User talk:Taivo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Brass plaque on concrete communications.jpg


Tahad äkki natuke kustutamise tegevust. Seal leidub nii mõndagi. Viisakama otsa pildid võib küll esialgu alles jätta ja vaadata, kas saab ka õigusi hankida. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Samuti võid üle vaadata kasutaja Embanville lisatud failid. Väga tõenäoline AÕ rikkumine. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:02, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Palun likvideeri Kruusamägi (talk) 02:41, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Harvey J Hip Hop Artist.jpg[edit]

Hi Tavio. I tagged File:Harvey J Hip Hop Artist.jpg for speedy deletion and you deleted as a copyvio. The same file has been uploaded locally to Wikipedia at en:File:Harvey J Hip Hop Artist.jpg. I think it should be tagged as a copyvio there as well per en:WP:F9, but I cannot find the exact source for the image on Facebook so I've used this instead. If you can provide me with the exact source where you found the image, then I cannot use that in the template. Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:49, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I think, that you did it enough well, nominating the file for speedy deletion in I cannot find the file in Facebook. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Удаление нескольких файлов[edit]


1) File:Plakatklein1.jpg — удалить
File:Plakatklein1b.jpg — оставить, но удалить первую версию

по-моему все нарушают авторские права. Taivo (talk)

2) File:Prozessklein.jpg — удалить
File:Prozesskleinb.jpg — оставить

по-моему все нарушают авторские права. Taivo (talk)

3) в истории файла: File:Solar altitude.svg удалите последние две версии (автор сам откатил свою правку).

✓ Done Taivo (talk)

4) File:Tinyhpc.jpg — разделите пожалуйста на две фотографии.

✓ Done File:Tinyhpc0.jpg Taivo (talk)

5) почистите пожалуйста историю файла: File:RussianLanguageMapRu.png (много откатов)

 Not done здесь ничего нельзя удалить. Важно показать всем, что происходил. Taivo (talk)

6) удалите из истории файла, в английской вики, две последние версии: en:File:MoviePlusX5.jpg

 Not done Файл находится в английской вики, там я ничего не могу удалить. Taivo (talk)

7) создайте пожалуйста в эстонской википедии как бы отображение диаграмм. Например, в русской википедии такой пример диаграммы можно увидеть в статье здесь и здесь, в английской википедии похожую диаграмму можно увидеть вот в этой статье en:Renewable energy#Photovoltaic development. Но в эстонской википедии я не вижу как можно создать аналогичную диаграмму. В идеале, если получится, то чтобы в круговой диаграмме, в самом центре, круг был не заполнен, то есть приблизительно вот так. Если данная задача окажется слишком трудно выполнимой, то попросите администраторов эстонской википедии, чтобы они создали такие диаграммы.

-- С уважением, Донор () 18:38, 9 января 2017 (UTC)

8) File:Marilyn Manson Live in Moscow 2012.JPG — почитите пожалуйста историю (много откатов).
9) File:Montrealmetromap-ms.svg — это мой файл. Удалите из истории средний файл. Т.е. чтобы остались: самый первый и самый последний. А средний файл: 17:06, 15 января 2017 (586 КБ) — удалите, я в нём допустил ошибку.
Донор () 16:12, 15 января 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Taivo (talk) 16:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Im blocked pls unblock me[edit]

Sir here is my ip and that error masseg

Auto-creation of a local account failed: Account creation from IP addresses in the range, which includes your IP address (, has been blocked by Berean Hunter. The reason given by Berean Hunter is

Wikipedia Checkuser evidence has determined that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. If you get this message, please read the following information

And also i have posted another unblock request pls unblock me. And only if you colud tell why im blocked pls

When ever i try to log in i get this masseg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zia-ur-Rehman Rehmani (talk • contribs) 21:02, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

 Not done Elcobbola answered to you in your talk page. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Updarte[edit]

Dear Sir:

I received today a notification that says: Constantin Brâncuși died in 1957. Salvador Dalí died in 1989. Lluis Barba and Pierre et Gilles are still living. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC).

The images (Photagraphs) of the Sculpture of Brancusi, Dali, the painting of Barbá and the Caligula of Pierre et Gilles, where taken directly by me. In the case of Sculptures and original artworks is possible to use or publish the images while the photographer give us authorization/permission and in this case the rights on these images are mine. If the image comes from a third (that is not the case) it should be published with the credit line on the picture. There are a lot of images, not only of Dali works, in Wikipedia that were token from exhibitions and were published by the photographer. As I understand, if I´m the owner of the image because I took it, I'm free to share, copy, distribute and transmit it. Waiting for your coments, Kind regards, Mario Baptista (Updarte). --Updarte (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Let's continue in Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Updarte. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Please, check[edit]

...these contributions, mainly the logos. Thanks in advance.--Fixertool (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

And the same here, please. I appreciate your help.--Fixertool (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Rejected Speedy[edit]

Hi Taivo,

here you wrote »The file is not eligible for speedy deletion.«. Of course the file not, I do agree completely. But I made the deletion request on the talk page, not on the file page.

Have you possibly misunderstud the speedy? --Stepro (talk) 10:29, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I understood it correctly: you want to delete the talk page. But I wrote decline reason slightly incorrectly. I wanted to say, that talk page does not qualify for speedy deletion either. I do not want to delete it speedily without broader discussion. Talkpages can be nominated for regular deletion too. Taivo (talk) 10:32, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
OK, I disagree that this page not qualifies for speedy, but accept of course your decision. :-) Thanks for explanation, Stepro (talk) 10:44, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


Sorry if I sounded a little harsh in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Francesco Camillo VIII Massimo.PNG, but I think that it's confusing to explain there how the copyright policy is applied. It's better to comment this Italian law in another conversation.

As you are aware, Italy distinguishes "works of photographic art" and "simple photographs" - in the English translation, while in the original Italian it's "photographic works" and "simple photographs" (art.2-7).

Simple photographs are: The images of persons, or of aspects, elements or events of natural or social life, obtained by photographic or analogous processes, including reproductions of works of figurative art and stills of cinematographic film (art. 87).

So simple photographs are basically landscapes and photos of elements without any creative addition or modification of the natural or social life (Court of Cassation judgement, sez. 1, sent. #8186 of 1992-07-04). Postcards are typically simple photographs, the same with images of people in the street with natural light. On the contrary, when you start to use artificial lights, or work in a studio, it cannot be considered "natural or social life"; fashion photographs are a typical example of that. The interpretation of the law stated many times that simple photograph are "a mechanic way to represent reality without any subjective reinterpretation" (Court of Appeal, Milan, 07-11-2000). The most extreme case was the image of a castle with a firework behind: the Court stated that it wasn't a simple photo because there was a creative choice of the author to click at the moment the firework would explode behind the castle, creating an emotional effect. On the other side, the Court stated that cannot be considered a creative work, at least not creative enough not to have a simple photograph, the choice of the framing, the prospective, the white balance, shadows and lights (even wanted) if the photo is a bare documentation of an event; in this case fall in particular pictures of a singer in a concert.

In addition are considered simple photographs reproductions of works of figurative art and stills of cinematographic film, which are not "natual and social life", but are exceptions. An exception on the other side (not a simple photo and with a separate treatment) are "photographs of writings, documents, business papers, material objects, technical drawings and similar products" (art. 87), including banknotes (sez.1, sent. #183 of 1988-01-13).

Hope that clarifies the matter and helps. Cheers! --Ruthven (msg) 09:30, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

My page[edit]

Hello. You have by mistake deleted User:Jack ma/monobook.js which is useful to me. I have never asked for its deletion. Can you restore it please ? Jack ma (talk) 13:39, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. Jack ma (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done. @Jack ma: somehow it appeared in speedy deletion requests category. Please check the file. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
The explanation is maybe that I have a button in it whose content is "speedy deletion". How can I prevent this page to appear in the list ? Jack ma (talk) 13:45, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
I made this trick : '{{spe'+'edy|mo... Jack ma (talk) 13:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Bad speedy deletions[edit]

Hi. Can you say why you deleted University of Notre Dame seal.svg? The IP is in an edit war with the uploader and this was a revenge tagging as out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

I thought, that it is redundant to en:file:NotreDameSeal.svg. Mayby this was my mistake, sorry about that. Taivo (talk) 19:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)


Hi, could you please restore the deleted category Category:AUT_vs._NED_2016-06-04? Thank you --Ailura (talk) 21:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Taivo (talk) 09:00, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Original Logo.png[edit]

Hi Tavio. File:Original Logo.png has been uploaded once gain by the same uploader. This file has already been deleted twice according to the deletion log. Although I am not sure if this is the same file which was deleted in March 2016, I am positive it is the same one that you deleted yesterday. Not sure what to do here since it obviously seems to be a case of fair use and it is unlikely the the uploader is the creator of the logo. I guess it is possible the en:Palm Beach Zoo has released the logo under a free license, but there's really no way to verify that with the information given. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? Thanks in advance. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:27, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

In addition to the above, the same editor has also re-uploaded File:PBZ logo.png, which you also was deleted yesterday as File:Palm Beach Zoo Logo.png. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:55, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done I warned Wikizoological. Next time block. Taivo (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

"Author requested deletion of page"[edit]


We received a permission (that is probably valid, I am still checking) for File:Alexandre Desplat.jpg via OTRS, but I see that you wrote the author asked for deletion.

Could you tell me how and why they asked for deletion ?

--Scoopfinder(d) 08:57, 26 January 2017 (UTC) (replies here will be read)

@Scoopfinder: SweetSueSociety uploaded the file on 22:15, 22 January 2017. It was claimed own work. SweetSueSociety nominated the file for speedy deletion on 01:42, 23 January with reason "plan large inutile". Meanwhile, Materialscientist marked it as missing permission on 23:00, 22 January. I do not understand "plan large inutile", but as uploader's request, it was eligible for speedy anyway. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
Ok, she/he probably changed his/her mind since another picture was uploaded with almost the same name and a permission came for this too. I will clarifiy via OTRS. Thx :-) --Scoopfinder(d) 09:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)


Can you send to me a sex videos,,,,,please Belarbi kada (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I can, but I eill not do that. I do not like them. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


Hi: Please, check these logos. Thanks in advance.--Fixertool (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

whats wrong with you[edit]

I got the copyright of all my photos, how can I prove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tropixel (talk • contribs) 20:46, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

If copyright holder (not file owner, but photographer) will send OTRS-permission, then the files can be restored. Taivo (talk) 20:48, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

I am the photographer XDDDDDDDDD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tropixel (talk • contribs) 20:50, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

No, you are not. You cannot be both Marieta Gilaberrt and Jordi Pla. Taivo (talk) 20:52, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

I put a random name because it is a required field, but the photos are mine — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tropixel (talk • contribs)

No, this is not required field. Now you confessed lying and this is punishment: I do not believe, that you are photographer. If Marieta Gilaberrt and Jordi Pla and other photographers will send permission, then the files can be restored, but if they are random names, then you are in trouble. Taivo (talk) 21:08, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

why you dont understand that the photos are mine? I thought I had to put any name but are different things.. This does not change it, the photos are mine equally .. I have not lied at any time.. Has been a misunderstanding on my part, I do not want to recover my photos now, dont worry. The next time I upload it I will use my name. But in my opinion I think that its better if you help to new people and not try to threatening us, my friend..— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tropixel (talk • contribs)

kind regards!

I do not believe you, because you lied about authorship of photos. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Taivo, it's author's right to use a pseudonym or different pseudonyms. This, apart from other possible concerns, shouldn't be a problem as far as copyright claim ("own work") is clear. 10:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedians can use only one pseudonym: own username. Others are prohibited and can bring problems, as you see yourself. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
I think you are referring to "one editor, one account" rule. I don't think there's a different rule which would prohibit one user (account) from using different pseudonyms. If there was such rule then it would probably violate copyright (inalienable moral rights). In fact, I haven't noted, that it would be problem here if someone uses their real name to attribute some works and username to attribute other works, and later shift to second or third pseudonym (with or without username change). 10:49, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
What? You see yourself, that I deleted files for using different so-called pseudonyms and you still dare to say "I haven't noted, that it would be problem here"! Taivo (talk) 10:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Sorry. To be clear, I have seen it being a problem before, though it isn't uncommon that people necessarily don't attribute their works consistently in the same way. Anyways, what policy or guideline you rely on by considering different psudonyms a problem? 11:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
To be frank, I do not believe, that here are different pseudonyms of same author. I believe, that these are works of different authors, uploaded by the same user as own work, violating real authors copyright. There are other arguments supporting my opinion, see User talk:Tropixel. Actually the case was so obvious, that I did not start regular deletion request, but deleted them speedily. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


Could you remove all of my user rights, and create protect my user page so no accidental creations will happen again? Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 17:04, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done Taivo (talk) 17:09, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Could you add autopatrolled? -- MCMLXXXIX 20:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
✓ Done Taivo (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyvio violation[edit]

Here and maybe here too. Thanks in advance.--Fixertool (talk) 06:50, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Writings of Henry David Thoreau (1906) v7.djvu[edit]

Writings of Henry David Thoreau (1906) v7.djvu - This was deleted in error, and has broken on-going work at en-Wikisource. The author nominated the work for deletion believing that he could not upload a new file over the original, but he could. When I explained this to him, he uploaded a new version, but forgot to cancel the Deletion discussion. Please restore this file. --EncycloPetey (talk) 13:49, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks --EncycloPetey (talk) 13:53, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

LGBT flag[edit]

  • In reply to your deletion comment, Unused and implausible, broken, or cross-namespace redirect: content was: "speedy|The rainbow flag doesn't always mean LGBT. Per CSD G2. #redirect rainbow flag". There are several rainbow flags that are not associated with the international LGBT movement (e.g. Incan flags), so "rainbow flag" should not redirect to "LGBT flag," but "LGBT flag" should redirect either to "rainbow flag" (since the rainbow flag has been adopted by many LGBT cultures around the world), or to a collection of flags (including the LGBT rainbow flag) that represent various gender and sexual minority groups (e.g. transgender flags, pansexual flags, etc.). I fixed the redirect for now to go instead to "LGBT flags." Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:All Sports Team Hannover Logo.svg[edit]

why you deleted??? It is our logo, created by myself! If there is something wrong with the "rights", then pls. ask and correct it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Heikobuetehorn (talk • contribs) 13:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

The logo surpasses threshold of originality. If you are copyright holder of the logo, then please open COM:OTRS page and look, what kind of e-mail must be sent to Commons permissions department at to restore the logo. Taivo (talk) 13:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


It seems that the file was not entirely unused, since I noticed this deletion when CommonsDelinker removed it from en:Television set. Special:GlobalUsage/103inchPlasma.JPG reports some additional uses. Anomie (talk) 13:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

It was redirect to file:Panasonic Viera 103 inches plasma 20090803.jpg, which I nominated for deletion as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Santosha86[edit]

Hi, Taivo. I recently found out the Mass deletion request of more of 10 pictures that I was upload and used in differente articles of Wikipedia. I would like to know what exactly mistakes I made for the future uploads. And if is possible to restaure the images deleted, tnx a lot --Santosha86 (talk) 19:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

I suspected, that you are not author of the photos, but you violate real photographers' copyright. They were mostly small photos without metadata and if camera data existed, then usually different. Can you upload bigger versions of small files, for example, 2000×1500 pixrls, with complete EXIF data? Why camera data is usually different? Two files came from Facebook, that's prohibited. Taivo (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Rabbi Marantz.jpg[edit]

Sure. It's a portrait of a rabbi, so I used it to illustrate fr:wikipedia:Judaïsme. Léna (talk) 10:10, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

File:Maryam Elisha Image.jpg[edit]

Hello Taivo. I saw the request for deletion of the above file and this one File:Maryam Elisha Image2.jpg which I uploaded to Wikipedia Commons. Please can you explain to me what to do to prove the copyright? I did state the name of the author when uploading the images, and I got permission to use. Please kindly take me through the steps of the right thing to do. Thank you very much. zayzeeltd (talk) 10:14, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Please open COM:OTRS page and look, what e-mail must be sent to Commons permissions department. Please remember: permission must come from copyright holder, that means from photographer, not from you. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. I will do that right away and have the photographer send the email. zayzeeltd (talk) 10:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Francis Bausch[edit]

Re your nomination for deletion of all 14 images used in two Wikipedia pages (Caswell Beach and Oak Island Light), I would remind you of the Wikimedia policy re this subject.

Mass nominations Users may feel attacked or demoralized when a large number of their uploads are nominated for deletion all at once....nominators should consider ways of softening the impact on the editors affected. This may include: • Inititate a discussion with the affected users before making the nominations...

       •   Consider only nominating a limited number at a time. If these cases turn out to be contested, consider waiting until the first group of deletion discussions has concluded before making more nominations.

• If the cases in question are representative of a more general problem, consider opening a discussion provide the users a fair opportunity to respond.

IThis being the case, I believe I can defend each and every image's inclusion in Wikimedia (and Wikipedia) and here are some examples:

• File:Caswell Beach NC Map (annotated).jpg (Where the base map comes from?)

The base map is as indicated "File:Caswell Beach NC Map" an already existing Wikimedia image that cites its source as EPA EnviroMap.  As I indicated, all I did was annotate it with place names.

• File:Ignite Bright Drone Photo.jpg (1083×608, source Corry Trimm/Ignite Bright Aerial Solutions) The source as noted is a Drone Video taken by Corey Trimm who vacationed here last year. The view of the lighthouse was taken from a film clip of his using Apple's Preview.

I asked for and received permission from Mr. Trimm to do this and identified him and his company as the source. What more should I have done?

• File:Looking East from the lighthouse towards Bald Head Island.jpg (1319×403) A photo I took a number of years ago and recently cropped using Preview so as to fit the text and provide a panoramic view of what it looks like form the top of the lighthouse rather than the rectangular format of the original.

I will be glad to defend the remaining ones but am uncertain was to what the basic problem is other than I'm a rookie contributor and obviously a slow learner.

Francisbausch — Preceding unsigned comment added by Francisbausch (talk • contribs) 11:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I think a contributor might be doing something unethical with uploads[edit]

Hello Taivo,

Today I nominated File:Jasmar Cassar - Just Be.png for deletion (it was uploaded today). Now I'm seeing (I think) that the same contributor uploaded the same file earlier today, but someone else added a missing permission tag: File:Just Be.jpg. If I'm correct, it seems to me that this user was hoping that he would not get caught the second time, but I caught him. He should have addressed the missing permission problem instead of uploading the file again. I don't know if he has tried to upload that file in the past because only administrators have access to information about deleted files, but you deleted the same picture when it was uploaded a few days ago by Kaitomare. Perhaps it would be a good idea to warn JeanMarion about what he did. I feel like he tried to fool the people who work here on Commons. That's just my opinion. Have a good night, and thanks for everything you do here! Dontreader (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

✓ Done. I deleted both files speedily. Taivo (talk) 22:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you very much. I have the Jasmar Cassar article on my watch list because the editors have been trying repeatedly to include a music award that is a financial crime. Maybe they will quit doing that because I think they now understand it's a scam, but I don't think they will stop trying to upload a picture, so I will notify you if I see that a new picture has been uploaded improperly. Thanks again! Dontreader (talk) 22:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)