User talk:DALIBRI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, DALIBRI!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Bahasa Banjar | বাংলা | Català | Нохчийн | Čeština | Cymraeg | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Kurdî | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | မြန်မာဘာသာ | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Ирон | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Sicilianu | Scots | සිංහල | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Basa Sunda | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Tagalog | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask Pump|Village Pump]] or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks

<div style="border-bottom:1px solid #abd5f5; padding:0.4em 1em boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.

  • All your uploads are stored in your personalTemplate:PageMaker Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

SieBot 20:50, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Contents

Image Tagging Image:Sir_Thomas_Lawrence_-_J_P_Kemble_als_Coriolanus_1798.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Sir_Thomas_Lawrence_-_J_P_Kemble_als_Coriolanus_1798.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 11:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, DALIBRI!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:44, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Capagnoli[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, der Stich der vermeintlich Campagnoli zeigen soll, ist als Verdeutlichung der Haltung des Violinisten für Schüler in Campagnolis école du violon op.21 zu finden. Ich werde dies präzisieren es sei den du hättest andere Quellen. Gruß -- Frinck51 (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Das ging aber schnell, ich wollte dir gerade den Link zum dem Artikel mit Kupferstich melden, der meiner Meinung nach eher Campagnoli darstellt. Ich habe mehrere alte Violinmethoden, in allen ist auf den ersten Seiten ein Geiger abgebildet, um die zeitgemäße Haltung des Geigers zu verdeutlichen. Gruß -- Frinck51 (talk) 16:27, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Schloss Haslangkreit - Philipp Apian.jpg[edit]

Könntest Du die "neue Version" eventuell unter einem neuen Namen hochladen? Denn es handelt sich ja um eine ganz andere Zeichnung. Danke. -- RE RILLKE Questions? 22:35, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Friedrich-August-II-König-Sachsen.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Friedrich-August-II-König-Sachsen.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

JuTa (talk) 20:40, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:Wikiuser by country[edit]

I see that you have created this category and several subcategories.

Please note that by policy, Commons categories are plural, so this should be:

and all of the subcats should also be changed. Also note that country names are capitalized -- it should be "Mexico", not "mexico".      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:37, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 2a300d6c8b3738a9d3e086fe1f1bace8[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Trijnsteltalk 22:21, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Riba28-maps (talk) 14:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Prinzregent Luitpold - Gemälde um 1900.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 18:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Flominator/Flinfo/Preview has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Riba28-maps (talk) 05:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Flickr-Dateien[edit]

Hallo!

Kürzlichst hast du Bilder von Flickr nach Commons übertragen, die zwar dort unter eine CC-by-NC-Lizenz stehen, aber dennoch gemeinfrei sind, aufgrund der Tatsache, dass sie von einem US-Soldaten aufgenommen wurden (Beispiel). Das ist auch völlig OK und höchst willkomen. Eine wichtige Bitte in diesem Zusammenhang: Könntest du in Zukunft bei derartigen Uploads unter der applizierten PD-Lizenz den folgenden Baustein einfügen: {{Licensereview}}. Dieser Baustein "provoziert" sozusagen die Aufmerksamkeit eines z.B. Administrators, der diese Lizenz anschließend bestätigen kann. Dann ist alles wasserdicht - und sollte das Bild irgendwann von flickr verschwinden, dann kann keiner die Lizenzierung anzweifeln. Ich danke dir im voraus! Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 10:15, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Mater Dolorosa - Pyrbaum 0016.jpg[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, dieses Kreuz dürfte sich wohl im Kirchengebäude befinden, nicht wahr? Dort gilt in Deutschland aber keine Panoramafreiheit. Weißt du wer der Künstler/Bildhauer ist? --Túrelio (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Elementary schools in Munich[edit]

Hi,
wenn du schon Kategorien wie die o.g. anlegst, dann sortiere bitte auch das dort ein, was dort reingehört (und nicht nur ein paar, bei denen der Name die Zugehörigkeit impliziert). So hast du bloß eine (in diesem Fall zu Category:Grund- und Hauptschule in Munich) vollständig redundante, aber unvollständige Kategorie geschaffen.--Nothere (talk) 16:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 20:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Villages in Landkreis …[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, was hast Du denn gedacht, was in Deine Villages-Kategorien reinkommen soll? Wenn die Kat. für Dörfer ist, dann solten die Orte, die keine Dörfer sind (Weiler, Einöden) nach meiner Ansicht nicht rein. Falls alle Orte rein sollen, ist der Kategoriename falsch. Man könnte sich, zumindest für Bayern, an der Liste der Orte in den Landkreisen (z. B. Liste der Orte im Landkreis Bad Tölz-Wolfratshausen) orientieren. Grüße, --Gras-Ober (talk) 05:30, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Gras-Ober, Ziel ist eine Kategorie für "Orte", in der alles aufgenommen werden kann. Die stehen heute ein wenig kreuz und quer in der Landschaft. Die englische Namensgebung (Category:Villages in ...) für die Kategorie ist vielleicht nicht optimal. Ich beziehe mich damit aber auf die Einträge en:Weiler ("Weiler (German for village or hamlet) may refer to ...") und en:Category:Hamlets, die unter anderem en:Category:Villages in Germany und en:Category:Villages in Poland aufführt. Vielleicht hast Du da ja eine Idee? Viele Grüße / Servus / Pfiat de --DALIBRI (talk) 11:05, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
Also, bei der Übersetzung von Villages ins Deutsche kann es eigentlich, im Unterschied zu anderen Begriffen, wenig Unklarheit geben. Die Frage ist dann nur, was alles ein Dorf ist. Nach meiner Kenntnis ist das eine geschlossene Ortschaft mit mehr als fünf bis zehn Wohngebäuden. Einzelhöfe sind auf keinen Fall Dörfer, ebenso Städte, welche auch in der Kategorie Villages gelandet sind. Von daher ist der Name mehr als unglücklich gewählt, ebenso wie das Anlegen eines ganzen Kategorieastes für Bayern. Dann ist die Frage, ob die Orte in einer Landkreiskat. untergebracht werden sollen oder in der Gemeinde, zu der sie gehören. Meiner Ansicht nach, sind sie in der Gemeinde besser aufgehoben. Es gibt auch schon eine Reihe Gemeinden, bei denen das so gemacht wurde. Auch gibt es Landkreise, z. B. Fürstenfeldbruck, wo es eine Kat. (Category:Populated places in Landkreis Fürstenfeldbruck) mit den Orten schon gibt, dort ist die Villages-Kat. praktisch ein identisches Doppel. Was die Category:Hamlets angeht, scheint sie zumindest für solche Objekte, wie du sie in den Villages-Kategorien eingeordnet hast, vorgesehen zu sein: a type of territorial subdivision of a municipality wenn ich mal die französische Unterkat nehme. Wobei hier möglicherweise auch nur ein bestimmter Typ von Ortschaft gemeint ist. Auch für Italien passt es wohl. In Polen kenn' ich mich nicht so aus. Den nach meiner Ansicht richtigen Namen (und Kategorienbeschreibung) scheint Spanien zu haben. Ich würde also empfehlen, mich daran zu orientieren. Villages vergrößert die begriffliche Unklarheit beträchtlich und sollte meiner Ansicht nach so nicht bleiben. Eigentlich finde ich, die Orte könnten als eine Unterkat. der Gemeinde stehenbleiben und bräuchten gar nicht aus einer anderen Richtung (Hamlets/Villages/Populated Places/Localities/oder was auch immer of Germany angesteuert werden können, weil es einfach zu unterschiedliche Dinge sind. Sie bräuchten also keine zweite Oberkat. Dann könnte der ganze Ast wieder weg. Aber das wird wahrscheinlich unrealistisch sein. Mehr kann ich dazu nicht sagen. Grüße, --Gras-Ober (talk) 09:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Mater Dolorosa - Pyrbaum 0016.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mater Dolorosa - Pyrbaum 0016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)


Gnadenkapelle Eichlberg[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, für die Ex-Voto-Bilder aus der Gnadenkapelle, wie beispielsweise File:Gnadenkapelle Eichlberg 009.JPG, würde sich schon eine eigene Kategorie lohnen. Siehe Category:Ex voto in Germany. Grüße, -- Ies (talk) 10:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:46, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt - Wissing 047.JPG[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, ich gehe davon aus, dass sich diese Tafeln in der Kirche befinden, richtig? Wer ist der Künstler und wann wurden sie geschaffen? --Túrelio (talk) 17:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Mariä Himmelfahrt - Wissing 023.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mariä Himmelfahrt - Wissing 023.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 17:06, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Medaille auf den Frieden von Breslau 1743.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Medaille auf den Frieden von Breslau 1743.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 16:27, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]

Barnstar of Diligence Hires.png Der Fleißorden
Für die vielen tollen Nürnberger Stadtteilansichten Aarp65 (talk) 12:10, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Benennung von Gemeindeteilen[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI,

Du würdest mir viel Arbeit ersparen, wenn Du Dich – zumindest bei meinen Bearbeitungen – an die offiziellen Bezeichnungen der Gemeindeteile halten würdest, die in der Liste der Orte des jeweiligen Landkreises nachzulesen sind. Danke. --I. Berger (talk) 20:19, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Wenn ich mich hier kurz einmischen darf: Es ist halt sehr ungünstig, eine Kategorie „Äpfel“ (Dörfer) anzulegen und oben reinzuschreiben, dass da Äpfel und Birnen (Städte, Dörfer, Weiler, Einöden) rein sollen. Ich kann mir nicht vorstellen, dass es dafür eine allgemeine Akzeptanz geben kann. Deswegen mein Vorschlag: „Villages“ in „Cities and villages“ umbenennen und tatsächlich nur Städte und Dörfer einsortieren. Dann gibt es auch Sinn, diese Kategorie in den Landkreisen einzuhängen. Für die sehr kleinen und alle anderen Orte in den Gemeinden haben wir ja schon eigene Kategorien mit unterschiedlicher Bezeichnung (Districts (was aber wohl nicht mit Ort übersetzt wird, sondern mit Gemarkung bzw. Stadtteil), Localities, eventuell noch andere), die den jeweiligen Gemeindekategorien untergeordnet sind. Grüße, --Gras-Ober (talk) 17:59, 3 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich würde das sogar noch enger sehen. Sowohl in der WP als auch hier gilt ja der Grundsatz "Redundanzen vermeiden". Diese Kategorie ist m. E. aber ein gutes Beispiel für das mehrfache Vorhandensein derselben Information auf derselben Ebene. Ich habe das mal an dem Landkreis Weilheim-Schongau nachgeprüft und die nicht unter "Villages" gehörenden Weiler und Einöden herausgenommen. Übrig bleiben dieselben Daten, die sich ebenfalls in der Kategorie Landkreis Weilheim-Schongau befinden und drei Dörfer, die aber als Unterkategorie ihrer Gemeinde bereits dort aufgeführt sind. --I. Berger (talk) 22:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

St. Stephanus (Wülfertshausen an der Saale)[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, gerade heute bin ich wieder über die falsche Schreibweise der Kapelle gestolpert und hab mir vorgenommen mich gelegentlich wieder mal in die Änderung von Kategorienamen einzulesen. Vielen Dank dass Du Dich darum gekümmert hast. Leider hat sich ein kleiner Fehler eigeschlichen, den ich als ehemaliger Wülfershäuser natürlich gleich bemerkt habe .... Wülfershausen, nicht Wülfertshausen. Gruß vom Bodensee --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 15:36, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank an den Experten aus der Rhön, Category:St. Stephanus (Wülfershausen an der Saale) ist schon gleich umgezogen. Viele Grüße aus der Oberpfalz --DALIBRI (talk) 15:51, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Klasse, Danke! Und der Oberpfalz bin ich auch näher als man annehmen würde ;-) --Dietrich Krieger (talk) 16:58, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

194.25.143.58 16:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

194.25.143.58 19:04, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burg Heimhof - Oberpfalz 004.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

194.25.143.58 18:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Sielstraße Nürnberg 006.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sielstraße Nürnberg 006.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Weissbier (talk) 11:01, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Sielstraße Nürnberg 007.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sielstraße Nürnberg 007.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Weissbier (talk) 11:03, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Photoatelier Bierl Neumarkt Frau 1900 Avert.JPG[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Photoatelier Bierl Neumarkt Frau 1900 Avert.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:19, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Motion detectors[edit]

Why did you add a wrong category on my image? It shows the motion detector, if you look at the lower corner. Yuboktying (talk) 16:13, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello Yuboktying, dont be angry. I categorized, what there is to see big in the center of this image. You are categorizing, what is small on the margin of this image. Is my opinion so wrong? Have a fine week. DALIBRI (talk) 18:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Haribo Gummibären.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Haribo Gummibären.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Haribo Lakritz-Schnecken.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Haribo Lakritz-Schnecken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 17:45, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Bild zugeschnitten[edit]

Hallo Dalibri, ich habe eines deiner Bilder zugeschnitten und neu hochgeladen. Bitte schau mal, ob das so passt (v.a. wegen der Lizenz). Link. Viele Grüße, Andol (talk) 17:46, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Andol, kein Problem, viele Grüße und einen guten Rutsch wünscht Dir --DALIBRI (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Städte als Dörfer kategorisiert[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, du hast eben einige Städte in die Kategorien von Dörfern (Villages) eingeordnet, z. B. de:Rottweil und de:Schramberg. Bist du sicher, dass du weißt was du tust? Der Kategoriebeschreibung in Category:Villages in Baden-Württemberg, die auch Städte als Dörfer sieht, würde ich im übrigen widersprechen, siehe [1]. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Nun habe ich zunächst ein paar Kategoriebeschreibungen an den Namen angepasst. Wenn du gemäß deiner Beschreibung eine Kategorie für "Städte, Märkte, Gemeinden, Ortschaften, Orte, Ortsteile" haben möchtest, sollte vielleicht über eine Verschiebung auf einen passenderen Namen nachgedacht werden. --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:52, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Hallo? Gedenkst du noch irgendiwe die Verantwortung für dein Aktion zu übernehmen? Andernfalls wäre es wohl am einfachsten, die Dorf-Kategorien pauschal per Catscan zu entfernen, damit sie irgendwann wieder überlegt eingefügt werden können. --Sitacuisses (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Karlskirche - Wien 063.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Karlskirche - Wien 063.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Karlskirche - Wien 063.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Masur (talk) 10:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Columns and pillars[edit]

I know that in english "column" and "pillar" are quasi synonyms, but you have to see the difference between the variety of supports in architecture ; in french, for example, there is a distinction between "cologne" and "pilier" (or even "pile" for the bridges. Colonne / Column : support comprising a vertical shaft, polygonal or circular, with a base and a capital Pilier / Pillar: any support, except wall and column. Support: anything that supports a load: the main supports are the column, the pillar and the wall. If you want suppress the category "pillar", please find an other word for categorize what is not strictly a column (a shaftn with base and capital). --Jean Housen 13:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Warum entfernst du die Hinweise auf die Denkmalnummer[edit]

Hallo DALIBRI, warum entfernst du die Hinweise auf die Denkmalnummer (z.B. hier). Die Objekte sind doch zweifellos Baudenkmäler. Was stört dich also? Gruß --Rufus46 (talk) 06:26, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Rufus, Du hast dankenswerter Weise die Bilder dieses Baudenkmals auch gleich mit einer Kategorie versehen. Ich habe nur den Link von den einzelnen Bildern auf die Kategorie hochgezogen. Eine doppelte Kategorisierung sollte nicht nötig sein. Ich hoffe, ich habe Dich nicht geärgert. Viele Grüße --DALIBRI (talk) 08:17, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
Die Vorlage Baudenkmal Bayern soll primär die Nutzer über die Denkmalnummer informieren, dass sie zusätzlich die Datei auch unter Cultural heritage monuments in Bavaria with known IDs kategorisiert, ist sekundär und dem Nutzer i.a. egal. Kategorien interessieren normale Nutzer kaum, und für die machen wir das ja alles. Kurz gesagt: Die Information Denkmalnummer geht verloren, wenn man die Vorlage entfernt, diese sollte bei jeder Dateibeschreibung bleiben. Ich setze das demnächst zurück. Grüße --Rufus46 (talk) 14:53, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Copyright status: File:Bericht des 748. US-amerikanischen Panzerbattailons vom April bis Mai 1945.pdf[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bericht des 748. US-amerikanischen Panzerbattailons vom April bis Mai 1945.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Maria-Hilf-Kirche Wien 009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maria-Hilf-Kirche Wien 009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zello (talk) 23:43, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

To bring this section to date, the file was deleted by one of the admins, but when contacted s/he had no objections to its restoration. I feel it was removed in error and have restored it. We have less than one page of pictures of candle racks, this one shows the storage drawer which none of the others do, it's identified precisely to location and the image is big. It could be clearer, but it's certainly usable. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Kloster_St_Josef_Neumarkt_-_Innenraum_18.jpg & Kloster_St_Josef_Neumarkt_-_Innenraum_19.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, en regardant les photos récentes sur Wikipédia, j'ai vu deux de vos photos qui pouvaient être assemblées. Voici le résultat, j'espère qu'il vous conviendra. Cordialement. François de Dijon (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Hallo, möchte nach den jüngsten Bilder auf Wikipedia, sah ich zwei Ihrer Fotos, die zusammengebaut werden können. Das Ergebnis, wie ich hoffe, dass Sie zustimmen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen. François de Dijon (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC) (Maschinelle Übersetzung)

Bonjour François, tres bon, tres belle, merci. --DALIBRI (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Hallo, danke. François de Dijon (talk) 11:32, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Kloster St Josef Neumarkt - Innenraum 18 & 19.jpg

FYI[edit]

Hi, bei deinem Kategorisieren von Bildern aus Dresden-Friedrichstadt ist etwas schiefgelaufen, siehe https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category_talk:Friedrichstadt. Vielleicht kannst du das reparieren. Danke im Voraus, --Vanellus (talk) 10:34, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Briefmarke Österreich 2 Schilling 1970 - Der Vogelhändler.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Briefmarke Österreich 2 Schilling 1970 - Der Vogelhändler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 10:53, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Pod hradem[edit]

Do not remove files from the main category (i.e. images are espacially in the category of what you can see on it), please. As you are doing in the case of "Pod hradem" pond.--Juandev (talk) 20:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Hello Juandev, perhaps it would be better, to create the categories first, instead of using not existing categories. We both have had less work. Best wishes --DALIBRI (talk) 10:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, basically moving something from non existent cat and thinking that you tidy up is an evil. As Commons is still vary crude, I prefer to upload firest and than create cats.--Juandev (talk) 18:08, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Neumarkt Oberpfalz - Stadtansicht von Nordosten - Gemälde.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Neumarkt Oberpfalz - Stadtansicht von Nordosten - Gemälde.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2003:C5:8BD1:1C00:C171:6C22:C990:639E 14:30, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz - Stadt-Ansicht 1796.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Neumarkt in der Oberpfalz - Stadt-Ansicht 1796.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Български | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2003:C5:8BD1:1C00:C171:6C22:C990:639E 14:36, 13 October 2017 (UTC)