User talk:Christer T Johansson/2012

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, C T Johansson!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 6235-Doronicum cordifolium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Lycaon 18:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 6236-1-Doronicum cordifolium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and QI. Lycaon 18:42, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

File:IMG 0265-3-Nymphaea × daubenyana.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 18:37, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 0265-3-Nymphaea × daubenyana.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:02, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 6732-Leucanthemum vulgare.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty. Mattbuck 20:51, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! IMG 6128-Fragaria vesca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments While the flower is a bit overexposed (40,000 pixels with a value of 255 in the green channel, it retains good detail. I would prefer the flower above and left of center so that leaf in the lower right is not cut off, but I think this image satisfies the criteria.Wsiegmund 17:46, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Cyclamen pseudibericum var. album

Dear C. T.,

I have seen that you have uploaded a picture of Cyclamen pseudibericum var. album. This is a very scarse variety of this rare species, of which all the other pictures uploaded on Commons, are of my own. To be sure that this plant is correctly identified, could you please provide me with a detailed description of the plant of which you have taken a picture.

With botanical regards, --Réginald (To reply) 09:58, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

The picture was taken at Göteborg botanical garden, and the species was identified by the tag. C T Johansson (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digitalis ferruginea-IMG 9992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Christer T Johansson!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

• Image:IMG 7419-Gaillardia × grandiflora.jpg was uncategorized on 18 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IMG 7462-Triticum timopheevii.jpg was uncategorized on 18 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:55, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catharanthus roseus-IMG 5432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 12:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium speciosum var. clivorum-IMG 6352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Holleday 12:44, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium auratum-IMG 6349.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea ampla-IMG 3479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, could benefit from higher F number and less tight crop. --Gidip 11:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea ampla-IMG 3481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The light in the middle left in the background is distracting. --Gidip 11:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC) I love it! Nice one. Maybe just a little crop? --WhiteWriter 11:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea ampla-IMG 3483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --WhiteWriter 11:31, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera-IMG 3511-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Exquisite. --Saffron Blaze 13:59, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anigozanthos flavidus-IMG 3364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Saffron Blaze 14:00, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera-IMG 3511.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 11:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera-IMG 3528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 23:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passiflora racemosa-IMG 6165.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo nucifera-IMG 5613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:17, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Näckroshuset-IMG 5531.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 15:58, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Location?

Hi C T - do you have a location for File:IMG 8122-Atropa belladonna.jpg please? - Thanks! MPF (talk) 19:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Yes, but I don't know how to add it?

http://maps.google.se/?ll=59.370111,18.045515&spn=0.000573,0.001742&t=h&z=20

Can you add it or tell me how to do it? C T Johansson (talk) 12:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I added it on the file. The formatting is {{Location dec|59.370111|18.045515}} - MPF (talk) 20:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capparis spinosa-IMG 3417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 17:22, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solanum betaceum-IMG 0242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ravenea rivularis-IMG 0468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:02, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gossypium barbadense-IMG 0230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:12, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acca sellowiana-IMG 0248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Not sharp in full resolution, needs downsampling. Gidip 14:48, 17 April 2012 (UTC) Why downsampling? it's perfect QI --Moroder 21:26, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

RE: No cacti

Sorry, I'm no expert, but with the plant had a sign that said Polaskia chichipe.--Canaan (talk) 19:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC) PD: excuse my english.

Location?

Hi C T - do you have a photo location for File:IMG 0011-Cirsium eriophorum.jpg and File:IMG 0012-Cirsium eriophorum.jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 11:59, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Done and done :) C T Johansson (talk) 10:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)