User talk:Ji-Elle

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Happy New Year !

File:Sri Lanka-Kurakkan flour.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sri Lanka-Kurakkan flour.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

🎂CAKE🎂 07:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Pour la photo de l'église Saint-Fleuret d'Estaing! Aarp65 (talk) 07:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Strasbourg-Rassemblement Charlie-11 janvier 2015 (1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Strasbourg-Rassemblement Charlie-11 janvier 2015 (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Josve05a (talk) 03:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

2015-04 Le dessous des cartes[edit]

Je crois que vous êtes mentionnée ici, ou . Visite fortuitement prolongée (talk) 20:32, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Merci merci. Il m'a fallu du temps pour reconnaître la photo concernée. Très bel endroit, on ne peut plus y aller :-( Ji-Elle (talk) 06:18, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

File:CapitaleGeo.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CapitaleGeo.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 07:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Autorisation musée des arts décoratifs ?[edit]

Bonjour, pour vos photographies du musée des arts décoratifs, avez-vous eu l'autorisation du musée ? Normalement, les photographies sont interdites. Merci de préciser le statut de vos photographies et les conditions d'acquisition.Schwilgue (talk) 08:28, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

S'il s'agit du musée des arts décoratifs de Strasbourg ( le pseudonyme Schwilgué indique, plus précisément, une référence à la collection d'horlogerie ), je peux répondre à la place de Ji-Elle que les photos y sont parfaitement autorisées. --Edelseider (talk) 08:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)