Commons:Javaslatok kiemelt képekre

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Javaslatok kiemelt képekre más nyelveken:	Magyar felület
Alemannisch | Asturianu | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lëtzebuergesch | Молдовеняскэ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Português | Polski | Română | Русский | Shqip | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Українська | 粵語 | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Ha úgy gondolod, hogy egy Commonson található fotó/kép eléggé vonzó ahhoz, szerepeljen a Commons:Kiemelt képek lapon, akkor tegyél új javaslatot ez a szöveg alján levő listán. Ha kialakult egy általános konszenzus 15 napon belül, a képet feltüntetik: a Commons:Kiemelt képek lapon.

Contents 1 Javaslatok 1.1 File:P1160243 Calopteryx splendens.jpg 1.2 File:Wadi Rum BW 16.JPG 1.3 File:SydneyUniversity WesleyCollege.jpg 1.4 File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png 1.5 File:Close-up of a cat.JPG 1.6 File:LuxioApustua.jpg 1.7 File:Botanica 2009 in Bad Schallerbach.jpg 1.8 File:Neochmia temporalis Cleland 2009 - 1.jpg 1.9 File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg 1.10 File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg 1.11 File:Mirów Castle - 15.JPG 1.12 File:Leaf trails.JPG 1.13 File:Lentos Art Museum.jpg 1.14 File:Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpg 1.15 File:Calopteryx splendens LC0156.jpg 1.16 File:Canon EOS 400D.jpg 1.17 File:Two Phalacrocorax auritus and one fish original n.jpg 1.18 File:Campesino Venezolano, Edo. Yaracuy.jpg 1.19 File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg 1.20 File:San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate Bridge and Marin Headlands at sunset.jpg 1.21 File:Krokusse violett.jpg 1.22 File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG 1.23 File:Dead Vlei Duene.jpg 1.24 File:The Congos concert Stockholm 2009-10-31--15.jpg 1.25 File:Apophyllitestilbite.jpg 1.26 File:Amsterdam Centraal Station2.jpg 1.27 File:Petra Jordan BW 26.JPG 1.28 File:Homless Woman.jpg 1.29 File:Lincoln conspirators execution2.jpg 1.30 File:FEMA - 12695 - Photograph by Barry Markowitz taken on 02-19-2005 in American Samoa.jpg 1.31 File:Martian Dust Devil Trails.jpg 1.32 File:Painted Cliffs.jpg 1.33 File:Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - Plague Column (part2).JPG 1.34 File:Squirrel Posing at Logan Pass.jpg 1.35 File:Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, 12th AU Summit, 090202-N-0506A-337.jpg, not featured 1.36 File:Procyon lotor (Linnaeus 1758).jpg 1.37 File:Australian Flag Flying animated.gif 1.38 File:US Navy gas mask excerise 021015-N-6996M-589.jpg 1.39 File:RSD-10 2009 G1.jpg

[edit] Javaslatok

[edit] File:P1160243 Calopteryx splendens.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2009 at 09:40:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: Created, uploaded, nominated by Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 09:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 09:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support WOW , really --Cesco77 (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Poor quality. —kallerna™ 11:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Wadi Rum BW 16.JPG

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2009 at 07:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:27, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dull centered composition. Otherwise good. —kallerna™ 11:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:SydneyUniversity WesleyCollege.jpg

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2009 at 04:46:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: all by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 04:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as nom. -- 99of9 (talk) 04:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Good resolution, cool composition. Tiptoety ^talk 06:43, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Tree of Life 2009 large.png

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2009 at 03:48:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Alan1411 - uploaded by Alan1411 - nominated by Alan1411 -- Alan1411 (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alan1411 (talk) 03:48, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose This looks very nice, but diagrams should always be SVG for obvious reasons (resolution independence, localization, file size). -- JovanCormac 07:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Close-up of a cat.JPG

Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2009 at 02:17:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by User:Laveol - uploaded by User:Laveol - nominated by User:Laveol -- Laveol (talk) 02:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Laveol (talk) 02:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very cute.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Don't care much for the crop. Sorry, Tiptoety ^talk 06:44, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Lovely cat just not FP for me, sorry. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:02, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:LuxioApustua.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 23:51:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Indalecio Ojanguren - uploaded by Akerbeltz - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Theklan (talk) 23:51, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose - needs lots of restoration work and neither the composition nor image quality are sufficient - Peripitus (talk) 01:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed because Too small, JGP-artefacts, needs restoration. --kallerna 11:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

[edit] File:Botanica 2009 in Bad Schallerbach.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 21:07:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I love the colors and composition! --Calibas (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Per Calibas.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:54, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
• Question: Have you boosted the colours? IMO it looks bit oversaturated. —kallerna™ 11:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Neochmia temporalis Cleland 2009 - 1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 11:28:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: all by Peripitus -- Peripitus (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Peripitus (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 11:56, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 17:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 17:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wolf (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support High detail, very good --Cesco77 (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 22:48, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - What a pretty bird. Tiptoety ^talk 06:45, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - great --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Citrus reticulata fruit 2009 G1.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 10:41:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: All by George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I do not fancy the wieving angle or background. Maybe just one or two of the fruits against a single-colured backgrond seen from the side? I think that could bring out more detail and keep it simple. --Korall (talk) 10:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment viewing angle are normal, it is only angle of wood pattern :) --George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment I kind of didnt like the wood pattern, cause its too much information competing with the fruit for my attention. Sorry friend. --Korall (talk) 16:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
      • Ok, don't worry, my friend. Fair opinion is important for me --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. I like it so much. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 12:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, as Korall. --Aqwis (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Shallow DOF, almost nothing's in focus ; flash lighting causes harsh white reflections on the fruits ; weird light reflecting off the table just behind the plate, distracting from the main subject. Sorry to sound so un-enthusiastic... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 16:53, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad light, odd colours and just average quality. —kallerna™ 17:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think you can replace this image better without flash and adding white (or black) background IMO --Cesco77 (talk) 21:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 09:45:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Alfred Palmer - uploaded and edited by Durova - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
• Question: This picture shows what appears to be JPEG compression artifacts/scanner noise but might as well be film grain (the photo is from 1942). Can anyone confirm that it is the latter? -- JovanCormac 10:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes, it is rather film grain IMO. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
    •  Support then. -- JovanCormac 16:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong support very nice and ultra-rare old color photo. It is M3 Lee modification, named in memory Robert Edward Lee --George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support For George Chernilevsky. Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes yes yes. Takabeg (talk) 16:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose WWII in Kentucky? I would like to see a real action shot. —kallerna™ 17:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
• Info: Color photography was very rare in 1942. This appears to have been shot on Kodak sheet film, which was higher quality but far more expensive than other processes that were invented after the war. The Alfred Palmer photos from training operations in Kentucky are the only color images I have ever found of World War II tanks in operation during their useful lifespan. Even at a training camp this was a difficult shot; the dust cloud posed a danger to the camera. This was about as far as WWII technology could go. Durova (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support GerardM (talk) 17:47, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 18:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wolf (talk) 21:13, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong support Of course --Cesco77 (talk) 21:32, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support but what is the wierd banding I can see in the sky - light-dark-light-dark etc... ? - Peripitus (talk) 00:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  • Info: Apparently it's a characteristic of the film. The same effect can be seen here. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mirów Castle - 15.JPG

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 09:36:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by and uploaded by Piotrus - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The perspective of this picture makes the ruined castle still loom large and imposing, even after all these years. If you don't like the tilt, I've got a modified version I can upload.
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Significant sharpness issues, dull colors. -- JovanCormac 10:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Leaf trails.JPG

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 05:54:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 05:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
• Info:There was an Image at Astronomy Picture of the Day.I wanted to take a similar image, but with no mery-go-round. I secured my camera at a chair that was able to turn, took it to back yard, put it under a tree, and turned it around. The picture was not processed. I believe, if a similar image was good enough to be featured at APOD, the nominated image should be good enoug to be featured here too :) So let's see...
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 05:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very creative and aesthetically pleasing. -- JovanCormac 10:39, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 17:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lentos Art Museum.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 01:37:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I wish the building was not cut off, but interesting shot anyway.--Mbz1 (talk) 05:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition is too random (lantern pole, silhouettes of people, contrail) and the crop hurts the picture. There are also sharpness issues in the left half of the image. -- JovanCormac 10:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral I don't like the crop --Cesco77 (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore I like the composition and the silhouettes of people :-) --Phyrexian (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition not striking enough. --99of9 (talk) 20:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

To me the structures that are seen in the natural frame of the main subject make the composition interesting.--Mbz1 (talk) 02:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpg

Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2009 at 00:33:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Wilson Dias - uploaded by Felipe Menegaz - nominated by Felipe Menegaz -- Felipe Menegaz 00:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
• Info: The picture captured the soul of Dilma Rousseff as the "Iron Lady". Felipe Menegaz 15:04, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Felipe Menegaz 00:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Lighting. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment I think that the lighting is not a problem. Felipe Menegaz 15:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment The lighting is wonderful, it's the crop that seems a little awkward. It draws attention away from her face. --Calibas (talk) 23:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Calopteryx splendens LC0156.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2009 at 21:21:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: a female Banded Demoiselle (Calopteryx splendens). Especially the males of that species are very noticable with their colorful body and their swaying fly like butterflies. But also the females are very attractive.
• Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
•  Support -- LC-de (talk) 21:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Excellent! -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
• Question: Just out of curiosity: the background is the sky or some artificial, studio surface? Wolf (talk) 23:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • The water surface. As it is reflective, you see at last the sky ;-) --LC-de (talk) 08:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Not good enough clarity. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:23, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Looks very clear to me. 99of9 (talk) 09:52, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Darius Baužys ^{→ talk} 11:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose IMO our macro-standards are higher. It's just too small. —kallerna™ 17:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per kallerna. -- JovanCormac 07:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Canon EOS 400D.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2009 at 19:26:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 19:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose EOS 50D gives you 15MP to play around with in a studio shot. Why leave us here with just over 2?--Korall (talk) 20:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I had to crop it, so the resolution decreased. Besides a resolution of more than 2mp is enough for such an object without small and fine details. -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 20:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Sure, and 640kB are enough memory for everybody as well... --Dschwen (talk) 23:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
• Question: Why did you choose to crop the shadow on the right? --99of9 (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
  • In my opinion the shadow is irrelevant for the encyclopedic function of the picture. In thumb view the camera would be smaller (in the same image size) if the sadow would not be cropped and you could not see the details of the camera as good as now. -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 13:00, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI and maybe VI (maybe I shouldn't say it, but this one lacks the "wow"). —kallerna™ 17:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Two Phalacrocorax auritus and one fish original n.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2009 at 03:27:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 03:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but IMO too unsharp, lots of CA and bad framing. —kallerna™ 10:28, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, it is an action shot, that shows motion. Could you please point me out to CA (I do not see it) and be more specific about fraiming (I could fix it). Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support The fish that one of the cormorans carries in its beak makes the picture exceptional enough to excuse the slight quality problems. -- JovanCormac 18:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

You call this right wing of the left bird a "slight quality" problem!? --AngMoKio (talk) 10:44, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose I think most of the issues brought up on previous vote on other version of this image are still valid. Also this version introduced new errors: why the bird on the left has its left wing cut at its base? It wasn't like that on the original, so it's probably bad photomanipulation - and that's another point to oppose for, as I'd like to vote for a photograph, not a clone stamp. --Leafnode✉ 18:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It is not "bad photomanipulation", it is good photomanipulation, and retouched template|manual cloning was added to the image, as soon as it was uploaded. I wanted to see, if people, who have not seen the original image will notice that "bad photomanipulation" , but I guess you had to spoil all the fun. Oh well... I withdraw my nomination

---

Yeah, cutting off real part of a wing is a very good photomanipulation. If not for this, it could have been quite good, but as I've seen the previous nomination, it wasn't any 'fun' for me. --Leafnode✉ 09:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

• Sorry but this is for sure not a good photomanipulation. It is just another photo where you try to pimp up your photos with obvious post-processing - it really gets annoying. And to tell now that it was just a fun-project to see if people recognize it makes it even worse. FPC is not the place to do such things...you can do that at "Photography Critiques". Sometimes i wonder if people actually look at the photos they vote for. --AngMoKio (talk) 10:15, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

really? The only difference that I added retouched template, the other person did not. And how about that sea otter File:Sea otter nursing02.jpg that actually was that sea otter File:Sea otter nursing.jpg once again with no retouched template added to the image. These are only two examples of who knows how many. And how about this nomination of yours,AngMoKio? The image was taken in ZOO, but presented as it was taken in a wild, while my question about ZOO info was ignored. What have I done? Did I add an extra ring to Saturn? Did I add a new crater to the Moon? Did I changed a historic image? No, no, no. I added the wing that was cut off in the original. What has changed? Still one bird is running after another, that has the fish. It was not obvious post-processing. Even Leafnode said, if he/she did not see the original, he/she would not have never guessed. The nominaton was withdrawn. If you want to comment you could continue to do it at my talk page please.--Mbz1 (talk) 11:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Campesino Venezolano, Edo. Yaracuy.jpg

Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2009 at 02:47:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Wilfredo Rodríguez - uploaded by Wilfredo Rodríguez - nominated by Wilfredo Rodríguez -- Wilfredo Rodríguez (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wilfredo Rodríguez (talk) 02:47, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Composition. Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting background, bad quality on full size. —kallerna™ 17:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Porto Covo November 2009-1a.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 23:36:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: Porto Covo, west coast of Portugal.View from south. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Mer30. Takabeg (talk) 23:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very detailed -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 19:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore --Phyrexian (talk) 17:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Congratulations!--Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Beautiful. Tiptoety ^talk 07:15, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice view. Could be a featured one. But from the left side to the point with the little boat the picture is too blurry, and because of that there are some stiching errors --Simonizer (talk) 07:22, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Done -- Thanks for noticing, Simon. It is fixed now. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 08:52, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate Bridge and Marin Headlands at sunset.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 22:05:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: everything by Mbz1 -- Mbz1 (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mbz1 (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support very good -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 22:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support High quality and nice colours --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Finally a sunset-long exposure -photo that I can support! Exposure is just ideal (not too long as usually) and I love that rock on foreground. Good job! —kallerna™ 10:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose composition - not enough space in the upper part, cut shore on the right. --Leafnode✉ 19:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

It is not cut shore. It is what is seen from that place.--Mbz1 (talk) 01:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

You mean there's nothing more to the right, at the small bay? --Leafnode✉ 09:09, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

No, it was not what I said. I said I took an image as what is seen from that place. I should have said I took the image of what my camera placed at tripod was able to see from that place. There is a cliff, and a high security fence all over the perimeter of the cliff. My tripod could not go any higher, security fence was on the way.--Mbz1 (talk) 16:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

•  Support--Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice one --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:59, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Krokusse violett.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 21:42:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Der Wolf im Wald - uploaded by Der Wolf im Wald - nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment I would say, it looks overprocessed. Saturation has been exagerated, brightness has been overly enhanced ; furthermore, it seems that some sharpness enhancement has been applied, leaving a weird fringe around the left ridge of the centermost bud. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oversaturated —kallerna™ 10:32, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: I have decreased the saturation. -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 11:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support I just like violet colors :) The out-of-focus of the distant plan is also good. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 12:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support nice now --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Gorgeous. --Calibas (talk) 23:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Sharp, good use of DOF, nice colours. Schöne Arbeit!. I cant see any oversaturation here, not by any stretch of the imagination. Can you please show me the part in the picture where the colours are blurred caused by oversaturation, kallerna? --Simonizer (talk) 07:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Now i have seen that he has changed the saturation after your comment --Simonizer (talk) 07:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:00, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Schloss Chenonceau.JPG

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 19:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Wladyslaw Sojka - uploaded by Überraschungsbilder - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 19:31, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --PaterMcFly (talk) 20:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC) (although it would have been nicer even if the sea was more flat)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:50, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice image, but we already have a very similar one File:Chateau de Chenonceau 2008E.jpg with not cut off castle.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
  • While the composition of that image admittedly is better, the quality is astonishingly bad for a FP. --NEURO ^⇌ 22:26, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Per NEUROtiker : the quality of that image is not even close to a FP. The composition of the current candidate, while arguably not optimal, is perfectly acceptable.
•  Support Valuable quality and composition. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This one is much better than the existing one. --AngMoKio (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Well, the main subject is cut off. Sometimes it is all, but impossible not to cut off the main subject, but from the other image we know that in this particular situation it was possible to have the whole picture.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Per Mila. —kallerna™ 10:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 14:03, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Mbz1 --Leafnode✉ 18:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Composition. I see no excuse for cutting off part of the building. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 12:49, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Part of the building is cut off to improve the composition... And I was under the impression that kind of stuff doesn't matter for FP anyway. --Calibas (talk) 23:26, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak Oppose Quality is really good, but the crop have no excuse, sorry --Cesco77 (talk) 08:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Dead Vlei Duene.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 19:25:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created - uploaded - nominated by Ikiwaner (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Ikiwaner (talk) 19:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice composition! —kallerna™ 10:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 12:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:33, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Leafnode✉ 18:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Peripitus (talk) 11:21, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Excellent! MartinD (talk) 12:35, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore Classic, but wow! --Phyrexian (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Immer wieder schön diese Wüstenbilder. Ich muss da, glaub ich, auch mal hin --Simonizer (talk) 07:25, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice image --Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:The Congos concert Stockholm 2009-10-31--15.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 17:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Korall - uploaded by Korall - nominated by Korall I love their expressions. I hate myself for not cappturing the hand of the man to the left. I am sorry that I do not know who is who in the group. Maybe someone can help me?-- Korall (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Korall (talk) 17:32, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose unsharp, bad composition and nothing special -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 20:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Sorry, had no chance to kidnap them and fit the into my non-existing studio. Of course theyre special to any roots reggae-loving person.--Korall (talk) 21:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
    •  Comment Maybe this is a Valued image, but not a featured! -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 21:31, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
      •  Comment Had you waited more than 7 minutes between me opposing your candidate and you opposing mine there might have been a chance of me taking this seriously. And there is also this thing about you downsampling your (studio take of a dead object) image and complaining about sharpess issues of my highest possible resolution (poor light conditions and moving peolple) image. I just do not think thats is fair. Please think a minute or two next time before angry-voting. --Korall (talk) 09:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, but the flash isn't the best light in image like this. Agree with Der Wolf for valued image. --Cesco77 (talk) 09:36, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think I would have supported if the hand wasn't chopped. --99of9 (talk) 20:54, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Apophyllitestilbite.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 16:55:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Archaeodontosaurus (talk) - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus (talk) - nominated by Archaeodontosaurus (talk) -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent quality, nice green colours inside crystal --George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support splendid --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --99of9 (talk) 05:13, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Amsterdam Centraal Station2.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 16:38:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Detroit Publishing Co. - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Amsterdam Centraal Station.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: 1890s photochrom print of Amsterdam Centraal railway station.
•  Support -- Durova (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Multichill (talk) 19:19, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good job. Takabeg (talk) 23:37, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- GerardM (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore Really, good job! --Phyrexian (talk) 17:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose The crops at the bottom and the left removed more than just the border. --99of9 (talk) 20:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Petra Jordan BW 26.JPG

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 16:18:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner|
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose motion blur, distracting background --Leafnode✉ 18:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Motion blur, background, she looks like she is up to something.--Korall (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Homless Woman.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 03:48:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: - Creator - http://www.flickr.com/photos/livenature/ Uploaded by Barun - Nominated by Barun -- Barun (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Barun (talk) 03:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
• Question: Is she smiling ? --Muhammad (talk) 08:44, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment It does seem that way. A sly smile.
•  Oppose "This media file is uncategorized." —kallerna™ 13:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
• Question: Does this woman know that her picture is shown online? --AngMoKio (talk) 14:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lincoln conspirators execution2.jpg

Voting period ends on 8 Dec 2009 at 02:46:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Alexander Gardner - uploaded by Durova - nominated by Durova. Restored from File:Lincoln conspirators execution.jpg by Durova. -- Durova (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: Execution of conspirators to the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. From left to right: Mary Surratt, Lewis Powell, David Herold, and George Atzerodt. July 7, 1865.
•  Support -- Durova (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mer30. Takabeg (talk) 09:36, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther (talk) 12:49, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Of course. -- JovanCormac 18:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support-- GerardM (talk) 18:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore Terrible! --Phyrexian (talk) 17:14, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:FEMA - 12695 - Photograph by Barry Markowitz taken on 02-19-2005 in American Samoa.jpg

Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2009 at 12:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Barry Markowitz, FEMA - uploaded by Multichill - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Now, I know not everyone is going to agree with me (hey, what else is new? :P) but I think that this image has the potential, not only to be featured, but to be Picture of the Day, December 25th 2009. Why? Well, in the past, we've only ever had one christmas themed image for POTD, and that was more of celebrations during Christmas than the event itself. So I decided that I'd try and get a festive FP for Commons. For 2 weeks I went looking through the various yuletide categories, examining hundreds of images of lights, decorations, presents, food, people and trees, seeking out the biggest and best for Christmas day. I found many grand and expansive images, but it seemed as if each of them had been specially crafted to look great in thumbnail, but horrible at full size. Onward and upward I pressed, discarding 12Mpx images left and right, determined to bring home the perfect picture. I had tried every search term I could think of, and had almost given up, when at the bottom of the screen, I spotted a tree. Not a large tree, not a tree draped with lights and streamers, in a city square or surrounded by rosy faced children; but a small tree, decked with simple red bows, perched atop an errant boulder, with a somewhat elderly gentleman holding it steady. Having already convinced myself that my search had been fruitless, I nonetheless clicked on the link, idle curiosity and utter exhaustion piling atop one another to see just why this man looked so proud of what was a very small and obviously weathered and threadbare plastic Christmas tree. "What possible reason" thought I, "could someone have for being happy with that scrawny thing?" It was then that I happened to glance at the caption. That tree, that small, weathered tree had been sucked out with the storm surge of en:Cyclone Olaf, a Category 5 cyclone that struck American Samoa in February 2005. Reading the article, I realised that the gentleman in the picture, Ioasa To'o, was from Tau Island, the hardest hit area by the storm. This is a man who quite possibly lost most of his worldly possessions, had certainly seen friends have all they owned ruined, and had his home island devastated. It was then that I realised I had found what I had been searching for. This was what the spirit of Christmas is about. Not gifts, or carols or lights, not even about trees. What this photo says to me is 'hope'. Even amongst disaster, the true spirit of Christmas, embodied in this tiny, unassuming tree, shines through. Just this once, I'm ignoring quality all together. For a picture like this, I wouldn't care if it was 100 pixels by 400 pixels. Wherever you may be, a Merry Christmas to you all. May it be as insightful as mine has been.
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Ok, ok you've persuaded me :) Personally, I don't care much about the "spirit of Christmas", but this picture has a story, so I don't mind not so good quality. I'm not sure about the tilt, though. The tree maybe looks better fully vertical, but still... --Lošmi (talk) 02:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Yea, it could be POTD, but not featured. Too much compressed and too much contrast. —kallerna™ 14:02, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Agree with kallerna. /Daniel78 (talk) 16:04, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose per kallerna, too dark foreground --Leafnode✉ 18:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Kallerna --Cesco77 (talk) 09:43, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Contrario Well, I love themed POTD, and I love this pic, because of the composition and because of the history of the subject, also sometimes I can support a low quality image because of its history, but I will not in this case. The quality is too low, and every day in the year is an "holy-day" in some cultures or religions, western christmas IMHO is not better than the National Women's Day or the Tu Bishvat. And I oppose to not featured POTD, if we have a featured picture for christmas I will support for 25 of December, but if we have not, let's try to found one for the next year... --Phyrexian (talk) 17:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Martian Dust Devil Trails.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2009 at 12:26:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by NASA/JPL/University of Arizona - uploaded & nominated by Originalwana (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: This image shows twisting dark trails criss-crossing light coloured terrain on the Martian surface. These trails are now known to be the work of miniature wind vortices known to occur on the red planet.
•  Support As nominator Originalwana (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 14:13, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Fascinating picture, I believe it's almost impossible to detect what it's about w/o reading the description page... My brain couldn't decide what my eyes were staring at: sheer fabric? Human tattooed skin? An eerie impression for sure. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 14:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Fantastic, nice and ultra-rare -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:15, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per George above. —Notyourbroom (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support /Daniel78 (talk) 22:23, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 02:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 22:09, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 14:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This is also the Picture of the Month in the december edition of Scientific American. -- JovanCormac 17:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose while description is interesting, the image itself makes absolutely no impression on me, especially when not on full-view. --Leafnode✉ 19:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Mbz1 (talk) 04:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
• A favor Excellent, looks like a weird tat xD -Nard the Bard 04:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  A favore Too intresting and rare to oppose --Phyrexian (talk) 16:41, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Painted Cliffs.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2009 at 12:10:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support There is some info at http://www.parks.tas.gov.au/index.aspx?base=1490 about this rock feature. -- Noodle snacks (talk) 12:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very pretty. --99of9 (talk) 12:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Strong support Excellent --George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:06, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --MAURILBERT (discuter) 14:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Yes, nice --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Wow! --Karel (talk) 17:21, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful! Jacopo Werther (talk) 18:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support —Notyourbroom (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment Are those rocks on the foreground really that blue? —kallerna™ 09:28, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Info: These are wet stones reflect the blue sky. Look are natural in this case. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:49, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
    • There is this edit (File:Painted Cliffs auto wb.jpg). I have no preference but the natural white balance is quite blue when the sun has well and truly set. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Peripitus (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I love rocks, and those are beautiful no doubt! Yet, I do not like the composition, and I cannot help it. Sorry.--Mbz1 (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 02:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 16:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 22:11, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 14:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Im convinced.--Korall (talk) 10:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:04, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose agree with Mbz1 here. Lovely picture but unbalanced composition --Simonizer (talk) 07:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, per Mila. —kallerna™ 11:08, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - Plague Column (part2).JPG

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2009 at 11:53:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality is not exceptionnal (blown reflections in the golden parts, noise...). --MAURILBERT (discuter) 14:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Squirrel Posing at Logan Pass.jpg

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2009 at 07:27:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by AlexAH - uploaded by AlexAH - nominated by AlexAH -- AlexAH (talk) 07:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- AlexAH (talk) 07:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Cute squirrel. Unfortunately there is a blue fringe running along the horizon of the background (and the sky is blown). --99of9 (talk) 07:32, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose sorry - nice squirrel but the sky/background is overexposed. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 16:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose central composition, deep DoF, overexposed sky --Leafnode✉ 19:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, 12th AU Summit, 090202-N-0506A-337.jpg, not featured

Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2009 at 05:52:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by

U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Jesse B. Awalt - uploaded by Martin H., edited by Grondin - nominated by 67.220.5.154 05:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Support -- 67.220.5.154 05:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I'd love to promote this, but the image noise is hard to ignore. -- JovanCormac 08:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment, I suggest denoising this. --Aqwis (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

• How would one go about de-noising the image? I really like this one, and want to help get it featured. Really, what I'm asking is what needs to be done to eliminate noise. Thanks. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 17:11, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

• • • There are several tools available for denoising. I have found Neat Image to be quite good (they also have a demo version, which can do close to everything the full version can. -- JovanCormac 17:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Even if this was fixed up, I find the eyes way too scary on the guy in the background. Otherwise I would have supported. --Silversmith Hewwo 09:36, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Procyon lotor (Linnaeus 1758).jpg

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2009 at 22:23:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --99of9 (talk) 23:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Really good! --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 01:07, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Fur is unsharp, also lots of image noise. -- JovanCormac 08:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good subject, but have Low DOF, low details and too noise. --Cesco77 (talk) 14:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)--
•  Support Useful and good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Cesco77. Yes it's useful and good, but that alone doesn't make it a FP IMO. --NEURO ^⇌ 18:39, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose good and useful image, but it does not meet the technical requirements for FPs. --High Contrast (talk) 18:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Australian Flag Flying animated.gif

Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2009 at 11:18:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: all by 99of9 -- 99of9 (talk) 11:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support as nominator -- 99of9 (talk) 11:18, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support This is cool. -- JovanCormac 12:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose ce n'est pas assez exclusive. -- Autofan45 (talk) 17:43, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

• Info: As far as I know it is the only animated gif flag on commons that was not computer generated. --99of9 (talk) 20:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Oppose Too few frames, could have been much smoother. /Daniel78 (talk) 19:11, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
  • And much heavier, and not possible due to the FPS limit on most DSLRs. Diti the penguin — 22:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
    • I'm not sure how valid a defense that is. My DSLR has a full-fledged video mode, as do many currently on the market. Point-and-shoots have had that sort of capability for more than half a decade, too. —Notyourbroom (talk) 01:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
      • Yours may do, but what about people like me, who buy standard DSLRs from Nikon (D40) or Canon (450D)? This category of DSLRs is the most common, and not every people is willing to buy every new camera that comes to the market. Diti the penguin — 13:05, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
        • Whatever the reason it does not make this look any smoother. /Daniel78 (talk) 18:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
        • I do not know what you mean by "standard" DSLRs; Nikon sells DSLRs at several price points with video recording capability, including the Nikon D5000, Nikon D90, Nikon D300S, and Nikon D3S. I'm not as familiar with Canon's models, but my point is that video recording capability is not unusual at all in modern cameras. It's certainly not restricted to high-end models. —Notyourbroom (talk) 04:37, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I would think a video would have been much a better medium to illustrate this through; Commons is a repository of video as well as images, after all. —Notyourbroom (talk) 01:49, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I chose the format in preference to video because I believe it will be more widely used than a video equivalent. IMO usefullness is easily as important as frames per second. Not all movies can be squashed into 256 colours, but flags are great candidates. 99of9 (talk) 02:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

•  A favore Cool :-) --Phyrexian (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:US Navy gas mask excerise 021015-N-6996M-589.jpg

Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2009 at 08:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: created by Shane T. McCoy (US Navy) - uploaded by Liftarn - nominated by Sarcastic ShockwaveLover -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: The yellow attachment is a MILES. And yes, I'm aware of the large space on the right, but I think the picture benefits from the off centre composition. Feel free to disagree. :P
•  Support -- Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support WOWWWW --Muhammad (talk) 08:54, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Amazing composition. -- JovanCormac 09:09, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Enough to get on your POTY list? :P Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:27, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
    • That's what I thought as well, though the mosquito below is also a good candidate. -- JovanCormac 11:26, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis (talk) 10:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy 4 me. —kallerna™ 11:39, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, considering that he's walking around in cloud of smoke, some noise is to be expected... Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 11:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Regretfull oppose i like military photos, but this really too noised. :( -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:11, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment I hate image noise, but in this special case I think it actually enhances the image, since it looks like the soldier is walking through dirty, green fog. -- JovanCormac 15:47, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree about the noise. /Daniel78 (talk) 19:38, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support. Noise adds to this image.--Silversmith Hewwo 21:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good composition of a subject that is quite tricky to photograph. Jopparn (talk) 00:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support The look in the eye gets me. —Notyourbroom (talk) 01:55, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Hey Notyourbroom, long time no see! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:51, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Jklamo (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support - Peripitus (talk) 13:15, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Durova (talk) 02:57, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noise. --NEURO ^⇌ 18:40, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Exceptional composition. --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:35, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose JukoFF (talk) 14:00, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Contrario Noise --Phyrexian (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose, as above. --Vprisivko (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Der Wolf im Wald (talk) 20:59, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not unusual enough to make up for the noise. Noise in the dust would be ok, but not on his helmet. --99of9 (talk) 05:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:RSD-10 2009 G1.jpg

Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2009 at 12:19:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

• Info: All by George Chernilevsky ^talk -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
• Info: SS-20 Saber a.k.a. RSD-10 Pioneer . Intermediate-range (Europe-range) Soviet ballistic missile with 3 nuclear warheads.
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:19, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Theoretically a fine subject, but the composition is relatively poor (distractions, background objects, shade etc.). —Anonymous Dissident^Talk 12:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Anonymous. Sigmund Freud would love this, though. -- JovanCormac 17:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Good resolution, good quality, high EV, and I cannot think how it could have been photographed with a better composition.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Distracting objects and the nose-cone of an aircraft in the background. Snowmanradio (talk) 18:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack Snowmanradio --AngMoKio (talk) 20:04, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support--Umnik (talk) 15:20, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Other object in background is too distracting. --Korman (talk) 07:23, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose distracting background - too deep DoF, could have had more space. --Leafnode✉ 08:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

v • d • e A Commons magyar nyelvű irányelvei és tájékoztatói Első lépések Regisztráció · Feltöltő űrlap · Licencválasztás · A tökéletes feltöltés · Kategorizálás · Munkakönnyítő eszközök · Ajánlott szoftverek · A Commonsra feltett fájlok használata A Commonsról Kezdőlap · Mi a Commons, melyek a célkitűzései · Gyakran Intézett Kérdések · Fájlformátumok · Kategóriák · Lapok, galériák és kategóriák · Előzetes óvatossági elv · Semleges nézőpont Licencelés Mit szabad és mit nem szabad feltölteni? · Licencsablonok · Flickr képek licencelése Törlés Törlési irányelvek · Törlési kérések · Egy fájl törlési jelölése lépésről lépésre · Visszaállítási kérések Feltöltések Saját alkotás · Egy másik Wikimédia projektből · A Flickrről · egyéb forrásból Közösség Magyar kocsmafal · Magyar közösségi portál · Angol kocsmafal · Kiemelt képek · Javaslatok kiemelt képekre · Kapcsolatfelvétel