निर्वाचित चित्र उम्मीदवार वो चित्र (छवियाँ) हैं जिनके कॉमन्स पर सर्वोत्तम चित्रों में से एक होने के लिए समुदाय के लोग मतदान करेंगे। यह सूची उन उम्मीदवारों की है जो निर्वाचित चित्र हो सकते हैं। आज का चित्र निर्वाचित्र चित्रों में से चुनी हुई एक छवि होगी।
यदि आपको लगता है कि आपने एक महत्वपूर्ण चित्र प्राप्त अथवा निर्मित किया है जो उपयुक्त चित्र विवरण और मुद्राधिकार के साथ है, तब निम्न कार्य करें।
प्रथम चरण: चित्र का नाम निम्न खाने में उपस्थित पाठ के आगे लिखें, उदाहरण के लिए, Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:आपके चित्र का नाम.jpg लिखें और "नया नामांकन आरम्भ करें।" बटन पर क्लिक करें।
सभी एकल फाइलें:
पुनः नामांकन के लिए चित्र के नाम 'के बाद केवल /2 लिखें। जैसे:– Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Foo.jpg/2
Set nominations ONLY
Sets are temporarily disallowed for technical reasons; will reopen soon.
द्वितीय चरण: आप जिस पृष्ठ पर पहुँचे हैं वहाँ के निर्देशों का पालन करें और पृष्ठ को संरक्षित करें।
वो सम्पादक जिनका खाता कम से कम १० दिन पुराना है और ५० सम्पादन कर चुके हैं, अपना मत दे सकते हैं। अपने नामांकन के लिए कोई भी मतदान कर सकता है। अज्ञात (आईपी) मतों की अनुमति नहीं है।
आप निम्न साँचे काम में ले सकते हो:
{{Support}} (Support),
{{Oppose}} (Oppose),
{{Neutral}} (Neutral),
{{Comment}} (Comment),
{{Info}} (Info),
{{Question}} (Question),
{{Request}} (Request).
You may indicate that the image has no chance of success with the template {{FPX|reason - ~~~~}}, where reason explains why the image is clearly unacceptable as a FP. The template can only be used when there are no support votes other than the one from the nominator.
Info Instead of forced portraits, you can have qucik and spontaneous shots. I like this one, planed and executed in few seconds till they realize. Sigthseeing group in Rabat, column stay. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 11:43:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:05.05.2024 - Sobrevoo das áreas afetadas pelas chuvas na Região metropolitana de Porto Alegre (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:05.05.2024 - Sobrevoo das áreas afetadas pelas chuvas na Região metropolitana de Porto Alegre (2).jpg
Comment Great document but the light is really tricky. There is some ccw tilt and it lacks a bit of vertical perspective correction Poco a poco (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The light is tricky due to catastrophic weather conditions. For me, the wow factor overshadows that issues. ★13:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 12:59:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 157.jpg
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 10:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Theyyam of Kerala by Shagil Kannur 2024 (30).jpg
Voting period ends on 18 May 2024 at 06:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Aerial image of the Monte Rosa east face (view from the east).jpg
Weak support Supporting because of the subject, nice light and sky and good quality. Still it's just a close-up of a mountain without any interesting composition Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 16:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 17.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Parque Nacional Marinho de Fernando de Noronha - João Paulo Marques DAndretta 17.jpg
Yes, but more important to me, this gives a kind of suspense or mystery, when she is not looking at the camera. Yann (talk) 14:11, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I was going to stay neutral because the portrait is good, but definitely too soft. The already existing FP is too similar, of a better composition, and with much better sharpness than this one, that's why I feel that I have to oppose here, sorry, Yann. Poco a poco (talk) 13:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I don't get it. The wheel may be interesting, but it is only a small part and too dark, and the rest is a blurry background. Yann (talk) 09:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 17 May 2024 at 01:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 85.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Iglesia de San Agustín, París, Francia, 2022-10-31, DD 85.jpg
Info Surprisingly there are no FPs of this iconic Parisian landmark, built in the reign of Emperor Napoleon III. (there is an FP on English Wikipedia but it cannot match this for image quality.) The composition and quality of this image are superb and I like the soft, golden light. created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very picturesque, idyllic and soothing atmosphere. Perhaps the blue-colored aberrations on the branches at the top left of the tree could be toned down a little. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:15, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 23:08:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:T-7A Red Hawk over Edwards Air Force Base.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:T-7A Red Hawk over Edwards Air Force Base.jpg
Weak support Good quality and nice subject but I'm not convinced by the new crop, I prefer the original one and if any, I'd have just cropped a bit on the right and keep the lead room to enhance the high speed feeling Poco a poco (talk) 13:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish something could be done about what appears to be aliasing in the water, but the mood is incredible. Cmao20 (talk) 01:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. It looks like the weird things you sometimes get when you do HDR in Lightroom and the program doesn't really merge the exposures correctly. You get "blobs" with hard contours. If the "blobs" in the photo are the result of an HDR merge, you can't get rid of them by doing a new one. The only way is to use some clone correction tool or doing a manual partial merge/patch from one of the original photos. In any case, I don't think such flaws belong in an FP. Atef Ouni, can you please see what you can do about this. --Cart(talk)22:28, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The 'Deghost' option may do the trick if the water was moving slowly. Click on 'Show deghost overlay' and check if the 'Low' deghosting amount masks the offending areas. If not, try 'Medium' or 'High'. After the HDR is generated, check if the masked areas look good and don't have excessive noise (a common side-effect of this technique). Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 17:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Water fountain at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Water fountain at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat.jpg
Comment Great subject, but still there is room for improvement: you focused on getting the horizontal next to the top parallel to the border, but the image needs indeed a tilt in cw direction (look at the horizontal at the bottom) and an horizontal perspective correction. Could you offer also a bit more of crop at the top? Poco a poco (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sure Poco, show me. I can send you original, or if you find any similar around internet. p.S. Read comment above for crop. --Mile (talk) 16:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great light, composition and perspective: The panorama has many interesting details, such as the serpentine road, the ski lift, the icy benches, the dynamic condensation trails, or the impressive view above the clouds. Well done! -- Radomianin (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Question Hallo Milseburg, ich finde das Bild klasse. Allerdings fällt mir bei Deinen Bergszenen immer auf, dass der Schnee ziemlich grau ist (was normalerweise ein Indiz dafür ist, dass bei der Aufnahme keine oder eine zu geringe manuelle Belichtungskorrektur eingestellt war). Egal, was auch immer der Grund für die graue Farbe des Schnees ist… könntest Du bitte überlegen, ob Du den Schnee durch nachträgliche Korrektur etwas weißer machen kannst? Beste Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:49, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Snow is simply not gray. I rarely intervene based on technical concerns, but I've now seen enough winter photos here where exposure compensation wasn't applied correctly. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info And just to explain this properly: Modern cameras are programmed to average the brightness of the scene to a middle gray, resulting in snow appearing dull and gray rather than bright and white. To correct this, the photographer has to dial in (some cameras have an extra wheel for this) a stop or so of exposure compensation to instruct the camera to increase the exposure, making the snow appear natural. Applying exposure compensation results in a well-exposed image where the snow retains its bright, white appearance without being washed out or appearing gray. Best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:44, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks to Frank for the thoughtful review. I just opened the image in PS and noticed that the sRGB profile is not assigned. This can make a big difference in how the image looks in different browsers. @Milseburg: If you are going to develop the Raw file again with exposure adjustments, exporting it in the sRGB profile would be a good choice. Just my 2 cents to solve the problem. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:44, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 May 2024 at 12:45:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hampi, India, Rocky landscape of Hampi, Granite rocks of Matanga Hill.jpg
Info Hampi's ancient granite boulder landscape at sunset. The Archean plateau is stable and one of the oldest in the world. Hampi, Karnataka, South India. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support Great light, unusual but effective composition. Compositionally much improved by having the woman in it Cmao20 (talk) 15:06, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like 1st version more than yellowed, unless you could put yellow somewhere in the middle of both, or to revert back, 1st was just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I might have overdone it with saturation. Following your suggestion, here is a new version with less saturation in red channel and tweaked temperature/tint. I don’t want to go any further as it will make it look bleak. I specifically reprocessed this file in newer version of Lightroom to get more true to life appearance. To me it looks golden/orange to match the last moments of the golden hour before sunset. I think it is closer to the original light as the sunset colors can be intense. Also newer versions have more detail and dynamic range. The original is 10+ years old and was batch-processed with older software and original temperature settings that may be wrong. --Argenberg (talk) 22:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Detail is good, but the bird is common, the POV (from the top) not the best and I don't usually enjoy when there are man-made elements in wildlife pictures Poco a poco (talk) 15:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 20:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Edible mushrooms in baskets 2022 G1.jpg
Oppose When you try shots like this, you will have to clean all dust around. For instance, i spent 2-3 h with clock. Also, as above, cup is empty, its just a cup, so cookie and coffee would be nice, now just cookie without coffee and pic is named per coffee. Third objection, spoon could be new or without wearing scratches. I dont see EXIF, but this should be sharp photo (stacked image), here seems like one shot on to much closed Aperture. --Mile (talk) 10:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Just a language note: This model of small cups are called "espresso cups" even if they are empty. It's a name for the cup size. (example) --Cart(talk)10:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you put cookie, than i would expect coffee too. Now its a bit spoiled, both or none. It could see size by spoon. --Mile (talk) 11:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Many thanks for the review and the tips.
If you have some info about how the photo was made, even if the EXIF is lost, you can use the Template:Photo Information to add info to the file page. Just add it after the "Summary" section and fill in the parameters you want to display. --Cart(talk)12:04, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 May 2024 at 08:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:022 Brown-throated wattle-eye at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Comment Very good composition and pretty bird but the bird is quite small in the frame and also the resolution is not huge which means the actual pixel level detail on the bird itself is not that high. Cmao20 (talk) 11:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment. With wildlife photography it is unfortunately very hard to get close to every subject and some birds are more shy than others. This small bird unfortunately didn't stay very long (only a few seconds) while I was approaching very very slowly. Apparently there is only 5 pictures of it on commons and the highest quality one that got it in focus is this one, the second one only beeing of 853x1280 pixels. Out of these 5, only 3 males were photographed and the second highest resolution picture in focus of the male after this one beeing only of 600x400 pixels. There is also no FP of the species nor of the family. The bird was shot with a 600mm lens with a 50 million pixels sensor and as I recall the bird wasn't that far, but it's just a small and shy bird. We have pictures of the same resolution of still subjects that are less sharp. I think that in this picture the light was good and that the picture nicely shows the bird's environment. The feather detail is also quite good considering the bird size in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 2,797 × 1,865 pixels and the bird in this image is very small. The background is too dominant in my opinion. Useful document, but not all the useful images on Commons should be featured. For a FP of a bird, you need at least to be able to see some fine details of the animals at full resolution, not only the branches where it lives. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:59, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your review. In my opinion it can not be expected the same level of detail for a small and shy bird where there is only a few seconds window to take a picture of it without possibility to go closer to it compared to pictures of still objects. Also, we have FP pictures of birds that have the same if not less definition than this one : 1, 2. I actually think this picture has enough level of detail compared to the bird size in real life and to the possibility to get close to it. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:57, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
When comparing the size in pixels of the two images you give, the first one is 3 times larger, and the second one 2 times. So both may actually have more definition. Moreover, almost all the birds in the FP galleries are much larger than this one. The possibility to get closer is also very subjective. The more time you spend to capture a specific animal, the more opportunities you get. But this same day you also captured photos of Chimpanzees. Useful photo for Wikipedia, but when zooming in, it's not a FP in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Small passerines like this one are among the most difficult subjects for bird photographers. They're skittish and notoriously hard to photograph. A big thank you to Giles for taking this excellent image and sharing it under a free license! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I also wish more detail but I'm not an expert in bird photography and will support relying on Frank's opinion. What is definitely a minus in my eyes, is the crop, it's too generous. I'd definitely crop more everywhere, but above all the leaves at the bottom Poco a poco (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 17:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 187.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 187.jpg
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 15:18:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Paraglide and Cesta tower - San Marino - GT 06 - 2024 04 30.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paraglide and Cesta tower - San Marino - GT 06 - 2024 04 30.jpg
Image reworked from RAW files and verticals reassessed and image denoised, THX. Infoː New version uploaded, refresh your computer cache, please.Terragio67 (talk) 14:31, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support We had a similar FP (demoted due to significant user problems), but your take is clearly better; the little part of the landscape shows much better in which high the tower and the paraglider are located. – Aristeas (talk) 16:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed a very good composition: It emphasizes the reliefs on the lamp post, but adds the castle in the background, appropriately out of focus, to intimate the context. – Aristeas (talk) 16:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the compo very much, the light is ok but the level of detail is low. It feels like the focus is below the sculptures, so that these are not really sharp. Could you also add some information about this piece? Poco a poco (talk) 15:25, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 14:56:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:St Julian church in St-Julien-de-Toursac (6).jpg
Info Casio W-96H-4A2V wristwatch. 1st Casio W-96 on Commons as i see. Orange color is rare (imposible) to find, saw one and only in Rabat. -- Mile (talk) 09:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yann thats is why i choose it. Its sporty watch, you cant place it on back of some expencive clock. Back was especially choosen for this. --Mile (talk) 08:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC) p.S. You even nominate botom portrait where black enter black face, that didnt bother you ?[reply]
Since it is a sports watch, why didn't you place it on some background that is associated with sports or even outdoors and not 'expensive-looking', like a rock, in front of water ("water 50m resist"), on sand, or perhaps AstroTurf/grass that would have set off the orange so well rather than trying to match it. I think even the fabric of a sports bag would have been better. Keeping the watch in context would make a great photo. --Cart(talk)11:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Green on orange, are you sure Cart ? I dont think its good idea. For "water" (all Casio are water resistant) but using water as back i would use other model for diving (Frogman). Rock, could be, but i would apply it at G-Shock series - strong structure and stonger material. However sand might be, but i am looking for similar on other clock. --Mile (talk) 15:50, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think green and orange are two vibrant colors that go great together. I always think of those colors as colors for stadiums where sports events take place. And there are a lot of other options for sports backgrounds, just use your imagination (or a Google search for ideas). Perhaps look at all the tricks people who do product photos do. --Cart(talk)16:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality product photography. And per ArionStar and author I like the background and how the colours match. Cmao20 (talk) 11:40, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Not all product photography can uses a neutral (white, black, grey) background; it is not uncommon to use a “matching” background, and this is one. (When my father did product photographs for catalogues etc., we used neutral backgounds for the small photos in the lists of items, but complex arrangements, often also with complex backgrounds, for the title page and the opening photos.) – Aristeas (talk) 16:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The watch has its style, and the tablecloth another style. Thus the background is distracting when we pay attention to the subject. Moreover, the vivid colors are eye-catching, thus still the show. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 06:54:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passo delle Streghe - Monte Titano - San Marino - GT 05 - 2024 04 30.jpg
The witches' pass (or Passo delle Streghe) is one of the attractions of San Marino, it is a shortcut that leads from the first tower (Guaita) to the second tower (Cesta) depicted in the background. It puts everyone in great fear due to the steep slope and the overhang on the sides. In the background the fortifications near the tower are literally devoured by nature every spring, each time giving a charm of mystery to the castle located on Mount Titan. Info All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 06:54, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A very nice view and I would be happy to support it. But (sorry to say this) at the branches at the left there are some odd transitions – see image note; maybe a stacking error? It would be great if you could fix this. Sorry again, – Aristeas (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comment. Yes, it was clearly a stacking error. It happens sometimes when the weather is windy or in this case, maybe I didn't rotate the camera precisely..., luckily I had spare shots, so I decided to re-process the new combo's images, cropping out minor disturbing blur benches parts declaring the new composition as retouched. Terragio67 (talk) 23:48, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 May 2024 at 04:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Magnolia, 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bloemknop van een Magnolia, 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg
Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:21:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (2019).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Government office in The Hague housing the Dutch Ministry of Justice and Security (2019).jpg
Users who are logged in and have at least 50 edits and 10 days on their account on Commons can vote. Just make sure you haven't told them to come and vote for your photo, since that can be seen as canvassing, and that's not allowed. --Cart(talk)17:27, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, okay! Good to know! This is my first time nominating an image or being here at all. So that's why I didn't know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 17:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks Yann for fixing the name of the file, just please remember that you need to change to the new file name in all places of the code on the nom page, otherwise the FPC Bot will not be able to do what it's supposed to do. I have fixed that for you now. All the best, --Cart(talk)18:16, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment By the way, the photo has been taken with a Samsung Galaxy S9 and has not been cropped, nor has it been edited or adjusted. No filters have been used either. Just to let you know! Kind regards, S. Perquin (talk) 02:40, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bedankt voor je reactie! Ik denk dat jij helaas ook niet mag stemmen... Je moet namelijk 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen, zie ik nu! 😕 Groetjes, S. Perquin (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Welcome and thank you for your review, Zozo7077. Unfortunately, you only have 4 edits, which is not enough. According to the rules, you need at least 50 edits to vote: "Editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. Everyone can vote for their own nominations". But the photo community appreciates your interest and would be happy to have you back as a reviewer after the 50th edit. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Zozo7077, you need at least 50 edits to vote. Je moet 50 bewerkingen hebben gedaan om te mogen stemmen. Met vriendelijke groet, S. Perquin (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first I was undecided because of the bright sky, but despite this fact and the lower image quality of the cell phone, after some consideration, I tend to support it. The composition of the objects makes up for any shortcomings - in that respect, a definite wow! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:05, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Typically one wants to avoid such a partially bright sky, but here the brightness of the centre effectively underlines the vanishing-point composition. Details show the typical smartphone rendering, but with this kind of architecture it works very well. – Aristeas (talk) 16:13, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support The architecture, colors and textures almost make it look like it's unreal and like it's a screenshot of a video game, which makes the photo quite interesting. The vanishing points are also quite interesting, and you could almost lose your sense of orientation when zooming in on the right-hand side of the image. --Giles Laurent (talk) 17:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I don't see anything featurable here, neither the lighting, nor the subject nor the level of detail. All those prompt supporting votes of unknown people or IPs are not helping either Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSee annotations. I think if you do sharpening, do just face (a bit) and leave other as it is. I dislike noise on feathers, and skin (again), seem like carpet with zebra patern. --Mile (talk) 17:20, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 13:10:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Uptown Charlotte 2018 taking by DJI Phantom 4 pro.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Uptown Charlotte 2018 taking by DJI Phantom 4 pro.jpg
Support Guess who's back? Back again? That's right, Wolverine XI is back. Alright, so to put things in perspective, this is Wolverine XI's first FP nomination since September 11, 2023—that is, almost eight months ago. Additionally, it has been precisely 11 months since Wolverine XI's initial edit on this site. Being Wolverine XI's uncle's hometown, Charlotte, North Carolina, holds special meaning for Wolverine XI and is consistently a pleasant destination. Wolverine XI hopes this FPC goes smoothly. WolverineXI13:10, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It makes Charlotte look positively utopian. But I can't support unless a perspective correction is done. Cmao20 (talk) 11:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If somebody tries a perspective correction (which would be much appreciated), they should also check if adjusting the white balance improves the image. IMHO the colours are a bit too bluish, so moving the balance a bit more towards warmer tones could be rewarding. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 13 May 2024 at 12:24:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaïque Université de Tlemcen - 1708005397705.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosaïque Université de Tlemcen - 1708005397705.jpg
Info, I took this shot with my phone, so the technical quality may not be perfect. However, despite it being my first FPC, I enjoyed capturing this mosaic.; created and uploaded by Riad Salih, -- Riad Salih (talk) 12:24, 4 May 2024 (UTC) nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 10:38, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a pity that there is no higher resolution available, but the striking design is worth promoting, in my opinion. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I didn't have any active nominations and don't feel motivated to search for new images at the moment, so I may as well take it over. It saves Riad from having to withdraw this image, too (which would suck if they did). --SHB2000 (talk) 12:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Totally agree, that is why I cautioned rather than just slam the template on it. There are often better solutions, and you provided one. --Cart(talk)12:11, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 20:07:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024.pngCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tornado outbreak sequence of April 25–28, 2024.png
@Wolverine XI: , if I may ask, what is your reasoning for it not being FP material? Fox Weather “Nearly 100 Tornado Warnings were issued Friday, making it the most active tornado day of 2024”, so it has a decent “wow” factor, especially for a map of a single tornado outbreak sequence. WeatherWriter (talk) 18:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 15:29:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Pamela Ghislain 01 - cc Christophe Péan - Les Francophonies 2023.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pamela Ghislain 01 - cc Christophe Péan - Les Francophonies 2023.jpg
Weak support IMHO this photo deserves a little bit more love. The bright background has a clear purpose – it helps to isolate the subject; using a high-key backgrund for subject isolation is unusual, but why not. The sharpness of the eyes is OK. There are some small CAs and I would wish for a little bit more contrast in the face (hence the weak support), but all in all the photos gives a natural, friendly and polite portrait of Pamela Ghislain. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 12 May 2024 at 11:19:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquée de Sidi Bou Médine03- SamirTerkih.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mosquée de Sidi Bou Médine03- SamirTerkih.jpg
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 20:04:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Henri-Julien-Félix Rousseau, French - Carnival Evening - Google Art Project.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Henri-Julien-Félix Rousseau, French - Carnival Evening - Google Art Project.jpg
Question It looks like low quality, but normally the Google Art Project reproductions are accurate, so maybe this is just how the original painting is. Can somebody who personally knows the original or at least other paintings by Rousseau comment on the quality? – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry but I consider this image a QI. Neither the lighting nor the level of detail nor the subject/compo are outstanding. In fact, I would say the subject is rather unspectacular Poco a poco (talk) 19:36, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with the above, this is a good capture but lacks 'wow' for FP. Needs a more spectacular backdrop, light and/or sky. BigDom (talk) 08:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite good, even if I would scan it in higher resolution. High educational value, as no free picture of this person is available. Yann (talk) 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 May 2024 at 10:39:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Kathakali of Kerala at Nishagandhi dance festival 2024 (14).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kathakali of Kerala at Nishagandhi dance festival 2024 (14).jpg
Info Kathakali is a classical dance form of Kerala. It is a "story play" genre of art. Usually the feminine characters in Kathakali, which is called minukka, are being performed by men. This is a good example for men dress up in the female attire. All by -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: a simple square crop of the original image looks best to me, and I would support it. If you want to preserve the proportions of the original, you can always upload a cropped version separately and propose it as an alternative here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 10 May 2024 at 15:09:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky.jpg
Comment Hi and welcome to the FPC. I've fixed up the file page a bit for you to match what it should contain for the FPC. Nice clouds, but the file name is a bit ambiguous and not describing the photo very well. This is a requirement here. It should be more specific, but changing a file name during a nomination should only be done by one of the regular FPC coders since it affects the whole procedure. Would you mind if I changed it to 'Cirrus uncinus clouds in the morning sky - D35 2227 01' and fixed things for you? Or do you have a better suggestion for a name. Best, --Cart(talk)16:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your proposed name is good, but can you leave out the words after sky? The average person would have no clue what that is. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, no problem. We just sometimes keep such numbers since they may be some sort of filing system the photographer uses and we respect such things, but for now I can skip them. I'll fix this right away. --Cart(talk)22:16, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info@ADARSHluck and WildMouse76: Great shot, worth promoting! The cloud structure is fascinating and reminds me of the structure of ice flowers on glass. Unfortunately, the image contains a lot of noise and some chromatic aberrations. I took the liberty of removing the imperfections and providing it to you under the SwissTransfer link. If you like, you can use the file for an update. The improvements increase the chances of promotion, in my opinion. Best regards :) -- Radomianin (talk) 17:48, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just realized I can't override it. I did some research and it seems that only autopatrolled users can override images. Can someone else do that for me? Thanks! WildMouse76 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I've fixed that for you. When you ask nicely there is usually someone around to help you. Good luck with your nom now. :-) --Cart(talk)23:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Special thanks to Cart for renaming and updating of the file, I just noticed it a moment ago. Otherwise I would have uploaded it tomorrow. Sincerest appreciation :) -- Radomianin (talk) 23:28, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Rose-ringed parakeets.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rose-ringed parakeets.jpg
Comment For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the bird species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality, and overprocessed in my view. Oversaturated and the blacks are too strong. Possibly artificial vignetting -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 16:25:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Sacred Lotus in a Pond 2.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sacred Lotus in a Pond 2.jpg
Comment Idem above. For featured picture candidate to succeed, the categories must be better provided. We need a category for the flower species, the location, and removing the too broad ones. Yann (talk) 16:54, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 May 2024 at 07:23:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Victoria Alada de la Columna de la Independencia 01.jpg
Hola Iván, I see potential for FP but you need to fix at least 2 issues: the strong chroma noise (probably as the result of having lifted up the shadows) and the red halo around the sculpture. Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for your help, Diego! I have fixed as much as possible now the chroma and removed the halo you mention. Hopefully this will improve. Regards, ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be honest, I had expected improvements in the original picture, not a different one, but as they are pretty similar I have no problem with that. The noise level is good in the current version and I also prefer the POV/angle in this version. The halo is overcorrected so that you can see a grey halo around the statue but in the inner side with no saturation. I also agree with the lighting comments. I prefered the lighting of the original version and the WB too. I'd weak support if you fix the halo and brigthen it a bit Poco a poco (talk) 19:52, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I think this was a really good try but I'm not sure the light was particularly kind to you. Keep trying though, good effort for (I think) your first nomination Cmao20 (talk) 15:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]