User talk:QueenWasp189

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, QueenWasp189!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cuidado en las fuentes e identificación de retratos[edit]

Hola, en las últimas semanas ha subido una cantidad considerable de retratos entre los cuales figuran varios a los que no indica otra fuente más que su propio nombre de usuario, procediendo éstos de páginas digitales de museos o archivos electrónicos. El inconveniente de ello es que dificulta la categorización, el llenado de datos de la ficha de obra de arte y principalmente la correcta identificación de los retratados, por lo que respecta a esto último y suponiendo que lo hace de buena fe, le indico que ha cargado las siguientes imágenes realizando una identificación equivocada de los modelos:

Eso sin contar File:The childs of louis xv.png y las miniaturas: File:Therese-1773.png, File:Federike-1778.png, File:Georg Karl-1779.png, File:Charlotte-1769.png, File:Luise-1776.png subidos para agruparlos en Category:The Childrens of Charles II of Mecklemburg-Strelitz y que ya estan corregidos.

Es cierto que muchos retratos estan mal identidficados por los propios museos, pero es recomendable mantener el nombre que aparece en las fuentes y colocar las palabras "supuesto", "presunto" y otras similares para indicar que se tienen dudas justificadas al respecto. Saludos

Ecummenic (talk) 07:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Prosigo con lo anterior: ¿Con que criterios realiza la identificacion de los personajes en los retratos? A File:Ritratto di nobile fanciulla - Galleria Palatina.png la identifica como Maria Josefa de Baviera cuando por la moda se le puede datar entre finales de 1720 e inicios de 1730 y ella recién nace en 1739 además de no contar con ningún parecido físico con la aludida. Hace unos días creo la categoria Mathilde d'Este-Modène con imágenes sacadas de la pagina de FANTASÍA histórica https://carrington.fandom.com/wiki/Matilde_d%27Este y que en realidad se trataban de retratos de Teresa de Brunswick como luego le hice notar, ahora volvió a llenar la categoría con nuevos retratos de tres mujeres desconocidas y sin ningún parecido entre sí, no contando este personaje con imágenes en la red con las cuales poder comparar las otras. Lo mismo sucede con Louise de Maisonblanche, de la que no se encuentran imágenes y usted fácilmente se saca de la manga dos retratos sin dar razón de qué lo lleva a pensar que sean los de esa persona.

Ecummenic (talk) 08:25, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

El mismo problema en Wikipedia en alemán y internacional.[[2]]. Saludos --Ziegelbrenner (talk) 14:15, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

I have nominated your files for deletion due to the above concerns. We can't have image with questionable source and questionable attributions. PaterMcFly (talk) 15:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Louise_de_Maisonblanche has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ecummenic (talk) 17:16, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Category:Mathilde_d'Este-Modène has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Ecummenic (talk) 17:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]