User talk:clpo13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lupin on Hurricane Ridge, August 2012.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lupin on Hurricane Ridge, August 2012.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Clpo13, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Majora/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC:


 webchat on You can also add {{user license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --Majora (talk) 21:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

@T Cells, Majora: Thank you! I hope getting promoted a few minutes ahead of schedule won't be an issue. I'll start checking out files for review and ask around if I have any trouble. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm not opposing you as a license reviewer, but I do have a question. Will you check files like XXXTentacionFebruary2018 (cropped).png more thoroughly in the future? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 03:44, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
@Alexis Jazz: certainly. My comment there was based on a very brief look at the cropped photo, including reverse image searching it on Google Images and TinEye, neither of which showed any results indicating it came from anywhere other than Wikipedia or Flickr. The original photo was deleted with the edit summary Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing, and I wasn't sure if that meant it was a case of Flickr washing or something else, which is why I asked the deleting administrator to comment on it. clpo13(talk) 15:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
In addition to the above: PD-mark is not a license, but you knew that as you answered a question about it in your license reviewer request, so I'm a bit puzzled by this DR. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:45, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Replied on DR page. clpo13(talk) 15:51, 22 June 2018 (UTC)


--Don (talk) 00:11, 23 June 2018 (UTC)