Jump to content

User talk:Rawpixel

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rawpixel!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:31, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply


User:Rawpixel

[edit]

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:13, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


Incorrect/changed license?

[edit]

Many of the uploaded images named "digitally enhanced by rawpixel", and tagged with the license "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0", seem to have been released under CC0 at rawpixel.com. Teadrinker (talk) 13:37, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Preview of rawpixel website.png

[edit]
File:Preview of rawpixel website.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankry (talk) 18:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked

[edit]
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Commons for the following reason: Your username is promotional for your own website and thus inappropriate. This is not the purpose of Commons. That you add mentions of your own website and watermarks to the images you've uploaded reinforces that point of view. The images themselves may be ok, but we are not a free repository for your own commercial venture..

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.


المصريه  العربية  azərbaycanca  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  Gaeilge  galego  עברית  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  occitan  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  Simple English  slovenščina  svenska  ತುಳು  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

[edit]

Attribution for the file File:Bird illustration by Elizabeth Gould for Birds of Australia, digitally enhanced from rawpixel's own facsimile book666.jpg was set to you, and the licence to CC BY-SA. You claim "We have spent time retouching the image to create the highest quality digital example of this work. A higher resolution with no attribution required can be downloaded: rawpixel.com/category/public_domain" The changes you've made seem to have been restricted to basic cleanup and colour correction, which is normal for a scanned work, and does not create a new layer of copyright. In addition, a promotional watermark has been added, as noted above. I've set the attribution to Elizabeth Gould, and the copyright status to Public Domain. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I second this claim. It seems to be a case of batch copyright washing. TiagoLubiana (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:33, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:34, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vintage illustrations by Miss May Rivers digitally enhanced by rawpixel 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 10:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:55, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 10:57, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vintage illustrations by Miss May Rivers digitally enhanced by rawpixel 102.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 11:08, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vintage illustrations by Miss May Rivers digitally enhanced by rawpixel 63.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 11:12, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:35, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:37, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:39, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:40, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:41, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:42, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vintage illustrations by Miss May Rivers digitally enhanced by rawpixel 6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nutshinou Talk! 11:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:49, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:56, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 11:59, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 12:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nutshinou Talk! 12:03, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

File:Vincent van Gogh’s famous painting, digitally enhanced by rawpixel-com 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:58, 21 February 2025 (UTC)Reply