Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Breakfast in Île d'Orléans 072.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Breakfast in Île d'Orléans 072.jpg, featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 15:47:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 15:47, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Oppose A pleasant scene, but not an FP. The food and drink are not very prominent, the food is not sharply focussed. Falls well short of the meals in the gallery. --Tagooty (talk) 03:51, 7 August 2022 (UTC)- Support --Yann (talk) 07:46, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support I see this more as a photo of the window with its intriguing inside/outside contrast than as a photo of a meal. I love the contrast between the well-ordered interior with its subdued light and the rich garden nature outside. Therefore it makes perfect sense that the focus is on the lamp and on the window. This photo reminds me much e.g. of this window FP. Therefore I would suggest to change the gallery link to Architectural elements#Windows. --Aristeas (talk) 08:50, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment Gallery link changed as suggested. (Undo my edit if you disagree ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Weak support A little busy to me, especially on the table. Urban Versis 32KB ⚡ (talk | contribs) 15:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)- Regretful oppose While Aristeas is spot on about how this works as a photo, the window muntins, glasses and plates are oversharpened. Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Done Daniel Case I rollbacked any sharpening filter, please could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice object, but that was too much HDR, it needs more light from the window on the table. -- -donald- (talk) 06:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Done -donald-, I lowered the HDR to give more light to the table, please, could you take another look?. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 09:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, the table top did not change in light, the window and curtain only. -- -donald- (talk) 11:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support I like this image - it feels a bit like a still life, a painting more than a photograph. The colors enhance this feeling. I do not see this as being too busy, the scene is well balanced. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas and Kritzolina. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support per above. -- IamMM (talk) 04:04, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support I like the way this looks now, and I like the feeling it gives. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Question Why did the size change from around 30 Mpixels to 55 Mpx and then back? Yann (talk) 08:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- I artificially enlarge the image with Topaz Gigapixel but this created other problems like oversharpening commented by others. --Wilfredor (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, so thank you from removing the enlargement again. --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- It was an experiment that went wrong, I always try to improve the photos but sometimes one ends up spoiling it. I consider myself more of a photographer than a photoshop editor, I like using stitched photos more than using the fake topaz Gigapixel trick but I wanted to try to see your comments and finally someone commented on what I more or less feared. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer. IMO use of Topaz Gigapixel to enlarge images should be highly discouraged on Commons, and certainly not accepted on FP. Yann (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yann I think that you are right, also Topaz Denoise or any Denoise tool because it's destructive. FPC should accept the noise like we accepted the film grain. --Wilfredor (talk) 12:02, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for your answer. IMO use of Topaz Gigapixel to enlarge images should be highly discouraged on Commons, and certainly not accepted on FP. Yann (talk) 09:19, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- It was an experiment that went wrong, I always try to improve the photos but sometimes one ends up spoiling it. I consider myself more of a photographer than a photoshop editor, I like using stitched photos more than using the fake topaz Gigapixel trick but I wanted to try to see your comments and finally someone commented on what I more or less feared. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:23, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ah, so thank you from removing the enlargement again. --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- I artificially enlarge the image with Topaz Gigapixel but this created other problems like oversharpening commented by others. --Wilfredor (talk) 10:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:58, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 09:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support Lotje (talk) 16:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support -- Bravo, Wilfredor! Not perfect technically but still magic, as a painting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Obrigado meu caro. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Donald. -- Karelj (talk) 15:45, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Support --De728631 (talk) 13:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:13, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Windows
