User talk:Judgefloro/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC) Howhontanozaz (talk) 15:02, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

File:6829Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 01.jpg

File:6829Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:33, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message; actually, these are gifts to me when my brother went abroad, hence for remembrance I took these photos and I have no objection to the deletion respectfully submitted Judgefloro 06:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:43, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Good morning from hereat Philippines. Before I took these pictures, I asked permission from the Curator, the Officer in charge who even assisted me in some of the photos, hence, it is respectfully submitted that since all these are now properties of the government and/or Bantayog, this falls within the express exemptions from the coverage of copyright law protection, very sincerely Judgefloro 02:54, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Repair

Hi, could you please repair your file descriptions.[1] Thanks, --Arnd (talk) 14:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Good morning from hereat Philippines, thanks for your message; apology in my oversight of the wikilink error due to typing error of mine, only 50 files were affected and now corrected, very SincelyJudgefloro 05:56, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

File:1449Pililla Halayhayin Zigzag Road 15.jpg

File:1449Pililla Halayhayin Zigzag Road 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

大诺史 (talk) 15:17, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and good morning from hereat Philippines, Bulacan; apology for my oversight in reviewing the uploaded photo; no objection to the deletion and very sincerely Judgefloro 06:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Request to help take photos of NHCP historical markers

Hello! I am part of a group that is documenting historical markers created by the National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) in Wikidata, a sister project of Wikipedia. Because you have contributed a lot of photographs of historical markers to Wikimedia Commons, we would like to ask your help to take photos of historical markers that do not have any photos yet in Commons.

Please refer to this website to see the historical markers that we have already documented so far. If a photo is missing, you should see a "No photo available", for example, this marker. Again, we would appreciate your help in taking photos of these markers including photos of the surrounding area or vicinity of the markers to help people find these markers. Thanks! —seav (talk) 14:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and greatest interest in Philippine photos; actually, for now, I have finished taking photos of more than 3,000 Barangays and the nearest that I have not covered are in a) Tagaytay, Batangas and b) Laguna; I suffered last year Vertigo and I quite recovered, but if I lack sleep, it might attack; for now, I stopped photos of Cavite, since it takes 5-6 hours to reach, and this PITex problem; so I started Laguna via Marcos Highway from LRT Santolan, and I finished most of the nearest; like yesterday I travelled to Lumban and Pagsanjan, and it takes also 6 hours to reach there, so I started 7 a.m. from Bulacan and I arrived late at 10 p.m.; rest assured that wherever I take photos, I take and will photos of these Historical markers; note that many of them are rusty or unpreserved and abandoned, hence our photos will make them forever; I will try my best to take photos of these markers, very sincerely Judgefloro 06:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
I took many photos of the Historical Markers, for I learned that taking just one without the surroundings would not do justice to the Markers Category:Tanay Veterans Memorial, 2019 as I did before with 3 pictures only Category:Tanay Veterans Memorial Sincerely Judgefloro 07:39, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (talk) 07:20, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

These photos include highly educational, relevant and landmark images of Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines; Thanks for your message, and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; I respectfully submit the following reasons, supported by news and DPWH data and information on this Bypass Road; a) 9.60-kilometer long road is a Diversion or Bypass that cuts short the travel from Baliuag to Pulilan: to wit: all the SUV or vans going to Dau or San Fernando Pampanga are now passing this instead of the heavy traffic roads of Pulilan Regional Road to NLEx or the San Simon Exit; b) all the vehicles passing Daang Maharlika and suffering the heavy or almost standstill traffic in Tarcan junction, and in Jollibee Pulilan Junction to go to NLEx or Pulilan town proper, will Bypass this Road; c) this is a landmark and tourist attraction road; that is, it is bikers friendly as your can see the white marked bicycle lanes for tourists and Lay-by or rest areas; d) the amount spent for this Bypass is PHP509.60 million to P 1 Billion and finished in record time; e) in Wikimedia Commons, the photos are very educational since the Categories delineates the metes and bounds of the architecture of this work; I took so much enough photos since the road covers 2 barangays of Baliuag and 5 Barangays of Pulilan; here are the news proofs of notability of these photos; in fact Secretary Villar and Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa inaugurated this road with Historical markers I still am looking for as this was headline news in our TVs: Pulilan-Baliuag diversion road The 9.60-kilometer long road begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) very sincerly yours, Judgefloro 07:35, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
As proof of notability I respectfully submit the following DPWH submissions to the public of the cost and descriptions of the project, to wit: P 115 million pesos contract cost [ Phase 1 is P 97 million contract cost Phase 2 is P 251 million pesos contract cost] Phase 3 is P 115 million pesos contract cost Secretary Villar landmark road projects sincerely Judgefloro 08:01, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
9.6-kilometer bike-friendly diversion road in Bulacan opens a four-lane road that features bike lanes Photos of the Inauguration, thus landmark notability on Thursday, May 9, 2019 photos of witnesses Pulilan Mayor Maritz Ochoa-Montejo, Rep. Gavini Pancho and DPWH Regional Director Roseller Tolentino sincerely Judgefloro 08:07, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Rejoinder: Exhaustive argument and discussion on the notability, landmark, educational, engineering and Philippine record on roads, never before done in past President's since Emilio Aguinaldo to Aquino, Jr. Category:Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road

With all due respect, I am hereby submitting the following, in line with the Philosophy of Wikimedia Commons of sharing photos for Wisdom, inter alia, to wit:

Prefatory: First in Philippine History of Road works

Wikimedia Commons Category:By-pass (roads) in the Philippines and Vide Category:By-pass (roads) all over the world on file hereat Commons, including Category:Roads in the Philippines by provinces Category:Roads in Pampanga Category:Roads in Nueva Ecija Category:Roads in Bulacan Laguna (province), inter alia, name them all, one cannot find -

Category:Cycle lanes in the Philippines Bicycle lanes and/or with Rest area Lay-by or Category:Rest areas in the Philippines

Admittedly, in Marikina and Antipolo, Bicycle lanes are innovations to ease traffic by former Mayor Bayani Fernando; in Lumban, there is only one Lay-by but here in Pulilan-Baliuag Diversion Road, not only from start to finish of the 9.6 kilometers consting P 506 million finished in record less than 2 years, Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas do line up both side of the by-pass road from Barangay Tarcan in Maharlika Highway to Barangay Tibag in Pulilan Regiona Road, both are notable Article of Wikipedia; while a political critic would argue such is waste of Tax money, still from the view of Secretary Villar of DPWH, Biker friendly By pass road was conceived due to the Tourist requirements of Pulilan as Kneeling Carabao Festival capital of the Philippines and Baliuag as Buntal Hat Festival capital of Luzon;

Economic savings due to reduction of travel from Baliuag to Pulilan vice versa from 1 1/2 hours to 20 minutes: Interconnection of 2 Wikipedia articles Philippine highway network Pan-Philippine Highway - Baliuag section and Pulilan Regional Road at Tibag toward North Luzon Expressway Pulilan exit

There are 3 modes of travel between these 2 towns: a) via the traffic conjestion of Jollibee Cutcut Junction and during 2 market days a week traffic standstill in Pulilan Regional Road ad Cut cut to Poblacion to reach NLEx; b) UV express vans from SM Baliuag and/or Poblacion to NLEX via i) San Simon exit or ii) Pulilan exit, to reach Dau Mabalacat of San Fernando Pampanga, takes 1 hour; iii) Travellers from MacAthur Highway from Santa Rita, Guiguinto NLEx and Cabanatuan to Baliuag travelers to reach NLEx need not face the traffic to reach Pulilan NLEx or Baliuag and Pulilan Town Proper due to savings of time reduced to 20 minutes because of this By pass road;

Mark Villar: Marvel and first in Engineering both Civil, mechanical and electrical including the Geodetic aspect vis-a-vis the Tiqui Builders advanced Construction or roads: advanced Cement and enforcement mechanisms of the By pass

I claim that I have not ever seen Philippine roads, except in Duterte's presidency, that cement road no longer need asphalt covering like in NLEx, due to strong quality of Eagles and Republic cement mixed with secret ingredients and with strong steel to withstand the pressures of even 20 wheeler trucks; however, this rainy season, they do not allow trucks and buses to pass to make strong the just inaugurated road but later they can pass;

How I photographed the roads, namely the numbers of photos needed to catch the Category:Paddy fields in Bulacan covering 7 Barangays and the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas

I hired a tricyle paying $6 or about 300 pesos to catch the scenery and roads centering on the Bicycle lanes and/or with Lay-by or Category Rest areas: this is 9.6 kilometers and about 25 photos per Barangay of the entire route is modest enough having in mind 3 birds with one stone, namely, 7 barangays, 7 Paddy fields, 7 grasslands, a creek and PBB Bridge; one my ponder that the roads are almost empty of vehicles and they look all the same; but not, since this Bypass has just been opened; one can imagine if may vehicles pass this, then it would enhance the beauty of the photos; Bypass begins at Pulilan-Calumpit road in Tibag, Pulilan and ends in Daang Maharlika in Tarcan in Baliuag, Bulacan with cost of PHP509.60 million - Network Development Construction of By-Passes (Pulilan-Baliuag, Bulacan Diversion Roads - Row) in Barangays Dulong Malabon 14°55'28"N 120°48'38"E Tibag 14°54'23"N 120°49'30"E Inaon 14°56'30"N 120°49'35"E Balatong 14°56'10"N 120°50'33"E Peñabatan 14.9175, 120.8552 Pulilan, Bulacan interconnecting with Barangays Matangtubig 14°57'3"N 120°52'10"E Tarcan 14°55'57"N 120°53'0"E Baliuag, Bulacan, Bulacan Philippine highway network;

A great contribution to Category Real Estate in the Philippines and reduction of Corruption in Public Works due to Jump of Category:Real estate in the Philippines Real Estate prices of mere ricelands without value to inevitable conversion of these lands to Commercial estates for Housing

This project did pop up from nowhere and nobody was notified before the project started, taking into surprise the Real Estate sector; just imagine from not even P 50 per sq. meter, the price of ALL ricelands passed by this Bypass jumped to about a conservative P 3,000 per square meter; deep inside this fact, many were caught unaware of this Real Estate boom done by this Bypass road; without fear, I predict that Villas and Camellas of Villar and others like those I photographed in Bulacan and Nueva Ecija and Laguna, will sprout like mushroom around this Bypass road;

Finally, an Impossible made possible: from paddy fields with creeks, so naive and almost impossible for roads to be constructed upon due to weak and watery foundation: Sec. Villar's genius of Engineering and Architecture made a First in Philippine road history

IN FINE, I respectfully submit that: the same thing happens in Pan-Philippine highway section from Junction Pulilan Cut-cut to Junction Sampaloc, San Rafael: repeated road or Highway works and reblockings failed to correct the once paddy fields and watery foundation resulting to Forever road works; but here in Bypass road, the Marvel of Advance Engineering by Tiqui Construction, and state of the art Engineering coupled with Secret cement additives with strong steel, made this P 506 million Bypass a legacy of the DPWH to Philippine Engineering and Science;
Valued images of Landmark Bypass Road
IN FINE II, not even 1 photo of the landmark Bypass road can justly be found in Commons and internet but here; allow me to subjectively and objectively express my philosophy of sharing wisdom to the future researchers and generaration: unlike other Internet sites, Commons does not resize the photos and the Categories are well delineated to allow readers to easily find the photos; when one opens Category:Cebu City Category:Davao City and the entire Visayas and Mindanao in Commons, one cannot find high quality picture as I did for Luzon 18 provinces; I never concentrated just on Historical Markers or Churches but also on broad overcompassing Categories of Roads, Schools, Buildings, and name them all; not only hard work but huge expenses just to fulfil the Sharing of Wisdom via Commons photos to future generations; many of my photos are intact even if Churches and other buildings are destroyed reconstructed and gone; if the photos of these Bypass roads are gone, by deletion, then, future generations will for sure loose the opportunity to know and learn about the above considerations they can only find in Commons, nowhere else, and for free to the public domain without any considerations whatsoever, very sincerely, Respectfully submitted Judgefloro 09:39, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Category talk:Barangays of Laguna: Appeal for kindness and understanding

Judgefloro 11:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Appeal for kindness and understanding Judgefloro 11:49, 20 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:40, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
With all due respect, I am submitting here the legal ramifications on the matter, to wit:
Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Rizal Park was granted to herein photographer editor by the Head of the Visitor Centre of Rizal Park, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the said Visitor Office of the Park including the Tourist Map Category:Tourist map of Rizal Park;
Category:Rizal Park Visitor's Center the head explained to me each and every numbers corresponding to the places of the tourist spots of the park, including the subject Sentinel of Freedom or Lapu-Lapu monument which is now the property of the Government; b) she assisted me in the photography of the Park's Tourism information center and even pointed to the bust of Jose Rizal for me to take photo of;
All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx Category:Colossal brass statue-monument of Lapu-Lapu (Sentinel of Freedom), Rizal Park Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark sport; Most respectfully submitted, and very sincerely Judgefloro 02:56, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Good morning from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; thanks for your message;
With all due respect, I am submitting here the Finer points of Philippine Copyright on the matter, to wit:
Express permission to photograph any and all subjects objects of Category:University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas was granted to herein photographer editor by the OIC, head, Supervisor or Curator of the Museum, as evidenced by the so a) many photos of the subject Museum, as I was even assisted in the taking of Pictures;
Incidentally, there is an ongoing event or Dinner reception when I took the photos with Permission;
Upon a careful review and look at the Displays, like the History of the Museum, almost all of the photos are pictures of Reproductions by Category:University of the Philippines Manila Museum of a History of Ideas of very very Old Originals dating from 1900 to 1920, Courtesy of a deceased Member of the University and Hospital; they are like Tarpaulins or Xerox of the Very very old Original like this and the many

Please consider the Legal lecture and explanations delivered to me by the very high ranking officers of the Past Blancaflor Office March 7, 2014: on the Code Republic Act No. 8293

Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL, in this building which I photographed including the 16th floor office of Director Blancaflor, I discussed the matter of my Petition on FoP with Atty. Limbo who said that the newly created on 2013 Bureau of Copyright will be the one under Director Blancaflor who is abroad but will be back soon to render and release a legal opinion on my Petition, Letter. : Considering that until now they failed to issue the promised Reply to Solve all the legal ramifications of the FoP, in good faith, I uploaded photos, understanding that I leave the matter of deletion to any and all editors who deem it proper to raise these issues; suffice it to say that I was granted express but verbal permission to photography these photos for deletion, hence,
All my photos fall within the Express exceptions provided by the Copyright law of the Philippines, thusly: "xxx On the other hand, works not protected by the copyright law are (1) unprotected subject matter and (2) works of the government.xxx Works of the Government On the other hand, no copyright shall be applied in any work of the Government of the Philippines. xxx Limitations on Copyright The following acts shall not constitute infringement of copyright: The use of a work under the direction or control of the government or other institutions for the purpose of informing and public. It must also be compatible with fair use. xxx
Fair Use A fair use, in its most general sense, is the act of copying of copyrighted materials done for purposes such as commenting, criticizing, or parodying a copyrighted work without the permission from the copyright owner. It is used as a defense under copyright infringement. xxx Reproduction of Published Work Under Subsection 187.1 of the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines,[4] the reproduction of a published work shall be permitted without the owner's authorization given that the reproduction was made for research purposes.xxx
In fact, everyone is doing Selfie and many photographers like me do take millions of photos of these Tourist landmark spots; references

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 09:51, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and Good Afternoon from hereat Cloudy Bulacan Philippines due to LPA; please allow me to let the researchers consider that Laborers or Paid Workers and not artist, work per piece or per day with minimum daily wages paid by Employers, here, the University Board; Love arts are scattered all over the Philippines; and here in my country, no artist will execute a work in the streets or outside the Schools; I ♥ love Landmark are manufactured by petty workers, hence, no Moral Value or rights exist, hence outside the scope of Copyrights law; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons in this matter; Very very sincerelyJudgefloro 10:00, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 07:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat very cloudy Bulacan province in Philippines; with due respect, this Events place was just painted and restored from the original dilapidated, haunted and eerie Old Mansion of Calamba; if I am not mistaken, this house including the sculptures dates before WWII, or less than 100 years old; hence the input category of Category:Old houses in Laguna; at any rate, I respectfully remain neutral in the sound discretion of editors of Commons on this matter, very very sincerely Judgefloro 07:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

File:6792Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 10.jpg

File:6792Foods in Baliuag, Bulacan 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ƏXPLICIT 07:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Philippines; my sibling came from abroad and bestowed upon me this food gifts for which reason I want memories, hence, I have no objection to the deletion and respectfully submit, very sincerely Judgefloro 07:17, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 大诺史 (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 06:52, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your message and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines amid stormy weather; with all due respect, I am submitting my following thoughts and discussions on this matter: the photos are not only valued images, but first in the internet, never seen yet, since Calauan is a tourist place or visitor attraction, in fact these 3 days in all front pages and TV headlines due to the Landmark Calauan Mayor Antonio Sanchez case:
a) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road (Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang, Victoria) contains only 139 pictures which covers 6 Barangays of Silangan-Lamot 1-Lamot 2-Santo Tomas-Dayap, Calauan & Masapang from Masapang Junction; a-1) Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road Calauan-Victoria Road is very notable since the DPWH technically and formally named it so as new access or by-pass road to ease traffic and to allow commuters alternative routes in going to Calauan and Victoria Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road, DPWH;
b) Category:Kanluran, Calauan, Laguna has only 75 pnotos, when this Barangay Kanluran , Calauan, Laguna 14.1487, 121.3108 Calauan,_Laguna is very large enough;
c) Category:Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna has only 108 photos when in fact this Barangay Balayhangin, Calauan, Laguna 14.1298, 121.3164 Calauan,_Laguna is located beteween 2 roads, namely i) the photos about half taken in the Category:Calauan Poblacion-Victoria Road and ii) the other half is taken on the Bay–Calauan–San Pablo Road a wikipedia article which is very notable;
d) Category:Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Mabacan, Calauan, Laguna 14.1344, 121.2885 Calauan,_Laguna is also a very large Barangays and only 118 photos were taken to create to researchers what this village is all about;
e) Category:Paliparan, Calauan, Laguna has only 209 photos when List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Paliparan 14.1205, 121.2722 Calauan,_Laguna is very large comparatively;
f) Category:Perez, Calauan, Laguna List of barangays in Laguna (province) Barangay Perez, Calauan, Laguna 14.1043, 121.2693 Calauan,_Laguna has only 121 photos, which covers only about 1/4 of the sites covered by 1/4 of the Perez Road;
g) these Kanluran - Balayhangin - Mabacan - Paliparan - Perez Road servicing these 5 Barangays from Calauan Pineaapple is the only New Route being constructed to reach Barangay Limao 14.0940, 121.242 Calauan,_Laguna where one can now reach Hidden Valley Springs Resort a Prime tourist destination where a day tour is 2,750 pesos located here and in Barangays Barangay I 14.0629, 121.2555 Barangay II 14.0697, 121.2449 Barangay III 14.0716, 121.2546 Barangay IV 14.0624, 121.2485 Alaminos, Laguna accessed from a very distant location of Category:Alaminos, Laguna National Highway;
h) It takes about 6 hours from my place at Bulacan to reach these Barangays and 6 hours to travel home; the cost of travel and hiring vehicles in the photography amount to about P 1,500, hence, it is submitted that these valued very notable photos are not only rare but treasures for future generations of the public domain in Wikimedia Commons in line with the Philosophy of its founders - sharing of Wisdom; respectfully submitted and very sincerely Judgefloro 10:18, 24 August 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Judgefloro/Archive_7&oldid=368085281"