User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Otospermophilus beecheyi Stanford April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otospermophilus beecheyi 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golden Gate Bridge San Francisco April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Question[edit]

Hi. You have been intervened here. You can maybe tell me what template i need for speed delete another redirect? Thanks and sorry for my bad english! --T137(varie ed eventuali) 20:37, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Versailles Hôtel de Ville June 2010.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hôtel de Ville de Versailles.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Conciergerie June 2010.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Towers of Conciergerie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conejo Valley hiking trails December 2010 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Anas platyrhynchos Newark April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anas platyrhynchos Newark 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Mission San Jose church interior April 2011.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mission San José (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Branta canadensis Fremont April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Fremont April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Electronic Arts Redwood City May 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Electronic Arts Redwood City May 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fremont Central Park April 2011 001.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lake Elizabeth, Fremont, California.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graham cracker.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graham cracker May 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oracle Redwood City May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oracle Redwood City May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oracle Redwood City May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oracle Redwood City May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Don Edwards Refuge April 2011 panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Don Edwards Refuge April 2011 panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Watermark[edit]

Hi, I don't see any dfference between this and this version of the pic. The watermark seems still to be present. Cheers.--Carnby (talk) 11:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

You need to refresh the page. On Firefox, press Ctrl-Shift-R. On IE, press Ctrl and click on the Refresh button. -- King of ♠ 20:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

problem[edit]

The discussion has not been closed, yet you closed it - [1] - please restore the deletion case, otherwise your actions are vandalism. (LAz17 (talk) 16:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).

[2] listed for deletion since May 15th, so please return it? (LAz17 (talk) 16:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
By placing the tag on the discussion, what you are doing is nominating the discussion itself for deletion. You probably meant to put the tag on File:Hrvatske opcine u BiH.png. -- King of ♠ 16:56, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh. Oops. So, it is okay right now? (LAz17 (talk) 17:45, 25 May 2011 (UTC)). Yeah I guess it's okay. Well, today I'm an idiot. :( (LAz17 (talk) 18:03, 25 May 2011 (UTC)).
Yes, it is OK now. -- King of ♠ 18:09, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kingston 19-in-1 memory card reader.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kingston 19-in-1 memory card reader.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Blinkenberg[edit]

There are a few more Blinkenberg uploads you might want to mark for deletion while you're at it. DS (talk) 00:25, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Got it, thanks. I'm leaving the title page alone as {{PD-ineligible}}. -- King of ♠ 06:01, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stanford University from Hoover Tower May 2011 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford University from Hoover Tower May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford University from Hoover Tower May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stanford University from Hoover Tower May 2011 005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Redwood Shores Lagoon May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford University from Hoover Tower May 2011 004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford Oval May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford Oval May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanford University Main Quad May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford University May 7 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

McWay Falls Big Sur May 2011 001.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, King of Hearts/Archive!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

OTRS volunteer[edit]

Hello King of Hearts I have known you for a month. I also see your works on Commons. They are so awesome. You are also an OTRS volunteer so I want to know what criteria for being an OTRS volunteer. And what did you do for that?--Hoangquan hientrang (talk) 00:45, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I don't really know; on the OTRS volunteering page an OTRS admin like Keegan (he was the one who accepted me for OTRS) just routinely removes a bunch of entries without saying whether they were accepted or not. But in general, experience with images (esp. copyright) is important, and having admin permissions on any wiki (for me, English Wikipedia) also helps. Best of luck, King of ♠ 19:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/Shoelace knot.svg[edit]

Not sure I fully understand your comment -- there could be photographs of shoelaces tied into a knot, and my diagram wouldn't be worse or better (wouldn't be in direct competition with the photographs). AnonMoos (talk) 01:37, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

I think that for a knot, a schematic diagram is more useful than a photograph of the knot because in the photo it might not be clear where all the loops go and such. But as it is, the scope is too narrow IMO. For example, for churches we can have scopes for both the exterior and the interior because they are substantially different. But here diagrams and photos are just different representations of the same thing, so they should be considered as one scope. -- King of ♠ 17:33, 27 August 2011 (UTC)