User talk:Poco a poco/2015-11

Archives 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Ulloa, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 19:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Palacio Real de Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Palacio Real de Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre del Moro, Lárrede, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lasieso, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Pirámide, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 15.JPG

Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Pirámide, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 15.JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.

And also:

• File:Pirámide, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 16.JPG
• File:Pirámide, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 17.JPG
• File:Museo Nacional de Historia, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 10.JPG
• File:Pirámide, Tirana, Albania, 2014-04-17, DD 15.JPG

JuTa 20:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

JuTa, why do you keep flooding my page? One message per image is IMHO enough. Poco² 20:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry about that, thats coming automaticly when pressing "covert to DR" on a files marked as cpvio. --JuTa 20:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Nice pictures .. and cool wording

Note: No Facebook.svg This file has been released under a license which is incompatible with Facebook's licensing terms. It is not allowed to upload this file to Facebook.

awesome wording.. cheers  ! David Adam Kess 6.03pm , 2 November 2015 (UTC)

• 

David Adam Kess, to be honest, the wording is rather from Cccefalon (thank you Uwe! now you got me :) ), I adjusted it slightly. The first time I saw it I kind of wondered about it, but after I have seen several of my pictures in Facebook and lately got the third notice of a kind person letting me know (as I ask for when it is used outside Wikimedia) that the picture is being in Facebook I decided to do campaign agains Facebooks copyright policy and spare some emails asking for that :) Poco² 21:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Facebooks copyright policy

Poco_a_poco

wow, true, true,,, I agree with you a 100 percent, regarding the one sided Facebook copyright policy .......plus, you can forget about being referenced, i have been referenced by Iberia airlines, Aetna Insurance, Museum of Natural History in NYC... then dont even contact me, but they have to ref. my name..and for me its a cool trade, but facebook, wow its like a one sided ex.. $$$$

Facebooks copyright policy is a joke, gives no rights to the photographer, plus in wikimedia and the PHP code, its very easy to index, ref. and seach for stuff.

Cheers and have a nice day !!! David Adam Kess 10th of November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Benito, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Bartolomé, Gavín, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 15:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Francisco, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-22, DD 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Note: halo above?--Famberhorst 16:40, 31 October 2015 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Oke. --Famberhorst 19:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Miguel, Plaza de España, Chodes, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Broto, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardín de San Carlos, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 76.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

QI candidate

I corrected this picture. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 18:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Jacek:  Gotowy Poco² 22:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Deine Nominierungen

@Diego: Ich habe den Eindruck, daß deine Bildr in letzter Zeit durchweg zu hell sind? --Ralf Roleček 19:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Hallo Ralf, danke für das Feedback! Ich tue mir dennoch ein bisschen schwer, weil ich derzeit Bilder in einer Spanne von etwa einem Jahr nominiere, die mit 2 Kameras (Canon 5D Mark II, von WMAT während Weihnachten ausgeliehen) und meiner Canon 5DS R. Kannst du mir ein Beispiel nennen? Viele Grüsse! Poco² 21:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 

Verstehe das bitte nicht als Meckerei, mir fällt das nur auf. Da sind keine ausgefressene Lichter aber es fehlt am Schwarz. Auch wenn Tonwertkurven nur bedingt aussagefähig sind, auf allen erkennt man links fehlendes Schwarz. --Ralf Roleček 21:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem Ralf, danke für deine Zeit, neulich habe ich das gleiche Feedback von Diliff erhalten. Also, es muss was daran sein. Ich muss halt etwas großzügiger mit dem Kontrast werden bzw. weniger großzügig mit dem Aufhellen der Schatten. Danke nochmals für den Hinweis. Poco² 22:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Salvador, Torla, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent -- Alvesgaspar 13:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santiago, Lestedo, Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-20, DD 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lárrede, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality --Christian Ferrer 09:52, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Hércules, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 32-34 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 18.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Tsungam 13:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Nuévalos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 25.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 13:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Misericordia, Borja, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-02, DD 004-006 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 12:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Teresa y San José, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 05-07 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Quite noisy but still within acceptable range. --Code 21:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 21-23 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 21:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colegiata de Santa María del Campo, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan de Busa, Oliván, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 37.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente medieval sobre el rio Celeiro, Sarria, Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-19, DD 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Hércules, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de San Antón, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 74.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Better now! --Hubertl 21:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Domingo, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 15-17 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Have you retouched the sky? - looks rather strange. --Tuxyso 21:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC) No, I didn't. I have uploaded a  new version with several improvements Poco a poco 22:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC) QI imo, slightly soft corners but overall good, nice composition. No problem with the sky now imo.--ArildV 19:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Santa María la Mayor, Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 21:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan de Busa, Oliván, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 24.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Clemens Stockner 19:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Francisco, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but not the sharpest possible. --C messier 16:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Eulalia, Buesa, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 00:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Ana, Morata de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hórreo, Vilei, Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-19, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 11:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Lárrede, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Andrés, Calatayud, España, 2015-01-09, DD 025-027 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:13, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-20, DD 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A ittle bit noise in the shadows. --XRay 07:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Casa natal de Francisco Goya, Fuendetodos, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:34, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Teresa y San José, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Partially a little bit noisy. --XRay 07:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Andrés, Calatayud, España, 2015-01-09, DD 005.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Centering perhaps more beautiful, but good quality.--Famberhorst 06:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 43.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 43.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del conde de Morata, Morata de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puente del embalse de la Tranquera, Ibdes, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-09, DD 45.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hermoso. --Johann Jaritz 08:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parador de Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-22, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Seems overall unsharp and blurry. Why did you use ISO 800 and only 1/8 s in such a dark surrounding? --Dirtsc 21:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC) What else? Asking the people staying freezed for 5 seconds? --Hubertl 22:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  Comment The people are not important, they can be blurry, if they move. But the overall noise is quite strong due to the image setting.--Dirtsc 22:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)  New version uploaded. Still, your question Dirtsc puzzles me. What settings had you expected? Those settings make obvious that the picture was taken handheld (no tripods allowed there) but still I believe that the result is not bad at all. Furthermore (this is not a QI argument, but important to note), if you look into all other pictures in the category, you will agree that this one is, by far, the best one we have of one of the most important altars in Catholicism. Poco a poco 21:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Compared to all others images we have of this altar your one is far more than a QI and has to be promoted at once. Considering that you are not allowed to use a tripod it is a very good result. I beg your pardon for my question, but I have (unfortunately) never been there, so I thought it should be possible to take an image with a long exposure time. Greetings --Dirtsc 22:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 08.jpg

Hola, Corregí la perspectiva de la imagen (fr:Fichier:Medium69_-_Image_de_travail.jpg. ¿Está de acuerdo que puedo reemplazar el original?

J'ai corrigé les perspectives de votre image. Seriez-vous d'accord pour que je remplace l'originale ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your offer Medium69, but please, don't do that. I didn't forget to correct the perspective, it was my option to leave it as it is. If the reviewer believes it does not deserve the QI stamp, then "bad luck". Your version is not good either, it is too distorted, you need adjustments in the aspect ratio (keeping the width and reducing the height). Thanks and greetings Poco² 14:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Ok no problem. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan de Busa, Oliván, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 21:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Ágreda, España, 2015-01-02, DD 021.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Ágreda, España, 2015-01-02, DD 021.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! San Juan de Busa, Oliván, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 21-23 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 20:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Fefiñanes, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de Santo Domingo, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 81.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment perspective not good. --Medium69 15:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC) I've done a slight tilt/perspective adjustment. Please, be aware of the fact that this church is not straight. The bell tower is rotated in the vertical axle versus the below part of the building Poco a poco 21:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC) This is the lower part that was the problem. Good quality. --Medium69 00:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Muralla, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 79.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santa Ana, Morata de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rolf H. 11:17, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 35-37 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Santuario de Nuestra Señora del Pueyo, Belchite, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-08, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Convento de San Francisco, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 14-16 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hórreo, Toxibo, Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-20, DD 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Hércules, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 29-31 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 10:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruinas de Santa Mariña Dozo, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 10:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de María Pita, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 92.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 02:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de toros vieja, Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 02:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Alameda, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 60.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:54, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro de los Francos, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 046-050 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks overexposed to me. I would prefer less brightness and more contrast. --Uoaei1 13:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC) The place really had a strong illumination, still, I have retouched it the way you asked for --Poco a poco 23:21, 13 November 2015 (UTC)  Support Thanks --Uoaei1 07:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de las Bárbaras, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 83.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cyan line around the cable. Elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 15:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)  Done Poco a poco 21:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real de Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for me --Hubertl 07:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaza de María Pita, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 91.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de San Saturniño, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parador de Alcalá de Henares, España, 2015-01-10, DD 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Templo de Debod, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Crop is quite tight and the top is a bit blurry but still ok for me. --Code 21:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Real, Madrid, España, 2014-12-27, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Rajoy, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 53.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Casa Felipó, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 01.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 16:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio del conde de Morata, Morata de Jalón, Zaragoza, España, 2015-01-05, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Fefiñanes, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Francisco, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Let me help you translate potd captions

Hi, Poco a poco. I've noticed twice that your translations of Picture of the Day captions had translation errors, which led to incorrect or grammatical captions on the Main Page. This happened today (2015-11-19) and on 2015-10-07.

Please let me help translate. My Spanish is poor, but I'm a native English speaker. If you do another batch of Picture of the Day captions, just drop a note on my Talk page, and I am happy to review and improve any translations to English. — hike395 (talk) 05:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello hike395, thanks, I appreciate your offer to help out. Will let you know when I rellocate an additional batch :) Poco² 21:16, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Monasterio de la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Monasterio de la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Alameda Park QIC

Hi Poco a poco, so wirklich glücklich bin ich mit deiner Ausrichtung von File:Parque Alameda, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 58.jpg immer noch nicht gewesen; also habe ich es mal selber versucht und meine Bearbeitung, in der alle Vertikalen einigermaßen gerade sind, in die Versionsgeschichte geladen. Was meinst Du? Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 23:50, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi kaʁstn, danke dafür, dass du die Initiative ergriffen hast, und diese Version angeboten hast. Ich habe es übernommen, deine Version ist definitiv die Beste. Mit Lightroom ist es mir nicht so gut gelungen und auf schwerer Waffen (PS) habe ich nicht zugegriffen. Viele Grüsse, Poco² 21:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Kein Problem! Das glaube ich gerne, dass Lightroom an seine Grenzen gekommen ist, mit Photoshop war es kein großes Problem mehr. Sieht ja jetzt auch so aus, als wenn das Bild durch kommmt :) Viele Grüße --kaʁstn Dis/Cat 18:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de Santo Domingo, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 52-54 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good shot! --Elrond 17:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Indígenas contemplando Quito desde El Panecillo, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 44.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iguana marina (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), Las Bachas, isla Baltra, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 23.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista del Puerto de Victoria desde Sky100, Hong Kong, 2013-08-09, DD 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality (Fantastic view BTW) --Halavar 17:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reynisfjara, Suðurland, Islandia, 2014-08-17, DD 164.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:49, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vista de Ágreda, España, 2015-01-02, DD 022-024 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascensor del Monte de San Pedro, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Coricancha, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 69.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaviota peruana (Larus belcheri), puerto de Paracas, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --El Golli Mohamed 19:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torre de Oto, Oto, Huesca, España, 2015-01-07, DD 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 22:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Pedro, Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 03-05 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camino de Santiago, O Leboreiro, Lugo, España, 2015-09-21, DD 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 14:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio Epìscopal, Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

QIC Camino de Las Grietas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos

Yes you're right: "Horizontal do not have to be horizontal, it depends from where I took the picture." I agree, horizontals depend on perspective. But let me exlain, why I think, the picture is tilted. When I had the first look on the picture, I had the impression that it is leaning to the right. But this can be, as you correctly say, a question of perspective and the landscape. So I had a look on the two houses (I markend them meanwhile by annotations). In the house with the brown lines, the horizontal ones are tilted. This also can be caused by perspective. But in the house at the right, we have also a tilt, and this tilt agrees with the other house (Both about 2 dregrees). Reviewing the "horizon" again, I found, that he has also an inclination of the same degree. So I don't think, it is only the perpective. I downloaded your picture and rotated it about 2 degrees counterclockwise , it looked much better. I please you to try the same and have a look on th result. If you are not convinced by the result, please let me know. --Llez (talk) 15:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Llez, I was not really convinced looking at the houses on the right but overall the landscape did indeed looked ccw tilted. I have uploaded a new version, please, let me know what you think. Thank you for your time! Poco² 18:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Torre de San Saturniño, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 29.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torre de San Saturniño, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 29.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

QI follow-up question

Hi there,

I'm just hoping you can provide some addition information regarding your QI review of File:Blackwell Island Light 2.jpg. You wrote "Decline Strong distortion, banding in the sky, sharpness not convincing, sorry, not a QI to me". I'm a bit of a newbie when it comes to assessing photo quality, so I'm having trouble seeing what you're describing and hoping you can walk me through it.

• "Strong distortion" - I see a perspective of being about 6 feet off the ground with the primary subject off to the right, but not distorted like e.g. a fisheye lens or somesuch. Is that what you mean?
• "banding in the sky" - There is a trail that has been partially blown to the side leaving a feather-like appearance, but that's actually there in the sky so maybe there's something else my eye isn't catching?
• "sharpness not convincing" - Does this mean it's just not sharp enough? Not convincing sounds like you might be saying the sharpness was artificially increased, but this wasn't even loaded into an image editor or altered in any way.

Sorry if I'm being daft, and thanks for your time :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  21:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Rhododendrites, no problem, I can elaborate my comment:

• The tower is vertical for real, or not? I can understand this kind of distortion if you are taking a picture of the lighthouse from the base and looking up, but your choice of composition just looks wrong and I am afraid that if you make verticals vertical it would look probably worse.
• I didn't mean that trail but rather on the right of it, there you'll see horizontal banding trails that shouldn't be there, the problem is the bigger the closer to the top.
• Yes, I mean that it is not sharp enough, look e.g. at the description in that board, I'd expect that I can read it, but it isn't the case.

Cheers, Poco² 19:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

• I see what you mean re: distortion. The tower is indeed vertical. As are the buildings off to the left :) Is there an easy fix to prevent this sort of distortion that you know? (or maybe you could link me to some best practices?)
• I thought I remembered the trail blowing off to the right to create that long feathery appearance, but now that I google "sky banding photo" I'm seeing some awfully similar issues that make me think I must be remembering incorrectly.

Thanks for the explanations. To be clear, I'm not arguing that the image should be a QI -- just trying to learn :) — Rhododendrites ^talk |  04:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi Rhododendrites, to show you what I meant I've introduced some improvents (see change history). I don't think that it is a QI now (still lack of sharpness, denoising should be applied between the bars in the fence in the top of the lighthouse and the lighthouse a bit further from the camera to avoid the current distortion), but it's a step in the right direction Poco² 18:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Wizardry! :) Thanks. Denoising I get, but how did you straighten it while still looking natural? — Rhododendrites ^talk |  02:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 51.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May be a little bit too blue. --XRay 14:32, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuente de Los Surfistas, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-24, DD 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanecer en el lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good mood --Llez 12:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueductos subterráneos de Cantalloc, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basílica catedral, Arequipa, Perú, 2015-08-02, DD 70-72 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrio Moro, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cerro de San Cristóbal, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 113.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 22:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Alameda, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 20:15, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Alameda, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Machu Picchu, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 47.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piquero patiazul (Sula nebouxii), isla Lobos, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-25, DD 53.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Роман Дергунов 20:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Artesanías, Sillustani, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 83.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeródromo de Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 38.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aguas Calientes, Cuzco, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 68.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teotihuacán, México, 2013-10-13, DD 21.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Camino de Las Grietas, isla Santa Cruz, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-26, DD 54-58 PAN.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals are correct, but the hoizontal lines (in the houses) are tilted clockwise about 2 degrees --Llez 12:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC) Horizontal do not have to be horizontal, it depends from where I took the picture. Can you please add a note? I don't see any issues here? Poco a poco 20:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)  Done please see your discussion page --Llez 15:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)  New version Poco a poco 18:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)  Support OK now --Llez 10:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palacio de Fefiñanes, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 12.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 12.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Los Menhires, Parque de La Torre, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Los Menhires, Parque de La Torre, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bote del yate Darwin, isla Baltra, islas Galápagos, Ecuador, 2015-07-23, DD 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:50, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Costa de San Vicente, El Grove, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 49.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 18:42, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caracola, Parque de la Torre, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 20-22 HDR.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:47, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Centro Histórico de Huelva

Hola Poco. Creo que esta nueva categoría no es incompatible con Category: Buildings in Huelva. Dejándo las dos es más fácil encontrar lo que se busca. Saludos, tyk (talk) 23:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC) PD: Enhorabuena por tus quality images!

Hola tyk, perdona el retraso en responder, los bots no dejan de atosigar mi página de discusión :) Leyendo tu comentario no puedo estar sino de acuerdo contigo. Si he eliminado de una imagen la categoría de Buildings of al incluir Centro Histórico de Huelva, entonces debe de haber sido un error. Estamos creando categorías de todos los monumentos (existentes) de España siguiendo esta hoja de ruta (quien sabe, igual hasta de animas a echar una mano :) ). A todo esto, en una semana estaré por Andalucía y, con un poco de suerte, espero conseguir un buen puñado de Imágenes Destacadas para ponerlas en la portada de Commons Poco² 08:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Genial, aún faltan muchas de bienes culturales, sobre todo de torres vigía que se encuentran desperdigadas por ahí y son de difícil acceso. tyk (talk) 17:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ascensor del Monte de San Pedro, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 95.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amanecer en el lago Titicaca, Puno, Perú, 2015-08-01, DD 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 23:58, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Plaza de Armas, Lima, Perú, 2015-07-28, DD 32.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 23:26, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio, Tulcán, Ecuador, 2015-07-21, DD 42.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 01:35, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Acueductos subterráneos de Cantalloc, Nazca, Perú, 2015-07-29, DD 14.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 22:52, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Vista de Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 07.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 07.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Casa, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 01.JPG

And also:

• File:Casa, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG
• File:Parlamento, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 01.JPG
• File:Parlamento, Andorra la Vieja, Andorra, 2013-12-30, DD 02.JPG

Yours sincerely, Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:48, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castillo de Eisenberg, Eisenberg, Alemania, 2015-02-15, DD 46.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Michael Barera 03:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cementerio de San Diego, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 55.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very impressive! --Michael Barera 03:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Catedral, Plaza de Armas, Cusco, Perú, 2015-07-31, DD 57.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice capture! --Michael Barera 03:47, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barrio Moro, Ágreda, España, 2012-08-27, DD 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:12, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cúpula Atlántica, Parque de San Pedro, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 131.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iglesia de San Francisco, Quito, Ecuador, 2015-07-22, DD 178.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:39, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 November 2015 (UTC)