User talk:9xl
I am mainly active in the german Wikipedia, so please contact me there.
Tip: Categorizing images
[edit]
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 05:49, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Oab010.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Thanks, done. --9xl (talk) 10:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:SSIE8.png was uncategorized on 29 December 2009 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Johann Karl Seidemann.pdf was uncategorized on 21 March 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
- Image:OABacknang127b.jpg was uncategorized on 29 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
- Image:OABacknang125b.jpg was uncategorized on 29 March 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Danke nochmal fürs Einstellen der PDF. Bei der Seitenangabe Seiten 94 bis 117 habe ich mich übrigens leider verhauen, da die Seite 117 der SLUB-Datei die Seite 106 des Zeitschriftenbandes wiedergibt. Die elf Seiten mehr schaden aber sicher auch nicht. LG --WikiAnika (talk) 13:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
URV
[edit]http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:S%C3%BC%C3%9Fer_die_Glocken_nie_klingen_01.jpg#File:S.C3.BC.C3.9Fer_die_Glocken_nie_klingen_01.jpg Als ob du davon irgendeine Ahnung hättest --84.62.70.61 16:18, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
- Es ist vielleicht nicht so klar wie ich geschrieben habe. Aber dass die Gemeinfreiheit der Noten nicht erwiesen ist, das siehst du wahrscheinlich erst wenn du dir den Schaum vom Mund geputzt hast. --9xl (talk) 09:37, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Category discussion notification | Category:Beschreibung_des_Oberamts_Heilbronn has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
SteMicha (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
Dane für deine Zuarbeit. Ich hätte nichts dagegen, wenn du dich um das Ausschneiden kümmern würdest. Um nicht doppelte Arbeit zu haben, müssten wir uns allerdings koordinieren. --Arnd (talk) 11:39, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
![]() |
Beschreibung des Oberamts Göppingen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Jochen Burghardt (talk) 20:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Hallo, was soll deine Revert meiner Bearbeitung bedeuten? Meine Bearbeitung ist eine wesentliche Verbesserung, vor allem Kategorien. Außerdem bei der Abbildung soll man den ihren Autor angeben und nicht den Autor des Werks, in dem die Abbildung wiedergegeben wurde. Falls Kleinigkeiten trotzdem sein sollte, dann kannst du sie korrigieren und nicht alles revertieren. Mewa767 (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
- Nun war dieses Bild Teil des Buches "Beschreibung des Oberamts Tübingen". Richtig ist, dass der Künstler unbekannt ist. Deine "wesentliche Verbesserung" führt aber leider auch dazu, dass das Buch nun unvollständig ist. Außerdem führt der jetzige Dateiname und die Dateiinfo zu der irrigen Annahme, das Bild sei 1643 entstanden, was nicht stimmt. Es ist relativ leicht festzustellen, dass die Ansicht frühestens Anfang des 19. Jh. entstanden sein kann. Das legt die Vermutung nahe, die Abbildung könnte für dieses Buch angefertigt worden sein. --9xl (talk) 07:36, 15 July 2023 (UTC)
Für das Buch Beschreibung des Oberamts Tübingen gibt es Category:Beschreibung des Oberamts Tübingen und das Bild gehört zu dieser Kategorie, also deine Behauptung, dass das Buch nun unvollständig wäre, nicht richtig ist. Du schreibst, dass das Bild frühestens Anfang des 19. Jh. entstanden sein kann. Woher diese Annahme? --Mewa767 (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2023 (UTC)