Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:140823 Märchendom Saalfelder Feengrotten.jpg

File:140823 Märchendom Saalfelder Feengrotten.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2014 at 06:49:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:140823 Märchendom Saalfelder Feengrotten.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:140823 Märchendom Saalfelder Feengrotten.jpg

•  Info created, uploaded and nominated by me -- Code (talk) 06:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Code (talk) 06:49, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support WOW! --Hubertl (talk) 07:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry there are areas overexposed,the part on the left is disturbing --LivioAndronico talk 07:55, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Crop on the left (dark area) would be nice. --Anton^Talk 08:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment Thank you for your comment, Anton. I would do the crop but I am not sure whether this is allowed after exactly this version of the picture was promoted as a VI. Wouldn't I have to upload it as a completely new picture? --Code (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Some parts are too bright, others too dark, but IMO it's OK. But: IMO you should crop out the dark area at the left.--XRay ^talk 08:57, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 14:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent! Alvesgaspar (talk) 21:46, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support I checked it with LR, I could´nt find any burned out areas. Hubertl (talk) 00:10, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

I leave some notes for burned aereas,anyway one vote is enough Hubertl --LivioAndronico talk 09:51, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

You are right, one vote is enough. ;-) --Hubertl (talk) 13:18, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment I checked it with lightroom as well and in fact there are no burned out areas. I don't understand your critique anyway, LivioAndronico, since it was you who promoted exactly this version of the picture as a QI without any concern about burned out areas or a bad crop just one week ago. --Code (talk) 14:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello Code, first thing you should write under the comment of the person that you want answer. Anyway a thing is QI and another is FP. It IQ is given the quality of the picture and I felt that burned parts were minimum standards for the quality of the same. In FP is different, the picture has to be perfect it whole and these areas or the dark part on the left does not make that, again in my opinion of course. Let's do this, cut the dark part on the left and i can review my vote.Grazie. --LivioAndronico talk 15:40, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Support Yann (talk) 08:45, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Agree with the crop on the left. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Also agree about that crop. --Halavar (talk) 15:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment See above - I would do it but I'm not sure whether this is allowed after the actual version was promoted as VI? --Code (talk) 16:46, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

 Comment If it makes common sense then it is allowed. Cropping that black off the left is common sense. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

• Absolute  Support, but do the cropping. --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support how it is. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --The Photographer (talk) 23:23, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Alright everybody, the cropping is done. Do you like it better now? Especially Anton and LivioAndronico? --Code (talk) 12:10, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Look nice, and i support. --Anton^Talk 13:11, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Ok accetable now --LivioAndronico talk 14:19, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support The new crop is better. Thanks for it --Chmee2 (talk) 15:02, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --JLPC (talk) 15:07, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Saffron Blaze (talk) 19:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent and rare.--Jebulon (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- ChristianFerrer 15:49, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural