User talk:MarkusFelix

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20140311 Cologne ESC Germany 0205-edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 14:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20140405 Dortmund MPS Concert Party 0202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 20:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150305 Hannover ESC Unser Song Fuer Oesterreich Fahrenhaidt 0005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150703 Muelheim CastleRock Visions of Atlantis 0066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI -- Spurzem 18:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0001.jpg[edit]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0003.jpg[edit]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 10:27, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0008.jpg[edit]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0011.jpg[edit]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0014.jpg[edit]

File:20150627 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival Darjeeling 0014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Zenwort (talk) 10:28, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Uploads...[edit]

Hallo MarkusFelix, erst einmal danke für deine Uplaods. Allerdings erzeugen sie kleinere Probleme auf Grund des | im author-Parameter. Könntest du diesen bitte z. b. durch {{!}} oder einen Schrägstrich o. ä. ersetzen? Vielen Dank, --Arnd (talk) 10:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, kann ich natürlich machen, kein Problem - gibt es dafür ein Tool mit dem ich das für mehrere Bilder gleichzeitig tun kann oder muss ich das von Hand machen? --MarkusFelix (talk) 10:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mir würde es reichen, wenn du es für zukünftige Uploads berücksichtigst. Ich kümmere mich um die schon hochgeladenen Bilder. Ist das so ok? Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 10:27, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ja natürlich ist das so in Ordnung. Ich habe es in meinen Template auch geändert, sollte also zukünftig keine Probleme mehr machen --MarkusFelix (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, habe es geändert. Jedoch noch zwei Anmerkungen: (1) das Datum muss statt 20160212 2016-02-12 sei. Außerdem ist das einzelne Anführungszeichen (') am Anfang und Ende de Beschreibung nicht nötig. --Arnd (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Geil![edit]

Danke für die Uploads von Unser Lied für Stockholm! Da will ich mich mal belesen wer diese Jamie-Lee ist, die nach Stockholm fährt und was sehen meine wunden Augen da? Ein erstklassiges Bild vom Vorausscheid, der seit ner Stunde vorbei ist (I know, war die Probe, aber egal). Fetzt, so macht das Spaß! --Indeedous (talk) 22:43, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dankschön fürs Kompliment, an den Bildern der Generalprobe und der Siegesverkündung sitze ich gerade. Die Liveshow war für Fotografen, außer zweien von Getty Images, Taboo - macht aber nichts die Generalprobe war, wie der Name schon sagt, identisch in allen belangen. MarkusFelix (talk) 23:02, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TurboNegro --> Turbonegro[edit]

Hallo MarkusFelix,

zur Info: Deine zuletzt hochgeladenen Bildern hast du alle in die nicht vorhandene Kategorie "TurboNegro" einsortiert, anstelle der korrekten Category:Turbonegro. Falls da noch mehr kommen: Könntest du das bitte gleich beim Upload korrigieren? Danke! --Tkarcher (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, mist hatte eigentlich gedacht danach geschaut zu haben, aber nein das das waren soweit alle von der Band - bei den nächsten schaue ich explizit nach der genauen Schreibweise; danke für den Hinweis. MarkusFelix (talk) 09:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kein Problem - für die bisherigen ist's jetzt schon korrigiert. Danke für die tollen Bilder! --Tkarcher (talk) 09:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung von Bildern[edit]

Hallo MarkusFelix, bitte achte auf die Kategorisierung Deiner Bilder, Beispiel File:20151226 Bochum Eisheilige Nacht Fiddler's Green 0072.jpg hattest Du folgendermaßen kategorisiert: Category:Bochum, Category:RuhrCongress, Category: Eisheilige Nacht 2015, Category:Eisheilige Nächte, Category:Fiddler’s Green (band). Sinnvoll sind hierbei nur die beiden spezifischsten Kategorien Category: Eisheilige Nacht 2015 und Category:Fiddler’s Green (band), die anderen sind Oberkategorien der beiden. Ich ändere das gerade für die Bilder, die ich unterhalb von Category:Bochum finde. Ansonsten Danke für die guten Bilder und beste Grüße, --Joschi71 (talk) 09:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorisierung[edit]

Was going to create a category for your photo set from 2015 Düsseldorf Open Source Festival but got stuck over "Ejin Eypro"; is it a new name adopted by Eypro, a rap group from Ratingen founded in 2007 by Patrick Hurtienne, aka Djin? --Taterian (talk) 02:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150821 Essen Turock Open Air The Idiots 0061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160607 Berlin Volbeat Volbeat 0046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160607 Berlin Volbeat Volbeat 0393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, it has FP potential to me but the right crop should be improved (those 2 guys) --Poco a poco 11:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160607 Berlin Volbeat Volbeat 0060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:18, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160607 Berlin Volbeat Volbeat 0017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160607 Berlin Volbeat Volbeat 0177.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:38, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20150425 Oberhausen Impericon Festival - Andreas Dörner of Caliban 0077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:42, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Featured Picture Promotion[edit]

Hello! Since the BOT sends the message to the nominator and not the creator, I'm pleased to pass on that your photo File:20150425 Oberhausen Impericon Festival - Andreas Dörner of Caliban 0077.jpg has now been promoted to Featured Picture. Congratulation! Nice work! --cart-Talk 11:39, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160723 Köln RheinRiot Arch Enemy 0521.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Poco a poco 09:42, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161022 Bochum Symphonies of Paint Mono Inc 0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Great shot. --Frank Schulenburg 01:38, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160805 Wacken Wacken Open Air Beyond the Black 0135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Yann 16:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20161022 Bochum Symphonies of Pain Mono Inc 0023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Weak  Support Good quality (for a concert with difficult light). --XRay 06:05, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deine Lizenz[edit]

Hallo MarkusFelix, am Beispiel dieses Bildes ist mir aufgefallen, dass der Text im Bildbeschreibungsfeld "Permission" nicht übereinstimmt mit den Lizenzbausteinen. Oben schreibst Du "GFDL and Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-3.0 and older", unten ist lediglich der "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported"-Baustein drin. Ist das Absicht? Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 09:18, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das stammt wohl noch aus der Zeit als der Festivalsommer Baustein in der Evolution war und ich für das Permission-Feld den Text von anderen, zu der Zeit bestehenden Bilder, genutzt habe. Inzwischen ist das ganze da zu CC-BY-SA-4.0 migriert sodass ich den Bereich bei zukünftigen Uploads anpassen werde. Danke fürs Aufmerksam machen. MarkusFelix (talk) 09:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images by PushingPixels[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to ask what this category is for and whether it needs to be created. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, thats a category that includes all images taken by me for the project "Festivalsommer" of the German Wikipedia, I do use it for tools like GLAMorgan to gather statistics about file usage and reach. Those stats are really important to a lot of organisers of the events we want to apply for press accreditations. MarkusFelix (talk) 13:46, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see. That makes sense. I was just curious about a non-existent category with almost 14,000 Files! Will you create the category or just leave it redlinked? Green Giant (talk) 13:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've just created the category and two subs, thank you for reminding me MarkusFelix (talk) 14:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160708 Ballenstedt RockHarz Saltatio Mortis 0047 Saltatio Mortis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 16:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160708 Ballenstedt RockHarz Saltatio Mortis 0014 Saltatio Mortis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Granada 16:45, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170819 Dinkelsbühl Summer Breeze Kitty in a Casket 0051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reusing einer Bilddatei[edit]

Hallo MarkusFelix, ich beabsichtige, die Bilddatei File:20170706 Ballenstedt RockHarz Infected Rain 0074 Infected Rain.jpg|thumb|20170706 Ballenstedt RockHarz Infected Rain 0074 Infected Rain für einen Artikel über Lena Scissorhands zu verwenden. Da ich mich mit den einschlägigen Lizenzen nicht so wirklich gut auskenne, bitte ich um kurze Bestätigung, dass die entsprechende Verwendung aus Deiner Sicht in Ordnung ist. Vielen Dank! --Achilles CK (talk) 13:34, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, das Bild kannst du sehr gerne dafür verwenden - genau dafür liegen in im Mediapool :) --MarkusFelix (talk) 07:40, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180804 Wacken Wacken Open Air Skindred 0189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180804 Wacken Wacken Open Air Skindred 0097.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 06:28, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20190802 Wacken Wacken-Open-Air Jinjer 0306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20160707 Ballenstedt RockHarz ASP 0122 ASP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20170701 Mülheim CastleRock Erdling 0109 Erdling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Isn't it possible to add the band name? --Poco a poco 10:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: The band name is 'Erdling' as written. -- Achim Raschka 04:22, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Sorry, didn't get it straight, QI --Poco a poco 13:14, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 20180804 Wacken Wacken Open Air Skindred 0025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wi fi

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MarkusFelix&oldid=805035979"