Commons:Valued image candidates

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from VIC)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Shortcut: COM:VIC

Skip to image nominations Skip to image nominations Most valued reviews Skip to most valued reviews Skip to set nominations Skip to set nominations

These are the candidates to become valued images. Please note that this is not the same as featured pictures or quality images. If you simply want some feedback on your pictures you can get that at photography critiques.

Single images can be proposed for valued image (VI) status. Candidates must be proposed as being the most valuable of all Commons' images within a specified scope. Judging is carried out according to the valued image criteria.

A Most Valued Review (MVR) is opened where there are two or more candidates competing within essentially the same scope.

The rules for promotion can be found at Commons:Valued image candidates/Promotion rules.

An image which has previously been declined can be renominated within the same scope only if the issues leading to the original decline have been addressed. Previously nominated images that were closed as "undecided" can be renominated at any time. Once a candidate achieves VI or VIS status it can normally be demoted only if some better candidate replaces it during an MVR.

If you would like to nominate an image for VI status, please do so following the instructions below. If you are proposing a better candidate within essentially the same scope as an image which already has VI status, please open an MVR.

How to nominate an image for VI status

[edit]

Nominations will be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those criteria before submitting an image to help cut down on the number of candidates that have a low chance of success. Make sure you understand the concept of scope and how to choose the correct scope for your nomination.

Please make sure that your proposed image fulfills all of the necessary criteria before nominating it. For example, if it needs to be geocoded, do that in advance. If no appropriate categories exist, create and link them beforehand. Although some reviewers may help by fixing minor issues during the review process, it is your responsibility as nominator to ensure your image ticks all the necessary boxes before you propose it. If you nominate an image that ignores one of the criteria, don't be surprised if it fails VI review.

Adding a new nomination (image)

[edit]

Step 1: Copy the image name into this box (excluding the File: prefix), at the end of the text already present in the box, for example, Commons:Valued image candidates/My-image-filename.jpg. Then click on the "Create new nomination" button.


Step 2: Follow the instructions on the page that you are taken to, and save the resulting VIC subpage.

Step 3: Manually add the candidate image towards the end of Commons:Valued image candidates/candidate list (under the heading "New valued image nominations"), as the last parameter in the VICs template. Click here, and append the following line as the last parameter of the relevant section:

|My-image-filename.jpg

so that it looks like this: 

{{VICs
 ...
 |My-image-filename.jpg
}}

and save the candidate list.

Renomination

[edit]

Declined VICs can be renominated by any registered user, but only after one or more of the root cause(s) leading to a decline has/have been addressed. Undecided VICs can be renominated as is although it is still recommended to consider and fix issue(s) which may have hindered a promotion of the candidate in the previous review.

Besides fixing issues with the previous nomination the following procedure shall be followed upon renomination.

Step 1: Edit the candidate subpage you intend to renominate. All declined and undecided VICs are placed in either Category:Declined valued image candidates, or Category:Undecided valued image candidates and sorted by the date of the previous nomination.

Step 2: Replace the previous nomination date and time by pasting in 

|date={{subst:VI-time}}

Step 3: Replace the "undecided" or "declined" status with "nominated" (or "discussed" if you intend to add it to a Most Valued Review).

Step 4: If the previous nominator was a different user replace the nominator parameter with 

|nominator=~~~

Step 5: If the candidate does not already have an archive link to previous reviews: Create one using the following procedure.

  • Cut the text in the previous review section (leave the closing braces "}}")
  • replace the review parameter with
|review=
{{subst:VIC-archive}}
}}
  • Save the page.
  • There is now a red link to Previous reviews. Click the link to create the archive subpage and paste in the previous reviews.
  • Save the previous reviews archive page

Step 6: Add the candidate to the candidates list.

How to open a Most Valued Review

[edit]

There must be at least two candidates competing within essentially the same scope to open an MVR. Each needs its own VIC subpage, which should be created as above if it does not already exist, but with status set to "discussed". Then, add the following section at the end of the page Commons:Valued image candidates/Most valued review candidate list: 

=== Scope ===
{{VICs
  |candidate1.jpg
  |candidate2.jpg
}}

where Scope is the scope of both images, and candidate1.jpg and candidate2.jpg are the respective candidates. If need be, also remove the relevant image(s) from the list in Pending valued image candidates

If one of the candidates is an existing VI within essentially the same scope, the original VIC subpage is re-opened for voting by changing its status to status=discussed and new reviews are appended to the original VIC subpage. However, any original votes are not counted within the MVR.

The status parameter of each candidate should remain set to "discussed" while the MVR is ongoing.

How to review the candidates

[edit]

How to review an image

[edit]

Any registered user can review the valued image candidates. Comments are welcome from everyone, but neither the nominator nor the original image author may vote (that does not exclude voting from users who have edited the image with a view to improving it).

Nominations should be evaluated using the criteria listed at Commons:Valued image criteria. Please read those and the page on scope carefully before reviewing. Reviewing here is a serious business, and a reviewer who just breezes by to say "I like it!" is not adding anything of value. You need to spend the time to check the nomination against every one of the six VI criteria, and you also need to carry out searches to satisfy yourself on the "most valuable" criterion.

Review procedure

[edit]
  • On the review page the image is presented in the review size. You are welcome to view the image in full resolution by following the image links, but bear in mind that it is the appearance of the image at review size which matters.
  • Check the candidate carefully against each of the six VI criteria. The criteria are mandatory, and to succeed the candidate has to satisfy all six.
  • Use the where used field, if provided, to study the current usage of the candidate in Wikimedia projects. If you find usage of interest do add relevant links to the nomination.
  • Look for other images of the same kind of subject by following the links to relevant categories in the image page, and to any Commons galleries.
    • If you find another image which is already a VI within essentially the same scope, the candidate and the existing VI should be moved to Most Valued Review (MVR) to determine which one is the more valued.
    • If you find one or more other images which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR.
  • Once you have made up your mind, edit the review page and add your vote or comment to the review parameter as follows:
You type You get When
*{{Comment}} My Comment. -- ~~~~ You have a comment.
*{{Info}} My information. -- ~~~~ You have information.
*{{Neutral}} Reason for neutral vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Neutral Reason for neutral vote. -- Example
 You are uncertain or wish to record a neutral vote.
*{{Oppose}} Reason for opposing vote. -- ~~~~
  •  Oppose Reason for opposing vote. -- Example
 You think that the candidate fails one or more of the six mandatory criteria.
*{{Question}} My question. -- ~~~~ You have a question.
*{{Support}} Reason for supporting. -- ~~~~
  •  Support Reason for supporting. -- Example
 You think that the candidate meets all of the six mandatory criteria.
  • If the nomination fails one of the six criteria, but in a way that can be fixed, you can optionally let the nominator know what needs to be done using the {{VIF}} template.
  • Your comment goes immediately before the final closing braces "}}" on the page.
How to update the status
  • Finally, change the status of the nomination if appropriate:
    • status=nominated When no votes or only neutral votes have been added to the review field (blue image border).
    • status=supported When there is at least one {{Support}} vote but no {{Oppose}} votes (light green image border).
    • status=opposed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote but no {{Support}} votes (red image border).
    • status=discussed When there is at least one {{Oppose}} vote and one {{Support}} vote (yellow image border).


Remember the criteria: 1. Most valuable 2. Suitable scope 3. Illustrates well 4. Fully described 5. Geocoded 6. Well categorized.

Changes in scope during the review period

[edit]

The nominator is allowed to make changes in scope as the review proceeds, for example in response to reviewer votes or comments. Whenever a scope is changed the nominator should post a signed comment at the bottom of the review area using {{VIC-scope-change|old scope|new scope|--~~~~}}, and should also leave a note on the talk page of all existing voters asking them to reconsider their vote. A support vote made before the change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn.

You can submit new nominations starting on COM:VIC.

Pending valued image candidates

[edit]
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache
56,066 closed valued image candidates
 Closed as Nominations 
Promoted
  
 50,445 (90%) 
Undecided
  
 3,119 (5.6%) 
Declined
  
 2,502 (4.5%) 


New valued image nominations

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-18 04:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Netherlands traditional flat-bottom boat, Butskop - RN 5142 - starboard view.
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-18 09:08 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Catherine Church, Eraviputhenthurai - front facade
Used in:
en:Thoothoor • en:Eraviputhenthurai • wikidata:Q129261613
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-18 09:29 (UTC)
Scope:
Thekke Kottaram Heritage Museum - northeast facade
Used in:
en:Padmanabhapuram Palace • wikidata:Q127689870
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-18 10:27 (UTC)
Scope:
Old women Co Tu of Ban Huay Lanong, view in Saravane, (Laos)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:09, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-08-18 11:21 (UTC)
Scope:
De Korenbloem, Ulvenhout - front facade
Used in:
List of windmills in North Brabant, Ulvenhout
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-19 04:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Adolfo Wildt - Anima gentile (e carattere fiero ) - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-19 04:21 (UTC)
Scope:
Martyr de saint André José de Ribera - Musée Goya

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-19 04:23 (UTC)
Scope:
Dionisio Renart - Vase with Female Figure - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

View promotion
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-19 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Anodonta cygnea (Swan mussel), right valve
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting is closed. Await automatic removal by VICBot2 at 00:18 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-08-19 08:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Watertoren, Wilhelminasingel, Breda - oblique front view
Used in:
Watertoren (Breda Wilhelminasingel)
Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-19 09:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Tombstones Rev Henricus Philipsz & Susanna Scharff's spouses in Wolvendaal Church of Colombo (Sri Lanka)
Used in:
Global usage

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:55, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-19 10:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Raket Elias's tombstone in Wolvendaal Church of Colombo (Sri Lanka)
Used in:
Global usage

 Support Useful and used --Llez (talk) 04:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed as Promoted if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-19 16:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Statue of Yeay Mao in Sambor Prei kuk Sanctuary S1 (Cambodia)
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-19 18:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Tesla Cybertruck - right rear view
Used in:
de:Tesla Cybertruck
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-19 18:09 (UTC)
Scope:
Renault Symbioz - left front view
Used in:
de:Renault Symbioz, en:Renault Symbioz, fr:Renault Symbioz
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-19 18:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Cupra Formentor Facelift - left rear view
Used in:
de:Cupra Formentor
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Shougissime (talk) on 2024-08-19 19:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Garmin Edge 1050
Used in:
wikidata:Q126902824
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-20 04:52 (UTC)
Scope:
Anodonta cygnea (Swan mussel), left valve
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-20 04:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Umberto Moggioli - La casa dell'artista - Museo d'arte moderna (Venice)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-20 05:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Le Martyre de saint Sébastien (The Martyrdom of Saint Sebastian) - Sebastián Munoz - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-20 05:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Ponte dei Fuseri seen from the Ponte de le Colonne
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-20 05:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail Sculptuur in Mildam (Friesland) by an unknown artist.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-20 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Sundial angel statue (Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-20 06:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Chapel of the apostles (cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-20 08:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Wichernstraße (Leipzig)
Used in:

 Best in Scope--Alexander-93 (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-20 10:41 (UTC)
Scope:
Herrnhuter Straße 3 (Leipzig)
Used in:
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-20 15:44 (UTC)
Scope:
BYD Dolphin (Global version) - left rear view
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-20 15:46 (UTC)
Scope:
Renault Symbioz - left rear view
Used in:
de:Renault Symbioz, en:Renault Symbioz, fr:Renault Symbioz, it:Renault Symbioz
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-20 15:47 (UTC)
Scope:
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VI - left front view
Used in:
de:Mitsubishi Motors, de:Mitsubishi Lancer
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Famberhorst (talk) on 2024-08-20 16:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Immature inflorescences of a Crocosmia 'Lucifer' (Montbretia).
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-20 16:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Tad Pha Suam waterfall, Laos
Used in:
Global usage
Reason:
Quality images link=Commons:Quality images, geocoded and used in articles! -- Pierre André (talk)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-08-20 22:08 (UTC)
Scope:
Vuurtoren, Academiesingel
Used in:
Lighthouse (Breda)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-21 04:40 (UTC)
Scope:
Well head Campo Sant'Agostin in Venice.

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:02, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-21 04:43 (UTC)
Scope:
Castres : Houses on the Agoût seen from the Pont Neuf towards the Pont Henri Sizaire
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-21 04:45 (UTC)
Scope:
I Mestieri veneziani - Lo studio del notaio (Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia)

 Comment Please check the scope --Llez (talk) 05:19, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-21 04:51 (UTC)
Scope:
Nodipecten subnodosus (Giant Lion's Paw), right valve

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 08:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-21 06:17 (UTC)
Scope:
Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Chartres from the south
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-21 06:18 (UTC)
Scope:
Épée du roi Arthur, lac de Trémelin

✓ Done I renamed the category. Gzen92 (talk) 14:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-21 06:19 (UTC)
Scope:
Saint-Pol-de-Léon former cathedral (pipe organ)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-21 07:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Confluence of Tsarap and Kargiakh rivers
Used in:
en:Tsarap River • wikidata:Q129485086
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-21 10:01 (UTC)
Scope:
Mercado do Pescador.- Parati (Brasil), view from Cais de Paraty
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
August (talk) on 2024-08-21 11:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Bruhnsstraße (Leipzig)
Used in:
Reason:
Only image in scope showing this small street. All buildings are listed as cultural heritage monuments. -- August (talk)

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:15, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-21 16:10 (UTC)
Scope:
Imperial Vault of Heaven and Echo Wall in Beijing, China.
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-21 16:14 (UTC)
Scope:
BYD Dolphin (Global version) - right front view
Used in:
de:Elektroauto, , de:BYD Auto, en:BYD Dolphin, en:List of BYD Auto vehicles, hu:BYD Auto, pl:BYD Dolphin, pt:BYD Dolphin
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Alexander-93 (talk) on 2024-08-21 16:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Datsun SR311 - right front view
Used in:
de:Datsun Sports, de:Datsun
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JustEMV (talk) on 2024-08-22 01:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Portrait of José Olaya by José Gil de Castro
Used in:
en:José Olaya, es:José Olaya
Reason:

Previous reviews

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-22 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Oliva bulbosa forma fabagina, shell
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-22 05:11 (UTC)
Scope:
Well head Corte del Spiron d'Oro in Venice.

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-22 05:13 (UTC)
Scope:
Hercule au repos - Musée Goya
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-22 05:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Oedemera nobilis male on Anacamptis pyramidalis

 Support Best in scope and useful. --Tagooty (talk) 13:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-22 09:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Base de lancement de V1 du bois des Huit-Rues.-Wallon-Cappel (France), view from sentier de Mémoire
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
ReneeWrites (talk) on 2024-08-22 11:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Ettensebaan 10, Breda view from the street
Used in:
Q129524921, Lijst van gemeentelijke monumenten in Breda
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JmH2O(talk) on 2024-08-22 12:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Ford Anglia Sportsman - rear three-quarter view
  •  Comment Thanks for adjusting the scope. However, this version of the Anglia 105E called Sportsman was developed for the Belgian market, it offered a spare wheel housed vertically against the rear exterior of the trunk resting on the bumper fittings. The rear view presents the specificity of the model. --JmH2O(talk) 08:22, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JmH2O(talk) on 2024-08-22 12:25 (UTC)
Scope:
Caserne caporal Trésignies (Charleroi)
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
JmH2O(talk) on 2024-08-22 12:31 (UTC)
Scope:
Éden (Charleroi)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-22 13:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Padmanabhapuram Palace clock tower
Used in:
en:Padmanabhapuram Palace • wikidata:Q129571375
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-22 12:57 (UTC)
Scope:
Eraviputhenthurai village, Kanyakumari district
Used in:
en:Eraviputhenthurai • wikidata:Q5385070
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Tagooty (talk) on 2024-08-22 13:36 (UTC)
Scope:
St. Jude's College, Thoothoor - entrance gate
Used in:
en:Thoothoor • wikidata:Q129571465
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-22 15:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Facade of Chapelle Notre-Dame de Keranroux
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-22 15:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of chapelle Notre-Dame de Keranroux
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Gzen92 (talk) on 2024-08-22 15:02 (UTC)
Scope:
Interior of chapelle Saint-Michel de Bréhat
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) on 2024-08-22 16:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Detail Water wave machine, waterloopbos Hydraulic laboratory.
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-08-22 21:07 (UTC)
Scope:
Vanellus senegallus (African wattled lapwing), incubating eggs
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-08-22 21:15 (UTC)
Scope:
Trachyphonus darnaudii usambiro (Usambiro barbet)
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-08-22 21:26 (UTC)
Scope:
Ploceus nigerrimus (Vieillot's black weaver) building the first steps of a nest

 Best in Scope ReneeWrites (talk) 06:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Giles Laurent (talk) on 2024-08-22 22:30 (UTC)
Scope:
Cinnyris chloropygius (Olive-bellied sunbird), female

 Best in Scope ReneeWrites (talk) 06:18, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-23 05:03 (UTC)
Scope:
Pinacoteca Querini Stampalia - Passeggio delle maschere il giorno di Santo Stefano - Gabriele Bella
(Walk of the masks on Boxing Day)

 Support Best in scope and used --Llez (talk) 05:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-23 05:04 (UTC)
Scope:
Porche de la cour de l'Hôtel de Nayrac
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) on 2024-08-23 05:06 (UTC)
Scope:
Marc de mirall amb noia i lliris by Pablo Gargallo - Museu Nacional d'Art de Catalunya
Hi, Gorge. I put the geocoding, but actually for the big museums we don't put geocoding. But this one is so big that you need a GPS to visit it. It's one of my favorite museums, it's really extraordinary. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.  Meet all criteria now --George Chernilevsky talk 10:49, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Open for review.

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Llez (talk) on 2024-08-23 05:12 (UTC)
Scope:
Spondylus variegatus, brown form, right valve
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Pierre André (talk) on 2024-08-23 10:05 (UTC)
Scope:
Église Saint-Vaast de Radinghem-en-Weppes, front facade
Used in:
Global usage
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mickaël en résidence (talk) on 2024-08-23 11:55 (UTC)
Scope:
Pauline Stey
Open for review.

Review it! (edit)
Nominated by:
Mickaël en résidence (talk) on 2024-08-23 12:15 (UTC)
Scope:
China Moses
Reason:
Best picture in the category. -- Mickaël en résidence (talk)
Open for review.



Pending Most valued review candidates

[edit]

Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view

[edit]
   

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:54 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Support This one has more representative colouring on the abdomen. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Review Page (edit)
Nominated by:
Zzzs (talk) on 2024-06-17 21:53 (UTC)
Scope:
Trithemis annulata (Violet dropwing) female, lateral view
Open for review. May be closed if the last vote was added no later than 12:17, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
To initiate a most valued review, please go to the dedicated MVR sub page.
Refresh page for new nominations: purge this page's cache

All open candidates in an MVR have to have their status set as "discussed" while the review is ongoing. Only when all candidates are due for closure can the MVR be closed.

Refer to Most valued review, the promotion rules and the instructions for closure for details.

Pending valued image set candidates

[edit]
   
Warning This section has been deactivated because of technical issues. Please do not add any VI set candidate.
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Valued_image_candidates&oldid=907565339"