User talk:Uoaei1/Archive01

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Uoaei1!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 14:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Zwettl Kapitelsaalfenster.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixen Domkreuzgang A05 Auferstehung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 21:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Uoaei1, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Innenraum 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Klosterneuburg Brunnenhaus Schlussstein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Uoaei1, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Deckenfresko Anbetung 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 00:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kloster Neustift Suedansicht 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:16, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent, however I wonder if a bit more light on the foreground would add to the image --DXR 19:22, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixen Domkreuzgang A14 Geburt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:30, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice view! But IMO there is a lot of magenta in the clouds. Also visible in the branches at the lower right side. Could you try to reduce magenta saturation? --Cccefalon 09:21, 4 February 2014 (UTC)  Done White balance adjusted --Uoaei1 22:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)  Support This is an impressive improvement! --Cccefalon 22:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 20:15, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Seitenfront 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me. --Mattbuck 22:10, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Friedhofskirche zum Heiligen Karl Borromäus (Vienna central graveyard church).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment must attach the scope to a category. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
 Info Scope changed accordingly! --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:38, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Archive01⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

QIC discussions

Hi. Regarding your edit here, could you please in future add a comment when changing to discussion - otherwise it just looks like the original decliner (or promoter) disagreed with themselves. -mattbuck (Talk) 23:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

• Sorry, I forgot that. And please let me point out that I highly appreciate your reviews. Regarding this particular image, however, please mention the atmospheric impact over a distance of about 15 km. Best regards, --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kloster Neustift (Vahrn), panorama view from S.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Could you, please, add "View from W (or E...)", as we usually do here ? -- Thanks in advance. --JLPC (talk) 14:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

•  Info Scope enhanced accordingly by from S --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support : OK now. --JLPC (talk) 08:35, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 23:03, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oetscher vom Blassenstein.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality image. --DAJF 17:23, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

QI

Why do you think that my pictures nominated for the QI have unnatural colors? In my geographic area, this time of year the colors are just like those. If you want I can send you unmodified jpg files straight from the camera, as well as RAW files. Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:29, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

• Dear Jacek, I believe you. Please let me also point out that I like the motive and the image composition a lot. To me, the images look hard and cold, having high contrast and a strong blue/yellow component. Objects that I expect to be white are not (e.g. the clock), so I am assuming bad white balance. And I have never seen a sky like this. Maybe its because of the time of the day when you took the fotos (early afternoon, as I see). Best Regards --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:21, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixen Johanneskapelle Maria Lactans.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 23:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschau Impression Neuschnee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:45, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blassenstein Kreuz mit Nebel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)  Very good! --Iifar 18:13, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschau Impression Neuschnee 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hyacinthus orientalis Blüte 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:18, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Vienna central graveyard church, Saint Karl Borromaeus

A. Savin was right about those not straight vertical lines. I just uploaded fixed version of your image. Feel free to reverse if you don't like it. Regards, Halavar (talk) 22:52, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

• Thanks! I hope this will get now a better vote! BR --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Arctic Kangaroo 03:38, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:The Cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The Cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination :-) Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Uoaei1,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 12:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

• Danke fürs Vertrauen! --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Taufkrone.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Veronica persica (Persian speedwell), flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis. Terms: close-up category and do not have to appear.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
  •  Info Scope changed accordingly --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:06, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:53, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Heidentürme 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 08:28, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Riesentor Fries 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Forsythia x intermedia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Südturm 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Nordturm 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Alberto-g-rovi 06:15,17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Dnalor 01 10:34, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aggstein Waldimpression 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 06:47, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 09:46, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ of Göttweig Abbey church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 02 Panorama.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Blassenstein Erlauftal mit Nebel 02 Panorama.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could be a bit sharper, but still QI IMO. --P e z i 20:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersbachklamm 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but please add English description. --Halavar 17:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done --Uoaei1 19:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 23:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersbachklamm 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Good, but please add English description. --Halavar 17:55, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Done --Uoaei1 19:52, 7 May 2014 (UTC)  Support Good now. --Halavar 23:31, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stephansdom Wasserspeier 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersbachklamm Brücke 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Cccefalon 19:09, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersbachklamm 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:40, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:QI

	Commons:QI
	https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Quality_images_candidates/Archives_May_09_2014 • NominationChornohora evening --Swift11 10:13, 6 May 2014 (UTC) • Decline Less than 2 mega pixels. --Uoaei1 10:51, 6 May 2014 (UTC), new version of this file, more than 2 mega pixels--Swift11 15:49, 6 May 2014 (UTC) Swift11 (talk) 09:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Donnersbachklamm 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Malchen53 15:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putterersee vom Kulm 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:23, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putterersee vom Kulm 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 08:27, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:15, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putterersee 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Malchen53 13:58, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Osten 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Osten 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Putterersee 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Osten 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacerta viridis - couple 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Putterersee, view from west side.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Could you, please, add "North (or West...) view" to the scope, as we usually do here ? --JLPC (talk) 15:45, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

 Support now. --JLPC (talk) 08:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum sect. Ruderalia 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May not enpugh DoF, but for this kind of image IMO it's still QI. --XRay 06:29, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kleinwien St. Blasius 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 22:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulln St. Stephan Kirchenschiff 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 10:09, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulln St. Stephan Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 11:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulln St. Stephan Westportal 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 10:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche und Burgruine Dürnstein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO QI --The Photographer 17:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Dürnstein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Be carefull with extreme distortion in lamppost. IMHO QI --The Photographer 17:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürnstein Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not very sharp, but ok for QI imo, large resolution.--ArildV 09:17, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee gegen Osten 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:16, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium martagon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is OK, but crop is improveable (see note). --Tuxyso 21:49, 7 July 2014 (UTC)  Done Crop changed --Uoaei1 19:45, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:04, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centaurea jacea 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 15:40, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 10:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilium martagon mit Rutpela maculata 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 21:31, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rana temporaria portrait 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:19, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lilium bulbiferum var. bulbiferum 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dryas octopetala 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:52, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dactylorhiza fuchsii Mariazell 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 16:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melker Altar - Dornenkrönung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melker Altar - Ecce homo.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Livioandronico2013 12:22, 3 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Marmorsaal Fresko Pallas Athene.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Marmorsaal Fresko Herkules.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:56, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dactylorhiza fuchsii Mariazell 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dactylorhiza fuchsii Mariazell 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Melker Altar - Dornenkrönung.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melker Altar - Dornenkrönung.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melker Altar - Flucht.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Vassil 10:41, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Osttrakt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Very nice morning light and good colors. If possible you may want to try and decrease highlights from the golden surfaces (cross, text, clock)) --Slaunger 19:39, 15 August 2014 (UTC)  Done --Uoaei1 16:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC) @Uoaei1: it was quite a dramatic change you made to the colors of the entire building at the same time. I am not sure that part of your edit was an improvement. It looks "too much" now for me.--Slaunger 19:58, 16 August 2014 (UTC) There was quite bright light, which I tried to work out in the new version --Uoaei1 09:58, 17 August 2014 (UTC) OK, you know better than I how it really looked, so I accept your explanation. Still a QI. --Slaunger 15:05, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melker Altar - 12jähriger Jesus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit blurry but IMO QI. --XRay 08:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:55, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Cat 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support DOF could be better, but ok. Good for me--Lmbuga 19:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:16, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness just ok --Poco a poco 19:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach Panorama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:10, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Beach Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok.--ArildV 07:30, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Hello! Thanks for your quality pictures of Crete. I illustrated with your Preveli Palm Beach an article Crete in Ukrainian wiki (my only featured arcicle).

Recently I created a few articles about some masterpieces from Kunsthistorisches Museum (such as Aquamanile in Gestalt eines Greifen, Hl. Gregor mit Schreibern, Gemma Augustea, Weibliche Büste). Hope to see your pictures from Kunsthistorisches Museum, especially Collection of Sculpture and Decorative Arts (Kunstkammer Wien), Egyptian and Near Eastern Collection, Collection of Greek and Roman Antiquity. --AnatolyPm (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Thanks for your feedback! I have some more pictures from Preveli, which I plan to upload in future (probably in October after the WLM contest). In the next future I plan no visit to the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna, sorry. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Palm Beach of Preveli, Crete, viewing eastwards.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Bay 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Beach Rock 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Trees 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Livioandronico2013 13:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Beach Impression 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:16, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Beach Panorama 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 06:29, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Beach Panorama 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 06:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Beach Rock 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality --AnatolyPm 08:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Beach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:52, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mushroom-shaped rock next to Preveli Beach, Crete, north side viewed from the beach.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : It would be good to add "View from...(N, S, E or W)" to the scope as we usually do here in VIC. Thanks. --JLPC (talk) 16:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

 Done --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

 Support now. Useful. --JLPC (talk) 14:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 07:55, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Marmorsaal Deckenfresko.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Cccefalon 08:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine Aggstein 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:37, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine Aggstein 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good. --A.Savin 15:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceiling fresco by Paul Troger, Marble Hall of Melk Abbey, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope : it's the only complete picture of the ceiling. (I've just slightly modified the scope because the subject is the ceiling. - Feel free to correct.) --JLPC (talk) 13:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:39, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Melk Marmorsaal Deckenfresko.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Melk Marmorsaal Deckenfresko.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, I think it's also a VI candidate --Llez 10:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresko Verkündigung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, even if the painter had no idea about what is perspective correction --Jebulon 09:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresko Himmelfahrt 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:30, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Orgel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI, nice--Lmbuga 09:29, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresko Himmelfahrt 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:44, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartause Aggsbach Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:38, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kartause Aggsbach Kirchenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 17:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ of the Church of the Nativity of the Virgin Mary in Maria Langegg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:18, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:31, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and good IMO--Lmbuga 22:15, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:54, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Kuppelfresko Detail 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --P e z i 09:03, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

by Herzogenburg Abbey Remix

Dear Uoaei1, thanks for the words and congratulations for photo. Sorry for the delay but I was out, the alternative is fixed ty, Lauro Sirgado^contribs 20:34, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Orgel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:29, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresko Heimsuchung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Ivar 17:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresko Geburt.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Ivar 17:22, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ceiling fresco by Paul Troger, Imperial Staircase of Göttweig Abbey, Austria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:02, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig Gobelinzimmer 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko Engelssturz.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 11:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Herzogenburg Nordfassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 07:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko Sonnenwagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 07:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.-ArildV 14:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Fassade 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective, and crop at the top --A.Savin 14:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)  Done Corrected version uploaded --Uoaei1 19:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 13:10, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:34, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Innenraum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 20:48, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Verherrlichung.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Pfingstwunder 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 19:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:00, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Kuppelfresko.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 23:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Kuppelfresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:12, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Georg.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. QI for me. --Steindy 11:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Stephanus.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. QI for me. --Steindy 11:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresko Pfingstwunder 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Category:Views from Burgruine Aggstein

du hast natürlich Recht, sorry, lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:34, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Melk Kuppelfresco

A pity the "Carré Hermès" was not promotted... A concert ? Are you a musician ?--Jebulon (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• Dear @Jebulon: , thanks for the kind words. I have another image that might be more eye-catching, which I want to nominate as FP soon. So please keep watching! I am not a professional musician, but I have studied singing for a couple of years with excellent and partly well-known teachers, so I regard myself as semi-professional bass-baritone. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:03, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I was tenor in a local choir when I was ... younger. 17th, 18th-century baroque music.--Jebulon (talk) 20:28, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 18:46, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 17:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Pfarrkirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 17:39, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Benediktuskapelle Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Benediktuskapelle kleiner Raum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:38, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 19:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Gartenpavillon 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good for me--Lmbuga 10:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Herzogenburg Nordfassade 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo.-ArildV 12:55, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle Deckenfresko Altarraum.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:31, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ruine Aggstein 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Hm, OK. Reality is often at fault. --Mattbuck 16:32, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle ruins of Aggstein, east view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:47, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:06, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:43, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Orgel 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Pfarrkirche Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gumpoldskirchen Schloss Fenstergitter 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Gartenpavillon 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 06:24, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Hochaltar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ in the church of Herzogenburg Abbey.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope Rich scope! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:39, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stift Göttweig Kaiserstiege Fresko 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Hochaltar 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresken 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Cccefalon 07:28, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Anzbach Pfarrkirche Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 08:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Gartenpavillon 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 08:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC) 08:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gumpoldskirchen Kirche und Schloss 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Ostfassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:56, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Alchemist-hp 08:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Orgel Gründungslegende.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments --Alchemist-hp 07:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Hochaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Gutes Standard Objektiv für die D7100

Hallo Uoaei1! Ich antworte einfach mal hier: Das Thema Standard-Zoom-Objektiv und D7100 ist relativ schwierig. Ich muss auch gestehen, dass ich ein ziemlicher Schärfe-Fetischist bin und gerade bei dem tollen Sensor der D7100 möglichst das Optimum rausholen möchte. Meine Erfahrung ist, dass folgende Objektive (rein subjektiv beurteilt, allerdings weisen die Werte bei DxoMark in eine ähnliche Richtung) eine sehr gute Performance liefern:

• Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 (schärfer als das AF-S 35mm f/1.8 DX)
• Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 (hat allerdings einige Schwierigkeiten an der D7100, daher habe ich es verkauft, die Schärfe ist aber top)
• Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8
• Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.8
• Nikon AF-S 10-24mm (bleibt aber schärfemäßig deutlich hinter dem 18-35er von Sigma zurück, allerdings fotografiere ich gerne mit UWW).

Zu dem inzwischen deutlich in die Jahre gekommenen AF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 würde ich nicht mehr raten, die Schärfe hat mich nicht sehr beeindruckt. Für Landschaftsfotografie ist das 18-35er von Sigma momentan der Top-Performer. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gumpoldskirchen Wassergraben-Brücke 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 15:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Benediktuskapelle kleiner Raum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:17, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Innenraum 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Herzi Pinki 08:15, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Turm 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kolomanisaal Deckenfresko 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Cccefalon 16:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Benediktuskapelle Kreuz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:46, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kaiserstiege 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kolomanisaal Deckenfresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:24, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Ostfassade Giebel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of Melk Abbey, interior view.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope imo (I slightly modified your scope so as to hide the word "Category"). --JLPC (talk) 18:36, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 22:19, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresken 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:39, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kolomanisaal Deckenfresko 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken Langhaus 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Livioandronico2013 07:58, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Kuppelfresko 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:24, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken Presbyterium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Colors, Resolution, Perspective! --Florian Voggeneder 08:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresko Langhaus Mittelfeld.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Colors, Resolution, Perspective! --Florian Voggeneder 08:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Kuppelfresko 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Colors, Resolution, Perspective! --Florian Voggeneder 08:33, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ruine Aggstein 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruine Aggstein 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Deckenfresken Langhaus 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 19:04, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Melk Emporenfresko.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:11, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Deckenfresken 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 09:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilika Mariazell Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Innenraum 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Livioandronico2013 19:29, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Hochaltarbild 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment My browser didn't show this image. I don't know why. Wrong Jpeg-Format?--XRay 16:52, 29 September 2014 (UTC)  Support Second try. It's good for QI, but it's a very little bit unsharp.--XRay 16:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Südfront 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Flügelaltar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Flügelaltar Johannes 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Herzogenburg Hochaltarbild 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Because of bright reflections no QI for me. But please discuss. -- Spurzem 07:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC) Now I see it with other light in my room an I think it ist good. -- Spurzem 22:11, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Flügelaltar Kreuzigung 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Flügelaltar Kreuzigung 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Maria 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 07:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Anna Selbdritt 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 07:20, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Südfront 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Glasfenster 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Emporenbrüstung West 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality... but it would be nice to know who he is. Maybe someone can help you ? --JLPC 14:24, 3 October 2014 (UTC) I have tried hard to find out in books and Wikipedia - but what I found is that all available descriptions of the church are not up to date. --Uoaei1 15:19, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Emporenbrüstung West 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 06:41, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Schloss Barbakane 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Some unerexposed areas but still QI IMO. --P e z i 10:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:58, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tulln Karner Fresken Apsis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 10:52, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Fassade 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:33, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stift Melk Kaiserstiege 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:24, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perhaps a bit tight, but QI for me--Lmbuga 19:20, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Fassadendetail 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:44, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Presbyterium 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:18, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Deckenfresko Anbetung 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Presbyterium 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO. Perhaps a bit tight at bottom--Lmbuga 19:16, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pöggstall Pfarrkirche Emporenbrüstung Nord 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 18:09, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Innenraum 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Hubertl 17:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Hubertl 17:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Hubertl 17:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Organ of Brixen Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Retable of the high altar of Brixen Cathedral.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment For this image the altarpiece terms or "retable" would be more appropriate than painting. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

 Info Scope and image description changed accordingly. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:17, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 19:46, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Presbyterium 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. --ArildV 07:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Fassade 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 09:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixen Jahrtausendsaeule 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:47, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Fassade 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 19:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Orgel 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:27, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Hofburg Wassergraben 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 21:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Hofburg Arkadenhof 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Hofburg Arkadenhof 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Hofburg Arkadenhof 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Kandidatur für Excellenz?

Siehst du das bei diesem Bild nicht? Ich - trotz kleiner Mängel (Fenster ganz hinten) - schon.--Hubertl (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

@Hubertl: Hallo und danke für den Hinweis. Es stimmt, das Bild hat was, und ich habe auch schon eine FP-Nominierung überlegt. Jetzt habe ich es einfach mal nominiert. Mal sehen, was dabei rauskommt. LG. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Hofburgplatz 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Hochaltarbild 1.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:32, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
High altar of Mariazell Basilica.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful.--JLPC (talk) 16:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Winged altar in St. Anna parish church Pöggstall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : useful.--JLPC (talk) 16:16, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 00:29, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Altar 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Orgel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:25, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Altar 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Deckenfresken 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Centaurea jacea (Brown Knapweed), top view of florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:39, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:32, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bistorta officinalis (European bistort), florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:06, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Scope changed accordingly, thanks for your advice --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
• The scope is perfect. But the caption is poor. In addition to geocoding must put the locality. A good caption ensures better distribution of the image. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:30, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

 Done Caption enhanced with locality information --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:14, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Geat --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Kirchen 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:00, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Kanzel 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kitzbühel Pfarrkirche Altar 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 06:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zentralfriedhof Kirche Innenraum 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice detail; properly exposed --Daniel Case 15:03, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Brixner Dom Innenraum 1.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Brixner Dom Innenraum 1.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brixner Dom Nordseite 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments both sides are leaning in a bit, CAs and halo at the top of the church, the top of the image need a little sharpening IMO --Christian Ferrer 19:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC) Please mark the CAs and halo, I can't find them --Uoaei1 20:31, 22 October 2014 (UTC) I put a note for the CAs, what I took for a halo is in reality an electric cord. --Christian Ferrer 10:45, 23 October 2014 (UTC)  Done Changes done accordingly --Uoaei1 21:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 08:18, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Johanneskapelle 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 12:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bistorta officinalis 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:32, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli World War II Memorial.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kadellar 12:38, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli World War II Memorial Abbot.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 07:24, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Church Apsis Window South.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Monk Cells 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 07:59, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mitterbach Gemeindealpe Panorama West 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos interior 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:20, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Church Bells 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:32, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Monk Cells 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:45, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Ossuary 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dual spot see note --Livioandronico2013 20:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)  Done Corrected! --Uoaei1 05:41, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Centaurea jacea 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Centaurea jacea 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Church 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--XRay 08:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Tree Bells 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A little bit noisy and some parts a little bit bright. --XRay 08:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Apsis Window North.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Poco a poco 19:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Tree Bells 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 22:28, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos interior 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Can you try to adjust the white balance? It's too much tungsten light in the bulb exposure. --Cccefalon 11:31, 3 November 2014 (UTC)  Info This is pure candle light, the WB is realistic --Uoaei1 13:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)  Neutral Might be, you are right. But for me it's too orange. It's not a QI for me, but it might be too harsh to decline. --Cccefalon 12:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)  SupportDon't touch the white balance. This is beautiful. --Ram-Man 18:21, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kato Moni Preveli 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 11:51, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Tree Bells 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This is very close to clipping on the blue channel, but I'm inclined to accept anyway. --Ram-Man 12:57, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Cemetery 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. I would have cropped out the car (see note) but nethertheless it's QI --Cccefalon 10:56, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque interior 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 13:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Rimondi Fountain 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 06:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moni Preveli Church 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:11, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 06:27, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Eastern Walls 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:10, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresken 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maria Langegg Klosterkirche Deckenfresken 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:10, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque dome 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Cccefalon 09:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno G. Chereti.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:05, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good qualtiy --Llez 05:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque interior 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No real flaws --Daniel Case 07:01, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Melker Altar - Ecce homo.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melker Altar - Ecce homo.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Storerooms 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:42, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza small door 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult lighting situation well handled. Somewhat low DOF, but acceptable. --Smial 10:12, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Rectors Residence 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rethymno Fortezza Mosque interior 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 12:14, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Trees 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 09.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:54, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --C messier 15:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Schickst mir kurz ein Mail

ich hab mir das Göttweiger Bild man angeschaut und möchte dir die Änderung von mir zeigen... Es ist großartig, aber die dunklen Bereiche (Gestühl, Tür) sind einfach zu dunkel. Wäre leicht zu verbessern. --Hubertl (talk) 22:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:48, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:11, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Preveli Palm Forest 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 17:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 11.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 08.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:13, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 12.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plakias Bay 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Incredible sharpness for this lens! --Hubertl 16:39, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kotsifou Agios Nikolaos interior 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 16:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Featured Pic

Hey just wanted to let you know I added the tree name and category, and this should warrant removal of you tag. Thanks! Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pink Flowers Closeup.jpg EoRdE6 (talk) 21:36, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 03.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stiftskirche Göttweig Orgel 03.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:17, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Astrantia major Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 20:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Ekklisia Agia Marina Bell 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:30, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polygonia c-album Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ammoudi Beach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:06, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Ekklisia Agia Marina 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:46, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben Greimelbach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:29, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Sandstone Cliff Line 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Ekklisia Agia Marina Interior 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limni Preveli 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:22, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Sandstone Cliff Line 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:17, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Ekklisia Agia Marina 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rodakino Ekklisia Agia Marina Bell 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spechtensee Wanderweg 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:40, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:34, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötschergräben Greimelbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok but some purple CAs or purple fringe on the water at bottom tight (see note) --Christian Ferrer 06:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Corrected version uploaded. --Uoaei1 18:37, 16 December 2014 (UTC) Support The reflects in the water drops are a bit overexposed but I will say ok, it is not too disturbing --Christian Ferrer 22:52, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Astrantia major Mitterbach 01.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Astrantia major Mitterbach 01.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:03, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Preveli Palm Beach Panorama 02.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Preveli Palm Beach Panorama 02.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 06.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:42, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:51, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Campanula glomerata Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 07:37, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalis tenax auf Tragopogon pratensis 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eristalis tenax auf Tragopogon pratensis 03.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Erlauf-Stausee 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not perfect, but near enough --Poco a poco 12:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Panorama Ennstal und Niedere Tauern 02.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Top left in the air two iniquities. Can you recover?--Famberhorst 16:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)  Done Spots removed --Uoaei1 19:13, 20 December 2014 (UTC)Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:02, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tragopogon pratensis Mitterbach 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pürgg Panorama Ennstal und Niedere Tauern 01.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Astrantia major, top view of florescence.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Best in Scope and useful. --P e z i (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 20:38, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ötscherbach 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}