Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Featured picture candidates[edit]

File:Manneporte en soir.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2020 at 10:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cliffs of Étretat with natural arch Manneporte

File:Capsicum - Mercado Municipal Funchal 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 16:31:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dried Capsicum, Mercado dos Lavradores, Funchal, Madeira

File:SL Horton Plains NP asv2020-01 img08.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 13:35:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Horton Plains landscape

File:Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar1.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:45:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Avenida Presidente Julio A. Roca y calle Bolívar

File:Equisetum telmateia Fallätsche drops 20200507.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2020 at 06:41:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Equisetum telmateia with dew in Fallätsche, Zurich

File:Torre del silencio, Yazd, Irán, 2016-09-21, DD 60-64 PAN.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Iran
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Tower of Silence (also known as 'Dakhma'), old settlement nearby and city of Yazd, Iran. A Tower of Silence is a circular, raised structure built by Zoroastrians for excarnation – that is, for dead bodies to be exposed to carrion birds, usually vultures. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's a great panorama, but it looks like it's strongly tilted downwards to the right to me. Happy to change my vote if this can be fixed, but it's pretty disconcerting as-is. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Cmao20: I uploaded a new version, hopefully I address your concern --Poco a poco (talk) 15:55, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Thanks! Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Structures look vertical. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not tilted IMO --Llez (talk) 16:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support It's great to see another one of your beautiful panoramas of Iran. I particularly love the desert mountains in the haze on the right that look almost like mirages. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:36, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Lago del Rey, Alemania, 2019-05-17, DD 25.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 21:44:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cottage at Königssee, Germany.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Cottage at Königssee, Germany. I enjoy the contrast of green forest and white mountains here with a nice cottage in between and the lake in the front. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:44, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cute composition. Shame about the top left corner, but no big deal on a 50 MP sensor. -- King of ♥ 22:11, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per nomination and KoH. Quality is fine, one would barely notice the blurry corners on a 20mpx downsample. Cmao20 (talk) 00:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Very nice! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Frank. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Needs a bit of work on pincushion distortion (if that's the right description). The reflections in the water are a long way off vertical except in the centre. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    I adressed that, Charlesjsharp, among other adjustments --Poco a poco (talk) 13:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol support vote.svg Support Good now. I like the balance of the two mountains. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Sonya7iv (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Appealing weather -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:18, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Too unsharp on the left side IMO --Llez (talk) 16:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Per Llez.--Ermell (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:The Hive - Kew Gardens.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 16:34:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 16:34, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Stunning composition. Please remove the purple fringing. -- King of ♥ 16:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Thanks --Sonya7iv (talk) 17:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support Still some fringing left, but no longer distracting. -- King of ♥ 22:12, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Purple fringing still present, there is also a grainy unsharpness especially in the lower edges, the whole picture seemms to be oversharpened to correct the unsharp edges. Would be a great photo without these issues. --Llez (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Not technically perfect, but wow, what a composition! Cmao20 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Could you add more detailed description, please? I am not sure what I am looking at... --Grtek (talk) 23:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 06:22, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--ahuR ☘ 10:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:52, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Eye-catching. But short description -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Andrei (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose it's a stunning picture, but I'm going to oppose because you have been on an oversharpened photos streak IMO. Almost all of your pictures I have looked full size show annoying artifacts. I feel that one wasn't that sharp to begin with and that you have hopelessly try to fix (ruining it IMO). - Benh (talk) 18:59, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • sincerely thank you for your suggestions. I will try to improve myself --Sonya7iv (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I believe I do see what Benh is talking about, but I just can't hold back from supporting such a great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Ikan Kekek. --Cayambe (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Front court of Wartburg Castle (4).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Front court of Wartburg Castle in Eisenach, Eisenach, Germany

File:Luther church in Apolda 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2020 at 12:40:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Luther church in Apolda, Thuringia, Germany

File:Iglesia Nova Gracanica, Trebinje, Bosnia y Herzegovina, 2014-04-14, DD 04.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 23:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:FelipeHeredia (retouched).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 13:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Felipe Heredia, former governor of Salta Province, Argentina

File:Golden Pheasants by John Henry Hintermeister.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 03:40:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Golden Pheasants, a 1938 painting by John Henry Hintermeister. The digital image shows the painting as it exists today, including multiple signatures, added to make sure a signature was visible in lithographed calendar prints that were cropped from the original. Spots may be seen on the painting, which exist on the original.

File:Oenopia lyncea3.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2020 at 06:36:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Oenopia lyncea
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I agree completely with Llez. What kind of plant is that, and are all the white things larvae, worms or part of the plant? Is there any way to find out? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry, but the reflections/flare on the animal are the main reason of my oppose. Also per Liez. --Cayambe (talk) 11:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 21:33:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Egretta garzetta in the United Kingdom
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family :Ardeidae
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Sonya7iv - uploaded by Sonya7iv - nominated by Sonya7iv -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Sonya7iv (talk) 21:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose. This is a hard one for me because it is a clearer, more illustrative image than any of the other four FPs we have (1 2 3 4) but the quality just isn't up to snuff, especially when compared to 2. I think a lot of the noise in the background is from oversharpening, because the D750 really shouldn't be that bad at ISO 400. -- King of ♥ 22:07, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Sorry but this one is definitely oversharpened for me. I like it and I think it could be FP, but the oversharpening is IMO pretty glaring at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - I have to agree with the others. Very clear oversharpening, particularly on and for some ways below the bird's head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 20:43:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Sociable weaver (Philetairus socius)

File:Hortus Haren. 06-05-2020 (d.j.b.) 06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 15:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Lamprotornis superbus - Karlsruhe Zoo 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2020 at 11:50:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Lamprotornis superbus (Rüppell, 1845)(Superb starling), Karlsruhe Zoo
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Sturnidae (Starlings)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Llez (talk) 11:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Note that there is some color noise in the background which should be easy to clean up with minimal degradation in image quality. -- King of ♥ 16:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Thanks for the hint --Llez (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Sorry, I take it back, I wasn't aware that it was taken in a tropical hall Poco a poco (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose very harsh flash and annoying shadow. - Benh (talk) 20:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Beautiful bird but the flash ruins it. I agree with Benh -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:20, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Seems fine to me, it's a very beautiful bird. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:51, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh - Ryan Hodnett (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't think we should need a flash for this bird in a zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:08, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Why Not? Light coonditions in a Zoo are sometimes more difficult than in nature. This bird was photographed indoor in the "Exotic hall" which was very dark compared with outside. --Llez (talk) 20:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment OK, I understand, but am surprised that a bird gets no daylight in a zoo. They do in London Zoo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
      • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I didn't say "no daylight", but in a room it is always darker, please see here. The birds fly free, but the light conditions are not optimal --Llez (talk) 05:31, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:53, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Memorial Day 2020 - San Francisco Under Quarantine (49935629483).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 18:02:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

White circles 10 feet (3.0 m) in diameter, spaced 8 feet (2.4 m) apart, are painted on the grass at Dolores Park in San Francisco to encourage social distancing during Memorial Day weekend amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#United States
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Christopher Michel - uploaded by Tm - nominated by Mxn -- Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Just as striking and educational as the photo from May 23 but higher-quality. Though the grass has gotten a little worn by Memorial Day, it shows more of the circles and a larger crowd has come out to use them. – Minh Nguyễn 💬 18:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- King of ♥ 18:08, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:39, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question I would support if it was taken legally and the CC licence etc. is OK. Is it illegal to fly a drone in a San Francisco park? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp: The photo is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, which is acceptable for this project. As for whether the photographer broke any rules, I can't say for certain. The Recreation & Parks Department doesn't allow drones to take off or land at city parks without permission, but Dolores Park isn't in an FAA no-drone zone. [1][2][3] The photographer hasn't indicated whether the drone took off from Dolores Park or from somewhere else nearby for this particular photo, or whether they got permission to take off at the park. (Some other photos were taken a good distance away from the park.) – Minh Nguyễn 💬 23:31, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Cmao20 (talk) 21:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Neptuul (talk) 21:24, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support yeah, this one definitely. --A.Savin 23:10, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice thumbnail, unfortunately at full size blown highlights everywhere, in every single white part. Technically not well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Yes, a nice illustration of the Quarantine period, but otherwise per Basile Morin. --Cayambe (talk) 05:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support idea & compo clearly outweigh minor technical issues --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support wow.--Grtek (talk) 10:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Llez (talk) 11:56, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile Morin. --Karelj (talk) 12:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per above. --Ivar (talk) 15:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Strong compo, quality is improvable but still ok to me give the wow factor Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - Benh (talk) 20:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others -- Alsakan (talk) 02:04, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per Martin. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:45, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile. A VI in all likelihood, but we can only forgive the technical failings of drones so much. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support - I find this compelling. Support per Martin, et al. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Cologne Germany Cologne-Gay-Pride-2015 Parade-06.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:07:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Cologne, Germany: Drag queen "Tatjana Taft" at Cologne Pride Parade 2015
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Cccefalon - uploaded by Cccefalon - nominated by Persia -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- PERSIA♠ 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's definitely a nice and interesting portrait but it lacks some wow due to the poor lightning and DoF IMO. --T.Bednarz (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Distracting background. --Palauenc05 (talk) 05:57, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Lovely woman and colors --Wilfredor (talk) 12:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:03, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose A different subject for FP, but I don't like the composition so much, with the blurry wires and the out-of-focus camera in the background. Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per above --Andrei (talk) 14:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Garden warbler (Sylvia borin) at the UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 12:12:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Swabian Alb is a fascinating place to listen and, if lucky enough, watch birds such as the Eurasian skylark and others. This Garden Warbler was spied singing his beautiful spring anthem in an almost blooming Hawthorn Crataegus monogyna. UNESCO Biosphere Reserve Swabian Alb.

File:Dolina Chochołowska i tatrzańskie krokusy.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 10:13:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Tatra National Park
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created by Qvidemus - uploaded by Qvidemus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Yes, I like this. I can see others opposing because of the blurry foreground though. I don't mind the blown-out areas, it seems to me that in a very bright sunny photo the highlights kind of should be dazzlingly bright. Overall this is a dreamlike composition and it really works. Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice mood and some beautiful light effects. --Bob Collowan (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Apart fromt the tilt I see a nice scene with moderate wow effect, disturbing elements (like left crop, shadow on right) and some overexposed areas, overall not a FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco a poco. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:06, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Poco, but I also find it overly busy compositionally (maybe something focusing more on just the hut and the trees behind it) and harshly lit on the right. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose - It's nice, but it's so bright that I can't see details in any of the flowers on the ground, and I want to. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Resedafalter am Morgen.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 09:53:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Masked Lapwing - Newington.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2020 at 05:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Masked Lapwing
  • @Frank Schulenburg: Did You look at shooting time? It was early in the morning, when light conditions were soft and warm. --Ivar (talk) 10:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Pfersag-Wasserfall-20200308-RM-113024.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 21:37:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Pfersag waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info Waterfall in the district of Lichtenfels in Upper Franconia. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Weak Symbol support vote.svg Support. Very beautiful, but framing could be slightly better: crop out a bit on the left, give a bit more breathing room at the top. -- King of ♥ 22:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral Very high resolution but the light is not very attractive, and the composition not well balanced (crop at the top too tight) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:59, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Neutral per Basile. I wasn't sure about this and I nearly supported it because of the great resolution, but I don't like the light, it's too dull for me and doesn't stand out from other FP waterfalls. I also think the detail looks a little bit odd at full size, hard to explain it though. Cmao20 (talk) 17:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per above, and the amount of water is a bit limited, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Nice composition, and pleasant to look at at full size as well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:02, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Nové Mlýny Reservoir - Dam 2020 07.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 20:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dam of Nové Mlýny reservoir cascade
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Czech Republic
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The exact gallery for the Czech Republic doesn't yet exist. Not sure about the right procedure. --T.Bednarz (talk) 20:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Light is maybe not the best but I like the composition and the reflection. Wouldn't worry about specifying a gallery that doesn't exist yet, I've done that before. Cmao20 (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Dull light, ordinary image -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It's fine, but lacking in wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile -- Alsakan (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Basile, also rather cluttered compositionally. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment - I disagree with some of you, in that I think this is a good composition and the clouds really help. However, the sharpness isn't overwhelming and I'd love a little more light to shine on the dam. I think this is a good motif and a strong QI and near-FP photo, and it's worth trying to shoot this scene in different lights and weather conditions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:06, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Wildpferdebahn, Dülmener Wildpferde -- 2020 -- 7245.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dülmen pony in the Merfeld Bruch, Merfeld, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Order_:_Perissodactyla_(Odd-toed_ungulates)
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:19, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The composition is too jumbled for me, with the ponies all facing different directions and failing to present a cohesive message. -- King of ♥ 21:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Great quality but I agree with KoH, it looks a bit too much like a snapshot rather than a careful composition. Good QI though and probably great for illustrating the animal in Wikipedia etc. Cmao20 (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The light is not working for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Du hast da noch andere Aufnahmen in der Serie, die mir besser gefallen haben. Auf jeden Fall ein tolles Motiv. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
Ja, mir gefallen auch mehrere. Als Fotograf bin ich immer ein wenig voreingenommen, bin aber für jeden Tipp dankbar. ;-) --XRay talk 16:54, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
z.B. diese Aufnahme (kann allerdings sein, dass die Ausrichtung noch leicht korrigiert werden muss) —Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:34, 26 May 2020 (UTC) P.S. Oder auch dieses
Danke für die Tipps! Ich nehme sie gerne auf. --XRay talk 18:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /pandakekok9 11:15, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Dülmen, Stadtquartier Overbergplatz -- 2020 -- 7378 (bw).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 17:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

StadtQuartier Overbergplatz, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- XRay talk 17:14, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support perspective and special. Black / white gives me an extra dimension.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support per Famberhorst. Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I don't like the tilt, nor the crop at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Basile.--Peulle (talk) 07:33, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I couldn't find anything spectacular enough to get this image featured. Although the cloud gap with the rooftops is an interesting idea, it doesn't work for me overall. --T.Bednarz (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 16:37, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose the composition is not for me --Andrei (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Bergtocht van Guarda via Ardez en Ftan naar Scuol. 20-09-2019. (actm.) 27.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:45:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Answer: This ruin is no longer square. And is propped on the inside to keep the walls upright.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /pandakekok9 11:16, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Settlements#Switzerland

File:Rotes Rathaus, Berlin-Mitte, Fassadendetails Ostseite, 160213, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info A beautiful and well-lit image showing the detailing of the east facade of the Rotes Rathaus ('Red City Hall') in Berlin. created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Good rhythm and perfect lighting conditions. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support lighting. A small perspective correction would perfect the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:46, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Great lightning. --T.Bednarz (talk) 16:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support One of those "shouldn't work but it does" images. Daniel Case (talk) 05:37, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:32, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Really pleasant. Support per others except Daniel. :-) (Because I think the image should work and does. I know what he means, though - a lot of similar images wouldn't work because the composition or lighting wasn't as good.). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:SL Galle Fort asv2020-01 img24.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 15:05:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Galle Lighthouse

File:Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz 4 Stadttheater SW-Ansicht 18052020 9029.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 14:36:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Klagenfurt Innere Stadt Theaterplatz

File:Durmitor mountains, Montenegro.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2020 at 11:13:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Montenegro
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the composition and for once I think the shadows really add to it, they give the landscape depth somehow. Maybe the resolution is a bit low for FP though. Cmao20 (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Per above. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 16:35, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Llez (talk) 06:01, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram-voting-question.svg Question Could you add the location? -- -donald- (talk) 06:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
    done --Pudelek (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • weak Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose It is not "extraordinary enough to be FP" for me. It is highly subjective. I have seen a lots of mountainous landscapes in my life and this one is just too ordinary for me (although defínitelly nice and well done.) --Grtek (talk) 10:36, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Grtek Poco a poco (talk) 18:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose sort of per Grtek, but if the sharpness at full size hadn't struck me as underwhelming, I might have supported. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 17:41:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info All by -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:41, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Andrei (talk) 19:00, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The crops don't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:07, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • GA candidate.svg Weak support I take Charles' point but it looks so tasty I can't oppose, especially when you have presented it to us with such high resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment This is a nice, moody image and the crop is OK for me, too. However the flaw I see is that according to the image title, the scene is about the meat which isn't in focus while focus is set on the secondary elements like bread and the cheese. --Basotxerri (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

*Symbol support vote.svg Support The focus should have been on the lemons, then the roast would certainly have been a bit sharper. But it is still good.--Ermell (talk) 09:49, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I agree with T.Bednarz.--Ermell (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Well, according to Wikipedia, it shouldn't be served with lemon. All the bread etc. has nothing to do with the dish (Bistecca alla fiorentina), which is (as pointed out above) blurred. My view, as written previously Cmao20, is that high resolution should not be a major factor to be considered here. High resolution for panoramas, church interiors, macro insects etc. are essential so you can zoom in on the details. High resolution of an out-of-focus image surely doesn't add any value, does it? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose According to the title “Bistecca alla Fiorentina” the meat has to be in the center of the picture and not cheese and bread, which are not elements of a real Fiorentina dish.--Christof46 (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Tomascastelazo, I fixed the gallery and categories for you on this since you still seems to have some trouble with that. Do you want me to re-name and move this file to: "Three-course meal including Bistecca alla fiorentina (Bistec a la fiorentina).jpg"? I think that would make this nomination go better. --Cart (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Cart lol! I am useless in categorizing!!! I woul really appreciate you doing what you suggest!!! Keep safe and many thanks!!! Tomascastelazo (talk)
  • Ok, will fix. Stay safe, you too! --Cart (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Please Cart ping those who voted in favour of the previous description, not just the oppose voters. Let's have balance. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Charlesjsharp, I pinged those who had voiced some problem with the name or the context of it, otherwise I would've pinged opposer T.Bednarz in that post too. But as per your request I'm pinging everybody else now, I hope that is satisfactory for you. Pinging Cmao20, Andrei, Ermell. --Cart (talk) 21:54, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • simply changing the wording of the title makes me confused, what is the message of the picture?--Christof46 (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Though the enormous resolution, I am not a fan of this image. Considering it as a studio shot, I'd prefer not to have the cropped parts of the image, like the plate or the lemon slices, displayed in it at all. I'm also not impressed by the focus, since the main part of the dish is blurred as mentioned above. However, the piece of blue tapestry in the background looks also quite redundant to me. -- T.Bednarz (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- My criterium when looking at pictures of food is, does it make me hungry? This picture does. MartinD (talk) 06:20, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per T.Bednarz. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support "Bread and Cheese to be eaten after having a nice Bistecca". OK, then. And per MartinD. --Basotxerri (talk) 13:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per others. Also, the foods are not appealing enough for me. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:40, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The whole table to me looks too arranged for a real-life situation but too chaotic for a studio setup. It feels like ist was arranged hastily ("before you all dig in, let's push it all together so we can take a picture"), and that doesn't work. The crumpled corner of the red tapestry plays a big part in that. As it is now, the three slices of bread are the visual focal point of the image in terms of location, sharpness, lighting and exposure – but not in a way that would make them the star of the image, as all the other dished look much more interesting from a culinary POV. --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Just too cluttered compositionally. Less would definitely have been more here. Daniel Case (talk) 00:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:38, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 12:52, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Unfavorable crop.--Milseburg (talk) 10:07, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:View from Stolová hora to the north in the morning.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 16:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:20180819 ReuttenerSeilbahn vorZugspitze blau DSC00935 PtrQs.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:50:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Cableways
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created & uploaded by PtrQs - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support nice minimalistic composition. -- Tomer T (talk) 12:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Mimihitam (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose nothing spectacular here. Seven Pandas (talk) 14:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Good quality but I incline to agree with Seven Pandas. It's all a bit empty for me, there's not much tension in the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:48, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Subject in the shadow -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:17, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
    • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As this picture is generated from a raw file there is almost no limit to highlighting, but a) the gondola is coated by tinted glass, and b) artificially minimizing the constrast would mean to destroy the monochromatic blueish look by flashy red colors. --PtrQs (talk) 23:44, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I'm not saying you can save this nomination with a better post-processing, unfortunately, this gondola is very dark and thus uninteresting in my view (like this one) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --XRay talk 11:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support I like the overall effect very much. I don't think it's a problem that the gondola is darker than the background -- which is the real subject. — Rhododendrites talk |  04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support love the overall effect, gondola is not the object here, but the background with its lovely shades of blue. Renata3 (talk) 07:45, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose The odd position and lighting on the gondola may have been intentional, but it doesn't work fo me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nothing stands out to warrant FP. -- Alsakan (talk) 18:36, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose I could see this working as a horizontal ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support This composition just does not work on a computer screen. I really dislike it especially in full screen mode. But looking at the thumb on the nomination page made me realize: It needs to be printed large, hung on an otherwise empty white wall and looked at from a distance of at least 3 meters. Perfect for waiting rooms or for relaxing your eyes in the office. Stare at it and get lost in your thoughts. The gondola could be a plain black silhouette and it wouldn't matter. It is not what you're looking at, it's only there to provide an additional layer of depth – and because of that it is positioned exactly where it needs to be. --El Grafo (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support El Grafo's idea finally convinced me. --T.Bednarz (talk) 10:22, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support how to take great shot in the day of bad atmospheric conditions. --Grtek (talk) 10:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 22:00, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --Ermell (talk) 13:24, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment I was going to oppose, but I looked at the full-page image from about 1.5 and then 1.7 or so meters, and I see more depth in it from there. I think I'll abstain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Zitting cisticola feeding its chicks.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 12:22:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION
  • I am talking about halos Cart, not stripes. There is a band of lighter colour surrounding each stem about half the width of the stem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support. Meiræ 03:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg SupportRhododendrites talk |  04:21, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:41, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose @Budi Santoso Adji, Mimihitam, W.carter, Cmao20, King of Hearts, Basile Morin, Palauenc05, Ermell, Meiræ, Rhododendrites: I have already asked for the image quality to be improved, but the photographer is not active here. There is a weakness in third parties nominating images where they have no control over the image they are nominating. We all make mistakes, but nominators should try to verify the accuracy of the subject description before nomination. The birds in this image are incorrectly identified. There are two cisticolas in Indonesia. This is the golden-headed cisticola (Cisticola exilis). Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:49, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    @Charlesjsharp thank you for pointing this out. Shall I change the name of the file then? Mimihitam (talk) 23:13, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
    I would not be happy if someone changed the file name of any of my images. This is for the photographer only who may challenge my id if they wisħ. This is an obvious error and my id in this instance Basile Morin has been validated by one of Asia's top bird experts after I first checked in one of his field guides, but many identifications of LBJs (Little Brown Jobs) are challenging and third parties should in general not correct identifications. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:04, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • These two species are very similar. For me the wow is about the situation (not the kind of spectacle you see every day). However, it's important yes that the animals are well identified. It might be fixable. Personally, I can't distinguish both (perhaps a species feeding another one ? 🐥😉) -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:38, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
  • @Charlesjsharp: the guidelines allow you to request the renaming of a file. Commons:File renaming#Which files should be renamed? Reason 3: To correct obvious errors in filenames, including misspelled proper nouns, incorrect dates, and misidentified objects or organisms. If you're absolutely sure the species is different, then just rename the file, what's the problem? If you're not sure, then maybe the photographer was right, and all is fine for us. As you can see yesterday I updated the description based on this discussion. I think this way the readers can judge and evaluate fairly what they're looking at. Finding the exact species is sometimes difficult, even for experts. A FP of mine won the 1st prize of WLS France although the species has always been unsure (I contacted high experts for precise identification, but they could not be 100% affirmative). Thus I think a margin of uncertainty is tolerated here. Most of us are photographers, not biologists. As I said above, this image is striking because three juvenile birds are fed by a parent, a rare thing in picture. And to be honest, I don't really care about the exact species, I attach much more importance to the behavior. Zitting cisticola and Cisticola exilis on Google are so similar, frankly it is not a drama. Hope this answers your question. -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:25, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
@Charlesjsharp: I must support Basile Morin's statement. Being a historian of literature, I don't know much about ornithology, hence, I must trust the uploader and/or the nominator. If you can attribute the birds more exactly, I would encourage you to change the file name and the description accordingly. The alternative would be that only ornithologists could evaluate such pictures. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support, and please change the name and description accordingly with an appropriate edit summary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Fin garden ceiling2.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 11:45:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

a part of qajar vault in fin garden, kashan, iran

File:Juvenile robin (12336).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 01:37:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Portrait of a fledgling American robin

File:Home made sour dough bread.jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2020 at 00:28:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

SHORT DESCRIPTION

File:Dandelion Gosling (49922177848).jpg[edit]

Voting period ends on 31 May 2020 at 17:47:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A Canada gosling eating a dandelion.
  • Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Branta
  • Pictogram voting info.svg Info created and uploaded by K6ka - nominated by 1989 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- 1989 (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Underexposed. -- King of ♥ 19:01, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose That could be sorted, but it's not very sharp and poor light. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:03, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Nice composition, and very cute, but at least half a stop underexposed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment As the photographer, I have the raw file in case anyone wants to make adjustments to the photo (not required but you're welcome to it). They're available on the Internet Archive. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:28, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose To me, it doesn't need all the extra space; the unsharp areas of the background are somewhat distracting. However, cropping in closer might put the picture under the FP minimum. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support -- While I see the technical imperfections, it has the wow-factor for me. MartinD (talk) 06:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
  • BA candidate.svg Weak oppose Cute but significantly underexposed -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per others though it's a pleasure to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Nosal i widok na Tatry.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 May 2020 at 07:52:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View from the top of Nosal, Bystra Valley and the Tatras

File:Tiefenstürmig Feuersalamander -20200314-RM-165910.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 May 2020 at 15:00:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Fire salamander on its way to spawn in a stream in Franconian Switzerland
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Constructive criticism is always welcome--Ermell (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Fascinating creature but I'm not sure of the wisdom of featuring an image where most of the subject is out of focus. I get what you were trying to do, but I don't think it works for me Cmao20 (talk) 21:24, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment The part of the animal that is under water cannot be sharp. Waterfall pictures are also nominated here although everything is out of focus.--Ermell (talk) 22:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support The point here is that salamanders are amphibians, i.e. animals who can only reproduce in waters. In my opinion, illuminating that specific aspect and showing the salamander in its habitat outweights the constant desire here on FPC candidates for all parts of an animal being "in focus". High educational value, therefore I support this nomination. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose An interesting idea, using very low speed, but it leaves nothing in focus. The blurred water doesn't work for me either. Artifical light/flash to allow faster shutter speed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol support vote.svg Support Frank put it very well. --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles.--Peulle (talk) 08:40, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose Per Cmao20 Poco a poco (talk) 10:09, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per other opposers. --Cayambe (talk) 06:44, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Cmao20. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:30, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /pandakekok9 11:18, 31 May 2020 (UTC)