Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG/2

File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Mar 2017 at 15:19:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG/2 Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museum Brandhorst June 2014 01.JPG/2

• Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
•  Info A rather radical, abstract view of the colorful facade of Munich's Museum Brandhorst, composed of 36,000 vertical ceramic louvers in 23 different colored glazes. This is my second attempt here after a very (and maybe all too) short-lived nomination in 2014. I couldn't retake the picture as intended back then. Everytime I passed the building with my camera in hands, the outer conditions I experienced there - especially the sky - were significantly worse. So I tried to address the issues mentioned the last time. I cropped the original image a bit, adjusted lighting and sharpness. I think it's improved now. What I really like about the picture is that it's not a formal representation of what one would usually expect. The composition is both simple and striking, consisting bascially of three overlapping triangles. Although there are in fact a lot of colors, the image is - more or less - dominated by shades of yellow/red and blue, a bit interspersed with specks of green and brown. So, at least imo, the photo successfully tries to reduce and deconstruct a complex urban architecture to a very limited array of visual elements. All by me, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Real art. --Yann (talk) 17:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Lovely abstraction; reminds of the cover of Yes's Going for the One. Daniel Case (talk) 18:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Me like! :) --cart-Talk 18:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 19:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:26, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Sometimes you can identify a FP from its thumbnail and just click on it to be sure it's not a total failure in quality (even though you know it'll be just fine) … --El Grafo (talk) 19:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support – Lucas^T 20:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support - Very good, and I like your conventional picture of the museum, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Reduced to the Max! --PtrQs (talk) 00:15, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Outstanding in its simplicity. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:01, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:11, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Pugilist (talk) 08:29, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Code (talk) 06:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 11:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support fun. Charles (talk) 14:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 09:25, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Good! --Laitche (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /lNeverCry 01:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Germany