User talk:Johannes Maximilian

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Claas Medion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 15:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:16x1px grey.jpg[edit]

File:16x1px grey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Imedeiros (talk) 18:37, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Civic 4 1987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:28, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E28 VL de spec.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocky még mindig büdös.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK. --Peulle 11:47, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Libellula depressa, female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Billy69150 08:45, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW T4 rot JM 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments --GT1976 10:53, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E28 M535i JM 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, nice composition. --GT1976 10:46, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eger JM 9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komondor JM 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SIL-131 JM 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image and good quality. But I would like a bit more contrast.) -- Spurzem 10:23, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E24 JM 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 05:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list[edit]

What are you did with Quality images candidates from 14 june? Tournasol7 (talk) 07:06, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose, that, due to some Javascript issues, 14 June was accidently deleted when I attempted to change the description of one of my photos. Also, on Monday I have experienced that my signature on the candidate list was not working: Special:Diff/305833665. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 07:40, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry and thank you for correction on my user page. Have a nice day! Tournasol7 (talk) 13:44, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 16:55, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fiat 126 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice little car, good image -- Spurzem 21:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Willys M38A1 JM 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:23, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gasturbine JM.jpg[edit]

Hi Johannes, can you please give any more information about this image. What sort of turbine was it? Or at least, where was it photographed? Thanks Andy Dingley (talk) 10:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Andy, this turbine is part of the new exhibition in the Technical Museum in Wien, according to the small information plate, it was used in a gas power plant in Germany from the late 1960's to mid 2015 (if I recall this correctly). Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 12:39, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E28 520i JM 1707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 23:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CX760 JM 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Sealle (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parkolo Parade JM 21.10.18 (116).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. So sieht für mich ein anständiges Autobild ausǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 16:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CC-BY-NC-ND[edit]

Hallo Johannes, es gibt es gravierendes Problem mit einigen deiner Bilder. Entweder ist es ernst gemeint mit der CC-BY-NC-ND Lizenz und müssen sie sofort gelöscht werden oder müsst du die Datei zu einer mit Commons kompatible Lizenz anpassen. Hier hast du einen guten Überblick darüber was zugelassen ist und was nicht. Viele Grüsse, --Poco2 12:12, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bilder sind unter mehreren Lizenzen veröffentlicht. Dazu auf der von dir verlinkten Seite: You can offer as many licenses for a file as you want as long as at least one of them meets the criteria for free licenses above. Die Bilder sind nicht nur, sondern auch unter CC-BY-NC-ND veröffentlicht. Gruß, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 12:16, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nachholtermin 17. Fotoworkshop[edit]

Im Gedenken an Gnu

Moin von der Küste,
es ist schon so viele Jahre her, dass wir uns in Nürnberg getroffen haben, wir (Ailura und ich) planten deshalb einen Fotoworkshop im Frühjahr 2019. Als wir erfuhren, dass Sebastian ebenfalls in Frühjahr ein BarCamp plant, entschlossen wir uns, zusammen zu arbeiten. Wir gliedern uns organisatorisch an diesem BarCamp an, sprich sind im gleichen Hotel, essen gemeinsam und nutzen ein Raum des Camps für unsere Fotovorträge, ähnlich wie auf der WikiCon 2011 in Nürnberg.
Wie Ihr vielleicht mitbekommen habt, ist Gnu zu seiner letzten Wanderung aufgebrochen, daher möchten auch wir seiner Gedenken.
Die weiteren Tage wollen wir gemeinsam ein Programm aus Fototouren und Vorträgen zusammenstellen, es ist noch viel Luft für Eure Ideen und Vorträge. Den geplanten ausführlichen LR Workshop wird zu einem anderen Zeitpunkt im Frühsommer ( WMDE gibt den Ort vor) stattfinden, da dieser sehr weit in die Tiefe gehen soll. Ich würde mich freuen, Euch in Nürnberg begrüßen zu können, wundere Dich nicht über meine Nachricht auch wenn Du lange nichts mehr editiert hast, ich habe Deinen Namen aus den letzten FWS kopiert. ;)

Tschüß
Euer
-- Ra Boe watt?? 12:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Valid license missing on File:Eger 05.02.19 JM (8).jpg and other images[edit]

Hi Johannes Maximilian, File:Eger 05.02.19 JM (8).jpg has the huge User:Johannes Maximilian/Autor on it, but that doesn't contain a valid license. GFDL-1.2 is not a valid license for new uploads, see Commons:Licensing#GNU Free Documentation License. Can you please add a valid license like for example {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}? Thanks, Multichill (talk) 17:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file has a creative commons license on it, too. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi A1 citycarver at IAA 2019 IMG 0296.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi Q3 Sportback at IAA 2019 IMG 0287.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamborghini Sian at IAA 2019 IMG 0332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:28, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wey VV7 PHEV at IAA 2019 IMG 0719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp, no disturbing elements, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:47, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Michael Lohscheller at IAA 2019 IMG 0364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:57, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart EQ fortwo at IAA 2019 IMG 0404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:09, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi e-tron 55 quattro at IAA 2019 IMG 0655.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A bit noisy --MB-one 16:40, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reduced it --Alexander-93 14:58, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:41, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz C 257 CLS220 IAA 2019 JM 0285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamborghini Sián IAA 2019 JM 1094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:03, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bugatti Type 41 Royale Coupé Napoléon IAA 2019 JM 0986.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:11, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi RS6 Avant C8 at IAA 2019 IMG 0194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ford Ranger Raptor IAA 2019 JM 0492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction necessary. --Steindy 09:33, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Steindy, like so? Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian 14:11, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Okay now, good quality. --Steindy 22:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Audi R8 Spyder IAA 2019 JM 1141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 911 T C-Serie 1969 (81 kW) IAA 2019 JM 0933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz W 198 IAA 2019 JM 1001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:34, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Touareg III IAA 2019 JM 0499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche Taycan IAA 2019 JM 0787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sharp photo, no disturbtions, an unexpected composition, good quality --Michielverbeek 17:31, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WEY GT Pro IAA 2019 JM 1028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good photo, but the CA on the left side should be removed. --Steindy 16:47, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I can fix this on monday, please be patient, thank you. --Johannes Maximilian 09:07, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:43, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Škoda Kodiaq Scout IAA 2019 JM 0689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Not really sharp + CA on the right side. --Steindy 16:54, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not okay (CA). --Steindy 13:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Have your pressed CTRL+F5? I'm pretty sure that I have removed the CAs, but maybe I'm blind? Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian 13:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks, I already know how to empty the cache ;-) Now it's okay. --Steindy 23:13, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porsche 971 Panamera ZF Gearbox IAA 2019 JM 0639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:Ikarus 256 Eger 19.02.20 JM (3).jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−

Information icon
Hello Johannes Maximilian, it appears that the version of File:Ikarus 256 Eger 19.02.20 JM (3).jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-19T17:00:22Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:00, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:BA3-2104 Eger 19.02.20 JM (2).jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−

Information icon
Hello Johannes Maximilian, it appears that the version of File:BA3-2104 Eger 19.02.20 JM (2).jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-19T17:01:40Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:BA3-2105 Eger 19.02.20 JM (2).jpg[edit]

Deutsch | English | +/−

Information icon
Hello Johannes Maximilian, it appears that the version of File:BA3-2105 Eger 19.02.20 JM (2).jpg which you uploaded 2020-02-19T17:01:40Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 7 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 17:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E28 520i Wien 25 July 2020 JM (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:16, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Touran II Bundespolizei Wien 25 July 2020 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllorhiza punctata in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 14:54, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Fortwo W 453 Wien 26 July 2020 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chevrolet Camaro RS (5th gen), 2015 model, Wien 26 July 2020 JM (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:17, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllorhiza punctata in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:02, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phascolarctos cinereus in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllorhiza punctata in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:29, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otaria byronia in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GRDN711 13:22, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BMW[edit]

Hallo Johannes, wie stimmst Du denn nun bei dem BMW, der vorn zu dunkel und mit hunderten Lichtreflexen übersät ist? – Bei Deiner Straßenbahn ist es schade, dass Du keine kleinere Blende gewählt hast, dass der zweite Wagen etwas schärfer wäre. Mal sehen, ob sich jemand dazu äußert; ich behalte es im Auge. Und Dein BMW ist mir zu dreckig – auch schade. Viele Grüße -- Spurzem (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ich schließe mich dir an. Bei dem Objektiv muss ich noch ein wenig ausprobieren, wie es richtig einzustellen ist; es macht selbst bei kleinen Blenden noch sehr gute Bilder (anders als das 70-300 mm, das bei der kleinsten Wolke sofort zu dunkle Bilder macht). Der Dreck am Wagen ist halt da. Vor zwei Jahren war der Wagen noch stark verbeult, was dem QI nicht im Wege stand, inzwischen ist er komplett ausgebessert (bis auf die Frontschürze); für §57a sind die Nebelscheinwerfer ausgebaut. Wer weiß, vielleicht ist er irgendwann mal komplett. Herzliche Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 19:26, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mazda MX-5 ND Wien 26 July 2020 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phyllorhiza punctata in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some noise reduction is necessary IMO --Ermell 19:29, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look now, best regards, --Johannes Maximilian 11:30, 31 July 2020 (UTC+2)
 Support Much better. --Ermell 07:16, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Peugeot 205 (1990–1998) Wien 26 July 2020 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 17:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E28 520i Wien 25 July 2020 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:47, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hylobates lar in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:27, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:57, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienna Ring Tram 4866 Schwedenplatz Wien 26 July 2020 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E21 315 Wien 26 July 2020 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Fortwo W 453 4 August 2020 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 14:32, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E28 520i Wien 25 July 2020 JM (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs some sharpening IMHO --Poco a poco 20:01, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I have increased both the sharpening and clarity. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian 08:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks better, good job --Poco a poco 19:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alfa Romeo Stelvio Wien 25 July 2020 JM (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:37, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spheniscus humboldti in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hylobates lar in Tiergarten Schönbrunn 24 July 2020 JM (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 19:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Fortwo 04.08.20 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could you please clone out that banana? --PtrQs 23:37, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I prefer to see the whole banana. It's an artwork (of Thomas Baumgärtel) and a nice background. BTW: The photograph is a little bit too warm. --XRay 08:43, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't intend to caputre the banana, it would not have been in focus anyways – I can remove it, but not "restore" it, since this picture is not cropped. I will reduce the colour temperature a bit. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian 10:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
XRay, PtrQs, what do you think? --Johannes Maximilian 14:03, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Hopefully PtrQs will agree, IMO OK now. --XRay 07:09, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for being out for some days. @XRay: Of cause I agree! If the asking reviewer is out for so long as me, it's understood that someone else has to replace him. Especially, when the correction is well done. --PtrQs 16:08, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opel Commodore A 16.09.20 JM (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 13:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Smart Fortwo W 451 19.09.20 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:47, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamborghini Urus 19.09.20 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:15, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Toyota Land Cruiser 16.09.20 JM (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW E46 19.09.20 JM (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted --Poco a poco 13:49, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected. --Johannes Maximilian 16:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW G21 19.09.20 JM (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed --Poco a poco 13:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Compression artefact or chromatic abberation? --Johannes Maximilian 16:58, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Chromatic abberations. Mostly on the right side, e.g. the front wheel. --Zinnmann 07:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
acknowledged; will fix this. --Johannes Maximilian 18:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise – the visibility of the CAs depended upon the image resolution; they were not so obvious when zoomed in, which is why I have not seen them earlier. Next time I'll stop down a little… Now the CAs should be gone; I reckon I cannot do better. Best, --Johannes Maximilian 23:08, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support You removed the purple CA but there is still a bit of red CA, give it a try if you like, the current version is though acceptable to me --Poco a poco 10:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honda VFR1200X Polizeikrad 19.09.20 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you fix the chromatic aberrations, e.g. at the back wheel, the license plate holder and below the emergency light? Spike 15:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'll try --Johannes Maximilian 23:09, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Have a look now… --Johannes Maximilian 23:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks, this looks better. Spike 22:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Diesels first experimental engine 1893.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Diesels first experimental engine 1893.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Diesels first experimental engine 1893.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Ariadacapo (talk) 13:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Struthio camelus 10.10.21 JM.jpg[edit]

Hallo, Johannes Maximilian! Ich nehme an, der Strauß stammt auch aus dem Allwetterzoo? Habe ihn entsprechend kategorisiert. Gruß, --Veliensis (talk) 12:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you Johannes Maximilian – Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 11:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Debrecen 01.08.21 JM (4).jpg[edit]

Hallo Johannes Maximilian, ist bei der Verwendung des oben genannten Bildes in der Wikipedia etwas zu beachten? Müsste also beispielsweise der Urheber, also Du, im Beschreibungstext genannt werden? Ich bin über die Lizenzbestimmungen des Bildes gestolpert und wollte sicherheitshalber mal nachfragen. Gruß -- Wiki0856 (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Du kannst das Bild einfach einbinden. Die Lizenzbestimmungen werden automatisch (durch die Einbindung) eingehalten. Du musst nichts weiter beachten. Viele Grüße, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you Johannes Maximilian Frissonneherissonne884 🔔 09:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TLF auf IFA W 50 LA (Nagyigmánd) 2023 06 27 JM.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 12:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Johannes_Maximilian&oldid=780139610"