User talk:Havang(nl)

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Reason 1: At the original uploader’s request[edit] Don't rename my stuff. Famartin (talk) 10:14, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

@Famartin:Hello, Say it to @Roadsguy: who asked for renaming, taking care of naming rules. The name you gave, is for the description template, not for in title. And it's no longer your stuff, but wikimedia's stuff. Kind greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Still not sure how the naming rules apply, I don't see anything about length listed. In any case, if Wikimedia doesn't want names that long, they should limit the length - otherwise, I'm naming them how I like. Famartin (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Give a concised title, which names the object and the location, but do not make it a story, that belongs in the description. Your description fails in clarity by giving too much detail. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Whatever. I don't really care since rule 1 outranks rule whatever. Famartin (talk) 11:53, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
I don't actually see anything in that policy that says the file name can't be as long as is permitted by the software. Meanwhile I see two policies which say the name stays as-is: Policy 1 (since its mine and I named it the way I want it to be) and Policy 4 (To harmonize the names of a set of images so that only one part of all names differs). At the very least I'd like to see where the policy actually says "File names must be such and such long." All I can find is here: [1] Famartin (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
You are mistaken in that the renaming instructions give possible reasons, not rules. Reason 1 can be used by the uploader, this was not an uploaders request at all, but it was a good renaming proposal. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
[2] says, «Tip:Use the 20 first characters for essential information» and your filename starts with 2017-09-03 10 35 55 View south along the ramps which will carry... which has no essential information at all, reason for @Roadsguy: to ask for renaming, which as a filemover i honored. --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:47, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
That says "tip" not "rule".Famartin (talk) 10:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Yes, and there are more tips: concise , etc. That's why the renaming was correct. You undid the renaming, you should have asked for a new renaming, which very probably should have been denied declined by another filemover. Passing by a renaming procedure is needed to ensure that the filerenaming in other wiki's will be executed automatically, so reverting is not the right procedure to undo renaming. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:10, 7 October 2018 (UTC).
I'm a file mover, I can move my own stuff. I don't need to ask. Famartin (talk) 11:34, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
That is surprising, seen that title of yours. But less surprising in seeing you naming your files will rename and categorize soon18.293 files ? . But that's surprising too, knowing that it's no more a job to name and categorise before uploading, preventing renaming. Havang(nl) (talk) 17:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

@Famartin: I see that you now name the files directly during upload. Thanks. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:33, 16 October 2018 (UTC)


Is deze File:Prins Bernhard decorates K.A. van der Hucht 7731699 500 500 6UWC.jpg nog te redden? (Er staat in de history: "approved by: User:Havang(nl)".) --VanBuren (talk) 20:11, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

@VanBuren: Move approved, d.w.z. ik heb als filemover de naamswijziging van File:7731699 500 500 6UWC.jpg naar File:Prins Bernhard decorates K.A. van der Hucht 7731699 500 500 6UWC.jpg goedgekeurd. Maar ik heb er geen idee van waar de foto vandaan komt. Ik heb uploaders info toegevoegd. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:55, 31 October 2018 (UTC)