User talk:Aciarium

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aciarium!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:00, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademie Montanuniversität.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Nice reflection --Tagooty 02:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Engel Engelsbrunnen Hauptplatz Leoben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westliches Ziffernblatt Altes Rathaus Leoben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 20:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Touran II Polizei Österreich (Innsbruck).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
important categories missing --MB-one 19:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --aciarium 23:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:04, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aussichtsturm Kohlern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Fine, but please, add a more specific category about the subject --Poco a poco 22:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done--Aciarium 15:36, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Support QI after some refinement of the categories --Poco a poco 22:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prettachstraße (6) - Leoben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fesselballon Berlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inschrift Engelsbrunnen Hauptplatz Leoben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 08:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, add a more specific category about the subject, the location is not enough. Poco a poco 20:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Aciarium 00:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please, don't mark your own candidates as promoted and let the reviewers do it. I cleaned up the categories. Please, don't overcat on Commons, this is not de.wp. Just add the deepest categories without the parents Poco a poco 13:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you and apologies. If I have promoted my own candidates, that must have been unintentional. I'll watch out in the future. --Aciarium 15:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptgebäude Montanuniversität Leoben 2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --SHB2000 11:33, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waltherplatz Bozen Luftansicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:37, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleinbus Finanzpolizei Österreich.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 14:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blåhaj 100cm side view.jpg[edit]

File:Blåhaj 100cm side view.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 05:54, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RHI Magnesita Technology Center, Leoben[edit]

Hallo Aciarium, in welchem Stadtteil steht denn bitte dieses Gebäude? Kannst du die Kategorie den "Buildings in ..." entsprechend zuordnen? lg Eweht (talk) 22:47, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Eweht! Das Gebäude steht in Göss, wenig überraschend in der Magnesitstraße. Danke für den Hinweis, ich habe die Kategorie soeben nachgetragen. --Aciarium (talk) 22:59, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ging ja rasch :-) - Ist es das, was früher mal als Werk für feuerfeste Ziegel in Leitendorf gestanden ist (galube es hieß Steirische Magnesit AG oder Magindag)? Eweht (talk) 23:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Zusatzinfo: Dein Bild ist ja eines von 3 in der übergeordneten Kateogrie. In solchen Fällen muss man die ganze Kateogie zu den "Buildings in ..." zuweisen. Hab ich grad erledigt. Eweht (talk) 23:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wunderbar, danke fürs Kategorisieren! Zu Leitendorf fällt mir gerade nur der Ziegelofenweg (der seinen Namen nach der einst dortigen Ziegelei hat) ein. Ich müsste mal in „Straßennamen mit Geschichte“ von Alfred Joham nachlesen, ob es da einen Zusammenhang gibt, oder ob das in Leitendorf vielleicht auch nur ganz normale Bauziegel waren. Ein freundliches Glückauf wünscht Aciarium (talk) 23:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, das dürfte hinkommen. Und: nein, es waren sicher feuerfeste Ziegel. Ich hab vor ziemlich genau 50 Jahren mal 5 Wochen dort in den Sommerferien gejobbt und jeden Tag die Dinger mit dem Hubwagerl von der Formerei in die Trockenhalle gekarrt :-) - Super, dein Straßennamenartikel! Eweht (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dann sieht das Ganze natürlich anders aus, wenn mir das ein so unmittelbarer Zeuge bestätigt! ;) Danke! --Aciarium (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:BOclassic 2022 Bahnhof.jpg[edit]

File:BOclassic 2022 Bahnhof.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vizepolizeiinspektor Stadtpolizei Bozen.jpg[edit]

File:Vizepolizeiinspektor Stadtpolizei Bozen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HS Elektrotechnik der Montanuniversität Leoben.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in Round 1 of the 2022 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2022.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aciarium&oldid=759578613"