User talk:NoFWDaddress/Archives/2015

How to start ?

@Jianhui67, Didym, and Revent:

Hello and thank you for your comments. I'd like to use my free time to help around here. Where to start ? Where is help needed ? I'm more the "maintenance" type of contributor. --Scoopfinder^(d) 13:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

There are many places where your help is appreciated, here just a few to start:

• Category:Media needing categories
• Category:Media needing category review
• Category:Media missing infobox template
• finding and tagging copyright violations

When you have gained some experience in those areas, there are further tasks you can do with additional rights, such as performing file moves, license review, ... --Didym (talk) 14:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you ! --Scoopfinder^(d) 14:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, you can also hunt for copyvios and out of scope images from User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users, User:OgreBot/Notable uploads and User:SteinsplitterBot/Possible copyvios. You can nominate them for regular deletion (for out of scope images/images that violate FoP/derivative works etc) or speedy deletion (for obvious copyvios). Not just that, you can help to patrol for vandalism and spam. Have a look at COM:CVU. This would be a useful link for you. Best, Jianhui67 ^{talk★contribs} 18:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Thx for these information --Scoopfinder^(d) 21:47, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@朝彦: Thank you for your support ! You probably replied to my questions above, so thank you for your big help --Scoopfinder^(d) 14:50, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

C'est vrai qu'on a besoin d'aide pour chasser les copyvios qui arrivent par centaine toutes les heures... Ton aide est la bienvenue. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Awww Merci Thibaut120094 ! Cela fait bizarre de changer un peu de projet et de découvrir un "monde" différent. Si j'ai des questions, j'ose me tourner vers toi ? --Scoopfinder^(d) 08:24, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Bien sûr. Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Well, bummer that your request didn't go through, but like I said there are lot of other ways to get involved, so try working on those tasks. It shouldn't be a problem to reapply after you have built up some experience. Best wishes, and have a nice day! --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 19:17, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Copyright of ARRC logo

Hello Scoopfinder, Thank you for your comment. I have created a copyright on the page of ARRC logo. Being a newbie, I am not really sure if the improvement can avoid the deletion of ARRC logo. And I also wonder how the deletion can be cancelled. Please tell me if the improvement still exists problem. Thank you. Willy81234 (talk) 04:10, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Willy81234: Hello ! A deletion request has been created to ask the community an other question about this media. Maybe you can use the {{Cmt}} template and add some explanations there to show that you are the copyright holder ? Best regards. --Scoopfinder^(d) 10:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Stamp Romer 1927.png

Hi Scoopfinder, thanks for your hint. But can you give me more informations about polish stamps and there licence status? Regards, --Bibonius (talk) 13:40, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Bibonius: . Polish stamps are in Public Domain when the author died 70 years ago (see Category:Stamps of Poland, {{PD-old}}) . --Scoopfinder^(d) 14:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, then please delete this image, because this stamp was issued in 1982. Thanks for help, --Bibonius (talk) 15:12, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Transformers - Decepticon logo.png

Salut^^

Merci pour ton message, il s'agit d'un oubli de ma part (je n'arrête pas de me battre avec la routine d'upload... mais un jour je vais y arriver^^)

C'est corrigé !

Cordialement,
Heddryin ^[🔊] 12:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Foto Wiener Blut / Lizenz

Hallo, erst einmal Entschuldigung, dass ich gleich mit scheinbar allen Regeln breche, obwohl ich eigentlich dachte mich gut informiert zu haben... Ich habe den Hinweis auch von einem weiteren User bekommen und werde noch heute veranlassen, dass beide Bilder durch eine Mail an das OTRS-Team von Herrn Enzinger perönlich autorisiert werden (Textvorlage "Einverständnis für Bild") und somit ohne Probleme in der Wikipedia genutzt werden können. Ich hoffe, das ist okay... Für die Zukunft werde ich mich besser daran halten um solchen Missverständnissen von vornherein aus dem Weg zu gehen. Vielen Dank und herzliche Grüße--Schreibmädchen (talk) 10:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Auf Ihre Diskussionssseite geantwortet. --Scoopfinder^(d) 11:02, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Löschen meiner Uploads

aus persönlichen Gründen möchte ich gerne meine gestern uploadeten Bilder wieder löschen lassen. Befürchte Ärger im Reallife. Die Bilder werden nirgendwo verwendet, bzw. ich werde sie nicht verwenden. Bitte um dringende Unterstützung. Gruß --Pitlane02 🏁_talk 09:33, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Danke, hat sich erledigt. --Pitlane02 🏁_talk 10:28, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

"Copyrighted free use provided that" is deprecated

Hello Scoopfinder

Yes I authorize replacement. thank you JMGM (talk) 16:21, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Leader Vocal.jpg

Hello. This is just to let you know that I came across the above file, which appears to be related to ticket:2015050310007683, but had been marked as no-license. My French is fairly basic, so I've marked it as OTRS-received and I leave it in your capable hands. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 17:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Green Giant:  ! Thank you for the template, the permission is missing some elements to be valid (and I'm still waiting for a reply). --Scoopfinder^(d) 11:19, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Josépedro8

Salut ^^

Pourrais-tu jeter un œil à cette DR et vérifier si les autorisations envoyées sur OTRS sont valides ? Notamment File:Aphrodite-pub1071.jpg qui semble provenir d'un catalogue.

Merci. Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

OTRS

Hello,ss

Pour info, le ticket:2015071910005081 a donné lieu à une demande de supp'

--Scoopfinder^(d) 23:13, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Salut,

Bien vu, merci. Tu as raison, il faut une autorisation supplémentaire pour les images, merci d'avoir pris la main !

kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 00:17, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

PS : il y a des tickets OTRS qui se languissent de toi :p

Ecorights

Bonjour, pour File:Venturia.gif, la licence personnalisée Ecorights ne présente pas de restrictions rédhibitoires, même les usages commerciaux sous conditions sont possibles. Cordialement, --Bildoj (talk) 10:03, 18 September 2015 (UTC) --Bildoj (talk) 11:04, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Category:New uploads without a license

Could you please remove that category too when you mark images as "no license since" out if it? Now other people like me have to check all of them again. Thx. --JuTa 10:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello @JuTa:  ! No worries, I usually do it with a simple catscan check, but it can happen that I forget to do it. I'll keep that in mind and focus more on that point. I'll also check if it's not my catscan request that is broken Best, Scoopfinder^(d) 11:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Храм Покрова Божией Матери (Чалдыбар).jpg

Can you please comment why this file was deleted? I obtained author permission for the free distribution. Francois (talk) 08:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Since I handed several copyright violations and licencing problems today, I can't remember precisely, but @Dharmadhyaksha: shoudl be able to read what I wrote as a comment on the speedy deletion request. --Scoopfinder^(d) 10:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

You don't have any records of what you do? Just delete for the sake of deletions? If you cannot remember please, ask |Dharmadhyaksha. Francois (talk) 07:42, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Here's the comment of Scoopfinder: 08:00, 21 September 2015 . . Scoopfinder (talk | contribs | block) (610 bytes) (Marking as possible copyvio because "Use for Wiki-projects permitted" is not a free licence and restrict the use to only Wiki projects !)

@Francois: Hi, you didn't add a license on this file. We also need a proof of permission, please follow the procedure on COM:OTRS. Please note that the file must be free of use for anyone, not just Wikimedia projects. Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Francois: No I don't keep personal records of my actions, since, when I ask for a deletion, I know at that moment that there is a rational reason to do it. I am also asking you to assume good faith and change your tone for any further message you might send to me.
@Thibaut120094: : Thank your for the help here. --Scoopfinder^(d) 14:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Scoopfinder: Non sequitur. Statement "free for use in Wiki-projects" is not equivalent to a statement like "Cannot be used outside Wiki projects". There is no word ONLY in my statement. Quite simple! Francois (talk) 00:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

@Francois: Then ask for an undeletion... I don't feel comfortable trying to explain to you what is wrong (see my previous remark on your tone). --Scoopfinder^(d) 09:04, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Logo Mémorial de Verdun.jpg

Bonjour. Suite à votre marquage sur cette image (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_M%C3%A9morial_de_Verdun.jpg), vous pouvez dès à présent la supprimer. (ou alors on laisse passer les 7 jours ?) Quoi qu'il en soit, nous ne demanderons pas d'autorisation de republication pour un logo obsolète mis en ligne il y a deux ans par une personne qui s'en déclarait l'auteur et qui ne l'était pas. En vous remerciant, bien à vous, --Mémorial de Verdun (talk) 14:06, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, image supprimée. Cordialement, Thibaut120094 (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Scoopfinder, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Alan ^(talk) 20:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you @Alan: --Scoopfinder^(d) 20:54, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hey félicitations ! Au boulot maintenant ! Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:44, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Déjà commencé par Flickr, mais je vais gentiment voir les autres catégories aussi, no worries. --Scoopfinder^(d) 06:45, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Aziz Sancar.jpg

Hi! You changed your decision at my undeletion request about Aziz Sancar.jpg. But my work is uncropped, untouched original version. The Twitter profile picture is probably cropped from my work at Commons. And what can I do for proving it? --Logom (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi @Logom: ! Thank you for your message. As I stated on IRC and in the request, there is too many elements that I didn't know about the picture and the whole context. That is why I don't support a restoration anymore: I'm not aware of everything and that seems more complex than what I thought. Sorry, --Scoopfinder^(d) 06:49, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

File:Betty Weiss 01.jpg

Bonjour,
Vous m'avez envoyé un message concernant le fichier "File:Betty Weiss 01.jpg". Il s'agit d'une photographie personnelle que j'ai prise lors d'une rencontre avec Betty Weiss dans le cadre de nos activités respectives à la FSCF. Lorsque je l'ai introduite sur commons, étant novice à cette époque sur wikipédia, il est possible que je n'aie pas fourni tous les renseignements nécessaires. Pouvez-vous me conseiller sur ce qu'il faut faire exactement pour valider cet apport ? Merci de votre aide; Cordialement --Gillesmourey (talk) 09:46, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

L'été des villes

Wow wow wow! Environ 800 images contiennent un template qui inclus automatiquement {{L'été des villes}} et ce genre de diff ne fait aucun sens! Je vais tout annuler, be careful --Scoopfinder^(d) 21:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

C'est corrigé. J'ai vu que les remarques sur ton maniement des éditions de masses ne proviennent pas seulement de moi. Peux-tu procéder avec plus d'attention la prochaine fois, en faisant, par exemple, des pointages réguliers et en étalant les éditions sur plus de temps?! --Scoopfinder^(d) 21:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour, je n'avais pas connaissance du modèle Template:Ete des villes mobeye, qui faisait doublon avec Template:L'été des villes. Je prends note de tes autres remarques, cordialement, Gzen92 ^[discuter] 06:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

"Republic of Korea" account/Flickr

Hi Scoopfinder, has the issue[1] with these images from Flickr been discussed anywhere here, on the VP or among OTRS volunteers? I agree with your conclusion, however, IMO the issue is worth a discussion, nottheleast to inform admins about it. --Túrelio (talk) 10:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello @Túrelio: . No, there is no active OTRS discussion between agents or active tickets that I would know about. The behavior of this account on FLickr is not normal and should be handled by them. For Commons, I don't know what actions can be taken, but a discussion can surely be opened (just don't know where/what/...) --Scoopfinder^(d) 10:55, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I think, either at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Probably, the first one is more on target. --Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Done! Hope I was clear enough about the problem @Túrelio: . --Scoopfinder^(d) 11:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I replied 'over there'. The Korea.net thing was one of Russavia's projects way back. AFAIK, the ticket on the license template is valid, though you might want to check. Revent (talk) 11:59, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

The ticket just says that the owner of the Flicker account changed all licences in batch (and might not have corrected the description). But, the ticket is from 2014, so the new descriptions should have been made according to the new licencing process, no? @Revent: --Scoopfinder^(d) 12:26, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

'Should have been', yeah, but I think 'might not have corrected the description' kind of addresses it. I suspect the restrictions are an artifact of the images previously being embargoed, and that the CC license is intended. Revent (talk) 12:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Photos deleted

I uploaded two photos which you deleted for copyright problems. I am new here so I might have made a mistake. Please clarify. I got the photos from here http://www.andreaiervolinoproducer.com/photogallery/ The photos that I used had this "Copyright free. This picture is available to be used freely without attribution)" written under them. Why is it not allowed on Wikipedia.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susana Hodge (talk • contribs)

Hello Susana Hodge! Thank you for your message and sorry that you had to experience these complications. You are right, I did not see the mention in the "lightbox" and marked the pictures as copyright violation. I just asked a second ago to restore these pictures. Sorry for the inconvenience. Best, --Scoopfinder^(d) 13:14, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

No problem Scoopfinder. I should have mentioned it in the description. Anyway, the photos have not been restored yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susana Hodge (talk • contribs)

I know. An opposition has been made since the text is unclear ("copyright free") and "available to use" is not enough to permit edition. For this picture, we will need the explicit permission from the author to put these picture under a free licence. --Scoopfinder^(d) 15:19, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

The photos were restored. Thank you. I have one question, though. If I see an article on Wikipedia that does not have a photo, is it okay to send an email to subject and ask them to send a photo to upload in the article. If they do send, how can I show that they have sent the permission?Susana Hodge (talk) 14:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Iza Loris

Je vous ai fais parvenir l'autorisation de Jacques Campens , il vous faut ouvrir la pièce jointe du courriel s'il vous plait. La permission est le texte scanné exactement conforme à ce qui est demandé et Jacques Campens l'a signé et daté. --Jlvenet (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Bonjour @Jlvenet: et merci pour le traitement de l'autorisation. J'ai répondu au ticket avec plus d'information, il arrive parfois que la vérification de l'identité soit légèrement plus poussée, mais je n'ai aucun doute que le tout soit validé. J'ai profité de l'occasion pour ajouter la photo à l'élément Wikidata lié à la personnalité concernée. --Scoopfinder^(d) 18:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Ah, merci beaucoup, car je suis contributeur à Wikipedia.fr et je n'ai pas trop l'habitude de publier sur Commons. C'est même la première fois que je mets en ligne une photo dont je ne suis pas l'auteur donc je m'inquiétais un peu, d'autant qu'avec Iza Loris et Jacques Campens nous avions essayé de faire pour le mieux. Si besoin, pour vérification, vous pouvez entrer en relation avec Jacques Campens dont j'ai l'adresse mail. Merci d'avoir répondu en français, je ne comprends pas tellement bien l'anglais. Bonne soirée. JL Venet — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlvenet (talk • contribs) 18:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Problem with the artist template

Hello, I have uploaded this image], where I use the artwork template. In the Artist field, I use the Template:Artist, so the image can have more info about the artist. However, you replaced the {{ with [[ and with this way the artist template is not visible. What am I doing wrong here? I am new, so maybe there is something, that I don't know? Thanks! EVDiam (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello @EVDiam: . I did not do such a replacement, look at my modification. --Scoopfinder^(d) 23:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Scoopfinder. I am really sorry. I had confused with the creator template, but I found what was the problem. I mistakenly thought you changed this template and you can give me your opinion about my confusion. Sorry. EVDiam (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 21:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Merci @Thibaut120094: . X-mas en avance? --Scoopfinder^(d) 21:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

About __NOINDEX__

I noindexed Commons:Requests for rights and Commons:Bots/Requests because folks may get annoyed when those two becomes number 1 due to their name. I got this idea from the robots.txt of Wikimedia Commons. I am okay for __NOINDEX__ to be removed from Commons:Bots/Requests (I think it is not too popular either) and Category:Photos taken by Louadfel, but Commons:Requests for rights is a popular one, so I hope you can reconsider at COM:RFR. And if you haven't noticed, I also noindexed Template:Administrators' noticeboard so the whole Administrators' noticeboard (and its subpages) will be noindexed too. They are popular too, and is also disallowed from web crawling at robots.txt. I also noindexed the Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard. Thanks! ★ Poké⁹⁵ 02:03, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

@Pokéfan95: Short answer: Please ask the community before making such changes... --Scoopfinder^(d) 13:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)