User talk:MGA73

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


File:333teruelmercancias.jpg[edit]

File:333teruelmercancias.jpg is not derived from File:RN333-031.JPG, is a photograph different from File:RN333-031.JPG, made from another angle.--JT Curses (talk) 17:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

@ JT Curses Oh sorry... They looked alike to me. The text on File:333teruelmercancias.jpg says the source is http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:333teruelmercancias.jpg and there it is said that the source is "Colección del autor." (Collection of author) but it also mention Commons so I thought it was originally from Commons.
The photographer is Jean Pierre Vergez and the uploader on ferropedia is Maquinista. Is that perhaps the same person? If not how do we know that the author agreed to GFDL.
Another file this http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:RN10309.JPG was uploaded by you (Jtcurses). Are you the photographer or where did you get the photo? --MGA73 (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
The uploader on ferropedia is "Maquinista" because Ferrropedia moved his server and "Maquinista" is an administrator. Originally, the picture was uploaded to Ferropedia by its author. The mention of Commons said that the file was then uploaded to commons, their origin is not commons. "http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:RN10309.JPG" and "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RN333-031.JPG" comes from commons. Sorry, I do not speak English properly.--JT Curses (talk) 16:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Mike Peel (talk) 07:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Korean War Veterans Memorial.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Korean War Veterans Memorial.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

You have broken {{Free screenshot}}[edit]

Hi.

Normally, I don't write message titles like this but your edit on 15 September has removed the previously valid |1= and |template=, prompting YiFeiBot to mark many images as not having licenses. See Category:Media without a license: needs history check for details.

Please take corrective action.

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 07:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi Codename Lisa. Thank you for telling me. I will see what I can do about that. --MGA73 (talk) 07:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Codename Lisa. I could fix most of the cases but some cases were not possible to fix so I reverted the change of the template instead. Guess we have to find another way to clear Category:License migration candidates. --MGA73 (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Well, maybe I can help with that. I am a template editor on English Wikipedia but I don't understand the license migration issue properly. What was your original concern?
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi Codename Lisa. If a file uses {{GFDL}} then it may be eligible for license migration and you see the {{License migration}} template below the GFDL. The idea is that if there is also a {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} or similar then license migration is redundant (and only the GFDL should be visible). If not then we can add different codes to tell the GFDL template what to do. The codes can be seen on Commons:License Migration Task Force/Migration. If the file is eligible for relicense then the template adds a new license like on File:Quail2.png. It is complicated in multi license templates :-( I copied the code from the {{self}} template. A work around solution is to move the licenses outside the template. --MGA73 (talk) 13:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Problem seems to be solved at Template talk:Free screenshot. :-D --MGA73 (talk) 17:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
That's great news. Well done. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Deutscher Dom Gendarmenmarkt Berlin-Mitte.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Deutscher Dom Gendarmenmarkt Berlin-Mitte.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pedelecs (talk) 15:53, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Cléston in 2008.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cléston in 2008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

P 1 9 9   17:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Change of license[edit]

Dear Michael,

If you can, please ask your bot to tag these 43 images with the 'flickr change of license' template as they are now ARR today. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:14, 21 September 2014 (UTC)


  • PS: Strange. Many of this flickr users images here and here from this large Commons photo set do not show up on the above list I don't know why. (about 28 of these images from the photo set come from a different flickr account) I thought the Sarah Iain flickr user had about 85-95+ images on Commons and not just 43. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Added to the 43 images. --MGA73 (talk) 15:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Soviet submarine Peenemünde.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Soviet submarine Peenemünde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

WvB77 (talk) 10:05, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 17:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Convoy timings.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Convoy timings.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Richard Avery (talk) 15:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

File:UCL Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:UCL Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

File:CornerSuite.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CornerSuite.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Richard Avery (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2014 (UTC)