Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Noctilucent-clouds-msu-6817.jpg

File:Noctilucent-clouds-msu-6817.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2019 at 05:40:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Noctilucent-clouds-msu-6817.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Noctilucent-clouds-msu-6817.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Clouds
•  Info created and uploaded by Matthias Süßen - nominated by Boothsift -- Boothsift 05:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Boothsift 05:40, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support - A bit noisy, but that's probably inevitable in that light, and otherwise, very good and striking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 07:45, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Cart (talk) 10:04, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support 50 shades of blue --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:35, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:49, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support I see you took a leaf out of my suggestion here Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulphere 16:06, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Per Ikan Poco² 18:37, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support Not very sharp in the background, but VERY impressive --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:52, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support--Bijay chaurasia (talk) 15:03, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support This would not be our first noctilucent cloud FP, as I pointed out yesterday, but its latticework pattern makes it too good to pass up. Daniel Case (talk) 21:01, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Support -- Eatcha (talk) 21:47, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
•  Neutral It would be an oppose because the blues are extensively processed (and yes, the EXIF show that). But I compared with what we already have and that looks on par, so I guess it is representative of the reality... - Benh (talk) 19:24, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Boothsift 05:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Clouds