Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cirrus front over Austnesfjorden, Austvågøya, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 April.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cirrus front over Austnesfjorden, Austvågøya, Lofoten, Norway, 2015 April.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Sep 2015 at 12:19:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Clouds
Info created and uploaded by Simo Räsänen - nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:19, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Comment Great scene and FP-worthy but am I wrong or is there a lot of posterization in the sky? --Code (talk) 12:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment There is definitely some noise and maybe even some color banding on the left and right side of the sky, but I wouldn't say there is a lot posterization. --Ivar (talk) 15:28, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 21:41, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --MB-one (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Noise in the sky, yes, but not enough to be problematic. Everything else very well done. Daniel Case (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Kikos (talk) 06:09, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Beside noise I don't like color of snow on sunny left part, its not white, but purple-red. I think postprocesing went to far. There might be banding on left side in sky...curve was moved simply to far here. --Mile (talk) 09:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- en:Rayleigh_scattering - Benh (talk) 09:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Benh Its more for gases, so air. Alpenglow is not the case here, snow is reddish at sunsets. If you would be there I think snow would be more white when observing with bare eyes. That's my point. --Mile (talk) 11:16, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Mile what you refer to is the fact the sky itself turns pinkish. But it's normal that when the sun is about to set, the subjects lit are yellow -> orange -> pink. - Benh (talk) 12:02, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- I just read the article about en:Alpenglow. Very interesting, and it looks to refer to indirect lighting of the mountains. What I mean is that things can get pink even with a direct lighting (is the case on this picture), and what I understand when you mention "gases" or "air" is the fact the sky becomes pink (which to me is rayleigh scattering in combination with a thin layer of cloud, or what you have in ur own nomination). - Benh (talk) 12:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support interesting --A.Savin 09:18, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 21:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:38, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support It's got wow. There is some posterisation in the sky but slight. I'd prefer if Simo Räsänen exported this as sRGB colourspace JPG rather than AdobeRGB as the colours here don't need the wider gamut that only a fraction of a percent of viewers could actually see anyway, and all mobile browsers will display the wrong colours for this image. -- Colin (talk) 20:04, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support and per Colin. — Julian H.✈ 07:07, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Wow, great shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:34, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Wow! --Pokéfan95 (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support Basik07 (talk) 17:31, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:53, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural_phenomena#Clouds
