User talk:T Gordon Cheng

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The user's homework is heavy and he has lot of exams, so he can not be active this site every Monday to Thursday, but give him a message will be replied.
Under normal circumstances,he will be on the line every Friday to Sunday and holidays (such as Moon Festival, National Day, New Year's Day) .

By the way, this semester:
10/07/2014 to 10/15/2014, 11/20/2014 to 11/28/2014 and 01/09/2015 to 01/19/2015
are monthly exam preparation weeks, so he will not on the line.

This template will be become ineffective on 01/28/2015


這位用戶因為課業繁重、考試很多而導致每週一到四無法活躍於本站,亦指不會進行編輯等事務,但留言會進行回覆
正常情況下每週五到日及假日 (如中秋節、國慶日、元旦) 都會上線

此外本學期的:
2014/10/07~2014/10/15、2014/11/20~2014/11/28、2015/01/09~2015/01/19
期間為段考準備週,因此即使是假日也不會上線,專心複習功課最重要。

本模板於2015/01/28寒假開始時失效

This is a discussion page, please follow the talk page guidelines, in particular:

1. The latest message into the bottom of this page. 2. Please remember to use "~~~~" sign your name.


這是一個討論頁,請遵守討論頁指導方針,尤其是:

(一)最新的意見置於頁面最底;(二)請記住用「~~~~」簽名



Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, T Gordon Cheng!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:10, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Pay attention to copyright
File:JeannekePis.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Modern statues are usually under copyright; see COM:FOP for a list of nations that we accept pictures of statues from. Belgium isnot one of them.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:JeannekePis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 10:06, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not recreate deleted content[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  sicilianu  svenska  suomi  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  +/−
Your image or other content, File:JeannekePis.jpg, was recently deleted in accordance with our process and policies. You have recreated this content after it was deleted; please do not do this. If you would like to contest the deletion, please visit Commons:Undeletion requests and follow the instructions there to have the deletion reviewed. Recreating deleted content outside of process is not allowed, and doing so repeatedly may cause you to lose your editing privileges. Thank you for understanding.

JurgenNL (talk) 14:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

請看照片,很明顯是只有列車,但是你添加Platforms at Tamsui Station類別,所以我不懂這照片哪裡有拍月台?--Kai3952 (talk) 11:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

我說錯了,不是看照片,是看你的編輯:special:diff/609610693--Kai3952 (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
你的回應似乎拖得有些久。你可以看看我上傳日誌顯示,我上傳夏于喬照片也是大量上傳,可是並沒有像你所說的發生,所以我不明白你添加類別是怎麼添加呢?你能教教我嗎?--Kai3952 (talk) 17:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
按照你的回應,你似乎告訴我,添加分類是手動,而不是靠某種工具自動的?還有,你說「在月台拍的我就歸類到月台」這句話意思是不是說,你想表達你從月台拍這張照片?--Kai3952 (talk) 06:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
我是不是看錯?你的回應是說你拍到月台門,所以月台門就是月台?--Kai3952 (talk) 03:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
我執著不是因為你,而是我看過很多人與你發生相同情況,每一位告訴我的答案,他們對於類別在使用上邏輯與想法竟然與你一樣,所以我很難相信是我們(指wikimedia commons)建立的類別存在這種問題。如果針對你的情況來說,你的是發生在月台類別,但你給我的答案是「在月台拍到月台門就歸類在月台」。我沒辦法改變你的邏輯或者對類別使用上認知,正如我剛才說,有太多人發生,不可能要求所有人可以正確添加類別,我唯一能做的是從類別上去解決。如果按照你的答案來看,我們還沒有精確到Low-height platform screen doors at Tamsui Station這個類別。假如要滿足你的需求,創建Views from the platform at Tamsui Station是個辦法,但這樣會衍生出另一個問題:從月台上可看到站外的風景,列車靠站是在站內,不算是站外,這樣會混淆,除非這個問題拿給社群討論,看是否有需要這樣做。--Kai3952 (talk) 13:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

我剛才幫你找到你所站的拍攝位置,你可以看看這裡。然而,我沒辦法對你每一張照片都這麼做,尤其是你上傳那些巴士照片都只添加Category:Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park。竹科是個園區,有一定的範圍,所以你有些照片的拍攝地點不是位在竹科,儘管我幫你檢查了,但我終究不是拍攝者,只有你最清楚每一張照片的地點。

比方說,拍攝者是對著寶山鄉某棟建築物,但我們看照片只看見一棟棟高樓,乍看都像是在新竹市,如果拍攝者沒有在照片中說明自己是站在東區,面朝向寶山鄉拍攝,那麼我們都會以為照片是在新竹市,這樣就會發生誤解,甚至人家要來commons.wikimedia這裡找照片,他們不知道就會變成積非成是,大家都將這棟建築物當成是在新竹市。這個比如雖然真實發生在別人那裡,差別是我將嘉義改成新竹作為例子,不過這仍然值得我們思考上傳照片是為了什麼。因此,我建議你,要嘛就學我添加座標,要嘛就在照片中說明地點及拍攝景物。這只是提醒,因為你上傳照片量多。

此外,根據我多年整理這麼人的照片來看,我是抱著悲觀。因為太多人習慣不將照片標題命名清楚,而且說明也沒有寫,這些在來commons.wikimedia累積起來,如果沒有幾十萬張照片,應該有數萬張,他們的命運最後會被丟入「未知的地點」,只不過我們沒有這麼做。原因是上傳的人多,所以當我們發現時,往往他們那些人已經很多年沒上線,我們想問也問不到,所以面對這種情況,我們要嘛要丟入未知的地點,要嘛就選擇不添加地點。--Kai3952 (talk) 10:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

我收到你的訊息,但是我嚇一跳,因為系統通知顯示你在警告。儘管我正在忙,我還是趕緊答覆你:
  • 我知道竹科沒有分,所以類別是命名「Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park (Hsinchu City)」‎,而不是命名「Hsinchu City Hsinchu Science and Industrial Park」,括弧用意就在這裡有分別。既然你現在向我說明巴士是出於服務竹科,我可以幫你建立一個專屬的類別,這樣未來別人也有拍此類的巴士,他們能找到這個類別。至於難處,你說錯了,應該是所有人,因為分類的用意是給人找照片用的,否則搜尋是很難找到,除非是你照片標題有命名或者說明中有寫。
  • 我只是針對拍照地點,然後建議二個方法給你選,所以我沒有強迫你添加座標。如果你不選擇座標,也沒有將照片標題命名清楚,甚至連Description這個欄位也沒有對照片說明清楚,那麼照片的使用價值就變低,低到可以說是幾乎變成上傳者私人財產,只有他自己一個人知道怎麼用他的照片。我會有這種堅持,這是基於commons.wikimedia本身是屬於所有人使用的精神原則,因此你這一次不做,下此我在整理到你的照片時,如果我有發現到問題,屆時我還是會找你問(儘管我曾被人警告不要騷擾人)。
  • 最後,我想藉這時機向台灣人說明。我知道不少台灣人受到我的騷擾,但我必須強調:我首要工作是「分類」,不是在檢查有關於照片的問題,比如說明沒寫清楚、EXIF時間與作者寫的不同,甚至是作者自己將拍攝地點搞錯,這些都不是我應該要做的,只是基於我每天分類的需要,每天巡查的照片數量相當多,因此利用「我路過」就順便幫作者檢查照片的問題。假如你們任何人有誰不願受擾,我很對不起,我是不會知道的,特別是那些喜歡裝聾作啞的人,所以我並非故意找人麻煩。--Kai3952 (talk) 13:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Hsinchu Bus 世博3號 2022-08-19 (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kurator 23 (talk) 12:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]