User talk:Kwasura

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

File:Naval Jack of Australia.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Naval Jack of Australia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:25, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

File:ВРС.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:ВРС.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−


The reason given by the user who added this tag is: This file is tagged as PD as per Serbian Copyright Law (PD-SerbiaGov), but this is a coat of arms of w:Republika Srpska (part of BOsnia and Herzegovina), not of Serbia. So, Serbian Copyright Law has nothing to do with this file.

Vanja / Вања (talk) 21:52, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

File:De1935~w.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:De1935~w.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alkari (?), 3 April 2014, 05:21 UTC 05:21, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

File:De1938~w.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:De1938~w.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Alkari (?), 3 April 2014, 05:23 UTC 05:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Finland Air force.svg[edit]

Do not edit deletion nomination pages after closure. It's quite unfortunate that you played a negative and unconstructive role there, arguing for deletion when the answer was clearly to rename. If you possessed information that would have helped in more accurately renaming, it's rather unfortunate that you didn't provide it. AnonMoos (talk) 14:19, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't know what you are talking about. The file is asking to be deleted. It is incorrect and is not needed (like the USA flag without the stars). It is very unfortunate that users are so ignorant in this subject and the administrators are so hasty in their verdicts to keep the rubbish. --Kwasura (talk) 15:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
If you had more knowledge than the other people, then it's too bad that you didn't use that knowledge to help, instead of spewing forth irrelevant tirades which had no relationship to any practical action to be taken. AnonMoos (talk) 22:14, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
Well, I am using my knowledge to help and I am willing to. But instead of taking the advice some users just vote against it. Is this the way of fixing the problems? --Kwasura (talk) 11:21, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 09:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

FAF insignias and flags[edit]

Hi, I looked through the categories Category:Air Force flags of Finland and Category:Air force of Finland. In my opinion the most important files have been reverted, although there are still some flags (File:Ilmasotakoulu.svg (cf. File:Ilmasotakoulun lippu.svg) and File:Ilmavoimien Esikunta.svg (cf. File:Suomen ilmavoimien esikunta.svg)) that seem incorrect. There aren't though that many pictures of those flags around, so it is hard to say which one of them is the correct one. Based on the squadron flag and emblems shown on the Air Forces website I would say that the correct ones are files Ilmasotakoulun lippu.svg and Suomen ilmavoimien esikunta.svg, but this is impossible to say without pictures of the actual flags. Then there are also those pins and insignias that FAF flags uploaded. Some of them should just be deleted and others are harder to fix as we don't have the correct ones uploaded to Commons, so they will need to be fixed by hand. Also, I started a deletion request about the file:Ilmavoimat (1918-1945).svg. --Msaynevirta (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Flags I am glade you are participating. We can do so much together. There is still a lot to do about the flags. I found the images of all of them, except the one - Ilmavoimien esikunnan lippu, so I can not be sure about the exact shape of the badge in the flag's cantone. Another thing is - I am not based in Finland, so the referencing material which is easily available for you is not available for me. Sotilasheraldiikka - Liput, merkit ja tunnukset by Kari Laurala is the absolute must have. All the answers could be found there. I am eager to get this book. But you can get it from any major library in Finland. I am working at the moment on the improvement of the Ilmasotakoulun lippu. It is difficult file to fix as I am missing some information. 1. I need to find out the close look of the flagpole decoration with the "Mannerheim Cross" and 2. It looks like they introduced the new flag for the Ilmasotakoulu (looks like the old one is being handeled to the Lentosotakoulu). In order to prevent future misunderstandings may I point your attention that there is difference between the flag's canton badge and the formation badge of the finnish Air Force. In the case of the Ilmasotakou (or the Lentosotakoulu now?) the former is being with the straight wings, and the later with the curved wings. --Kwasura (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Qualification badges I support your request and agree that the file need to be deleted. Please, feel free to nominate this, this and this too. The rest I will correct manually and we will be done with it. --Kwasura (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Emblems Two duplicate files need to be deleted here - this and this, and one corrected (unfortunately I don't know how to work with the animated .gif files). --Kwasura (talk) 07:29, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

I have been viewing this flag changing from afar and I can say that good work has been done at presenting the AF flags finally realistically (especially the Lapland Air Command one). I have a insight in the flag of Ilmasotakoulu (Air Academy?) if you need help on that, I am not totally sure if this information is correct, but I believe that the school previously had the flag which is shown on the president. While at the same time Lentosotakoulu (Flight Warfare School?) had the one with three swastikas. However Lentosotakoulu was disbanded in 2014 and I saw Ilmasotakoulu have their flag instead of their own in the 2015 flag day parade in Oulu so I presume that the flag of "Lentosotakoulu" has been carried over to "Ilmasotakoulu". I don't have anything white on black which would proof this though. The thing which makes the FAF flags problematic is that Ilmasotakoulu was previously named Ilmavoimien viestikoulu (Air Force Signals School) and Lentosotakoulu had Ilmasotakoulu as name until 2005 when the both were renamed to their current forms. Not sure if this is help to the topic. I might help on the flags and other insignia by checking this one book (Puolustusvoimat ennen ja nyt) for Air Force flags (and insignia) and I might even scan some for reference. --Caselius (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

That would be very welcome. Every little help. --Kwasura (talk) 04:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
Please, look at the pdf-file:Ilkka 1.12.2014, Ilmasotakoulun lippu.pdf, which has been loaded (from the Finnish newspaper Ilkka). In the caption of the picture (red-edged) reads in English: The commander of the Training Air Wing, lieutenant colonel Antti Koskela presents the Training Air Wing flag. The flag will not go the tradition museum, but it will become the Air Force Academy flag.
Thus, the right has been taken to download the proper version to the file:Ilmasotakoulu.svg. Because the basic format is the same - basic colour is cobalt blue - , the proper versions has been downloaded also to the files Ilmavoimien Esikunta.svg, Karjalan Lennoston lippu.svg - should be renamed Karjalan Lennosto.svg - , Lapin Lennosto.svg and Satakunnan Lennoston lippu.svg - should be renamed Satakunnan Lennosto.svg.
There are too much very similar flag pictures in the gategory Air Force flags of Finland, so that should be considered for removal the following files:
(maybe also the file Lippujuhlan päivän paraati 2014 015 Karjalan lennosto ja ilmasotakoulu.JPG)
--Finnish Air Force (talk) 11:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

@Finnish Air Force: Dear Finnish Air Force, we could do a lot together. I, Msaynevirta and Motopark are working hard, improving Finnish Air Force related files and the categories. You could help if you like and we could really use your help. But your unilateral editings, without the consideration, can only lead to no good. They will soon understand that you are one of the sockpuppets of WPK~commonswiki and you will be blocked indefinitely.

Now, about your proposed changes:

  1. I have seen your File:Ilkka 1.12.2014, Ilmasotakoulun lippu.pdf before it was deleted, and translated all I could. I understand you point, but I will oppose any possible renaming of this file on the background of one simple truth - flag need to have its original name. Once introduced and given, flag can be inherited in the future by many different ore related units and organizations. This information need to be given in the file's description, but not by renaming the file over and over again. Same thing apply to Hämeen Lennoston lippu.svg. Yes, this Air Command exists no more and its flag is inherited by Lapland's Air Command, but it existed and was the true owner of this flag in the past. Renaming the Lentosotakoulun lippu to Ilmasotakoulun lippu will conflict with this. This file is yet to be created and named File:Ilmasotakoulun lippu.svg as per original name.
  2. Flag and insignia files can not be named for example Lentosotakoulu because of Lentosotakoulu what? Flag or badge? Lentosotakoulu is the flying school, not the flag or the badge. Therefore flag will be named Lentosotakoulun lippu and badge - Lentosotakoulun joukko-osastotunnus.
  3. I am trying to delete File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svg, I know that it is nonsense and does not exist. You could help in participating in the conversation.
  4. There is no reason to delete File:Lippujuhlan päivän paraati 2014 015 Karjalan lennosto ja ilmasotakoulu.JPG. It is not violating the copyright, is not incorrect or duplicate of the other file.

Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 12:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

I did some research on Finnish Air Force HQ and according to this book named Puolustusvoimat: Joukko-osastoperinteet (Unit traditions of the FDF) by Finnish war museum (2008) Finnish Air Force HQ doesn't have a flag. It states following on page 256: "Esikunta käyttää kielekkeistä valtiolippua. Tätä valtiolippua käyttävät kaikki ne puolustusvoimien esikunnat ja laitokset, joilla ei ole omaa lippua." It could be roughly translated the following: "The HQ uses the Military flag of Finland (I don't know the correct translation, file can be found here: File:Naval_Ensign_of_Finland.svg). This flag is used by all headquarters and institutions which don't have flag of their own." So I think it is quite sure to say that Finnish Air Force HQ doesn't have flag of it's own. The deal is same for other HQ's like Army and the now disbanded military provinces. The book has quite detailed old flag of the Ilmasotakoulu, I could upload a scan of it sometime later for reference. Also the unit insignia are shown on each unit's page along with flag. Caselius (talk) 08:49, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 09:51, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you.

  • Thank you for your trust. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 07:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Kwasura, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | Українська | +/−

  • Thank you for your trust. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 07:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:L11918B.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:L11918B.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Молдавский орден[edit]

Здравствуйте!
Не расскажете зачем Вы сделали эту правку? --Kaidor (talk) 08:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Дякую що звернули увагу. --Kwasura (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 10:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Fotos of Medals[edit]

In some countries the design of a medal awarded by government bodies is exempted from copyright. This does not mean that the photographer not has a copyright. You can not upload photos from random photographers here, even if the subject of the photo is a medal with no copyrighted design. See Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet for similar cases. --Martin H. (talk) 20:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Whatever. --Kwasura (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Order of the Red Banner of Labour (KhSSR).png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Order of the Red Banner of Labour (KhSSR).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 20:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Delete 'em all, mate! . --Kwasura (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. --Kwasura (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Do not leave harassing messages on my user talk page[edit]

Since you have behaved consistently somewhat poorly from beginning to end where the file now named File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svg is concerned, and I didn't say anything about you on the undeletion request that I didn't previously say on this page above, I'm really not in the mood to listen to any sanctimonious lectures from you. Please do not leave any more harassing messages on my user talk page! AnonMoos (talk) 06:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

@AnonMoos: Oh, sorry for "harassing" you. But you seemingly having no problem slandering people. You have to be ashamed of yourself. This is not something that need to be tolerated in the respectful society. With all do respect. Have a nice day. --Kwasura (talk) 12:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Guardia Nacional de Venezuela.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Guardia Nacional de Venezuela.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Photographer (talk) 12:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Ve~cfaa.gif[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ve~cfaa.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Photographer (talk) 10:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Lotta Svärd badge.svg[edit]

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lotta Svärd badge.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Air Force flags of Finland[edit]

Hi, why the Air Force flags of Finland have different swastikas and blade circles? --85.76.181.39 00:03, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi, who are you? About the flags: I did not corrected Karjalan Lennoston lippu.svg yet (just ignore it for now). The other flags have two minor differences (1 2) which can be easily observed from the photographs. Sincerely.
No, swastikas and blade circles has to be similar, based on the swastika and the blade circle of the file:Suomen ilmavoimien tunnus ja lentomerkki 1918-1945.svg (however, the opposite rotation direction of the cirle). In addition, the dimensions of the flags are different, but they must be the same, of course. --85.76.181.39 01:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
PS. Who "on earth" has put the white olour of the blade circle and heraldic rose to the file:Suomen Ilmavoimien tunnus.svg instead the silver colour? In 1945 only the swastika was replaced by an eagle. By the way, look at the correct eagle here (headwears), its wings are elevated, not on horizontal level.
Again, who are you? Please authorize. I would be happy to correct the flags if you would help me to find missing information. Namely the proportions. All my pictures are based on real flag photographs and they are not exactly the same. Note the different thickness of the white border of swastika and swastika itself 1 2. Suomen Ilmavoimien tunnus.svg is based of course on the real image of the Puolustusvoimat. You well know that there are no "white" or "yellow" in Heraldry, but "Silver" and "Golden", so everything is fine. We only need to colour the real badges to show the white metal, not the heraldic emblem which remains white as per Heraldry. Your "correct eagle" of the cap badge have nothing to do with the emblem, those are different things as you well see. --Kwasura (talk) 02:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

File:ANRBV.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ANRBV.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Photographer (talk) 16:29, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Shoulder sleeve insignia[edit]

Я не настолько хорошо владею английским, чтобы оценить правильность перевода, но в статье en:Shoulder sleeve insignia написано, что этим термином называют нашивки армии США, так что для других стран этот термин, возможно, будет некорректен --Butko (talk) 12:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Це значно більше вірна назва ніж "patch", що є лише назвою "shoulder sleeve insignia" на сленгу. Британці вживають "formation signs" і "tactical recognition flashes", що тим більше не відразу сприймається як предмет уніформології у стороннього читача. Між тим даний предмет уніформології прописаний в правилах носіння військового однострою саме як "нарукавний знак". --Kwasura (talk) 14:36, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Удаление категорий населенных пунктов и областей[edit]

Ну а категории населённых пунктов Вам чем помешали? Зачем Вы удаляете Чугуев, Охтырку и т.п.? Вместо того, чтобы переименовать необходимые категории Вы удаляете все подряд. Если так будет продолжаться и не будет исправлено, то придется не глядя откатить весь Ваш вклад за последние дни --Butko (talk) 20:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

@Butko:Вибачте, а можна докладніше про ці категорії міст і областей? Я знаю що боти (за відсутністю правильної категорії), пхають конкретні зображення в абстрактні категорії. Я не бачу сенсу вміщувати зображення військової символіки в географічні категорії. Або я чогось не знаю? Проясніть мене тоді. --Kwasura (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Конкретно эти категории сделаны не ботом. Если вы не Видите смысла отнесения нашивок Львовского УМВД ко Львовской области, а Харьковского к Харьковской, то это не повод их удалять. Я тогда не вижу смысла сохранять Ваши правки - мне проще всё откатить будет --Butko (talk) 20:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
@Butko: Я просто хочу розібратися. Наприклад файл File:MVS Lviv.png має наступні категорії: Category:Uploaded with UploadWizard, Category:Patches of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, Category:Police in Lviv Oblast, Category:Patches of Lviv Oblast. З них остання - вельми сумнівна. Це не "нарукавний знак Львівській області", а нарукавний знак УМВС у Львівській області. --Kwasura (talk) 20:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Category:Patches of Lviv Oblast - это подкатегория Category:Patches of Ukraine by region, которая включала в себя нарукавные знаки разных служб, относящихся к конкретным регионам. Сейчас Вы эту структуру ломаете --Butko (talk) 20:51, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
@Butko: Вам не здається така категоризація зайвою? Тоді вже перейменуйте нарукавні знаки регіонів у нарукавні знаки територіальних управлінь. А то феодальна роздробленість виходить. А це в корені невiрно. Якщо Вам не байдужі категорії з символікою силових структур України - давайте працювати разом. Не треба тримати мене за вандала. У мене великі плани і Ваші відкати мені будуть лише заважати. Давайте тоді вже приходити до спільного знаменника в цiх питаннях. --Kwasura (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Чтобы не было откатов, меня устроит если Вы будете переименовывать категории, вместо того, чтобы их удалять. Очень много потерялось в результате Ваших действий. Кроме территориальных управлений МВД в этих категориях хранились и другие знаки, например, учебных заведений, казачьих организаций, пограничных отрядов и других организаций и подразделений т.п. --Butko (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
@Butko: ОК, будемо покращувати. Тільки не треба відкочувати мої правки раніше, ніж я закінчу роботу. У категоріях завали. Розібрати їх - це не день і не два. Будемо на зв'язку. --Kwasura (talk) 21:27, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

File renaming[edit]

I declined your renaming request of four files since I do not think it is a good idea to replace Latin names with Cyrillic names which may be not intelligible for most Commons users. However, if you propose either more descriptive Latin names, or mixed Latin-Cyrillic names, I would be happy to consider the new request. Thank you.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: Some names are very difficult to translate. Wouldn't it be better to simply put the files in right categories for people to understand? In this case renaming wouldn't be a problem. Plus many files named incorrectly in Russian, so i am, giving correct Ukrainian names using official documents. --Kwasura (talk) 08:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I do not think such renaming would fall under the renaming criteria. May be you could take it to the village pump to discuss? I am open but I do not feel like I should decide this single-handedly.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
@Ymblanter: I still could use your advice since you are first who noticed such renaming. I could do all Ukrainian or all English as I currently working on the clean up and harmonization of the Category:Symbols of Ukraine. --Kwasura (talk) 10:12, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
My opinion is that all-English (or even all-Ukrainian but using the Latin alphabet) is definitely preferrable.--Ymblanter (talk) 10:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
I will take your advice. --Kwasura (talk) 10:49, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Since you do not seem to be interested in stopping moving files, I opened a topic about this here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Kwasura and Latin to Cyrillic renamings.--Ymblanter (talk) 16:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Blanked categories[edit]

Hi, what shall be done with the categories you blanked (see [1])? --Achim (talk) 15:55, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

@Achim55:HI. they need to be deleted. i don't know how to delete them, sorry. --Kwasura (talk) 20:29, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Корекції опису файлів[edit]

Ви понавставляли документального опису військових штандартів та емблем позамінявши авторство. Маленький ньюанс полягає у тому, що тут вказується та має значення авторство не ескізу, який був затверджений міністерством, а конкретного файлу (цифрове виконання). Таким чином ви неабияк спотворили інформацію. До того ж той опис геть безглуздий і явно зайвий. Там на різних мовах має бути написано, що воно таке, і все (все інше зайве). Те що ви туди напхали описується ліцензією PD- та не має значення для використання зображення у статтях.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

А, і ще міняти назви на найдовші можливі, також безглуздо. І вставляти of of of of, трохи безграмотно.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
@PsichoPuzo: Шановний, сподіваюся Ви не вбачаєте в моїх діях вандалізму, тому не треба займатися відкатами. Опис англійською повинен бути, згоден, і він може бути кородкім. Але український опис може бути повним, і вiн займає не так вже й багато місця, щоб називати його "безглуздим". В цілому, я не хотів би займатися з Вами суперечками або відкатами правок. Якщо Ви не байдужі до категорії - давайте працювати разом. У такому випадку будемо консультуватися і розробимо загальні концепції її розвитку. Думаю це буде правильно. --Kwasura (talk) 15:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Тут серед іншого, механіка така, що опис іншими мовами можна використовувати для вставки файлу у статтю. Тож ті описи таки повністю безглузді. Це не фрагмент енциклопедії, а її технічна частина. Якщо я на основі джпегу ескізу взагалі незадовільної якості, зробив зображення - нормальний прапорець придатний до використання, то мені здається, що люди яких ви туди втулили, які розробляли таки символіку, до конкретного файлу не мають ніякого відношення. Це має бути у статті на вікіпедії про прапор, але не тут. І я вас закликаю не плутати ці проекти. А також можна радитись, перед тим, як переписувати опис файлів, які завантажили не ви (я маю на увазі не категоризацію).--PsichoPuzo (talk) 15:52, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
@PsichoPuzo: Моє бачення проблеми полягає в тому, що я не бачу нічого поганого в тому, щоб дати повний опис файлу, таке зустрічається не раз і ви перша людина, якій це не подобається. Будь ласка, вкажіть назви файлів, зміну яких ви не хотіли б бачити у жодному выпадку, я розгляну кожен випадок окремо Я говорю зараз не про опис файлу, а саме про самомi файли. --Kwasura (talk) 16:09, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Ви що гуглтранслейтом пишете? Якщо ви мали на увазі назви файлів, то коротші назви значно зручніше використовувати під час написання статей, ніж отаке: Файл:Прапор Державної служби спеціального зв'язку та захисту інформації України, Можна і так звісно, але половину назви можна зробити абревіатурою, яка теж буде унікальною назвою.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Стосовно заміни назв з англійських на кириличний запис, вам вже вище писали. До того ж у англійському варіанті запису назви, вона зазвичай виходить коротшим рядком тексту, що також зручніше.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
File:Ukrainin Minister of Defence flag at see.svg - тут же ви чогось такою маячнею не займались.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Я не зовсім розумію що саме Ви називаєте "маячнею". Взагалі ви розмовляєте як дуже молода людина. Я почав з того про що у мене є офіційна інформація. --Kwasura (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

@PsichoPuzo: Які файли Ви не хотіли б міняти? Говоримо про самі зображення. А назви самих файлів можна обговорити. Я також не бачу нічого поганого в тому, щоб вони були українською. Є ж і іспанські та італійські файли, і нічого, ніхто не скаржиться. З скороченнями згоден, якщо вони потрібні. Якщо у вас є якісь конкретні пропозиції - дайте приклади. Будемо обговорювати. --Kwasura (talk) 16:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Тобто міняти? Підвантажувати інші файли? Було кілька прапорів, міняти обрізаний прапор на його загальний ескіз із держаком - явно недоречно. У таких файлів різне використання.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
ОК, з держаком завантажу окремий файл. Тiльки виправте недоробки і не плутайте офіціали з проектами. Приклад недоробки: File:Державна служба статистики України.gif. Також розрізняйте поняття "герб", "емблема" і "логотип". Які ще будуть пропозиції? --Kwasura (talk) 17:27, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Ви що, знущаєтесь? Завантажуйте свої файли НЕ поверх геть інших. І не чіпайте опис.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:46, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Тим паче ви не маєте права чіпати адміністративні шаблони.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:49, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Якщо ви не розумієте і будете продовжувати у тому ж дусі, отримаєте скаргу адміністрації.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 17:58, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
@PsichoPuzo: Ви поводите себе як троль. Без жодної поваги до думки опонента. Пропоную вам або домовитися або винести нашу суперечку на обговорення спільноти. --Kwasura (talk) 18:01, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Ви навіть значення цього терміна не знаєте. Домовитись щоб ви завантажували із заміную геть різні файли, псуючи верстку статей де вони використовуються? Докорінно переписуючи зміст опису файлу, який початково завантажували не ви? Вітаю, це і є вандалізм. Перед тим як вимагати поваги, її б слід було проявити.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
@PsichoPuzo: Шановний, я не видаляю текст як Ви, а дописую. Є різниця? І не завантажую файли там, де їх не слід поліпшити. Почитайте укази, якщо цього не розумієте. І ніщо не дає вам право розмовляти з іншими людьми в неповажному тоні. --Kwasura (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

вилучення - прапори[edit]

я коли заходжу до себе в обговорення - аж страшно стає. але, спасибі, що ви це робите. --Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:44, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

@Andrew J.Kurbiko: Шановний пане Андрію, спасибі вам за Ваші роботи. сподіваюся на плідну співпрацю у справі поліпшення категорій про українську символіку. У моїх планах систематизація та категоризація всього, що там є. Також хотів би позбутися українофобії, дублікатів, виправити кольорi і пропорцію там де необхідно, забезпечити файли гідним описом, а також спростити все до .svg та .png. і без .gif та .jpg. З повагою, --Kwasura (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Flag VVS i PVO RB.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag VVS i PVO RB.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

File:Vms flag.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vms flag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Іменна вогнепальна зброя[edit]

Добрий день, щось десь не так: File:Imgun.jpg -> File:Іменна вогнепальна зброя.png -> File:Відзнакою Президента України «Іменна вогнепальна зброя».png. У Вікіпедіях малюнки зникли. --Reader85 (talk) 09:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

@Reader85: Добрий день. Ось же воно. --Kwasura (talk) 10:31, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Категоризація[edit]

Як ви ставитесь до розділення категорій Militsiya та Police, для впорядкування та розділення відповідних груп зображень, бо там зараз такий гармидер?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Militsiya це не правильний spelling. Повинно бути Militia. Police тут взагалi не до чого. Це рiзнiречи. А про що саме ви говорити? --Kwasura (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Малася на увазі транслітерація. Категорії символіки старої міліції та нової Національної поліції, там все в купу нагромаджене та переплутане з половини, зокрема Category:Insignia of the Ukrainian Police. Можливо розділити все на просто Police та National Police.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 11:35, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Я так i зробив. --Kwasura (talk) 17:40, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Vms emblem.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vms emblem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 21:45, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Zsu emblem.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zsu emblem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Ps emblem.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ps emblem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 01:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Sv emblem.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sv emblem.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 01:35, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Емблеми ЗСУ[edit]

У вас є посилання на оригінальний проект, я так розумію з використанням ширшого хреста?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 18:59, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Де що снаходиться тут. --Kwasura (talk) 02:59, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

PNG[edit]

Чому ви не вилучаєте фон та не обрізаєте зображення емблеми по її контуру?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 12:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Також можливо вам варто ознайомитися із можливостями Upload Wizard.--PsichoPuzo (talk) 12:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Не маю Фотошопу щоб че робити. А що з Upload Wizard? --Kwasura (talk) 01:42, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Finnish Air Force Flags[edit]

Hello, In case if you are still needing sources for the missing AF flags. I managed to find a book with the disbanded independent units and here are some scans of the missing flags. Once again the book is from the Finnish Defence Forces and the flags should be allowed to be posted here because it is outside copyright. Kuljetuslentolaivue height 80cm x width 95: [2] Tiedustelulentolaivue (later Tukilentolaivue when merged with the first): [3] Ilmavoimien Viestipataljoona (later Ilmavoimien Viestikoulu) height 80cm x width 95: [4] The book doesn't tell the size of the flag of Tiedustelulentolaivue, however it is quite certain that it is the same size as the other two flags as it was battalion/squadron sized formation ("laivue"). --Caselius (talk) 16:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

{{ping|Caselius]] You are such a good help, my friend! Thank a lot! I will be certainly uploading these flags to commons. Please, help me with the descriptions for these flags (description+date+decision number+author, if you have). Also, if you can find the images of the first four flags (Hame, karjala, Satakunta, Lentosotakoulu) of the same type - it would be great. They will look wonderful together here in Commons. And the badges, of course, i will try to vectorize them. Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 23:07, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
No problem. The two books about history of the Finnish Defence Forces should cover it up quite well (there is overall description, usually the size of the flag/insignia, date when taken to user and the author). I will post some scans as soon-as-possible from the Air Force flags/insignia along with the information. Sadly the style of the graphics in the books are not completely the same and some look slightly different when compared with each other color and quality wise. I will also scan some unit insignia from units which didn't have their own flag but still had their own shoulder and sleeve insignia. Main problem with information might be the insignia of Häme Air Command as there is no section for it in the two books but only the history after it was assigned to Lapland and renamed to Lapland Air Command. --Caselius (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Штандарт командувача ВМС України.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Штандарт командувача ВМС України.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 21:24, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Знамена військових частин[edit]

(File:128bp.png) Мені вдалось знайти посилання на те що вони визначені тим же указом що й інша основна символіка. Хочу завантажити зображення базового зразка але трохи плутаюсь. У описі бойовий прапор, але це знамено (тобто одиничний виріб), а бойовий прапор це по суті має бути якраз прапор ЗС ПС і т.д. + Він для всіх частин йде малиновим, не залежно від виду, але зображена на ньому емблема сухопутних військ і інших варіантів нема (емблеми я гадаю мають таки мінятись для відповідних частин). Які у вас думки з цього приводу?--PsichoPuzo (talk) 19:51, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

@PsichoPuzo: Так, емблеми будуть змінюватися і на лицьовій і на зворотній сторонах бойового прапора (правильною є саме така назва). Тому для базового варіанту в цих місцях замість емблем треба залишити порожнє місце з написом: «Емблема виду збройних сил» і «Емблема роду військ». --Kwasura (talk) 23:41, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Logos та Emblems[edit]

Хіба Logos та Emblems не те саме? Може краще об'єднати ці дві категорії в одну? --Tohaomg (talk) 07:58, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Це взагалі різні речі. Повірте моєму досвіду. Емблема - це (зазвичай) геральдичний знак, а логотип - це (зазвичай) зображення чогось з написом. З повагою, --Kwasura (talk) 08:33, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

File:Airforce.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Airforce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 13:42, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Geoarmy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Geoarmy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 13:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

White silver?[edit]

To compare with these, where are the white silver in the Suomen Ilmavoimien tunnus.svg and Lotta Svärd badge.svg? --85.76.161.117 17:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Емблема Антитерористичного центру при СБУ.PNG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Емблема Антитерористичного центру при СБУ.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 16:11, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

File:SVO Kazakstan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SVO Kazakstan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

PsichoPuzo (talk) 22:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Suomen ilmavoimien tunnus 1945-2001.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Suomen ilmavoimien tunnus 1945-2001.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

85.76.166.58 19:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1912 г..jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1912 г..jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1912 г..jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1915 г..jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1915 г..jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ златен емисия 1915 г..jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1912 г. (реверс).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1912 г. (реверс).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1912 г. (реверс).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1917 г. (реверс).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1917 г. (реверс).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1917 г. (реверс).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:3-1 Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 1 клас, 1941г..jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:3-1 Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 1 клас, 1941г..jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:3-1 Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 1 клас, 1941г..jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1917 г.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1917 г.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1917 г.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Орден „За Храброст“ II ст.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Орден „За Храброст“ II ст.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Орден „За Храброст“ II ст.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 16:58, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Емблеми Збройних сил України.[edit]

Вітаю. Підкажіть будь-ласка, який саме офіційний номер (мається на увазі RGB) "малинового?"кольору емблем Збройних сил України? Сьогодні перемалював усі емблеми, тепер треба знати точний колір. Приклад: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emblem_of_the_Ukrainian_Armed_Forces.svg --Inkscape'r (talk) 19:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC)