User talk:Alexandar Vujadinovic

This is a Wikimedia Commons user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikimedia Commons, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikimedia Commons itself. The original page is located at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Alexandar_Vujadinovic.

Wikimedia Commons

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alexandar Vujadinovic!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tarfala.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:27, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Tarfala valley panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tarfala valley panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kebnekaise, east slope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : Good but can you add "NE (or SW...) view" to the scope, as we usually do here for such pictures ? Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 13:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC) * Done - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 14:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
 Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 17:34, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 11:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port of Barcelona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 19:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:01, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Karpoš Municipality.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment The caption in English, must be in English. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

•  Comment Fixed. - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 12:12, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Palauenc05 (talk) 20:23, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amaryllis (Hippeastrum).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:47, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyacinth (Hyacinthus).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 23:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

New nomination for Featured Picture

Hi, Alexandar. I liked your Quality Image of a hyacinth, so I nominated it for FP. I'll be curious to see what other people think of it. Good luck!

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Desert panorama, UAE, February 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A small railway crossing in Kamakura, Japan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo, but please upload full resolution as per Commons:Image guidelines. Dllu 23:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A sunrise and skyscrapers as seen from Shiodome, Tokyo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good photo, but please upload full resolution as per Commons:Image guidelines. Dllu 23:10, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Q1 Nomination

Please look to your Q1nomination, because I cannot look to your photo. I guess you have made a syntax error (File:ASEA X10 train at Karlberg station in Stockholm.jpg) --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

• Fixed, thanks for the notification. - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 17:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Great Buddha of Kamakura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a weak  Support, the sky is unfavourable light, but for a Qi ok, IMO --Hubertl 11:36, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watch salesman in Souq Waqif, Doha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:43, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! A lotus flower after rain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:45, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ASEA X10 train at Karlberg station in Stockholm.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice light. --Tuxyso 19:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 7N Djurgårdslinjen SSB A2 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --W.carter 19:08, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Photo-phylles 2017

Hi Alexandar,

I suggest you have a look to my website http://www.jjmilan.sitew.fr/#accueil.A

We would be honoured if you agree to participate. It's completely free!

Best regards, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 21:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC), administrator of the french Wikibooks

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Fysingen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be useful to reduce the scoop to: Aerial view.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 25 January 2017 (UTC)  Done Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 18:20, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 26 January 2017 (UTC)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:59, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial view of Domsten.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support useful Olivier LPB (talk) 22:38, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial views of Johanneshov.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Must connect the scope to the category that contains the image --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Done - Alexandar Vujadinovic (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
•  Support Useful & used --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- DeFacto (talk). 18:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena and Ericsson Globe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 29 November 2019 (UTC)