User talk:Cayambe/Archive 2010

ARCHIVE 2010

Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel irc:wikimedia-commons #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing. | style="padding:0 0.5em;" | | style="width:55%; vertical-align:top; border:1px solid #abd5f5; background-color:#f1f5fc;" |

Goodies, tips and tricks

• Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
• All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery
• Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
• Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
• To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg
• If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper

Made a mistake?

• Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}}
• For more information read the full deletion guidelines.

Quality Image Promotion

File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good -- George Chernilevsky 18:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC) very good indeed - symmetry, reflections --Ikiwaner 19:26, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Vauban Luxembourg parc 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice colours, good exposure, good composition --Ikiwaner 05:23, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like the composition of buildings. Unfortunate there was not a blue sky that day to contrast more with the concrete. Rwendland 13:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City from Adolphe Bridge 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 14:01, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal Alzette Béinchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut --George Chernilevsky 20:32, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casino Luxembourg bd Roosevelt 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me Archaeodontosaurus 17:09, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Luxembourg_Kirchberg_A_De_Gasperi_entrance_01.jpg

File:Luxembourg_Kirchberg_A_De_Gasperi_entrance_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 07:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't believe this infringes Luxembourg copyright law. You can see my explanations at:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Philharmonie_of_Luxembourg.JPG

Ipigott (talk) 11:52, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

FP

Guten Tag, Claude!
Bitte, ergreife die Nomination nicht. Ich denke, das Foto wird nicht entfernt sein. Die Nomination hat die guten Chancen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:00, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Luxembourg Kirchberg A De Gasperi entrance 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 19:41, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Pfaffenthal church 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments As a whole it's OK imo.--MrPanyGoff 07:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments despite the shadow below, it is a QI. --Jebulon 23:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Pafendall Béinchen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sehr gut! -- George Chernilevsky 19:08, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Wilno - kosciol sw. Kazimierza.JPG

Thank you for your support. Can you sign? :-) Albertus teolog (talk) 11:53, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb Saeul church 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO a tint overexposed and the crop isn't ideal, but still QI. --kallerna 10:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Pafendall Sang a Klang 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI and useful -- George Chernilevsky 19:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Luxembourg, structure de la forteresse, vallée de la Pétrusse et Pont Adolphe

Bonjour !
Jolie photo et bel endroit que je connais, comme tu sais !
Puis-je toutefois te signaler un petit problème ? dans le ciel, juste au dessus de l'immeuble sous échafaudages, tu as essayé de faire disparaître quelque chose, mais ça se voit beaucoup, même sur la vignette. Je pense que tu dois pouvoir arranger ça. Je supporterai alors volontiers cette photo. Bien cordial, sincère et très amical salut vers le Luxembourg, depuis Paris (si tu vois ce que je veux dire...).--Jebulon (talk) 16:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

• Je vois que tu n'as pas attendu lundi, et je vois aussi que j'ai été devancé pour soutenir ton image ! --Jebulon (talk) 20:51, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
• Je veux bien ! Tu devrais faire comme moi avec mon Jules César. Archéo l'avait promu, puis il m'a fait un commentaire sur ma page perso auquel j'ai acquiescé. Alors j'ai arrangé selon son souhait, et je l'ai mis sur la "revue", comme ça c'est carré (mais il n'y a que lui et moi dans cette histoire, c'est un peu différent pour ta photo). Si tu mentionnes des améliorations après la promotion, alors je la confirmerai, je crois que c'est le mieux. Es-tu d'accord ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:19, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
• Chose promise, chose due ! ça me parait parfait comme ça. Tout est clair !--Jebulon (talk) 21:31, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Hôtel de Ville de Guadix

• Bonsoir mon camarade !

A ton tour maintenant ! J'ai corrigé l'image en QIC, et j'ai mis une note. Peux-tu confirmer la promotion par ton vote amical ? Merci !--Jebulon (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

QIC assessments

Hey, you are in the wrong month! Or have you used a time machine ;-) ?
I'm going to correct some of your mistakes, but maybe you could look by yourself if you found some, too (and please correct the problem at your computer). Regards --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:00, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Mensch, da hab ich mir extra Mühe mit dem übersetzen gemacht, wo ich hätte Deutsch sprechen können...^^ Ich hatte schon seit ein paar Tagen immer wieder die promoteten Bilder gesehen und mich heute nun wirklich gewundert, warum der QICBot die nicht archivieren wollte. Aber jetzt kennen wir ja das Problem. Danke für die Korrekturen! Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:46, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City fortress Petrusse valley 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice composition --Carschten 17:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)  Info New version, with bad cloning remains removed from the sky. --Cayambe 21:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)  Support with improvements. Good picture IMO --Jebulon 21:30, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Place d'Armes (Luxembourg)

Hi Cayambe, I saw you took many quality images of Luxembourg, and wonder if you have any in your collection of the Place d'Armes, which I'm preparing a DYK nomination for? --Elekhh (talk) 22:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for you quick reply. It appears that even without scaffolding is hard to take a good image of the square because of the many trees. Anyway, if you get the opportunity one day to take a good image think of placing it in the article, or just let me know you uploaded it. Cheers, --Elekhh (talk) 23:02, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Oh that's very kind of you, but is no rush any more, as the DYK has been already processed without lead image and will appear on the main page on 8 October at 8am (Luxembourg time). --Elekhh (talk) 23:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 03.jpg

I looked at the bottom of the tower, perhaps I was wrong. Anyway, I am impressed with all the nice pictures from Luxembourg you have uploaded. Best regards--Ankara (talk) 20:26, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

It seems to me that the walls of the tower are not perfectly vertical, neither at the base nor more upwards,. The tower was erected in the 1920s. Thanks for the compliment, which I'd like to send back to you, for your pictures from Sweden and many other places in the world. Cheers, --Cayambe (talk) 20:40, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Port de Nice

Bonsoir Cayambe, J'ai téléchargé une nouvelle version suivant ton conseil : File:Nice port.jpg. Te semble-t-elle mieux ? Amicalement, --Myrabella (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon front 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentGood. But slightly tilted?--Ankara 20:10, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Mmh.. I've annotated 1 antenna on the tower, another one on the large structure at the top of the large structure at right, and also two fence structures at right. What do you think? Thanks for reviewing. --Cayambe 20:24, 4 October 2010 (UTC) It was probably a mistake.--Ankara 20:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Sichenhaff cemetery 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Rambrouch Jardin Napoléon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Jolie composition.--Jebulon 23:41, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

signature

Please, see this. Thanks--Miguel Bugallo 10:43, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxemb City échauguette montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Kirchberg

Bonjour Cayambe, J'ai inséré ton image du plateau du Kirchberg dans fr:Kirchberg (Luxembourg), et je me suis permis de développer la description en français car les annotations ne s'affichent pas sous fr:WP. Bien amicalement --Myrabella (talk) 07:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Sichenhaff 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 18:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 10:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Image choisie en image du jour sur :fr

Bonjour,

Je viens de choisir File:Kehlen chapelle rue d Olm int 01.jpg en image du jour de WP:fr pour le 1er novembre. Afin d'être sûr que la relation entre l'image et la toussaint puisse être faite, j'aurais besoin de la confirmation qu'il s'agit bien d'un édifice dédié au culte catholique. Par ailleurs, "chapelle de Kehlen" suffit-il à la description ou doit-on vraiment spécifier "de la rue d'Olm" (qui peut sembler un peu "too much" pour un descriptif d'image du jour) ?

Cordialement, Ikmo-ned (talk) 18:28, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Merci beaucoup.Ikmo-ned (talk) 19:34, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

¡Ay, Cayambe!

Bonjour Cayambe, Merci de ton message. Cette fois-ci, c'est une de tes images équatoriennes/équatoriales que j'ai insérée dans fr:WP, dans Géographie de l'Équateur et Équateur (ligne équinoxiale). Ce qui m'a donné le plaisir d'en apprendre plus sur ton pseudo :-) --Myrabella (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayambe Equator monument 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & useful --Jebulon 17:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Kirchberg as from montée Pfaffenthal 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice documentation --Mbdortmund 15:04, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgen de Quito 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 09:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cayambe Equator monument 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & useful. --Jebulon 17:02, 21 October 2010 (UTC) My mistake, I wanted to support the other one. Please help reviewer by giving different names to your files and nominations , thanks ! --Jebulon 17:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)  Support Mattbuck 17:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgen de Quito Panecillo Detalle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --George Chernilevsky 11:16, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Virgen de Quito Panecillo dragon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 12:42, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City Roost Népomucène 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Virgen de Quito Panecillo 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Virgen de Quito Panecillo 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito as from panecillo Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful  QuestionWhy two clocks of the cathedral does not mark the same hour?--Archaeodontosaurus 17:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC).  Info Yes, the two clocks show two different times :-). I suppose this to be due to the fact that they have each their own movement (deux corps mécaniques séparés, non coordonnés). --Cayambe 20:30, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwarzwald Hinterzarten 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 19:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterwald Cattle Hinterzarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good!--Mbz1 17:27, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Templo de la Patria from Panecillo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 10:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito from El Panecillo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 19:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

porte de la banque

Aujourd'hui c'est toi qui n'a pas signé, ce qui n’empêche d'ailleurs pas ton image d'être promue... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg BCEE pl Metz av Liberté.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I deeply regret that not everyone cares, caption like you do. --Archaeodontosaurus 13:57, 13 November 2010 (UTC) .../... I strongly agree.--Jebulon 09:41, 13 November 2010 (UTC) Aye, nice use of images in the annotations. --Avenue 23:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg City BCEE porte av Liberté 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me... (ART DECO?) --Archaeodontosaurus 08:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC). Plutôt ART NOUVEAU, construit en 1908. --Cayambe 09:02, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg BCEE bv Pétrusse porte 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition.--Ankara 00:06, 15 November 2010 (UTC) It is an allegory of the banking system ...--Archaeodontosaurus 15:02, 15 November 2010 (UTC) Merci, I now think that it is the head of Mercury/Hermes, the god of commerce, sometimes associated with a male goat (un bouc)... --Cayambe 15:50, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mondorf-les-Bains pavillon Kind a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Maybe a better categorization would make this building more visible in "Commons", and then more useful. --Jebulon 22:12, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

QI

Guten Tag, Claude!
Deine Nomination hat die Fehler. Die weißen Flecke auf dem Himmel und auf dem Dach. Ist es das Bild aus zwei Schichten gemacht? Siehe und entferne die Anmerkungen.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen, George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI and Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 07:39, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Quito Acordion player.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Acordion player.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI & émouvant --Archaeodontosaurus 10:48, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito El Panecillo monument entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Mbz1 17:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Plaza Independencia Pal Carondelet 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Elekhh 22:25, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito calle Venezuela Panecillo 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 10:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

FotothéikLëtzebuerg01

Hi Cayambe, would you be able to upload your image lb:Fichier:FotothéikLëtzebuerg01.jpg to commons, so that it can be used in en:Photothèque (Luxembourg) ? --Elekhh (talk) 23:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Many thanks, is great to have so helpful and reliable editors like you. Hope to get it onto the main page soon. --Elekhh (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

And there it is on the main page for the next six hours. Thanks again. --Elekhh (talk) 01:45, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Les baskets Adidas de Jésus-Christ ne semblent pas d'époque...--Jebulon 01:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi Cayambe,
have you seen my comment to your deletion request File:Quito Acordion player.jpg? --Túrelio (talk) 11:12, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito calle Venezuela Basilica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good.--Jebulon 00:10, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Plaza Independencia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 06:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Merci

Salut Cayambe.
Je m'aperçois que je bénéficie fréquemment de ton soutien, et de tes votes favorables.
Je t'en remercie. Je suis heureux que mes images te plaisent.
A part les amis Archéo, Rama et Llez avec leurs magnifiques images de studio (mais c'est très spécial), je suis à peu près le seul à proposer des images d'objets ou d'oeuvres d'art prises en intérieur, mais personne ne semble le remarquer, et je me sens donc un peu seul parfois. Avec l'éclairage artificiel, dans un musée, à main-levée (interdiction de supports), c'est difficile de faire des bonnes photos, je te remercie donc de ton soutien fréquent, qui m'est précieux.
J'aime beaucoup aussi, en ce qui me concerne, tes photos équatoriennes, ça m'ouvre l'esprit sur un secteur du Globe que je ne connais pas. merci de me le faire découvrir, comme de me permettre de mieux connaître ton pays de Luxembourg.
Bien à toi, --Jebulon (talk) 16:28, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luxembourg Ville photothèque 2008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs a perspective correction IMO--Jebulon 23:31, 2 December 2010 (UTC).  Done Merci! Comment n'avais-je pas pu voir ce défaut? J'ai aussi élargi un peu le cadre. --Cayambe 10:00, 3 December 2010 (UTC)Très bien, now.--Jebulon 15:08, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Accordion player.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good. --Slaunger 21:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito San Francisco Interview RTU 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit harsh light & shadows, but otherwise ok. --kallerna 09:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Quito Accordion player.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Quito Accordion player.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Palacio Arzobispal patio 2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:55, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --kallerna 08:30, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Calle García Moreno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 08:12, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

La Rampante

Bonjour Cayambe
J'ai peur que tu ne soies embêté par des "chercheurs de petite bête" avec la licence et la permission.
Tu es détenteur du droit d'auteur de la photo, mais pas de l'oeuvre photographiée. J'ai peur que la licence choisie ne soit pas la bonne.
Tu écris que tu as l'autorisation des ayant-droits... Je crains qu'un administrateur zélé ne t'en demande la preuve.
Mais je ne connais rien au droit luxembourgeois en ce domaine. En France, publier cette photo en l'état ne serait pas possible...
J'espère et je souhaite bien sûr que mes craintes soient vaines...
C'est une bonne photo, et l'oeuvre mérite d'être connue, en tous cas.--Jebulon (talk) 18:45, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! L Wercollier La rampante.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 10:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito calle García Moreno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Ankara 20:43, 20 December 2010 (UTC)  Comment Very nice! Is it really so steep? --kallerna 08:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC) Yes, it is at 2900 m a.s.l. in the Andes. --Cayambe 10:54, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

* * * :) * * *

Ich wünsche Dir fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage und alles Gute und ganz best im Neuen Jahr!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice and good composition. --Alchemist-hp 19:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana iguana Portoviejo 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good!--LeavXC 22:57, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Quito Proc del Jesus del Gran Poder 2010 e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}