User talk:Xpërt3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Xpërt3!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:17, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi flag[edit]

Here you go

1- [1]


2- [2]

Next time don’t lie. Aziz bm (talk) 22:37, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aziz bm:

Look at the pictures carefully. You will see this detail:

Comparison between the Saudi flags on FOTW and VM

The "Vexilla Mundi" version of the flag is seen in the picture with MBS, President Erdogan, and President Abdel Fattah el Sisi! Look with your eyes!

Before you get blind and edit anything you don’t know, read Wikipedia’s term of services. when you upload an image, information or article you need to add source for credibility. The flag I uploaded has it’s source from a government website especially from royal decree page 10. The one you asked about page 11 is just a model for how the flag is constructed and it’s written in Arabic (Model 6). I reverted your edit and any other actions you take regarding this article will cost you suspension from editing. Aziz bm (talk) 01:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aziz bm:

Go ahead and explain to me why this version is not in the official presence of the King or Crown Prince. On Page 12 of this document it shows this version with the characters of the document I am uploading. There are two versions of this flag. You should upload this separately. It is not your job to threaten me with suspension since you are not a Wikipedian official. Your version has been reverted by other individuals, and if you continue to fight, this issue with flag versions must be brought to a Wikipedian official or we can hold a consensus and they will decide.

Go ahead and brought it to Wikipedia officials, there is already a source for this file and that will decide which one will be used. The source is the royal decree page 10 , a government website and a constitutional document, the one you uploaded is from construction sheet and it’s designed by @mapgrid two years ago and as I mentioned to you, page 11 is only showing the model of this flag and how it’s constructed which means it’s not the official one, I don’t care whether your version is showed on royal court or not, the important is the source and there is already a source. On the other hand, you can upload the previous version of Saudi flag to File:Flag of Saudi Arabia (type 2).svg to distinguish between the two versions. I think everything is clear to you now and I’m not going further with you. The file will be reverted Aziz bm (talk) 02:50, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but you need to upload this separately. There is a designated version of the file for this flag, and move the version you are arguing for to the other file. The royal court version will be used in the first version. Xpërt3 (talk) 02:58, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For god’s sake, STOP THE REVERTING WAR ON on File:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg. THERE IS ALREADY A GOVERNMENT SOURCE FOR THIS FLAG AND NO NEED FURTHER CHANGES !!!!! Aziz bm (talk) 03:57, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not continuing this unconstructive war with you anymore, and this has been reported to the Wikipedian Administrators Noticeboard. They will decide from here. Xpërt3 (talk) 04:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Upload war over the flag of Saudi Arabia. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

LaundryPizza03 (d) 08:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saudi Royal Flag[edit]

Hi, I see you’re still in the perverting war and I’m here to explain everything from A to Z

1- the flags I uploaded are aligned to a government official website (the Royal Decree 1973), on the other hand, your flag are actually aligned to (Vexilla Mundi) which means there is no comparable to the two sources in terms of accuracy since the first one is a government website while the other is private.

2- every national flags on Wikipedia should be associated to a government source and Saudi Arabia flags right now are associated to a government source that can be seen on the description (Royal Decree 1973) at page 10. So any speculations and analytics must not affect these files.

3- Your arguments are all based on speculations and interpretations without providing any official sources, your arguments is that your version is similar to royal court and it’s displayed on MBS’s visits and I’ve shown you several pictures to contradicts your arguments and I’m here again to show you proof.

1- [3]


2- [4]

3- [5]

4- [6]

5- [7]


See ? No similarity to the your version . And in fact, the Shahada is much more accurate to my version.

4- since LaundryPizza03 said that my version is correct, that means all other flags’s calligraphy shall be changed to the original one without any exceptions

5- you claimed that on page 11 on Royal Decree, there is a flag that is very similar to your version while you ignored the fact that the flag is just a model for how it’s constructed and it’s colored black and white, written in Arabic (Type 6) so you took that as an advantage and started reverting my edits, ignored the fact that page 10 shows the official flags of the country and the royal standard and they’re actually coordinated to my versions. This alone proves that you don’t make any sense at all


This is my position, very clear and legally and I’m not going further and further with you into this issue. The current flags are the accurate and there shouldn’t be any changes until you can bring a government documents that can associate your version to it. Aziz bm (talk) 19:44, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, Sources 1 and 2 that you are showing are actually of my version (1- [8] 2- [9]), look again at the shahada script. I never invalidated the version you are arguing for, in fact I said it is a legitimate flag for civilians. I have talked to LaundryPizza03 which he didn't respond to, so don't get too excited. Xpërt3 (talk) 19:59, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you CANNOT see what your own sources say which show the version of the flag I am arguing for and admit to your faults with the sources, then there is no point in discussing with you. Xpërt3 (talk) 20:00, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Al-Riyad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Achim55 (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abdullah of Saudi Arabia Portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]