Commons talk:Picture of the day/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

POTY finalists unused

Hello. I found some of the POTY finalists in Commons:Picture of the day/Unused featured pictures. (I am not familiar with POTY2006 or POTY2007, so there might be more POTY2006 or 2007 finalists unused). Will you - can you use them in POTD?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Miya (talk • contribs) 14:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Symbol support vote.svg Support: Sure, go ahead and create some POTD templates for days that don't have a POTD yet. These are brilliant pictures which are beautiful to be on the main page. Just make sure that you use the appropriate templates: {{Potd filename}} for the filename page, {{Potd description}} for all captions and {{Picture of the day}} for the file description page. Furthermore, it's probably helpful to steal the captions from the image description page, as these usually have some translations. --The Evil IP address (talk) 14:09, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Messy redlinks all over the template

It seems to me that the templates double the redlinks unnecessarily. For each language that does not have a description, there is a redlink on the language name (ok), and then a redlink of the template name that is missing (not ok). Both link to the same place, so I would much prefer only to see one of them. Is there a technical problem doing this? --99of9 (talk) 03:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

I agree with you that this doesn't look good, but I'm afraid we can't change this. Technically, there's an option to use {{#ifexist}}, but this parser function can only be used <500 times on a page (and developers are planning to reduce this to <100). We would definitely hit this limit, and in such a case any ifexist parser function will be treated as if the page would exist, even if it actually doesn't. So, the only option to remove the redlinks is to create a translation. --The Evil IP address (talk) 13:25, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
I've made a change which I think improves the situation. At least now you don't have to scroll to find the images! If anyone's got objections to this, let's talk and see if we can sort them out. --99of9 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

File renames

Hi, it recently came to my attention that File:Adm2.jpg was renamed to File:Admiral David Farragut (1801–1870) - collodion, LC-BH82-4054 restored.jpg in preparation for its appearance as the February 16 POTD, with the summary "Change meaningless". It would have been less unpleasant a surprise if someone had contacted me (as the editor who restored that file) to inquire whether there actually was a meaning. Indeed there was. I use a filename system for digital restorations that appends numbers and letters according to their progress as restorations. For instance:

The filename suffix (usually 2) differentiates a restoration from the pre-histogram edit, which is usually uploaded under the suffix numbered 1 such as File:Grant of arms1.tif. This system makes it possible for genuine wiki-style collaboration to occur since histogram changes are nonrecoverable. The filename change that was implemented damages the recordkeeping element of that naming system and I would like to revert it (the rest of the filename, "Adm", is a standard abbreviation for admiral). Please communicate and inquire before taking preemptive actions of this type; I discovered this change only through my watchlist. Durova (talk) 03:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

I responded at User_talk:MGA73#Featured_picture_name_change where this was posted initially. The change was requested two days ago and the full reason given was "change meaningless name" (refering to Commons:File renaming point 2). BTW, there is no File:adm1.jpg and you can still retrieve the image through the redirect. -- User:Docu at 03:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
That pre-restoration filename would be in TIFF format of course, to prevent progressive JPEG artifacting. WMF software did not support TIFF format until 2009. That particular restoration was completed in 2008. During the interim I had a system crash and lost several dozen restorations including that one, which was a reason the developers implemented TIFF support. These measures are necessary to facilitate collaborative editing within a wiki structure. Per the above explanation the original filename was meaningful. If you have no further objection I intend to restore it, although it would be equally effective in this instance to change to File:Admiral Farragut2.jpg. Would that be an acceptable compromise? Durova (talk) 04:13, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I still don't think "adm" is an acceptable filename, but if others think so, I guess you could rename back to that.
When requesting the rename (four days ago), I also expanded David Farragut with more images from Category:David Farragut. At some point (in preview), I wanted to re-arrange the sequence of portraits, but as they are all named more or less the same, I had trouble keeping track which image was which one.
If we do rename the file, I think we should attempt to pick one that is sufficiently descriptive and different from the other images used on David_Farragut. For portraits, first name and last name of the subject should be included. It isn't the only collodion either. As photographer and year of the portrait aren't known, we can't use that. Personally I'd keep the LC id. BTW "restored" seems more descriptive than just "2". -- User:Docu at 04:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Would you have any objection to [[[:File:Admiral Farragut2.jpg]]? It's the filename I probably would have chosen if the restoration had been done half a year later. This was one of the earliest. :) Durova (talk) 04:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
For the reasons explained before, personally I would pick one that allows to identify the image in "AdmFarragut.jpg Admiral-David-Farragut-1.JPG Admiral_David_Farragut_Monument_1024.jpg Admiral_David_Farragut_Statue.jpg Admiral_David_G_Farragut.jpg Brady_-_Admiral_DG_Farragut.jpg Commodore_Farragut.jpg David-glasgow-farragut.jpg David_Farragut.jpg David_Farragut_WWI_poster.jpg David_G._Farragut_memorial.jpg Farragut_Memorial_-_facade.JPG Farragut_Memorial_-_statue.JPG Farragut_Square_-_Connecticut_Avenue.JPG Farragut_Square_-_facing_north.JPG Farragut_Vicksburg.jpg Farragut_sculpture.JPG Madison_Square_Park_Farragut_Memorial.jpg Plaque_Farragut_Sculpture.JPG" and includes "David Farragut". -- User:Docu at 04:55, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
I was asked if I would rename the file before it was POTD. That is why the rename was done so fast. I still find the old name meaningless. Was he really known as "Admiral 2"? Had it been "Adm David Farragut" or something like that I doubt that someone would have suggested a rename. --MGA73 (talk) 07:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

These responses don't address the question which has been posed twice, so I have gone ahead and renamed to File:Admiral Farragut2.jpg. Feel free to remove this image from the POTD queue if that causes any problems. It's unlikely that this problem would recur in future with my FPs because this images was one of the earliest, yet in future it might be good practice to see whether the FP nominator is active and available for dialog before implementing radical filename changes--less feathers ruffled on all sides. Best regards, Durova (talk) 19:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Ok. Hope you remember to change the wiki-pages that uses the file. --MGA73 (talk) 20:51, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
You might want to lend a hand to MGA73 with renaming files to test the suggested procedure. -- User:Docu at 23:32, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Refactored/extended instructions for inclusion in the aftermath of COM:FPC discussion

I have adjusted an extended the instructions for inclusion quite a bit following Commons talk:Featured picture candidates#Concern over effective delisting of image. It is a rather big change I have made, but I hope you agree with the intention behind. I am not the best at writing concise and precise English, so feel free to adjust, tighten, improve as you please. Of course, if you totally disagree with the change I will take no offense if it is reverted either. In that case let us just discuss what to do. --Slaunger (talk) 12:04, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

The edit looks good to me for what it is worth. And thanks for the work. --Herby talk thyme 16:52, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Non-FP POTD candidate

Hi folks! It seems to me that the candidate for Picture of the Day 2010-05-27, namely this file, is not a Featured Picture. What is the protocol for that case? --MichaelBueker (talk) 22:02, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Well, it is not eligable for POTD, so it should be replaced by another image. The user, whi has inserted the image, potd has only made a few edits, and may (if I AGF) simply not be aware of the procedure. --Slaunger (talk) 07:27, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Caption on Template:Potd/2010-03-30 (en)

The first thing I wondered was where or what is Paranal platform. Needs a link but is protected. Moondyne (talk) 03:05, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibility of including commons Template in Wikipedia

Is it possible to include a commons template in a wikipedia? This would make it easier to keep POTD translations updated at a single place (i.e., here on commons), via e.g., Template:Potd/2010-03-30 (en). br. Quackor (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC) (fo.wp)

See bugzilla:4547 for this feature. I also agree that it would be great to have such an option. --The Evil IP address (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I guess I won't start at local translation here on commons then (to much double work). br. Quackor (talk) 13:53, 5 April 2010 (UTC)


The page should load a lot faster now. There was some incredibly inefficient code in one of the sub-templates which I desnarled. Basically, something that was a good idea when this served fifteen languages did not scale up to the hundred or so we now have very well.

Let me know if there's issues, though I have tested this and it seems to work great, and I doubt that very many people will even notice the change.

Those of you who are not coders may turn their attention away now.

Basically, #ifeq is one of the more server-intensive parserfunctions. The documentation says that it's limited to 500 uses per page, because of this, after which it will refuse to load.

This page used it a bit over 3000 times.

The reason it was used so much has to do with how the languages that can be translated into are divided into a short list of languages with (in theory) lots of translators, and a long list of all the languages with (in theory) few people supporting them.

However, all the languages' PotD page use the same template to provide the back end. It's translated using a "lang" parameter passed to the template.

However, what if you're on, say, the Afrikaans PotD setup page? That's one of the languages in the secondary list, but on that page, it needs to be in the main list.

...The problem is, they decided that A. Alphabetical order had to be maintained, and B. That it had to be suppressed in the secondary list. That meant the code was something like:

  • Check if the page is the Afrikaans PotD. If it is, show the link to the Afrikaans translation here.
  • [Check a dozen other languages, show them if they're the selected one]
  • Show the link for bn, one of our "main" languages
  • [Check a dozen other languages]
  • Show the link for Česky, one of our "main" languages.


Then, just to make it worse, when you got to the list of other languages:

  • Check if the page is the Afrikaans PotD. If it is don't show the link to the Afrikaans translation here.
  • [Same thing for every single other language!]

There were over 100 checks devoted to that effort of prettying up the page slightly - PER DAY ON THIS PAGE. That's a huge server load, and put this page a few more languages being added away from breaking completely.

Here's what I did.

  • I used a single #switch parser function to check whether {{{lang}}} was one of the languages in the main list (or undefined). If it wasn't, show the language {{{lang}}} represents at the top, in bold.
  • Display the rest of the list with no checks.

It's not as "pretty" in some very specific cases, but it has the benefit of being scalable, and not giving this page a server processing time measured in entire seconds. It also loses no actual functionality. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:57, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

I made a few more efficiency tweaks - there were a whole ton of padleft calls, and I realised that, if the template is going to work at all, there's no way they could ever do anything. ( {{{month}}} is always of the form YYYY-MM, calling it to be padded to at least two digits cannot do anything. Evidently, PotD used to be on a yearly cycle, like MotD currently is. )
Suffice to say, I have checked that the change works in all the higher-level templates that called it. This wasn't hard: It's a subsidiary template only used by one other, and some new stuff I made myself and which isn't in common use yet.
PotD should be loading really fast now =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:07, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

motd problem

Hope I am putting this question in the right spot? I was trying to help out MOTD, so I added a hidef video of a gorilla (that I took, so I am sure it is on firm copyright standing) but the default thumbnail isn't the best. I tried to use the wikicode thumbtime=8 to give a wonderful thumbnail, but it didn't seem to work. Any way we will be able to select thumbnails for the motd? That would be great, cheers, Nesnad (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. I'm not sure whether that's possible, in all honesty, while keeping things simple enough to be usable. Let me think about it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Well, I am not making the template, but I'm not sure why it can't work like wikicode on a page. On the template where you put the file name is it impossible to parse a |thumbtime= command at the end of the file name? I am not inventing wikicode here, that code already works in Wikipedia. Just sayin! Nesnad (talk) 17:30, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Hmmm. Not sure if you noticed, but the advanced options suggested, doesn't work. The thumbnail on the gorilla video is still in the middle instead of frame 8 like would be better. The advanced option (as of now) is not working. Hope you see this! Cheers, Nesnad (talk) 17:44, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Thumbtime is actually in seconds, not frame number. I've set it to .5, which seems to be what you wanted. You may need to purge the page to get it to show. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:54, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Language lists

The following languages are very frequently translated into, and thus now appear in the main language list: Belarusian (Taraškievica), Korean, Macedonian, and Ukranian.

Esperanto is almost never used, and is now under "Other languages". Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC) Bold text


It would be nice to tweak {{Potd/DaySetup}} so that when adding a description for a Potd, {{Potd description}} with the relevant parameters is preloaded. What do you think ? Jean-Fred (talk) 20:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Quite simply, it's impossible due to that requiring more #ifexist functions than are permitted (~60 languages * ~30 days = ~1800. The maximum number is 300, and we already use about... maybe 100 on this page for more basic functionality.
However, a bot's being worked on that'll automatically add the template after the fact. Adam Cuerden (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Okay, makes sense. That could be done with {{Potd}} though ? (though it would be better if it is never used : means otherwise that the Potd has no description yet on its day :-p).
(By the way, I love this new layout : I never thought about translating the Motd before, and now I do. Great idea). Jean-Fred (talk) 21:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! There's been a lot of hard work put into it, since the old code was hugely inefficient, which meant that getting it to the stage where we could double up like this took a lot of work. =) Here's the current stats.

NewPP limit report Preprocessor node count: 58807/1000000 Post-expand include size: 1855422/2048000 bytes Template argument size: 164484/2048000 bytes Expensive parser function count: 138/500

Not really happy with that Post-expand include size, but it at least has a bit of a buffer.

By the way, I don't know if anyone's noticed yet, but from May 2010 on, the monthly pages auto-translate. Compare:

Been trying to decide if we can use that instead of the monthly translation pages some languages have. The issue, of course, is whether we should have, say, following a link from the Commons:Picture of the day page in German to a monthly page to there should change commons' language to German, or just use {{int:lang}} unprompted, and hope the user has set his language appropriately already. If we DID use either method of {{int:lang}} translations, though, it'd vastly simplify {{Potd/Months}}. Thoughts? Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Minor improvement

The blank image and speaker icons used for unselected Potd and Motds may now be clicked on to choose a PotD or MotD, respectively. Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


Two questions I had about POTD:

  1. How are POTDs selected? Is there a vote on it?
  2. If I add myself to the POTD email list, can I remove myself from it later?

--The High Fin Sperm Whale 05:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)


Due to the controversy surrounding POTD, I suggest we replace it with COM:FK. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:25, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

July 25, 2010

"on july 25th 1946.": a capital "J" is needed here.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 05:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Not enough featured pictures for the POTD?

Seems there are now not enough FP to get one for each day? --Berthold Werner (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Caption template link for language Malayalam (ml)

Wish to add a caption link for language Malayalam (like # English : Template:Potd/2010-08-01 (en) ). But unable to figure how. Pls help. Thanks--Praveen:talk 16:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Somehow did here Template:Potd and Motd/Languages, but still not sure--Praveen:talk 23:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

14. September 2010

This is best of the best of Commons? Please, be careful when adding new POTD's. kallerna 12:33, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

POTD logo.png Could we replace the current Commons logo on the template with this? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Piłsudski description

Shouldn't it be at least the briefest mention that Piłsudski served as a military dictator? I understand that he was significant for the modern independence of Poland, but it's a bit touchy to leave out a fact like that in a PotD caption.

Peter Isotalo 01:02, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

November 17, 2010 English caption

The current caption in English (Template:Potd/2010-11-17 (en)) reads "Picture taken in Duisburg while summer meetup. nymphaea alba". This is pretty incoherant not to mention non-wikipedians might not know what a meetup is. Could it read something like: "Picture of nymphae alba taken in Duisburg during a Wikipedia meetup", Sadads (talk) 07:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Yes the caption is not very good and should be changed. And our main page should not lead people away from Commons so the links should lead to nice galleries at Commons, not to article or project pages in Wikipedia. I suggest changing the caption to "Picture of Nymphaea alba taken in Duisburg in August 2010." /Ö 10:50, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done Lupo 12:06, 17 November 2010 (UTC)


Has this file ever been a POTD ? If not, I think it is worth a nomination. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

No, it hasn't. But before it can be POTD it needs to be a Commons:Featured picture. /Ö 13:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Oh, and how does it become a Commons:Featured picture ? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 05:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

There seem to be quite a few element samples in January (3 in ten days), maybe we should switch some of the them. Oddly most replacements I considered were already POTD. --  Docu  at 04:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

It seems that the POTD RSS feed hasn't been updating recently. The last item in the feed is for 2nd January. 15:30, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Dup potd image.

Template:Potd/2011-04-08 and Template:Potd/2011-01-21. -- ChongDae (talk) 04:07, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

No picture for 4 January 2011?

Hi, Template:Potd/2011-01-04 seems to be missing. Does anyone know which file was chosen for POTD that day? Thanks. --Kjoonlee 13:05, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

It seems to be File:Apikal4D.gif but I don't know understand why the template was deleted. Please reinstate it if that would be OK. Thanks. --Kjoonlee 13:08, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Caption 2011-03-04

Why is the caption written in the past tense? This is a fossil, yes, but brachiopods are far from extinct and still filter-feed using their lophophore. --EncycloPetey (talk) 02:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Caption April 21, 2011

Can we please clean up the grammar and italics in the Jesus Baptism picture? Thanks. Stickpen (talk) 00:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done Thanks for the note. --99of9 (talk) 01:58, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Yahua Blowgun Amazon Iquitos Peru.jpg

See also Template talk:Potd/2011-05-16

How come this picture features as the POTD? It isn't even a featured picture, and its size is below the size requirements for FPs. Tomer T (talk) 10:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

I believe it was done in error and has been reverted. Kaldari (talk) 08:10, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

POTD in other languages

Is there any help/tutorial/faq that indicates how one can automatically display the commons POTD on the main pages of other language Wikipedias? Or can anybody be nice enough to write the steps here? It will be greatly appreciated! -- (talk) 05:17, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Any help? -- (talk) 01:20, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Ignore please. I now know how to. -- Hgetnet (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)


Template:pdh is supposed to automatically categorise Potd templates. In some cases, this doesn't work, and I can see no reason why. Compare Template:Potd/2010-04-03 (de) (fails) with Template:Potd/2005-01-07 (de) (works). (I'm cleaning out Category:Uncategorized templates.) Rd232 (talk) 07:55, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

The dates have to be written with a leading 0 for single digit numbers. So for April it should be "04" and not just "4". /Ö 10:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
OK, thanks. I've tried to clarify the documentation. Rd232 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Addendum: in fixing these templates it turns out that template parameters not matching the template name also breaks the template (so eg Template:Potd/2010-04-24 (ca) must use language code ca and date parameters 2010|04|24). Rd232 (talk) 21:15, 18 June 2011 (UTC)

Please correct year

Hi. Can someone kindly correct the year for File:Mona Lisa, by Leonardo da Vinci, from C2RMF retouched.jpg? It said 2012 which I don't believe is correct. Thanks. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

It looks correct. Maybe it is a bit early to choose a picture for May next year. But I assume someone did this to make sure that the image is used on the death date of Leonardo da Vinci. To use a specific image for a specific date one needs to do it in good time before that date. /Ö 19:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Thank you. The edit summary says it hasn't been featured yet which explains it, along with your info ("good time before that date"). -SusanLesch (talk) 02:40, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Acceptable captions

I've noticed quite a lot that POTD's often have really sub-standard captions. Captioning is a very important aspect of image metadata, especially when something goes on the mainpage. As an example of an upcoming POTD, the image File:Cucurbita 2011 G1.jpg has no information other than "Squashes and pumpkins". I don't question the quality of the image, but as information about what the image actually portrays, it's near-useless. Where was the picture taken and in what context? What species or varieties are we looking at? Are they edible or inedible? Every single detail doesn't have to be included, but reducing the description to "squashes and pumpkins" seriously lowers the usability of the image.

Are there any kind of quality guidelines concerning image information?

Peter Isotalo 15:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Identical images

Two potd images are same.

-- ChongDae (talk) 03:25, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I've removed the latter. Featuring the same image twice in one year because of a mere two-year anniversary doesn't seem right at all.
Peter Isotalo 16:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
It looks like a mistake was made when the FP nomination was closed. Both files were marked as featured, when only the editted version was voted in the nomination. /Ö 17:30, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

How can I ...

How can I propose a picture of the day?--Llorenzi (talk) 21:11, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

second time?

This picture has already been elected in July--David1010 07:35, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes - well spotted. We need a replacement now. Rd232 (talk) 11:08, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Period at the end of captions

Hi, I've been asking myself why do the captions here have the period at the end. Is this a convention here? Per en:Wikipedia:Captions#Wording, there should be no period at the end except in the case of full sentences, because the majority of captions are not grammatically complete sentences, but noun phrases. --Eleassar (t/p) 14:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

A length of caption

There was a dispute about a length of caption in Template:Potd/2013-02-11 (en). In my opinion, because the English description is used in commons and some Wikipedias, it is better to be short (For more reasons and discussions see User talk:Gidip#Too much info). What do you think about this? Should we really have to made a guideline for this? --관인생략 (talk) 11:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Beppe Grillo image of the day ????

I do not know who roposed and who choosed Beooe Grillo as "image of the day" March 14th, but it is a very strange and inappriate idea. --Arrakis (talk) 08:09, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Why not? This is a featured picture, like many others, and it can be assigned to the "picture of the day" like any other featured picture. --Kaganer (talk) 08:34, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wrong county

Could someone please correct the caption on the picture of the day April 2nd? Måbødalen and Eidsfjord are located in Hordaland, not Sogn og Fjordane. - 4ing (talk) 07:19, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Please help us develop consensus on an Infobox photo

Could available editors please give their opinion on which of [ these photos] would make a better Infobox pic for the Rick Remender article? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

File templates

Why are the current POTDs not decorated with the corresponding templates any more? — Julian H.✈ (talk/files) 09:18, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Portal Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.jpg (POTD for 30.04.2014)

File File:Portal Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque.jpg was nominated for deletion (No FOP in Oman). I propose chenge it to File:Isfahan Lotfollah mosque ceiling symmetric.jpg. --Kaganer (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2014 (UTC)