[edit]Danke für die Unterstützung hier, aber ich persönlich vermeide solche Situationen unmittelbarer gegenseitiger promotion, weil das möglicherweise nach Cliquenwirtschaft aussehen könnte. Bilder von MBDortmund z.B. bewerte ich nur sehr selten, obwohl man die eigentlich fast immer nach kurzer Überprüfung positiv abhaken kann - wir kennen uns halt persönlich, das überlasse ich deshalb gern anderen :-) -- smial (talk) 14:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC) (der an sich selbst nicht so wild auf Bapperln ist, es aber halt für notwendig hält, hin und wieder mal ein eigenes aus unterschiedlichen Bereichen vorzustellen, um als Bewerter auch ernstgenommen zu werden)
- Nachklapp: Hast du mal ein anderes Objektiv an der Kamera ausprobiert und ein paar Testaufnahmen gemacht, um herauszufinden, woran die partiellen Unschärfen liegen könnten, die auf manchen deiner Bilder auftreten? -- smial (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ich habe nur deshalb abgestimmt, weil ich bei meinem Bild vorbeigeschaut habe, nicht aus Sympathie. Aber wenn du das nicht so gerne hast, kann ich es zukünftig lassen, wenn du möchtest. Zur Feststellung der Herkunft der Unschärfe habe ich mal ein kariertes Blatt Papier fotografiert, wie mir es Alchemist empfohlen hatte, demnach ist es auf einer Seite ein plötzlicher, kein fließender Übergang. Woher das kommt, weiß ich immer noch nicht, scheint aber in irgendeiner Form bei allen Objektiven aufzutreten. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Bei allen Linsen? Urgs. Das klingt nach einem dejustierten Sensor oder einem verzogenen/dejustierten Kamerabajonett. Hast du noch Garantie auf dem teil? So lange knipst du damit doch noch nicht, oder? --smial (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Ich habe nur deshalb abgestimmt, weil ich bei meinem Bild vorbeigeschaut habe, nicht aus Sympathie. Aber wenn du das nicht so gerne hast, kann ich es zukünftig lassen, wenn du möchtest. Zur Feststellung der Herkunft der Unschärfe habe ich mal ein kariertes Blatt Papier fotografiert, wie mir es Alchemist empfohlen hatte, demnach ist es auf einer Seite ein plötzlicher, kein fließender Übergang. Woher das kommt, weiß ich immer noch nicht, scheint aber in irgendeiner Form bei allen Objektiven aufzutreten. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 16:15, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
- Öhm, seit Mai 2009. Über ein Jahr ist es also schon her, da müsste ich mich über die Garantie informieren. Wenn, dann ist das Üroblem aber schon seit dem ersten Tag vorhanden. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 10:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Nun, das würde ja für einen Qualitätsmangel und gegen eine Beschädigung durch den Benutzer sprechen. Sowas kann ja passieren und dafür gibt es ja den Garantiekram. -- smial (talk) 13:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Öhm, seit Mai 2009. Über ein Jahr ist es also schon her, da müsste ich mich über die Garantie informieren. Wenn, dann ist das Üroblem aber schon seit dem ersten Tag vorhanden. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 10:25, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
- Dann müsste ich aber schauen, ob da noch ne Garantie drauf ist. Ich kümmere mich mal darum, denn inzwischen bin ich mir sicher, dass es nicht an mir liegen kann und dass die Unschärfe einen technischen Grund hat. Grüße, -- Felix König ✉ 13:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Römerturm Haigerloch 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Dateiversionen-Revertieren
[edit]Zum Dateiversionen-Revertieren kannst du übrigens einfach auf den "zurücksetzen"-Link links in der Tabelle klicken. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 17:26, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
- Habe ich doch, wüsste such nicht, wie das anders geht. Viele Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 08:44, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlosskirche Haigerloch 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlosshof Hohentübingen-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kraftwerk Altbach-2 2010-2-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eberhard Gienger 2010 crop.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heizkraftwerk Pforzheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schlosshof Liebenstein 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haigerloch 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Papierfabrik Gemmrigheim 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gyrocopter 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Wernau-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! North American AT-6D.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gyrocopter Löchgau 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cessna 182N Skylane.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cessna 192N Skylane Löchgau.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bahnhofsturm Stuttgart.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stiftskirche Stuttgart 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Neue PRIS-Codes 09/2010
[edit]Hey Felix, gibt wieder neue PRIS-Codes. Muss es leider hier schreiben, da ich erst mal das Wiki wieder vom Server runter habe, da ich mir einen eigenen zusammenbaue, deshalb wird ke-wiki vorerst nicht erreichbar sein. Jedenfalls hier die neuen Codes:
* CHINA - CN - 72 - TIANWAN-3 - PWR - PL - 1000 - - . . - . . * * CHINA - CN - 73 - TIANWAN-4 - PWR - PL - 1000 - - . . - . . * * CHINA - CN - 74 - TIANWAN-5 - PWR - PL - 1000 - - . . - . . * * CHINA - CN - 75 - TIANWAN-6 - PWR - PL - 1000 - - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 167 - LENINGRAD 2-4 - PWR - PL - 1085 - 1170 - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 170 - BALTIISK-1 - PWR - PL - 1082 - 1170 - 01.04.2011 - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 171 - BALTIISK-2 - PWR - PL - 1082 - 1170 - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 175 - KOLA 2-1 - PWR - PL - 1094 - 1170 - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 176 - KOLA 2-2 - PWR - PL - 1094 - 1170 - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 177 - CENTRAL-1 - PWR - PL - 1115 - 1199 - . . - . . * * RUSSIAN FEDERATION - RU - 178 - CENTRAL-2 - PWR - PL - 1115 - 1199 - . . - . . *
Grüße ChNPP (talk) 11:40, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Na wunderbar, das ist ja wirklich wieder viel Interessantes. Grüße -- Felix König ✉ 12:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Naja, mich stört nur das Baltiisk im PRIS anstatt Kaliningrad im PRIS. Was mir aber sehr entgegen kommt sind die Leistungen der Anlagen anhand der man bereits feststellen kann, was für ein Reaktor zum Einsatz kommt, wobei mir die ungleichen Zahlen auch nicht wirklich gefallen. Ob bei Tianwan das 1000 MW bei Block fünf und sechs korrekt ist, bin ich mir nicht sicher. Jedenfalls fahre ich dieses Wochehende vielleicht nach Temelín, werde da bestimmt ein paar Bilder schießen. Mein Vater ist aktuell auf Usedom und hat schon ein paar Bilder von Greifswald gemacht, is ja nicht weit von dort. Vielleicht kann ich ihn ja überreden, dass er sich anmeldet und die Bilder hochlädt. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 13:46, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Nachtrag: mal kurz Achtung, ist mir gerade aufgefallen, beim Kernkraftwerk Süd-Ural Block eins und zwei, werden nun die neuen Reaktordaten gelistet, also nicht mehr als FBR, sondern als PWR mit einer Bruttoleistung von 1199 MWe, also ein WWER-1200/392M. Die Nettoleistung entspricht noch den alten Reaktoren. Wollte dich nur wegen den jetzt nicht mehr ganz belegten Daten in der Wikipedia darauf hinweisen, vielleicht schaust du da mal vorbei. bei weiteren Änderungen informiere ich dich, wenn du möchtest. Grüße ChNPP (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de San Juan Bautista.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iglesia de la Concepción Agaete 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Teatro Pérez Galdós 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Santa María de Guía.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Las Palmas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pico de Gáldar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portal Kirche Arucas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Gáldar 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckarwestheim NPP 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche La Aldea de San Nicolás.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Ingenio 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cemetery Telde.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parador Cruz de Tejeda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windmill Puerto de las Nieves.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Großbottwar B-3.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Shopping Center in Maspalomas 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kuppel Kirche Ingenio.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Monument Huerto de las Flores.JPG
[edit]I'm sorry I'll have you send it by e-mail and not pay directly. To let you choose. But I wanted to save the poem ... Best Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. It's a nice rework, but I don't like it to be uploaded over the original because it doesn't show the reality. But maybe upload as a derivative work and a separate QIC? Sincerely, -- Felix König ✉ 18:17, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Institut für klassische Archäologie Tübingen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Statue Columbus, Las Palmas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portal St. Anna Haigerloch 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Evangelische Kirche Haigerloch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stadttheater Baden 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church Bad Liebenzell 2010-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! GKN pano2 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Entrance Museo de Pérez Galdós.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Solarantrieb Elektrischer Weidezaun.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge Jardín Canario.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Extra 300LP Löchgau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bahnhof Ilsfeld 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caves Gran Canaria.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Lauffen 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Beschriftung Strommast.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ilsfeld Pano.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
49 - 50
[edit]Good evening! See pls. --Vizu (talk) 21:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, but what's that? -- Felix König ✉ 16:31, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- 50 degrees monument in Kharkov. --Vizu (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, okay. (Sorry, I don't speak Russian and the generation of thumbnails has problems temporarily.) Very interesting. -- Felix König ✉ 18:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirchturm Winzerhausen 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Konferenz- und Medienzentrum Hohenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kläranlage Ilsfeld.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bauhof Ilsfeld 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tafel 49. Breitengrad Großbottwar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Großbottwar neu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brunnenfigur Bönnigheim 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hochwasserrückhaltebecken Großbottwar.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Hohenstein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello Felix Koenig.
Congratulations for your images.
Maybe will you be happy to have a look here. Your picture is much better than the other one of the same place in this page, IMO. I made a french translation of your file page with links to the french WP, and added some other categories. Gruesse aus Paris.--Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
- Merci beaucoup pour utiliser mon image et la tradiction. Grüße aus Neckarwestheim, -- Felix König ✉ 16:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Öltanks Heilbronn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Eingang Landtag Rheinland-Pfalz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turm Cyriakuskirche Bönnigheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirchturm Baden NÖ-2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pestsäule Baden 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hohenstein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turm Kirche Agüimes-CN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hafen Mgarr.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fort St. Angelo 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Bildbeschreibung File:Mercedes-Benz SLR Stirling Nuss.JPG
[edit]Hallo, "Stirling Nuss"? Das soll doch sicher Stirling Moss heißen? --Berthold Werner (talk) 19:10, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
- Ich muss mal als Angriff gegen mich selbst Dieter Nuhr zitieren ;-) Wenn keine Ahnung hat, einfach mal Fresse halten.
Ja, du hast natürlich recht. Ich hatte nur das Schild gelesen, das hieß für mich Nuss und ich habe den Mist einfach mal ohne weitere Recherche so hochgeladen. Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit und für den Hinweis, ich habe den Fehler korrigiert. -- Felix König ✉ 18. Nov. 2010, 20:21
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Windmill Puerto de las Nieves 2010 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hessischer Landtag 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Portal Veitskirche Flein 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirche Schladming 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heizkraftwerk Nord Mannheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Marbach III power plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Turm Burg Wildeck.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dünen von Maspalomas.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Steirischer Bodensee 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Gedenktafel Helfenberg
[edit]Hallo.
I tried this. Es scheint mir ein bisschen besser zu sein. I've upload it as a derivative work of yours. Please feel free to use it as you like. No worries if you dislike. Danke.--Jebulon (talk) 21:45, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
- I like the rework very much, thank you, but I'm not sure whether it is realistic or not. By chance, I was there encore une fois yesterday and tried to photograph it another time (with snow! ;-) ); maybe I will upload a new picture which could be better. -- Felix König ✉ 19:55, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- That was my problem. Is the stone tending to "blue", or tending to "grey" ? You know, me not ! I'll be happy to see the next version with snow ! Guten Abend. --Jebulon (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I've not enough time to upload it soon, so maybe it will last till weekend. -- Felix König ✉ 19:09, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- I've uploaded the new version now. Sincerely, -- Felix König ✉ 19:54, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Roque Bentaiga 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hochwasserrückhaltebecken Großbottwar 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Königsbau Stuttgart reworked2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Popeye Village 2009.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Glass Bottom Ferry Puerto Rico GC 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Reblandhallen Neckarwestheim 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Neckartor Kirchheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monument Puerto de las Nieves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cenobio de Valerón 2010.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Unit Heilbronn power plant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Town hall Großbottwar.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dorfkirche Oberstenfeld 2010 H25P.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! BASF Ludwigshafen part.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rathaus Saalfelden 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Church St Julians 2009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Quintinskirche Mainz 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|