User talk:Reda Kerbouche

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 66.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sqifa Ceramique 62.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour de Marbre 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI assuming that the door is not straight --Poco a poco 19:18, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour de Marbre 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) 12:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Diwan, Bardo d'Alger 8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 20:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Modern primat 23:47, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cour de Marbre 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte de l'escalier (menant au hammam).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, fix the top crop and add a more specific category about the subject --Poco a poco 07:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 18:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammam du Bardo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, add here also a category about the motif, not only the place --Poco a poco 07:24, 2 April 2023 (UTC)@Poco a poco: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 18:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sols de la Chambre en face du Hammam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:24, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 13:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Borderline in terms of sharpness, but ok, a bit more of sharpness would indeed help --Poco a poco 11:39, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court of the Bartdo, Algeria3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:47, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:10, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ceramique du Patio, Bardo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lit dans la chambre des femmes d'Alger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Miroir dans le salon principale du Bardo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 12:26, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add more sharpness. --Halavar 09:46, 7 April 2023 (UTC) @Halavar: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 11:13, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. QI for me. --Halavar 13:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Superior Court, Bardo 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would be good to add more sharpness. --Halavar 16:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)@Halavar: ✓ Done--Reda Kerbouche 11:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Much better. Good quality now. --Halavar 13:00, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tafunast[edit]

Salut,
Cet enregistrement en tacawit est bugué (File:LL-Q33274 (shy)-Reda Kerbouche-tafunast.wav), on ententend taf*crc*st. Est-ce que tu peux le réenregistrer Àncilu (talk) 18:31, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut oui je vais le réenregistrer, merci pour l'info Reda Kerbouche (talk) 18:39, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timgad Museum entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 11:04, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timgad mosaic number 155. Flumen Vamaccura.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Is it intentionally that dark? I'd expect the canvas to be white. --Plozessor 13:19, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Plozessor: Unfortunately the light in the museum is very bad, and this is the only color that can be catch with any eyes and lens. as you can see the wall is also white and also my other photos from the same place.--Reda Kerbouche 08:58, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I would guess that that can be fixed in editing. But anyway, the light aside, the picture is very good. --Plozessor 17:46, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the Kreuzkirche (Düsseldorf-Pempelfort) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the Kreuzkirche (Düsseldorf-Pempelfort) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 15:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of the Kreuzkirche (Düsseldorf-Pempelfort).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 22:39, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Collenbach Hof 1905 collenbachstraße düsseldorf Germany.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:47, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timgad mosaic number 141. Garlands and shells.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alt-Eller 25 Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GGS Stoffeler Straße Düsseldorf door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:30, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ludwigshafener Straße 2, Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:26, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christian epitaph of Flavia Albula (Timgad).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexis Lours 06:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Door of St. Gertrud, Gertrudisplatz 26, Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 09:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Algiers Bus with text in Tamazight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you identify the bus model? --C messier 08:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC) <be />@C messier: someone did it at my place--Reda Kerbouche 18:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 18:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ornamental mosaic with frame of cups and hearts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Sarcophagi in Timgad to the left of the entrance of the museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Sarcophagi in Timgad to the right of the entrance of the museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ornamental mosaic with frame of cups and hearts.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 20:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Sarcophagi in Timgad to the left of the entrance of the museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 10:26, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roman Sarcophagi in Timgad to the right of the entrance of the museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:45, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient funerary steles in Timgad (near to the Museum) 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 18:40, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche der JVA Ulmer Höh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image but insufficient categorization --MB-one 17:03, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@MB-one: I have create one category about the Kapelle and and another one. Hope this time the categorization is ok --Reda Kerbouche 13:12, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 22:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient funerary steles in Timgad (near to the Museum).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:03, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ancient funerary steles in Timgad (near to the Museum) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 05:59, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Side door of St. Gertrud, Gertrudisplatz 26, Düsseldorf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 21:58, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tag of french football team in Kazan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of the Regency of Algiers[edit]

Hello @Reda Kerbouche, i would like to thank you for your work on promoting the Algerian content on Wikipédia and Wikimédia commons, regarding this file File:Type d'étendard de gierre (XVIII siecle).svg , i wanted to ask you if you have access to its two sources. Thank you. Nourerrahmane (talk) 11:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, unfortunately I have not the access now, I have worked in 2013 (10 years ago) with some other users on the Algerian historical flags, and one of the users was the owner of the two books. This user now is not active at all. Check maybe you can get it online somewhere. Reda Kerbouche (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah too bad, because i have found multiple sources for this war flag which appears it was pretty well known, i have listed what i found in this article File:Flag of Regency of Algiers.svg. So i beleive that its two strips were golden or yellow and not orange. Nourerrahmane (talk) 17:43, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All colors in my sources are the same as in my SVG file, maybe it's a variation you found or something else. anyway, I copied the exact color from the book. Regarding the relevance of the colors, I have no idea, my only sources are these two books. I think you should create an other file with the colors that you have found, and after we can use all the variants from different sources. If I get the source I will share it with you. Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UAE In Lens Competition - Arab Books by Emirati Authors[edit]

Hello, for the past few days I have been uploading pictures for the UAE in Lens competition. However, some are getting removed because of a Wikimedia rule because they were book covers and rules state no book covers. In the competition page, you included a request for Arab books by Emirati authors; you can’t put books unless you put a book cover on the picture - which will end up getting removed. I talked to the person who deleted the files - this is one of the seventeen Arab books I uploaded https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=851345366#Deleted_file. However, he let me know to talk to you, who is involved in the competition. Please let me know as soon as possible about this matter, because the competition will close tomorrow (it is 4:00 in the time of UAE I am uploading this). What is the point of asking for Arab books by Emirati authors; when it will get removed by moderators? Ziank-photography (talk) 12:18, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Reda Kerbouche It is getting late now, please reply ASAP. Thank you Ziank-photography (talk) 14:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Bust of Ibn Khaldun (Casbah of Bejaia, Algeria).jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bust of Ibn Khaldun (Casbah of Bejaia, Algeria).jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolperstein 1 - Zietenstraße 10, Golzheim, Düsseldorf - Karl Deutsch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolperstein - Zietenstraße 10, Düsseldorf, Golzheim - Karl Deutsch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:20, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Riad Salih 17:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolperstein 1 - Uerdinger Straße 25, Golzheim, Düsseldorf - Gert & Hans Mayer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Oppose Lacks sharpness, sorry
--Nikride 19:58, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Lack of sharpness is compensated by high resolution --Nikride 07:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stolperstein 2 - Uerdinger Straße 25, Golzheim, Düsseldorf - Gert & Hans Mayer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]