User talk:Alvesgaspar/archive33

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Connemara October 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:44, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kylemore October 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. In my opinion,there's more nature than abbey,but is good --Livioandronico2013 13:22, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fog Lisbon October 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Villy Fink Isaksen 07:33, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barcelona June 2008-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvaterra September 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice composition --Livioandronico2013 16:03, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salvaterra September 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho Porto October 2014-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very weak  Support Shorter time would be better. The dark looks like a frame, OK. --XRay 05:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC) It lacks an old photographer IMO.--Jebulon 21:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

"Nobody is victorious, but God !"

Et voilà ! --Jebulon (talk) 23:34, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you my friend, I'm really impressed. Should I promote the picture twice? Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • No need, thanks: I did not promote twice your picture just above, even if I wrote a comment !! Did you notice ?--Jebulon (talk) 17:49, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

• Yes I did! But no old photographer was available... Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wind rose Valladolid.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent, but what about a SVG version ?--Jebulon 16:41, 23 October 2014 (UTC) -- The conversion from Corel Draw to svg didn't work well (as usual). Maybe someone can help? Alvesgaspar 16:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC) I don't care. QI anyway.--Jebulon 21:10, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Ljungris

Please have a look here File:Härjångsfjället_October_2014.jpg, the building is not straight and the fenceposts are tilted in different directions. Also, please try to "correct" the panorama on your computer. In order to to get the walls straight you have to rotate the image 3 degrees clockwise, look what happens to the lake in the background when you do so. I know this place very well, I've gone through all the pictures I have used a second time after your comment and there is no tilt. If you dont believe me, I cand uploaded the four other images too--ArildV (talk) 22:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Roque July 2014-2b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --ArildV 20:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice also the girl in bikini --Livioandronico2013 17:29, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-11a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 22:39, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-9a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuchsia October 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Flash a bit high for my taste but QI anyhow --Poco a poco 17:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dublin October 2014-4b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tobias "ToMar" Maier 21:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo October 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK for me. --Hockei 21:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Porto Covo Outubro 2014-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Porto Covo Outubro 2014-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Outubro 2014-6b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:37, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho Porto October 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good resolution, but overprocessed?: Too dark to be taked at 16:37 h. A bit of noise IMO. Unnatural colors IMO. Perhaps FP, but I'm not sure if QI. I'm thinking that it's not QI for me, but very nice picture--Lmbuga 22:50, 30 October 2014 (UTC) @Lmbuga: Fine for me.  Support. Mattbuck 21:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Chapel of St John the Baptiste, Church of São Roque, Lisboa, Portugal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : best in scope imo when geolocalized. --JLPC (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 17:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kylemore Abbey, Ireland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment : geolocode needed in the caption and "SW (or NE...) view" in the scope, as we usually do on this page. Can you complete, please ? --JLPC (talk) 16:41, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

•  Done Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:05, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Falco peregrinus (Peregrine Falcon in captivity).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment The scope is not properly formatted. The binomial name should be in italics followed by the English vernacular name in parenthesis.. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment We must add a geocoding. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Done Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Halavar (talk) 12:23, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo September 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very very good. --Livioandronico2013 23:33, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Galway Cathedral (organ), Galway, Ireland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good focal length, lighting (except for reflection on left), and exposure. COM:VICR satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:14, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. P e z i (talk) 21:56, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo January 2014-11a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-35a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. That door was open??? --Kadellar 18:26, 10 November 2014 (UTC) -- Yes, His Majesty recognized me from the window and came to say hello -- Alvesgaspar 20:02, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tampa Florida November 2013-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 13:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Madrid May 2014-31a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality --P e z i 16:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gazania October 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 19:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cat December 2005-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and QI -- Spurzem 18:59, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guincho June 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sunset August 2010-1c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cistus May 2014-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ezarate 21:25, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Implementation of the new rule

Perhaps you should add this night a box over the todays gallery of nominations, stating that the new rule is effective from now.

The new rule is effective from today. Please add only a maximum of 5 photos per source.

I guess, that not everyone is following up the huge thread in QI talk page. Cheers, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 22:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC) }}

I took the liberty to add this to the QIC page. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 05:05, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for that, I've been quite busy in real life. Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:42, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo March 2010-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 20:52, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fly June 2013-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 22:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helsinki July 2013-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 21:21, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nelumbo July 2011-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Greek or Trojan, I find it very good, again, three years later.--Jebulon 00:46, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bubo September 2014-4a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jarro-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verbesina & bee July 2011-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 14:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelargonium May 2010-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lavatera May 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition is a little awkward, but the exposure and sharpness are fantastic. An obvious QI. Appears to be downsampled, but at that aperature, it's diffraction limited anyway. --Ram-Man 00:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC) --  Info -- Not downsampled but cropped from a 5520 X 3680 original. Why the camera was not set to maximum size I can't remember. Should have been accidental because all my photos of May 2013 and most of April and June have this reduced size.-- Alvesgaspar 12:56, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paris July 2011-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support good but permission missing and there is no personality template.--XRay 07:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Eristalinus June 2014-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eristalinus June 2014-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hockei 08:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo Sunset September 2012-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty, but tilted clockwise. Mattbuck 18:24, 20 November 2014 (UTC) --  Corrected Alvesgaspar 18:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --El Grafo 12:13, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flower July 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:01, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus June 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 18:11, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver May 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Papaver May 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

New user template

Hello.

I've created a new template to describe yourself : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

I've use it on my user page.

Regards. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:43, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bembix October 2007-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Code 21:37, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wasp July 2013-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trifolium May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 18:39, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus May 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:53, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliotaurus May 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 12:21, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flower April 2013-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:37, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

• Obrigado por você ser você mesmo, e estar perto--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:43, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpobrotus April 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa June 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments *  Comment vertically distorted. Please repair, its a good picture. --Hubertl 15:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC) Good quality, the distortion is not detectable--Lmbuga 20:53, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho Porto October 2014-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:45, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho Porto October 2014-15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A few dark but good. --Livioandronico2013 22:55, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse December 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Not just QI, its FP for me! Congratulations! --Hubertl 00:16, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:13, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

• Hi Medium69, thanks for the compliment. What do you think? I don't even remember inserting this category into my account... Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:16, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho April 2009-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 12:52, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse December 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 08:49, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could do with brightening the low levels, but generally nice. --Mattbuck 22:21, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe December 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Llez 19:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2014-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 20:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Horse December 2014-1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Horse December 2014-1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:05, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2014-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FritsHG 19:24, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aloe December 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Perfect. --Code 16:47, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2014-6a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me --Halavar 16:41, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2014-8a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 21:39, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bank safe Lisbon October 2014-1a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:48, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa October 2014-8a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 23:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! S. Martinho Porto October 2014-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality but sharpness could be better. --XRay 06:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Inputting images

Please when you input images, put a more precise category. For instance, you reinputted Category:Clouds for two images but I had already moved your images to a more precised category. It was the best I could find because your image have nothing else much to go one. Category:Clouds in a main category that should be kept as empty as possible.

Pierre cb (talk) 15:14, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Pierre cb In my opinion, it is more useful for the users to search in "Clouds" than in "Clouds by year or month". I would be happy to categorize those images with the exact type of cloud (cumulus something) but I don't know enough on the subject. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

There is too many images in that category that cannot be identified because of on partial view, mixed types of clouds, bad point of view, etc... and your images are two of them. I don't know why people input images if they are not usable for an article, it clutters Commons. I guess that is the reason so many subcategories have been created that are related to month, shapes, country, etc... I'm trying to distribute the images from Category:Clouds to the best existing subcategories and I was abble to come down from 2500 to 500 so far. Pierre cb (talk) 01:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I sympathize with your work and thank you for having inserted the correct cloud categories into my clouds' images. However, please nore that Wikimedia Commons is much more than a repositoy of images to be used in Wikipedia! Please see here -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colored flowers b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition. --Ram-Man 03:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2014-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although title could be more descriptive. --C messier 13:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porto Covo December 2014-7a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments One dustspot to remove. Consider to remove the two other issues, too. I made annotations. --  Done Corrected, thanks Alvesgaspar 10:43, 13 December 2014 (UTC) Absolutely beautiful. --Ram-Man 04:50, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caldas May 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me --Ram-Man 16:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Caldas May 2014-2b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments 1 dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:11, 16 December 2014 (UTC) --  Done Fixed Alvesgaspar 21:45, 17 December 2014 (UTC)  Support It's quite subtle. I say good enough. Ram-Man 16:36, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butterfly May 2008-3a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 00:31, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Horse December 2014-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lisboa December 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, although title could be more descriptive. --C messier 12:28, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corkscrews December 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bottle and corkscrew December 2014-2a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:44, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2015!

		* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SMP May 2008-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Could you upload the old one in bigger size? I remember it small. --Kadellar 14:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC) -- If you mean this picture, I don't have a larger size, sorry. Alvesgaspar 11:48, 22 December 2014 (UTC) I had to ask, just in case! --Kadellar 13:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PortraitGirl2005-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well categorized, nice details on the face but overexposed background --Christian Ferrer 20:56, 21 December 2014 (UTC) I tested 1700×1479 at 127 for less background and centered. Do you still have one pixel at the top for 1700×1480 or even 1700×1500? –Be..anyone 22:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC) -- I really don't see the need for correcting or hiding the background. Many portraits of people (or objects) have pure white backgrounds. Alvesgaspar 11:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)QI(nès) for me as it is.--Jebulon 19:06, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

PH-4

This user is able to take professional quality photographs.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

• Thank you for reminding me, Thomas! But I don't think those categories are consistent enough. Happy New Year! Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cortaderia December 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cotoneaster December 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bamboo December 2014-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality now, thanks! --DXR 22:48, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvas September 2013-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 13:57, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elvas September 2013-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dustspot (top left) --Christian Ferrer 13:41, 27 December 2014 (UTC) --  Done Removed, thanks. Alvesgaspar 15:56, 27 December 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 17:01, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-39.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:49, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas December 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Ursus arctos

Bonjour Joaquim, j'ai vu que tu comprends le français, alors..
J'arrive souvent à m'étonner moi-meme avec mon mauvais caractère. Et bien que je reste sur mon point de vue, je te souhaite mes plus sincères et chaleureux voeux, à toi, aux tiens, et à ta magnifique Ines.
Fin de l'histoire pour moi, je ne chercherai pas tes images mais ne les éviterai pas non plus.
à bientot,
:)-- ChristianFerrer 19:07, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

• Salut Christian! Oui, je parle et comprends bien le français. Mais écrire c'est autre chose: je ne sais jamais ou mêtre les doubles "tt", les "ll", etc. C'est pourquoi je ne l'use pas souvent à Commons. Merci pour tes voeux, je te souhaite aussi une Bonne Année, pleine de joie, et aussi de quelques FPs et Qis. Inês n'est plus une jeune fille: elle est déjà à l'université! Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:16, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos October 2014-12a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos October 2014-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 01:12, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grijó July 2014-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --DKrieger 11:46, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grijó July 2014-10a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the left side should be cropped a bit, the tube (above the tree) is somewhat disturbing --DKrieger 11:51, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Borba September 2013-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:09, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vila Viçosa September 2013-32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:54, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos October 2014-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Walls are very bright, but it's fine. --Ram-Man 03:29, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Óbidos October 2014-14a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 00:47, 30 December 2014 (UTC)