User talk:Ximeg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Image scaler doesn't like progressive encoding and large images (or it hits some system limits). I uploaded a version without progressive and this works now. --Denniss (talk) 15:31, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to have a go at redoing this with Lightroom+Hugin+Photoshop. Contact me by email with links to something like Dropbox for the raw files. Lightroom is very good at dealing with noise and CA and the 16-bit workflow of these tools helps with the considerable levels adjustments you mention. -- Colin (talk) 18:35, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sent an e-mail to you --Ximeg (talk) 19:14, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Replied with link to new version for download -- Colin (talk) 23:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grass close-up at sunset in Turkey.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 11:55, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eiffel Tower souvenirs[edit]

I used this to illustrate the en:WP article on souvenirs. very nice image of ephemera. in the particular lies the universal.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, you are welcome --Ximeg (talk) 10:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:President Barack Obama Tours Storm Damage in New Jersey 5.jpg[edit]

Kontra I don't see neither storm damage nor president --Ximeg (Diskussion) 10:10, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --Ivar (Diskussion) 10:50, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Kommentar I should rather nominate as National Geographic Magazine Photo of the month. --Frze (Diskussion) 10:58, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Собор Покрова[edit]

[1] У меня есть и RAW и готовый TIFF (если обрабатывать, то лучше TIFF, т.к. я там подъёмный кран сретушировал). Если вам охота, пришлите ваш е-мейл адрес, а я попробую скинуть TIFF (размер порядка 63 мб). Готовой версией можете переписать существующий файл, а дубликат с шумом лучше удалить за ненадобностью. - A.Savin 11:09, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saint Isaac's Cathedral Sept. 2012 Interior.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saint Isaac's Cathedral Sept. 2012 Interior.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campagnolo Centaur cassette - side view.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 21:28, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VVO Regionalzug in Dresden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 09:26, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water drops on the table surface.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK to me. - A.Savin 21:08, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air Berlin Boeing-737 taking-off 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support --Iifar 19:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiffel tower models.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:22, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old tourist tram in Porto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 10:10, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MarkBachJoch Cableway in Wildschönau at sunset 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK (desp. some noise) - A.Savin 10:07, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick nach Wörgl von Skipiste bei Wildschönau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice. - A.Savin 10:03, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flying gull in Portugal.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice moment, QI for me, please only add geotag --The Photographer 14:20, 16 November 2012 (UTC)  Info Done --Ximeg 14:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick nach Wörgl von Skipiste bei Wildschönau 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, QI for me --Haneburger 19:37, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old tourist tram in Porto 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Geotag --The Photographer 14:25, 16 November 2012 (UTC)  Info Done --Ximeg 14:36, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Smial 17:02, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Saab Safir 91B.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Saab Safir 91B.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air France Boeing-737 taking-off.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. - A.Savin 23:38, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main building of ETH Zürich interior.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (don't mind those ghosts) --Poco a poco 20:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plutonium.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall in the main building of the University of Zürich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sorry, but too much noise and/or unsharpness --Poco a poco 23:25, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Info The image was improved. Please review. --Ximeg 20:35, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mucho better now Poco a poco 22:41, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Zurich from Lindenhof hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --Isiwal 17:36, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sofas on the roof near Lindenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks beautiful. IMO should be promoted. --Harsh 2580 15:45, 13 December 2012 (UTC) Thank you! --Ximeg 15:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Filemover[edit]

العربيَّة  Deutsch  español  English  français  português  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(台灣)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hi Ximeg, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{Speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Érico Wouters msg 21:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münzplatz, Zürich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harbour in Konstanz with green water.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI now --Poco a poco 00:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sparkasse in Konstanz am Morgen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better --Poco a poco 22:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grossmünster - view from Münsterbrücke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slight CW tilt (probably plus perspective correction) (correction: ~ -0,9 in LR ). How do you process your photos? I think this one could be much sharper. I tried amount +50 and masking 65 (for avoiding noise) --Tuxyso 09:18, 16 December 2012 (UTC)  Info Seems that you're right - now it is much sharper. Normally I apply sharpening from 0 to 12 and it seems sufficient for me... Also my objective is far not the sharpest one --Ximeg 15:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. QI now. --Tuxyso 22:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Isaac's Cathedral Sept. 2012 Interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. --Tuxyso 11:35, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Houses on Fortunagasse in Zürich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good photo, but strong CAs (see note). Probably you could apply slight NR. --Tuxyso 09:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)  Info Image was updated --Ximeg 15:44, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Better. QI for me. Nice shadows from the trees on the left fassades. --Tuxyso 22:53, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garden on the roof near Lindenhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I hope "lovely garden" is meant ironic :) Nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 09:27, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sankt Peterhofstatt, hauses 8 and 9 in Zürich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, but composition is a bit disordered for me. --Tuxyso 09:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chroicocephalus ridibundus in Zürich 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2013![edit]

* * * 2013 !!! * * *
С Новым годом! Счастливого Рождества!

С уважением, Георгий -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:26, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolderbahn altes Antriebsrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:29, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water drops by Ximeg 24.12.12-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 18:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodensee in Konstanz 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 19:20, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bodensee in Konstanz 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best light, but for me a very harmonic and clear composition. --Tuxyso 14:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Hall in the main building of the University of Zürich.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hall in the main building of the University of Zürich.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:07, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zürich - Limmatquai with tram.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much better, this version is good to go --Poco a poco 20:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kunstgrenze zwischen Deutschland und Schweiz - "Magier".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Borderline but OK. --Mattbuck 19:05, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It’s an Avanti =)[edit]

You asked about the aircraft shown on File:Airplane above Jena.JPG... it is a Piaggio P.180 Avanti. Thank you for your contributions! Greetings, Ariadacapo (talk) 21:43, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fundamentals of optics lecture notes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Interesting --Poco a poco 08:57, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verbindungsseilbahn Alpbach-Wildschönau 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:22, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildschönau feiert Neues Jahr 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Vamps 20:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildschönau feiert Neues Jahr 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:58, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildschönau feiert Neues Jahr 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice view --Rjcastillo 15:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildschönau feiert Neues Jahr 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice view --Rjcastillo 15:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Blink comparators.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olga Zaitseva in Oberhof 2013 pursiut race.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I'd like it to have more contrast on her (but not so dark as the previous version) and next time I'd use wider f and lower ISO if possible, but ok for me. --Kadellar 20:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC) Thank you very much, I will correct the contrast. Unfortunately it's not possible to lower ISO, since it's evening and already at 1/250s blurring occurs. They are moving VERY fast, so the autofocus cannot follow them and I need to close the aperture to get sharp images even in case of small AF mistakes --Ximeg 11:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpbachtal Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Predawn landscape in Niederau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The plane trail is a bit disturbing, but QI. --Kadellar 13:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Biathlon 2013-007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildschönau feiert Neues Jahr 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This one's just about ok. --Mattbuck 03:23, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snowstorm in Tyrol - 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snowstorm in Tyrol - 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not overly sharp, and yet: what an atmosphere! --Martin Falbisoner 17:50, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sunset in Wildschönau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 21:45, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Alpbachtal Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alpbachtal Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate File:Delta II and NPP at dusk.jpg after 10 days --Ximeg (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Brightly lit STS-135 on launch pad 39a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brightly lit STS-135 on launch pad 39a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:PIA15279 3rovers-stand D2011 1215 D521.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PIA15279 3rovers-stand D2011 1215 D521.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:54, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good --Rjcastillo 01:26, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-12-Ski track.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 10:28, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-13-Ski track.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:41, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 12:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and beautiful pic. --Jastrow 12:44, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skiing in Oberhof March 2013-16-Ski track sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 13:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chroicocephalus ridibundus taking off in Zürich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the best sharpness, but sufficient for QI. --King of Hearts 01:22, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Playing dogs in Lindenhof.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Delta II and NPP at dusk.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delta II and NPP at dusk.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Nürnberg-081-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue-059-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4144.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Street in Nürnberg-058-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 17:10, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus bei Nacht-235-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4490.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments realistic nice colors. --Ralf Roletschek 08:32, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauthalle Wappen-026-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:03, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wild Duck-161-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4355.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I think your description needs a Latin animal name. Otherwise QI for me. --JLPC 15:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC) I find the upper part a bit distracting. Would you consider cropping out the other animals? --Jastrow 20:38, 10 April 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done The Latin name was in the EXIF metadata; anyway, I've added it. I cropped the image --Ximeg 22:11, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I was told, a few months ago, to write the Latin name in the caption and... I didn't read the EXIF metadata. --JLPC 20:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bratwursthäusle am Rathausplatz-237-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jastrow 12:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goldenes Posthorn-067-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4155.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hasen-047-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 18:06, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balkon-Nassauer Haus-035-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but a bit pity that the scroll at the left is cutted. --Tuxyso 15:27, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trödelmarkt, Cafe-230-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 15:29, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus-053-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 15:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kirche-030-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kirche-031-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kirche-032-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus-238-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment QI, but, tilted. imo. --Rjcastillo 01:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC) ✓ Done Fixed! --Ximeg 22:07, 14 April 2013 (UTC) Comment OK for me --Rjcastillo 16:50, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nassauer Haus-034-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. I don't like the cut people but nevertheless QI imo --Moroder 07:52, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Lorenz Kirche-033-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment lacks details a bit. imo --Rjcastillo 01:23, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok to me. Mattbuck 02:35, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2[edit]

Please revisit Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Streisand Estate.jpg/2, as there is an ALT proposed by Alchemist-hp which edited the image to improve its quality, thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 21:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2014 ![edit]

* * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Fiber[edit]

Fiber
Hello,

I am new to this site. Do not know how I can contact you? I have some questions about the erbium-doped fiber that you've brightened up with green laser. can you please email me danijel@alphacomsweden.se Visolight (talk) 21:07, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 00:30, 12 December 2014 (UTC) [reply]

PH-4



Happy holidays! 2015![edit]

* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 20:15, 24 December 2014 (UTC)  [reply]
File:Frogs-049-Nürnberg 2013 MG 4132.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vikiçizer (talk) 13:31, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***[edit]

* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:34, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers[edit]

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]