User talk:Lycaon/Archive14

Archives Archive 1 (3 1 2006 – 8 1 2007) Archive 2 (11 1 2007 – 30 5 2007) Archive 3 (30 5 2007 – 2 8 2007) Archive 4 (2 8 2007 – 24 8 2007) Archive 5 (25 8 2007 – 16 12 2007) Archive 6 (17 12 2007 – 27 4 2008) Archive 7 (27 4 2008 – 30 6 2008) Archive 8 (01 7 2008 – 04 11 2008) Archive 9 (04 11 2008 – 25 11 2008) Archive 10 (25 11 2008 – 10 01 2009) Archive 11 (10 01 2009 – 29 03 2009) Archive 12 (29 03 2009 – 13 06 2009) Archive 13 (14 06 2009 – 13 10 2009)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rhinoclemmys funerea (Black Wood Turtle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Sharp & a good image but I'm afraid this is overexposed slightly to me --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
  • Did you perhaps have a better candidate in mind, or might this still be the most valuable one on commons? That's what VI is all about. Unless of course the quality is really abominable rendering the subject not properly illustrated. Lycaon (talk) 21:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
    • Hum - I didn't actually decline it (you did) & I intended it as a comment rather (my time is a bit short). Given the obvious opportunity it seems a pity that you did not seek the same standards for yourself that you do for others. The image is valuable. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 09:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
      • Hmm - You actually opposed while I had to update the status according to the rules. Then you reverted your own oppose. Bad hair day? Lycaon (talk) 07:28, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me, all criteria met -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:09, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spartium junceum (Spanish broom).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria; good quality photo, if a little overexposed. -- JovanCormac 10:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 14:18, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Basiliscus plumifrons (Plumed basilisk).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meet all criteria for a VI, tail not damaged --George Chernilevsky (talk) 11:28, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I agree with Lycaon and Chernilevsky --Cesco77 (talk) 09:11, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:23, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rivina humilis, fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This image needs a scope, or it will be impossible to review. --Korall (talk) 14:39, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

• • Ouch!! Sorry about that  now fixed. Lycaon (talk) 17:58, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Now meets all criteria, best in scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:49, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

VI nomination

Hi, Hans!

About Guiana chestnut, fruit. There are some variants: ripe, unripe and very interesting view inside. Probably, narrower scope is required.

Also that you think concerning my nomination Tinder fungus, inside?

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks George for the remarks. I adjusted the scope to 'ripe fruit'. Scopes of unripe fruit and/or seeds are then conceivable. Concerning your fungus, Maybe a single image with both complete fungus and section would do better as a VI, or alternatively a VI set with a section, a top view, a bottom view, a young sample, an old specimen and perhaps some mycelium and spores? Lycaon (talk) 08:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Ok, i support nomination with new scope. And about my nomination: it is rare image in Internet as whole, not only on Commons. I think, it is good nomination, because sub-scope like this some times was used. Example "exterior" and "interior", "male" and "female" etc... -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Then maybe you should use 'section' instead of 'inside'? Lycaon (talk) 08:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Thank You! Scope now changed and file description now corrected. It is problem with my biological English. In Russian biological 'section' is 'inside view' - 'вид изнутри' or 'вид в разрезе' --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:02, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Rename

Hi, Could you please rename File:Litchis.jpg to File:Rambutans.jpg? --Muhammad (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Renaming is unfortunately not possible (it was for a brief period of time, but this functionality has been switched off many months ago). If however you reupload under the correct name, and tell me, I can get rid of the wrongly named version for you. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 18:35, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Note: A bot can do a rename for you, but then the upload is registered under the bot and not under your name. Lycaon (talk) 18:37, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diastema affine.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 18:22, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Geonoma epetiolata (Stained Glass Palm).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria, rare. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:42, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Penelope obscura (Dusky-legged Guan).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria. Best in scope -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 18:23, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

N'anga

Hi Lycaon, Your new image in situation: en:N'anga :-) Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 07:13, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks :-). Lycaon (talk) 08:09, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pachira aquatica (fruit).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Berthold Werner 18:25, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anthurium trinerve, fruit.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets the criteria -- Multimotyl (talk) 23:28, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 06:00, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Combretum mossambicense, flowers.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:43, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Lycaon (talk) 08:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

CU request

Are you aware of Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Estrilda? You really should take a look at that. An explanation would be good, if one can be provided. Thanks. ++Lar: t/c 04:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Your answer there was not sufficient. You need to review what I said and respond in detail, or the alternate account will be blocked. ++Lar: t/c 11:25, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Your attention as noted here is necessary please. Thanks --Herby ^{talk thyme} 08:58, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Heliconia imbricata, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Alternative not exist, rare. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:42, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magelona johnstoni.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Criteria met. Alternative not exist, rare. Studio shot -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:28, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Acanthochondria limandae.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met. Alternative not exist, rare. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:32, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:44, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Eurydice pulchra (Speckled sea louse).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Satisfies five criteria. I agree that geolocation is not applicable. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:38, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:54, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

File talk:Big Ben 2007-1.jpg

Hi Hans, Do you mind checking this user? Apparentely it was created with the sole purpose of commenting the Big Ben picture above. I've been reverting his/her edits because I don't thing that is the proper place to contest a QI promotion. What do you think? -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:57, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

If that is a checkuser request, then I think it is not appropriate for a minor dispute like that --Tony Wills (talk) 11:47, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

USS Mesa Verde

Thanks for your cleanup of this picture, I've nominated it at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:USS Mesa Verde (LPD-19) during shock trials - 080816-N-6031Q-213.jpg. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:08, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Rissa tridactyla 2.jpg

File:Rissa tridactyla 2.jpg: really nice shot. & I don't usually leave notes like this. - Jmabel ! talk 06:11, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Beautiful Picture of the Day!

Gratulation! Greetings. Orchi (talk) 12:41, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Estrilda

Hello, in November we delayed a final discussion and resolution until December on this matter. Your input is welcomed; we'd like to find out what is happening and settle things fairly. Respectfully, Durova (talk) 04:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Full explanations and (where necessary) apologies were offered to Lar by mail several weeks ago. He chose to ignore. So be it. This place is no longer fun. Lycaon (talk) 13:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Please come back

I respect if youre busy in real life but I really miss your commons contributions. And I am very sure Im not the only one. --Korall (talk) 17:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, me too. VIC reviewing is less interesting and funny without you! Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

agama aculeata

Hello,

I would like to show your picture of agama aculeata on our coming soon website about agama aculeata. Would this be ok for you? I would place your name (Hans Hillewaert) with a copyright sign under the photo. If I shall remove it, please email me @ info@stachelagame.de

Further I would like to know, where did you took the picture?

Greetings Monique from Germany