User talk:Discovery23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Discovery23!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 04:10, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:2012 Chinese administrative level and above ground level Schematic per capita GDP data.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2012 Chinese administrative level and above ground level Schematic per capita GDP data.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

shizhao (talk) 03:05, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

建议[edit]

你好,Discovery23!
看到你的作品2012 Chinese administrative level and above ground level Schematic per capita GDP data.png,信息的收集是如此浩大的工作量,佩服佩服。但有一些看法,不妨你借鉴一下。
作为发展中的中国(仅大陆),2012年全国人均亦就美元6K,从省级水平来看,2012年全国人均GDP均超过美元3K,但以地级行政区来看,地级行政区之间的差异和全球经济体之间差异还要大,全球经济体也就约200个,地级行政区则有300多个;沿海中西部差距比欧美与老挝的差距还要大。2012年全国人均亦就美元6K,划分上,6K附近划为中等是合适的,一半水平即3K以下划为低,高于10K划为高,这种划分切合中国现实际发展水平。不妨参考一下国际组织的划分,像世界银行对全球经济体按人均GNI划分,也就分为贫困、低、中偏低、中偏高和高5大类。以图形直观来进行分类,当然对中国人均GDP适当细分蛮合适的,但过细没有太多意义,对于一个地级行政区的数据,因核算口径的不同,省市二级统计部门的计算偏差有时超过好几百美元。此外,2012年数据多数系初步核算数据,这些数据多出自年度公报,公报中很多人口数据资料不详。很多数据省级和地级是不一致的,你可以比较一下山东和当地各市的年鉴数据。从可比性和权威性来看,对地级行政区的数据,真正可以作为权威参考依据的应该为所属的省级年鉴数据为准较好。目前全球对国民经济核算均使用NAS核算体系,人均GDP使用年中人口计算,年中人口为上年末和本年末人口的简单平均值。而早年的江苏和现在的浙江,人均GDP数据均按户籍人口计算,这种算法不符国际上和国内通行的做法。特别像经济发达地区,未落户当地的外来人口占有极大比重,按户籍人口计算的人均GDP大大高于按常住人口计算的人均GDP。为纠正这种偏差,国家统计局规定按年中常住人口核算人均GDP。有鉴如此,图形仅作为直观的参照物,并简单注明来源。建议简化划分,设立1K-、1K-3K、3K-5K、5K-10K、10K-20K、20K-30K、30K+几个档次更为清晰。CncsTalk)1:52 2013年9月3日(UTC)

File:2012 Chinese administrative level and above ground level Schematic per capita GDP data.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

庄明仁 (talk) 13:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]