User talk:Tuxyso/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon-AF-S-85mm-1.8-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 15:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nikon-AF-S-85mm-1.8-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 15:36, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Thomaskirche-Essen-Stoppenberg-Kirchenfenster-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Moroder 13:48, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-2013-01-Alternative.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:54, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Raphael-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Underexposed on the right-buttom. Can you correct it? (I use exposure blend for GIMP).--Grondin 12:30, 9 March 2013 (UTC)  Done I've corrected shadows and (slightly) overall brightness. Hope it is better now. My intention was to show the nice and warm evening light which lightens the tower of the church. IMHO some contrast between right bottom part and brighter tower should remain and was on purpose. --Tuxyso 22:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC). It's OK for me. Good qualité.--Grondin 13:27, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Rathaus Mülheim an der Ruhr.jpg

Die jüngste Bearbeitung finde ich nicht mehr gut. Ausgefressenes weiß durch grau ersetzt. Das macht es nicht wirklich besser. Dann lieber weiß, wo man erwartet, geblendet zu sein. Und QI soll der Teufel holen. --RalfHuels (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Vermutlich hast du recht. Dann setze sie ruhig zurück. Nach den Maßstäben auf QI wird das Bild wohl ohnehin nicht durchkommen. Ich habe die Nomierung zurückgezogen.--Tuxyso (talk) 11:04, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

"Und QI soll der Teufel holen." - aber selbst ein Bild nominieren :) --Tuxyso (talk) 11:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

War halt mal neugierig. Und der Spruch war durchaus erstmal nur auf das Rathaus-Bild bezogen. Und es gibt durchaus ein paar Bilder, die ich selber als gut bezeichen würde, bevor ich meine eher mittelmäßigen Architekturfotos durch den Nominierungsprozeß fechte. ;) --RalfHuels (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

War bei mir genauso (mit der Neugier). Habe vor gut einem halben Jahr QI entdeckt (auf einem anderen Bild) und habe mich dann mal näher damit beschäftigt. Man muss nicht zwangsläufig mit allen Bewertungen einverstanden sein, allerdings finde ich QI sehr lohnend, um die Qualität der Bilder auf ein besseres Niveau zu heben. Wenn du sehr gute Bilder hast, kannst du sie nach erfolgreicher Kandidatur ja auch bei den exzellenten Bildern nominieren.

Deine aktuelle Nominierung finde ich übringes sehr gelungen und würde mit Pro voten, hatte mich aber wegen Befangenheit zurückgehalten :) Die Nomierung könnte ggf. an dem Schatten scheitern, wobei ich ihn aus kompositorischer Sicht gerade sehr gut finde. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:26, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim an der Ruhr, die Petrikirche foto3 2012-08-19 15.38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU-Dortmund-Mathetower-Abendlicht-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:18, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Bild Tür im Justizpalast München

Hallo Tuxyso,

so sehen bzw. schreiben wir uns wieder. Vielen Dank für dein Review bezüglich meines neuerlichen Vorstosses in Bezug auf File:Blick durch eine Tür in den Gang.jp Qualitätsbilder. Ich habe zunächst Deinen Rat befolgt und Lightroom 4 ausprobiert. Das Bild ist da auch durchgelaufen. Mit dem Englischen kannst Du mir in der Tat weiterhelfen, weil ich da auch noch reichlich unerfahren bin. Ich hatte das Bild im Deutschen immer Tür im Münchner Justizpalast genannt. Genügt das in einer englischen Übersetzung? Nun habe ich noch mal eine inhaltliche Frage, weil ich ggf. in Lightroom nachsteuern kann: Was bedeutet - bzw. wie sieht man - "Noise / artefacts from NR are visible". (NR = Noise Reduction?!). Ich habe da noch kein Auge dafür und muss mich darauf verlassen, dass mir das Programm alles richtig macht. Ich bedanke mich schon mal im Voraus für Deine freundliche und kompetente Hilfe. --Mummelgrummel 08:34, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Zum Dateinamen: Zur Zeit heißt die Datei "Blick durch eine Tür in den Gang.jpg". Das finde ich etwas unschön, da es sicher bessere Blicke durch Türen in einen Gang gibt. Meine englische Übersetzung war nur für die Leute auf QIC gedacht. Auf Deutsch würde ich die Datei vielleicht einfach Tuer-Justizpalast-Muenchen.jpg (oder auch mit Umlauten) nennen, ist aber eine reine Geschmacksfrage.

NR bedeutet Rauschreduzierung wie du richtig getippt hast. Wenn du die Rauschreduzierung (Regler Luminaz) zu hoch stellst bügelst du Details etc. glatt. Ich arbeite sehr gerne mit dem Schärfe-Regler. Wenn du Schärfe z.B. auf 50 gestellst hast, kannst du bei gedrückter Alt-Taste und Betätigung des "Maskieren"-Reglers bestimmte Bereiche vom Schärfen ausnehmen. Das ist gerade bei Aufnahmen praktisch, die relativ viel Rauschen.

Grundsätzlich gibt es verschiedene Regler, die das Bildrauschen erhöhen:

• Klarheits-Regler
• Schärfe-Regler (ggf. gegensteuerbar mit Maskieren)

Wenn du das RAW-File irgendwo hast, kann ich mir das auch mal in Lightroom anschauen und dir die Bearbeitungsschritte beschreiben, die ich daran vornehmen würde. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:55, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Zunächst: Ich werde mir eine Lightroom Lizenz kaufen, denn das Programm ist wirklich toll. In manchen Dingen kenne ich mich aber noch nicht so aus, deshalb habe ich da eigentlich auch (noch) nichts gemacht. Ich habe also vor allem mit dem Weißabgleich, der Blende und der Ojektivkorrektur gearbeitet. Für mich wäre ja spannend zu erkennen, woran Du die Arteifakte festmachst bzw. siehst. Damit ich selbst einen Blick dafür bekomme. In Lightroom gibt es dafür ja eine eigene "Abteilung" (Details), die ich aber bei diesem Bild nicht verwendet habe. Insofern steht der Regler "Rauschreduzierung" (Luminanz) auf Null. Eine RAW Datei kann ich Dir in diesem Fall nicht bieten, weil es wieder mit meiner IXUS entstanden ist, die ich auf einer Veranstaltung im Justizpalast dabei hatte. Mit RAW arbeite ich erst seit meiner Canon 60D (es ist ebenfalls ziemlich interessant, das zu tun, weil in Lightroom dann mehr Einstellmöglichkeiten bestehen). Ich könnte Dir also höchstens die Ursprungsdatei als jpg zuschicken, wenn Du Dir diese Mühe machen willst. Gerne kannst Du den Dateinamen ändern. Ich werde künftig besser auf eine gute Beschreibung achten. Bis später --Mummelgrummel 14:31, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel-Drei-Könige-Bernkastel-Kues-2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:09, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5-Centesimi-Toscana-1859-Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 00:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weisse-Flotte-Muelheim-an-der-Ruhr-Detailaufnahme.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1-Mark-1905-Back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC Also slight CCW tilt. Biopics 14:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)  DonePlease take another look. --Tuxyso 16:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC))

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5-Cent-Belgium-1856-Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Biopics 13:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Von-Graefe-Strasse-46-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you brighten a bit? Mattbuck 10:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC) I could, for sure. But the photo exaclty reflects the evening mood. The house (and only the house) was nicely lightned by the deep sun. IMHO such an accentuation is better than an overall increasing of brightness. --Tuxyso 13:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)  Done I've cautiously increased brightness. Please take another look. --Tuxyso 13:04, 16 March 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 18:55, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Laurentius-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:08, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ev-Dorfkirche.Muelheim-Saarn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:11, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarn-Düsseldorfer-Straße-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Broich-Vorderansicht-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 17:27, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StLaurentius Mintard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 16:40, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altenhof (Mülheim) im Morgenlicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Thank you for improving my photo (Petrikirche in Mülheim) to a Q1-quality. Which program did you use? Greetings, Michielverbeek (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarn-SWB-Center-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarn-Kirche-Haus-Düsseldorfer-Straße-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Qualitiy Arcalino 10:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1-Mark-1905-Front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Slightly tilted. Please fix. Biopics 14:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)  DonePlease take another look. --Tuxyso 16:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC) IMO still a bit CCW. Otherwise quite good (check the base of the '1' and the beginning and end of the word 'Mark'). Biopics 06:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded. Please take another look. Thanks. --Tuxyso 08:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC) This is it. Biopics 18:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5-Cent-Belgium-1856-Back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Biopics 13:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Can you get rid of the chromatic noise? Poco a poco 17:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)  InfoI've uploaded a new version while you wrote your comment. Please take another look. --Tuxyso 17:42, 16 March 2013 (UTC) Better, but Arild's version is definitely better Poco a poco 19:33, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saarn-Zur-Alten-Muehle-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some minor remarks but meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 16:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC) What remarks do you mean? Probably I can work on it and improve the image. --Tuxyso 16:41, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 5-Centesimi-Toscana-1859-Back.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 17:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulptur-Bogenschuetze-Muelheim-Kopf-Portrait.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Despite some CA on shoulders. The choice of DOF is appropriate here IMO. --Myrabella 00:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)  Done CAs corrected --Tuxyso 20:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altenhof (Mülheim) bei Sonne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality- the shadow is not so bad in full resolution, only the thumbnail appears dark. --NorbertNagel 20:48, 21 March 2013 (UTC)  DoneI've slightly increased the shadow areas. Do you think it is better now? --Tuxyso 23:25, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasserbahnhof-Muelheim-an-der-Ruhr-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulptur-Bogenschuetze-Lickfeld-Muelheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

You have a new message

Thanks for writing on my talk page, I've answered. You have 1 message in my talk page. Thanks --The Photographer

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm Muelheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Notes added. --Iifar 10:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)  Done I applied some additional sharpening and dynamic. Please re-review. --Tuxyso 16:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)  Support --Iifar 18:56, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aakerfährbrücke-001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Agressive camera, but ok for me --The Photographer 16:38, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotel-Handelshof-Muelheim-Abends-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 23:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhausen-Centro-Promenade-Brauhaus-2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Ghosts on the left can exist from my point of view in case of night shot. --Nino Verde 11:04, 29 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review. Ghosts are unavoidable due to long exposure and a very vivid place. --Tuxyso 13:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruhrtalbruecke-Richtung-Nordosten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--ArildV 09:02, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ship-De-IJmond-Denick-Port-Zeelande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor halos in the trees, still ok --Poco a poco 22:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petrikirche-Abends-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lighting conditions were not the best. There is a considerable blurring the top of the cross, also minimum chromatic aberration --The Photographer 20:39, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Done new version uploaded. The "blurring" is from perspective correction. Have a look at the coordinates. The place is very tight - no possibility to step further backwards. The slightly unsharp top of the church is a combination of normal border unsharpness of a wide angle lens and perspective correction (the lens I use is the best available for DX (Nikon 10-24mm). I reduced perspective correction to make the top sharper and removed CAs (trade-off between straight lines and sharpness of the top). IMHO lightning is not that bad, look at the church: light (evening bright sky behind me) and level of detail is quite good. --Tuxyso 21:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Info Some blur on top, but ok for me. I prefer Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8 Pro DX, Someday, after saving, several years maybe I can buy it ^_^ --The Photographer 22:47, 25 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the review. The Tokina is also very good, but has some problems with lens flares. --Tuxyso 06:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)  InfoNew version uploaded with selective lightning. Better? --Tuxyso 15:16, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mülheim adR - Bergstraße - Theodor-Heuss-Platz+Stadthalle 03 ies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:17, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktkirche-Essen-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mintard-St-Laurentius-Strassenbild-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but IMO ugly composition with that traffic light --Poco a poco 10:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC) "Ugly" is a bit harsh :) There are several photos (a few from me) of the building, but none which shows the church embedded in its enviornment. Nonetheless thanks for the review. --Tuxyso 11:40, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloss-Styrum-Neobarocke-Freitreppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:16, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aquarius-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 02:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Oryx

Du hast Post, Viele Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:05, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

?? Habe ich etwas übersehen? Wo habe ich denn Post? --Tuxyso (talk) 14:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Bitte siehe meine Wiki-E-Mail :-) Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:11, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Alles klar, habe ich erhalten. Du hattest so eine RICHTIGE Email gemeint :) Ich werde mal schauen, ob ich was machen kann. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Das wäre nett. Danke schon mal für die Mühe! Datei liegt nun auf meinem Server bereit. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:20, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe mal einen Versuch gewagt, ich hoffe es gefällt. Falls nein, einfach revertieren. Ein wenig konnte ich bei den Augen rausholen. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

OK, vielen Dank, es gefällt! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Noch einmal ich. Wenn es noch möglich wäre: könntest Du selektiv den Kopfbereich, vor allem beim den weißen Anteilen die Helligkeit herausnehmen. Es entstanden nun größere weiße Flächen die überstrahlt erscheinen. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Könntest du die relevante Stelle mit dem Notiz-Tool markieren? Wenn ich in Lightroom mit der Maus über den Kopf fahre habe ich höchstens Helligkeitswerte von 90%. Ich sehe dort ehrlich gesagt keine überstrahlten Bereiche. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Erl. In den beiden Bereichen am Kopf ist sichtbare Zeichnung verloren gegengen. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:00, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Erledigt. Man konnte tatsächlich noch etwas Struktur herausholen. In deinem ursprünglichen TIF war aber auch nicht viel Zeichnung vorhanden, jetzt sind mehr Details erkennbar. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

OK, habe es schon gesehen. Das sollte nun reichen! Danke nochmals, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:44, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dohne-105-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 08:43, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Venlo-Loewe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments wow! Good quality. --Steinsplitter 17:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Venlo-Teilansicht-Treppen-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fünte-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:09, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Roermond-Retail-Park-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualitiy Arcalino 18:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venlo-Cafe-Central-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High technical qualitiy Arcalino 19:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Evangelisches-Krankenhaus-Muelheim-Abends-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Distorded sun on the left of the hospital (see note).--Grondin 10:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC) It's not the sun, it's the moon :) I see no problem with CA. --Tuxyso 11:25, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Giebeloval-Schloss-Broich-Neubau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Mattbuck 12:40, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-Teilpanorama-von-Styrumer-Bruecke-Nordosten-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 12:21, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skulptur-Kindergarten-Barbarakirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but, please, see the tower. It seems tilted--Lmbuga 21:27, 7 April 2013 (UTC)  Done But please note that the tower becomes thiner no the top, thus not both vertical can be completely straight. --Tuxyso 22:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 18:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Panoramakopf

Salut Tuxyso, ja, ich habe einen selbst gebauten Nodaladapter mit dem ich auf dem Stativ mit einer Brennweite von ca. 50mm in Vertikalposition Panorama schieße. Aber da hab ich es wie du. Ich schleppe das Ding natürlich nicht überall mit. Ich habe aber auch von einem Arbeitskollegen einen fast neuen Roundshot VR Drive Panoramakopf [1] abgegekauft. Ich darf es fast niemand sagen, ich habe ihn bis jetzt erst zwei Mal benutzt um unsere Produktionsanlagen zu fotografieren. Bis der eingestellt und justiert ist, braucht das seine Zeit. Ich überlege ich mir mit diesem Teil Kugelpanoramas von Innenräumen wie Kirchen, Schlösser u.ä. zu machen. Ich hab da vom Land Vorarlberg und vom Vorarlberger Tourismusverband schon Anfragen dazu erhalten. Es gibt auch Interesse von Hotels, die ihr inneres mit 360° Grad abgelichtet auf der Homepage wollen. Na ja das würde dann neben meiner Arbeit und der Familie dann doch zu viel werden. Schöne Grüße Fred --Böhringer (talk) 19:40, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Informationen. Deine Panoramen sind wirklich gut, da wundert es mich nicht, dass du entsprechende Anfragen erhalten hast. Einen Nodalpunktadapter selbst basteln traue ich mir eher nicht zu. Wenn du für den geschenkten Panoramakopf keine Verwendung hast, wüßte ich schon, wer diesen gut gebrauchen kann :) Wenn du antworten magst habe ich zur Aufnahmetechnik deiner Panoramen noch folgende Fragen:

• Welche Software nutzt du?
• Wie bekommst du die Verzerrungen bei WW-Aufnahmen, die ja gerade für Panoramen etwas problematisch sind, in den Griff. Unter 30mm hat meine Software (Hugin) arge Probleme daraus vernünftige Panoramen zu erstellen?
• Skalierst du deine Panoramen ganz am Schluss herunter? Die Schärfe, die deine Panoramen aufweisen, kann so eigentlich nicht aus der D300 kommen.

Vielen Dank schon mal für deine Antworten. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

den Panokopf habe ich leider nicht geschenkt bekommen :-(

• Software = PTGui
• Ich fotografiere gerne im Bereich von 40-70mm, da hat man am wenigsten Probleme. WW-Aufnahmen sowie auch Tele-Aufnahmen funktionieren nicht gut. Dafür brauchst du schon wieder diesen Panoramakopf. Die Überlappung der Bilder mach ich gedrittelt. 30% Li + Re überlappt 30% beleibt mittig.
• Ich skaliere gar nicht, weil ich nicht weiss wie das geht. Das macht bei mir in diesem Falle der PTGui automatisch.
• Die schärfsten Bilder kommen wenn du jedes einzelen Bild scharfstellst und auf dem Stativ drehst. Bei der automatischen Panoramerstellung mit dem Motor ist das schon wieder schwieriger, weil dort sollte man auf unendlich stellen.
• Generell habe ich in der Kameraeinstellung bei der Schärfe um einen Strich härter eingestellt. Das habe ich bei allen Kameras schon so gemacht.
• Schlussendlich kommt die Schärfe auch, wenn das Licht und der Kontrast am schönsten ist. Dies ist gerne am Morgen so.

Liebe Grüsse Fred --Böhringer (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Barbara-Muelheim-Kreuz-Aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vennepothschule-Oberhausen-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:20, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St-Barbara-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 17:44, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oberhausen-Wehrplatz-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:39, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hingbergstraße-377-Muelheim-Highres.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:15, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kiosk-Oberhausen-Duempten-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! U-Bahn-Heissen-Kirche-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Grondin 15:46, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschaftspark-Duisburg-Nord-Industrieanlage-sw.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jbribeiro1 23:35, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loro-Parque-Delfin-Show-2011-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 19:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuevas-de-Chinamada-Tenerife-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 19:52, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide-Einsturzkrater-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 13:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Vondern-Steintafel-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:44, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Vondern-Westen-vom-Weg-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Vondern-Durchgang-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 07:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Oberhausen-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Suboptimal lighting, but ok --Poco a poco 07:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mirador-del-Jadina-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 10:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cruz-del-Carmen-Anaga-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 10:14, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercado-de-Nuestra-Señora-de-Africa-Rueckfront.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:11, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuevas-de-Chinamada-Tenerife-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:38, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschaftspark-Duisburg-Nord-Teilansicht-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition, unsurprisingly soft in the corners but overall a high quality wide angle image--ArildV 09:48, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU-Dortmund-Mensa-Mathetower-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Contrast seems rather harsh to me. mattbuckGodot13 01:49, 17 April 2013 (UTC) I see no problem with the contrast. I like clearly defined contrast especially for architecture. Other opinions? --Tuxyso 06:12, 17 April 2013 (UTC) I don't see any contrast problem, good enough for me. --Selbymay 08:28, 17 April 2013 (UTC) I put that on the wrong image actually. Mattbuck 10:44, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Info New version with lower contrast uploaed. --Tuxyso 11:11, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cuevas-de-Chinamada-Tenerife-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Vondern-Haupthaus-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The reflexion on the windows give to me a nice effect. --Christian Ferrer 17:50, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TU-Dortmund-Physik-Innenhof-Richtung-Mensa-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments imho Good quality. --Steinsplitter 20:47, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Nomination

Thank you very much for nominating my picture, you have a good eye to know that things are good in my photos. For me it is difficult to know what is special if every day I can see the same thing. --The Photographer (talk) 20:29, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Tuxyso,

ich habe an deinem Bild File:Loro-Parque-Delfin-Show-2011-01.jpg mal ein wenig gedreht. Die interessanten Teile waren bedauerlicherweise gerade aus der Sonne heraus. Ich habe mal versucht, diese besser erkennbar zu machen. Wenn es dir nicht gefällt, bitte einfach zurücksetzen. --Hic et nunc (talk) 11:02, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Passt schon , vielen Dank für die Bearbeitung, sieht doch gut aus. Leider habe ich zu dem Bild kein RAW File, sonst hättest du vielleicht noch mehr rausholen können. Mit welcher Software hast du das Bild bearbeitet? --Tuxyso (talk) 11:12, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Das war Corel PhotoPaint 11. Ich habe einfach das Bild bzw. Teile mehrfach dupliziert, als Ebenen übereinander gelegt und getrennt manipuliert und danach wieder zusammengesetzt.--Hic et nunc (talk) 06:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide-Bergstation-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 06:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide-Seilbahn-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 02:16, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschaftspark-Duisburg-Nord-Stahlkonstruktion-Innen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 08:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landschaftspark-Duisburg-Nord-Stahlkonstruktion-Aussen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 08:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schloßstraße-32-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-City-Eisenbahnbruecke-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brueckenansicht-Muega-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-Wohnungen-ehemaliges-Stadtbad-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good although I'd crop sky (and so get rid of the branches in the right corner) and the tree shadow at the bottom --Poco a poco 09:28, 21 April 2013 (UTC)  Done I had also thought about it, but it makes the compositon unbalanced (unequal"empty space" at the top left and front right). But I've done some cloning staff. Do you think it is better that way? --Tuxyso 09:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC) Better now, but the shadows are really disturbing (not an issue though for QI) Poco a poco 17:26, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muega-Fruehjahr-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and QI--Lmbuga 15:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-Brunnen-Bahnhof-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus-der-Stadtgeschichte-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volkenborn-Buerohaus-Hotel-Noy-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang-Tenerife-Playas-de-las-Americas-2011-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit soft, but with 3s that can be excused. What's the blue spot in the water? Mattbuck 16:51, 17 April 2013 (UTC) Difficult to say. I guess a kind of swimming lights near the beach for the tourist. --Tuxyso 21:39, 17 April 2013 (UTC) OK then. Mattbuck 18:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Burg-Vondern-Westen-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 17:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide-Seilbahn-Talstation-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --Nino Verde 12:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang-Tenerife-Playas-de-las-Americas-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. Mattbuck 02:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teide-Seilbahn-mit-Gondel-Bergstation-2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 18:55, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mendener-Bruecke-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality for me. --Christian Ferrer 08:01, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rathaus-Oberhausen-Tafel-Steine-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moehnetalsperre-Nebelstimmung-2007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice atmosphere. --Jastrow 22:56, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uhu-Bubo-Bubo-Falknerhof-Lenggries-2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Selbymay 16:45, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigma 17-50mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigma 17-50mm-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruhrwiesen-von-Mendener-Bruecke-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 05:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick-auf-Leinpfad-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 05:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muega-Aufgang-Eisenbahnbruecke-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:10, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forum-City-Mulheim-Hochhaus-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:43, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muega-Fruehjahrstimmung-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muelheim-Baustelle-ehemalige-Buecherei-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough. --Mattbuck 23:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Usage statistics

Hi! First you have to categorize your images, then it's easy: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/ts2/glamorous/ Regards, --Ivar (talk) 08:22, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much! For a long time I have been looking for such a tool. At the moment I have only categories for quality images and featured pictures by me. I have to add a new category like Images by Tuxyso to make a complete analysis. Have a nice day. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:06, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aprather-Muehle-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 12:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diakonie-Aprath-Haupthaus-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hochhaussiedlung-am-Eckbusch-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirche-Diakonie-Aprath-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perhaps minor cw tilt (tower). --Iifar 20:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review. I've corrected perspective and two minor stitching errors. --Tuxyso 06:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aprather-Muehlenteich-2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image quality. I suggest you add camera and lens taken as category, --Manuela 06:27, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aprather-Muehlenteich-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice image quality --Manuela 06:16, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Objektiv Tagging

Hallo Tuxyso, ich wusste nicht, wie du das mit den Objektivkategorien hältst. Ich habe alle meine Bilder mit dem dazugehörigen Objektiv getagged, weil ich dachte, dass es für andere möglicherweise interessant ist zu wissen, womit genau das Foto aufgenommen wurde. Du scheinst ja mehr Erfahrung mit wikimedia commons zu haben als ich, ich kämpfe noch immer mit den ganzen Konventionen und Tags etc. Wenn ich dich fragen darf, mich interessiert, wie das grüne Qualitätslogo auf die Seite kommt, geht das irgendwie automatisch, wenn das Bild als Qualitätsbild akzeptiert wurde oder muss/darf man das selbst einfügen? Ich konnte leider keinen Hinweis darauf finden, was vermutlich an meinem Unvermögen liegt, mich in wikimedia zurechtzufinden. So weiß ich auch nicht, wo man auf einen Talk-Eintrag wie deinen bei meinem Account antwortet, ebendort oder beim anderen Account. Ich mache es wahrscheinlich genau verkehrt, aber so stelle ich sicher, dass du meinen Beitrag auf jeden Fall liest :-), viele Grüße, --Manuela (talk) 07:25, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Burg-Vondern-Westen-vom-Weg-2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Burg-Vondern-Westen-vom-Weg-2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

Giardino Papadopoli

I think you're right. It is smoother like that. I sometimes experimental ideas. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Experimental ideas are nice. I also do not like statements like "Photos with golden ratio or rule of third are good photos". But the new crop of your photo looks nicely balanced (same width of the sky as the water). Crop issues are often a matter of personal taste, and I am not sure if my point was really a QI issue. But IMHO also at QI the composition is important and should look appealing. Keep on shooting :) --Tuxyso (talk) 13:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle-Daelenbroeck-2013-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 22:24, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle-Daelenbroeck-2013-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle-Daelenbroeck-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castle Daelenbroeck-2013-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:14, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view. --Selbymay 10:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:30, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwalm-Hariksee-Borner-See.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Stu Phillips 09:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borner-Muehle-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, fine IQ --Manuela 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Heidelandschaft-See-Fruehjahr-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, fine IQ --Manuela 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pfarrkirche-St-Peter-Born-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, fine IQ --Manuela 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borner-See-2013-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, fine IQ --Manuela 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture, fine IQ --Manuela 03:12, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Need help

Hello Tuxyso, I just wanted to ask you a little favour. It would be very very nice if you could help me. For my last Quality Image ( File:Arc Héré, Place Stanislas, Nancy.jpg ) , you made a very good perspective correction with Lightroom. The problem is that I have not the software and it seems very nice for this kind of correction. Do you think you can improve the perspective of this picture File:Las_Vegas_Strip_at_night,_2012.jpg ? Or maybe can I do it with an other software ? Thank you very much --Clément Bardot (talk) 09:56, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

I could do it for you, but you will face again and again such a situation. Lightroom is not yet expensive, you can first try the 30 day trial version. For a dedicated software for correction of distortion you can try PTLens. It costs only 25 dollars. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for the information :) --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:56, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

HDR

I am new to the more advanced features of CS6. The HDR toning, is this considered a normal filter or is it too much of a change to the original image? In some cases it looks great, but are there other advantages or disadvantages? If this is not something you are very familiar with, do you know who I can ask? Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 15:41, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Good question. I do not use Photoshop and cannot give you a competent answer to your specific question. I have positive experiences with Photomatix (in combination with Lightroom, you can create a DRI and do the tonemapping in Lightroom) and HDR Efex Pro. Probably you can ask User:Alchemist-hp, he is familiar with HDR processing but I do not know if he uses Photoshop CS 6 for it.
On question to you: Do you really posess a middle format camera (Mamiya) or with it just barrowed? --Tuxyso (talk) 19:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback. I do actually own a Mamiya 645 medium format camera, but for film. I rented the Mamiya 645+ and the Leaf Aptus II 12 digital back specifically for a two-week trip to Israel. I am slowly processing the images and loading them to commons. I have been impressed by the image quality. Thanks--Godot13 (talk) 23:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Archivieren

Hello Tuxyso, würdest du bitte deine Disk archivieren, da Sie nun schon ziehmlich lang ist. Besten Dank und Viele Grüße--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Ja du hast völlig recht. Kann ich das irgendwie automatisieren? Auf de-WP gibt es das Auto-Archiv. Geht das hier auch? --Tuxyso (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Siehe Commons:ARCHIVE#Archiving - when there is too much text, LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 15:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für die Links. Ich habe mal ein Autoarchiv hinzugefügt. --Tuxyso (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borner-See-2013-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 06:13, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: COM:QIC

After your advice I have added English description. Would you please be so kind to check my other nominations? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I have re-reviewed your nomination. I would reduce the hightlights a bit, face is IMHO slightly too bright. --Tuxyso (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

IMHO this is because of the contrast between dark background and bright face. While the face is not overexposed, it still may look bright compared to the dark gray border. Maybe I may ask you to check my other nominations? PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I've reviewd your other portrayals nominations. Unfortunately most of them were wrongly focused (focus not on the eyes). --Tuxyso (talk) 20:24, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. You might mention the difference between studio portraits (as Amelkin or Smirnov) and live speech shots, so I had no intention to focus on their eyes and wanted to show the scene. With Sachkov (on scene) I hoped it had enough sharpness, yet it is far from the ideal shoot. Anyway, many thanks. This is a good school for me, to know the possible troubles and to check the points of attention. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 22:36, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

I have taken similar photos during academic speeches, see for example 1, 2, 3. It is possible to get the eyes sharp with an open aperture: you have to use continous autofocus mode. If you want to integrate the background, use flash and f8+, f4 is not sufficient in this case. Especially with this photo f4 is simply the wrong camera setting. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:45, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borner-See-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground plant is out of focus, need f infinite --The Photographer 22:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC) I cannot see your point. For sure: Very near leafs are out of focus. But is is always a reasonable idea with such shots to integreate nearby objects to get an impression of the spatial distances. --Tuxyso 22:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC) Well balanced composition with unsharpness in the foreground and good qualitiy and sharpness of the wohole image -- Arcalino 08:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borner-See-2013-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Arcalino 08:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Information-Table-De-Meinweg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I do not think so. It is exposed in public space. IMHO it falls in Germany under "Panoramafreiheit. Do you agree, are there other opions? --Tuxyso 19:51, 6 May 2013 (UTC) I'm pretty sure that is is a copyright violation. Ask an admin. --NorbertNagel 05:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC) It is not (see added template). It falls under the freedom of panorama in the Netherlands. Please re-review. --Tuxyso 06:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC) Good quality - you're right - sorry for the inconvenience. --NorbertNagel 15:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ara-Zoo-Muenster-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ev-Kirche-Muelheim-Duempten-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 19:45, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spheniscus demersus-Zoo-Muenster-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:15, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elephas-maximus-Ear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:31, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ara-Zoo-Muenster-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality photo, well done -- George Chernilevsky 06:05, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality. --Christian Ferrer 13:50, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Ghetto of Venice

Thank you for your support. Before I used three lenses and, in addition, the tripod. Today I use the monopod and a 24-120 zoom. It's worse, but is lighter. When I am in Venice I can walk five hours away. I'm getting old :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:47, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

I thought of the 24G/1.4 because the edges were quite good, even in full resolution. My favourite wide-angle lenses on DX (unfortunately I do not own a D800E) are: Sigma 17-50/2.8 (imho very sharp and good contrast) and the very good Nikon 10-24. In Germany one says "Gut Licht!" (good light!) --Tuxyso (talk) 10:51, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graugans-Jungtier-Schwalm-Nette-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:32, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Graugans-Jungtier-Schwalm-Nette-2013-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:33, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebirgslori-Zoo-Muenster-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Florstein 07:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Syrischer-Braunbaer-seitlich-Zoo-Muenster-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor CAs in the upper part of the picture (water reflections and wood), easy to fix. QI anyway. --JLPC 16:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)  DoneI've removed the CAs. Thanks for the hint. --Tuxyso 21:31, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buggenbeck-30-Muelheim-Denkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariae-Rosenkranz-Muelheim-Rueckseite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johanniskirche-Muelheim-2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:53, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Plured plant, maybe need a shoot with more speed --The Photographer 22:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC) IMHO the problem is not the speed (look at the other leafs). I focus at the farer trees. IMHO is is OK to get an impression of the spatial distance. --Tuxyso 22:51, 7 May 2013 (UTC)  SupportIQ is o.k. for me, therefore QI recommended --Manuela61 15:08, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwalmtal-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Manuela61 14:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De-Meinweg-Landschaft-Fruehjahr-2013-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Manuela61 14:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

System cameras

Zu deiner Bemerkung „I must confess: The quality of system cameras became quite good“: Im Netz gibt es einen Vergleichstest zwischen OM-D und Nikon D7000, den die Nikon zwar knapp gewinnt, aber nicht in allen Disziplinen. Trotz aller Vorteile des Vollformats bin ich immer noch Four-Thirds-Fan, weil dieses System den Bau kleiner Kameras ermöglicht, mit denen sich gerade unter Leuten ganz anders, nämlich absolut unauffällig, fotografieren läßt. Die kleine OM-D mit der wunderbaren Festbrennweite 1,8/45 beachtet einfach keiner. Über die E-500 und E-620 bin ich vor knapp 2 Jahren zur großen E-5 gekommen, die ich für das Sahnehäubchen von FT gehalten habe. Aber seit ich Ende Februar mal die OM-D angetestet habe, deren Bildqualität locker eine Klasse über der E-5 liegt (auch wenn sie nur halb so groß ist, die Finger müssen sich dran gewöhnen), lag die E-5 nur noch arbeitslos im Koffer (ich hab sie letzte Woche verkauft). Ich bin sehr gespannt, wie sich (M)FT weiterentwickelt, das fotografische Arbeiten damit ist faszinierend anders als mit großen Geschossen. Lies auch mal das hier. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 10:06, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Kreuzschnabel! Schön, dass du etwas zu Systemkameras geschrieben hast. Bist du Umsteiger, also von DSLR zu MFT, oder hast du dein System direkt mit MFT-Bodys und -Objektiven aufgebaut? Für mich kommt kurz und mittelfristig keim Umstieg in das Systemkamera-Segment in Frage, da ich bereits (gemessen daran, dass es nur Hobby ist) recht viel Geld in Objektive und Zubehör für das Nikon-F-Bajonett gesteckt habe. Hinzu kommt, dass ich mit der D7000 extrem zufrieden bin. Neulich hatte ich mal eine leichte Weitwinkel-Ergänzung für Fahrradtouren gesucht (gerne auch eine Systemkamera), es hat sich aber kein wirklich gutes Ergebnis herauskristallisiert, s. Thread im DSLR-Forum. Hast du diesbzgl. noch einen guten Vorschlag?

Zum Gewicht- und Größenvorteil: Bei den Olympus-MFT-Kamera sehe ich den Größenvorteil ja durchaus noch ein, dort sind die meisten Objektive auch schön kompakt. Dagegen halte ich das Sony-NEX-System für einen schlechten Witz. Mit angesetztem Standard-Zoom-Objektiv ist das schon ein ziemlicher Brocken - da nehme ich lieber meine alte D60.

Was mich speziell noch an MFT abschreckt: Die Sensorgröße und der Preis. Speziell für Super-Weitwinkel-Aufnahmen fehlen mir erschwingliche Objektive. Wenn ich z.B. das wirklich sehr gute Nikon 10-24 als Beispiel nenne: Um eine äquivalente Brennweite an MFT zu erhalten muss ich fast doppelt so viel ausgeben. Auch wenn die Sensoren aufgeholt haben und exzellente Bildqualität liefern, werden sie allein wegen der Größe immer einen guten Tick schlechter sein als eine brandaktuelle DSLR. Vor dem Hintergrund hinkt der Vergleich zwischen der E-M5 und Nikon D7000, da zwischen den beiden Sensoren gut zwei Jahres Entwicklungsunterschied bestehen. Anders wird der Vergleich aussehen wenn man die D7100 mit der E-M5 vergleicht :) Warum sollte ich mir eine E-M5 mit kleinem Sensor kaufen, die aktuell sogar mehr kostet als das aktuell DX-Flagschiff von Nikon, die D7100? Klein finde ich die E-M5 auch nicht wirklich... Hast du eigentlich schon ein paar Beispielbilder gemacht, die ich mir anschauen könnte?

Vielleicht denke ich in zwei Jahren anders über das Thema, momentan bin ich mit der DSLR allerdings glücklich. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:39, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Ich hatte nicht vor, dich zu „bekehren“ ;-) nur eine Bestätigung deiner Aussage. Alle Bilder von mir ab März sind mit der E-M5 entstanden. Und den Bildstock am Rheingauer Dom nominiere ich lieber nicht auf QIC, da hab ich die Schärfentiefe des 1,8/75 doch massiv überschätzt :-) --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 18:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Habe es auch nicht als Bekehrungsversuch verstanden, wollte mir nur meine DSLR schönreden ;-) Anhand deiner Fotos ist ja deutlich erkennbar, dass deine Systemkamera, ausreichend Licht vorausgesetzt, Fotos auf dem Niveau einer Mittelklasse-DSLR macht. Kann der Fotograf dann noch was und investiert gut Geld in Objektive, steht tollen Fotos nichts mehr im Wege. --Tuxyso (talk) 23:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)