Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:За селом 2.jpg

File: За селом 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2019 at 16:05:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File: За селом 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File: За селом 2.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
•  Info created by Swift11 - uploaded by Swift11 - nominated by Swift11 -- Михайло Пецкович (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Михайло Пецкович (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Question -- Category ? -- Eatcha (talk) 16:51, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Category Nature-- Swift11

•  Support - Eatcha (talk) 17:17, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  CommentTo me it looks a bit too artificial. --Granada (talk) 16:57, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Comment - I haven't decided yet, but it's pretty small for a current-day FP nominee. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:30, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Please, the size increased -- Swift11 17:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Weak support Beautiful, but it is indeed a little small. This camera produces 10 megapixel images, so I suspect it has been downsampled. Could we perhaps have a slightly larger version? Cmao20 (talk) 19:14, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Tone the saturation down and you have my vote. -- KennyOMG (talk) 20:24, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Tone the saturation downed -- Swift11 17:40, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral I will be neutral on this one, it isn't enough for a support or oppose--BoothSift 03:20, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral per Boothsift.--Vulphere 03:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very nice, but the resolution must be better. --XRay ^talk 09:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Resolution bettered-- Swift11 18:02, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Considering that this was taken in the morning hours of a sunny day in October, the colors and saturation look pretty much exactly how I'd expect them to look. Size is a bit on the small side, but still enough for a large print. --El Grafo (talk) 09:56, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Piotr Bart (talk) 13:06, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose pending the question about downsampling per Cmao20. Swift11, could you please explain? – Lucas 14:10, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done Please Explain more (per Cmao20?)-- Swift11 17:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

• Much better! Seems much more like the sort of size I'd expect from that camera now. Changing to full  Support - thanks Swift11. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

• Swift11, we are still short of the full 10 MP the camera is capable of with no explanation from you. Cmao20, I'm concerned you are happy being spoonfed 6 MP out of 10 MP when it's not answered whether it's a crop. – Lucas 20:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

• Lucas, I chose to take it on faith that it was a crop. In a situation where I asked for more resolution and someone provided it, I would generally assume on good faith they had uploaded the full file rather than taken the time to create a larger downsample. Of course you may be right that it's still downsampled, but I didn't feel like pressing the issue any further given that this size is adequate for FP for me. I know that we have a rule that prohibits downsampling, but I feel that the FP rules are somewhat contradictory in that sense - they simultaneously penalise for downsizing images and dictate that 'Images should not have distracting amount of noise when viewed in full size', which seems an invite for pixel-peepers and probably encourages people to downsize so as to avoid criticism. In addition, I'd point out that Diliff's church interiors - which I nominate a lot of - are nearly all downsampled to improve quality at full-res, so FP isn't really consistent about this. But this isn't the place for this discussion. For me, 6 MP is adequate for a rather nice landscape like this, but you are of course welcome to disagree. Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Neutral Love it but wonder if clarity / contrast wasn't pushed a bit too far. - Benh (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Done /clarity downed.../ -- Swift11 19:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment I'm happy to support if you explain if it was down sampled or if it's a crop. Also, after the nomination is over, please give the file a meaningful name. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:56, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment This is the Carpathian Biosphere Reserve. Name foto: «On the edge of the village» -- Swift11 09:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support Outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - I agree. Outstanding composition and light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Appretiate all the changes after boys' feedback! Still a bit oversaturated to my taste but nothing that would stop me from supporting. -- Jakub Fryš (talk) 03:59, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment - Not speaking for myself in this case, but perhaps you don't know that this is not an all-male group here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Yann (talk) 04:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Support per Frank and Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I'm with Benh about too much clarity. It looks artificial. --Cart (talk) 08:41, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment do you watch the full size? -- Swift11 12:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

• Of course, always. You have to look at a photo in several different sizes before you vote. --Cart (talk) 12:00, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

• on Monday I'll fix it... -- Swift11 17:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
• /clarity downed. -- Swift11 19:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Comment Looking through your uploads, I found File:Polonyna v tumanah.jpg of the same scene taken just a minute earlier and the processing is way more natural than in this so my oppose stays. --Cart (talk) 18:41, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Rbrechko (talk) 11:53, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Benh and Cart. What did it for me is that tree at left center ... the edges of the leaves against the fog (which also looks like it could have been added as a texture in Photoshop—I'm not saying that it was) really don't look right. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

• How many times have you seen such a state of nature? -- Swift11 17:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

• Look through his uploads if you want to know. He's taken loads of photos of natural landscapes, including many in the Arctic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

•  Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 06:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --СССР (talk) 01:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 20:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:42, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:47, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 3 oppose, 5 neutral → featured. /--BoothSift 23:16, 7 June 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural