User talk:Resident Mario

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Other accounts

Hawaii hotspot.jpg

Welcome to my talk page. While I will see comments here for a faster response see my en-wiki talk page.

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Resident Mario!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

TUSC token a575246cd4590498a59012e8d75e34cd[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:PacMan Ghosts.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:PacMan Ghosts.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Kungfuman (talk) 16:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Worst Painter[edit]

Could you please explain this?! Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@Marcus Cyron: Can you? Resident Mario (talk) 04:02, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Again: why do you have removed this correct Category? Simple question. There must be a cause and I would like to know this cause. If there's no cause, it was vandalism. Marcus Cyron (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
I am really tempted to be snide in the hopes that you'd exact poor judgement becoming of your overly enthusiastic questioning and block me. But, no, this appears to be a thing. I suggest you email them to ask what is with their choice of name. Resident Mario (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
Ah yes @Marcus Cyron: Resident Mario (talk) 18:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
I know, why he has this Name. This artist also have an article at de:Wikipedia. It is a Notname. There are thousands of them. This is one of ca. 1500 Notnames the famous Archaeologist and researcher of ancient vases, John D. Beazley, has given to unknown artists. There is a wide spread system of different names. And he gave this name to the in his opinion worst artist in this field. But at the end it is only a help to classify unknown artists. It is frustrating, when people come and change things they don't understand. Real frustrating. Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Picture removed from article[edit]

The mountain comparison SVG was removed from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_mountains_in_the_Solar_System because it is mis-leading. The height of Mauna Kea should be listed (like as in the table) based on base to peak, not sea-level to peak. Please fix. It will continue to be removed until then if attempted to be re-added.

66.190.94.33 04:19, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Well...you've been reverted...so I guess the status quo continues. Resident Mario (talk) 19:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
The individual who reverted it. WoflmanSF, did say that it should be improved but still adds value, so you should probably still make the adjustments if you have the time available. Quote: "it only shows base-to-sea-level for Everest; it would be nice to have it improved, but I think most readers can figure out what is going on, and it still adds value to the article". He also added notes in the captions to that effect in subsequent updates. 66.190.94.33 23:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
@66.190.94.33: I looked into it again and I don't see the issue here, Kea is 4,205 m in terms of elevation above sea level, and Everest is 8,848 m. Resident Mario (talk) 02:16, 30 June 2015 (UTC)