User talk:Richard Bartz/archive 2008
FP Promotion 2008[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:MC Rotfeuerfisch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:MC Rotfeuerfisch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Argynnis adippe 1 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Argynnis adippe 1 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Image-Heliconius ismenius 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Heliconius ismenius 2 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Philaethria hecale 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Philaethria hecale 2 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Helioconius sp Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Helioconius sp Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Leopard Lacewing Cethosia cyane 2 Richard Bartz .jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Leopard Lacewing Cethosia cyane 2 Richard Bartz .jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Senf-Variationen.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Senf-Variationen.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 7b Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 7b Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 10 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 10 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Dolichomitus imperator Oviposition R Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Dolichomitus imperator Oviposition R Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak - modified2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak - modified2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Heliconius melpomene 2b Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Heliconius melpomene 2b Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Oxalis triangularis Stereoscopy Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Oxalis triangularis Stereoscopy Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:ZM1210-operating edit2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:ZM1210-operating edit2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe 4 Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe 4 Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
| ★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Clone war of sea anemones 2-17-08-2 edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Clone war of sea anemones 2-17-08-2 edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:The sun, street light and Parallax edit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:The sun, street light and Parallax edit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Katta Lemur catta.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Katta Lemur catta.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Aphidoidea fight.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Aphidoidea fight.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Allianz arena daylight Richard Bartz.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Schizophyllum commune with Pollenia sp. male on Betula.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Schizophyllum commune with Pollenia sp. male on Betula.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Erdfunkstelle Raisting 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Erdfunkstelle Raisting 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Sphegina montana Syrphidae.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Sphegina montana Syrphidae.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major detail.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major detail.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Rhithrogena_germanica_subimago_on_Equisetum_hyemale.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rhithrogena_germanica_subimago_on_Equisetum_hyemale.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Formica cf lugubris 3.jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Formica cf lugubris 3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image Image:Auchenorrhyncha Anaglyph.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Auchenorrhyncha Anaglyph.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
 |
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
Quality Image Promotion 2008[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Graugans Anser anser Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argynnis adippe 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Steinhuhn Alectoris graeca.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Argynnis adippe 1 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heliconius melpomene Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Helioconius sp Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Image-Heliconius ismenius 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Torynorrhina flammea chicheryi and Formica Rufa Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leopard Lacewing Cethosia cyane 2 Richard Bartz .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heliconius sp Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leopard Lacewing Cethosia cyane Richard Bartz .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Parthenos sylvia Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Philaethria hecale 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nashornleguan Cyclura cornuta Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Romanesco Brassica oleracea close Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Romanesco Brassica oleracea Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phoebis philea Caterpillar Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Testudinata Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Weiße Baumnymphe Idea leuconoe 4 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Streifengans Anser indicus Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Streifengans Anser indicus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gonepteriyx rhamni Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Image-Phoebis philea Caterpillar 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blässhuhn Fulica atra Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 5 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dolichomitus imperator Oviposition R Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 7 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 7b Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lachmöwe Larus ridibundus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lachmöwe Larus ridibundus 4 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Streifengans Anser indicus 4 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Streifengans Anser indicus 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 11 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rabenkrähe Corvus corone Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lachmöwe Larus ridibundus 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blässhuhn Fulica atra 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stockente Anas platyrhynchos Couple Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 10 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 6 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Heliconius melpomene 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 4 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Höckerschwan Cygnus olor 3 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stockente Anas platyrhynchos Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! DIY flowerpot reflector photolamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canon EF-S 17-55mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tamron 180mm Makro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canon EF 70-300mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canon MP-E65mm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oxalis triangularis Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Oxalis triangularis Stereoscopy Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phallus impudicus Stereoimage Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Phallus impudicus Stereoimage 2 Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Allianz arena at night Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aphidoidea fight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spornzikade Delphacidae larvae 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Katta Lemur catta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Schizophyllum commune with Pollenia sp. male on Betula.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Allianz arena golden hour Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Keeshond Sibirian Husky crossbreed puppy.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gewoehnlicher Seidelbast Daphne mezereum2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dotterweber Vitelline Masked Weaver Textor vitellinus 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nilgans gyptian Goose Alopochen aegyptiacus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Brautente Wood Duck Aix sponsa.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Huflattich Coltsfoot Tussilago farfara 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Huflattich Coltsfoot Tussilago farfara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Barbary Striped Grass Mouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dotterweber Vitelline Masked Weaver Textor vitellinus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kanzelleitersitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erdfunkstelle Raisting 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formica cf lugubris 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formica cf lugubris 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Erdfunkstelle Raisting 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ephemeroptera on Equisetum arvense.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Zunderschwamm Fomes fomentarius.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gonia capitata Tachinidae.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Ephemeroptera 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Caelifera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sumpfdotterblume Caltha palustris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spornzikade Stenocranus minutus auf Dactylis glomerata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gonia capitata Tachinidae 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Raps Rapeseed Brassica napus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Rapsfeld Rapeseed Brassica napus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Image-Schloss Nymphenburg Munich CC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpenmolch Alpine Newt Triturus alpestris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Forestry Forwarder Ösa 250 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Forestry Forwarder Ösa 250.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Alpenmolch Alpine Newt Triturus alpestris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sphegina montana Richard Bartz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gonepteriyx rhamni.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Lycaon 12:39, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Allianz Arena zu verschiedenen Zeiten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Venus-von-Epfach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Spaten-Franziskaner-Braeu factory.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pollenia rudis female 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pollenia rudis female.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bayerische Staatskanzlei Nacht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grosser Wollschweber Bombylius major.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gonia capitata Tachinidae 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gewoehnliche Pestwurz Common Butterbur (Petasites hybridus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Huflattich Coltsfoot Tussilago farfara 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formica cf lugubris 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Formica cf lugubris 4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Danke für die Nominierung[edit]
Hallo Richard, danke für diese featured picture Nominierung. Ich war mir nicht sicher ob es eine Chance hat, deswegen habe ich es nur bei den Qualitätsbildern eingestellt... Die Abstimmung läuft ja ganz gut zur Zeit, mal sehn was am Ende rauskommt. Chmehl 07:16, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- Also mit 22-1 hätt ich ja nie gerechnet. Mein bestes Ergebnis bis jetzt! :)) Chmehl 17:02, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Reh[edit]
Beste Wünschen für 2008, Richard. Dein Reh is leiter ein Damhirsch (Dama dama). Female (sub)adult. check the spot pattern. Roedeer only have spots when they are very young. Cheers. Lycaon 10:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Yawn[edit]
You should probably revert this. I was bored. Interesting that I could do something like that and still be bored. But not so interesting that I am not still bored.... -- carol 05:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Verbesserungsvorschläge:
- Der Fühler ist durch den fleckigen Hintergrund nicht gut zu erkennen, das könnte man verbessern (Beispiel).
- Die Pflanze könnte auch eine andere Centaurea sein, z. B. eine Centaurea jacea, aber ich bin da kein Experte. --TM 17:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
Commons Guide[edit]
Hello,
Having seen a number of your pictures in QI and FP sections, I was wondering if you would be interested in sharing some of your knowledge and assist in writing of a photography guide for Commons users?
Could you please see this page:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photography_Guide_Project_Alpha
Please consider participating in this. Thank you.
--Thermos 16:36, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hello,
- Unfortunately the project page was deleted because of lack of media (I suppose). An undeletion request has been filed and I hope to have the page up on later day. In the meanwhile, sorry for inconvenience. I will notify you on the further developments. --Thermos 03:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Project page has been restored to commons: namespace --Tony Wills 23:21, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Kein Caligo[edit]
Hallo Richard, das Image:Caligo eurilochus 3 Richard Bartz.jpg ist kein Caligo sondern ein Eryphanis. Welcher weiß ich leider auch nicht. Schau mal hier: [1]. Die Gattungen sind sehr eng verwandt. Ich nehme an, Du hast die Bilder im Bot. Garten München gemacht :-). Leider sind die Schautafeln mit nicht besonders guten Bildern versehen. Ob die Arten auf den Tafeln auch wirklich fliegen, da bin ich mir nicht so sicher. Die Gattungen kommen schon hin. Dar war jedenfalls letztes Jahr so. Viele Grüße, --Hsuepfle 20:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Ich sollte es schon lange promoviert haben. Aber mit die Amerikanerin herum wollte ich hier nicht mehr participieren. Es tut mir leid. Lycaon 14:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Diva turds[edit]
I like diva turds. They are often sharp, not noisy and in good focus. The way to withdraw diva turds is not documented, so with all due respect to the diva:
{{/Withdraw|... }}
in place of the {{/Nominate|... }} and {{/Discuss|... }}
Thanks! -- carol 05:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is called timesaving ! --Richard Bartz 08:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- Timesaving? Since when and by whom? What I did not mention was a lot of stuff about early withdrawal and prematurity, etc. -- carol 18:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you just start with /Withdraw instead on /Nomination it saves a lot of time ;-) --Tony Wills 09:03, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- Timesaving? Since when and by whom? What I did not mention was a lot of stuff about early withdrawal and prematurity, etc. -- carol 18:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Frage[edit]
Haben sie eine Version von Image:Wild_Boar_Habbitat_2.jpg, in der die unterere rechte Ecke nicht retuschiert ist? Es ist hier http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Wild_Boar nominiert, aber die Ecke ist ein Problem. Danke, Pschemp 04:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nein, leider nicht. Ich habe aber die Stelle unten nochmal kurz nachbearbeitet --10:27, 19 January 2008 (UTC
- OK, Danke - Ich meine, wir haben eine gute Lösung gefunden. Pschemp 03:22, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Not Butterflied fried turkey spam as planned[edit]
This was going to be my ace in the hole (I think that is an American card game saying about cheating, pulling a high card from the sleeve or maybe keeping it in your hand past the time that it made sense to play it, which is not cheating) in case the butterflies started to be too many and not in focus, etc. It never happened and I also could not bring myself to eat this stuff -- it has dried up in the 'fridge. The original spam, that is a different bird all together and probably it would have been lightly fried and eaten.
Butterflied fried turkey spam was a very funny name for an image to me -- carol 18:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Continued Support requested[edit]
I am having a difficult time putting Image:Shoes in telephone wire.jpg into this page. I considered Electronics and Events and even Other animals since I have seen some of this species that would not surprise me if they could walk on their own. The song suggests Birds and it would not be difficult to argue that it is also a Place both on earth and in time.
What Would Richard Bartz Do? -- carol 17:15, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Insect porn and less[edit]
"analyze"?
The less: I appreciate that you are trying to utilize the talk pages more. Image talk pages are the least used of the software options that I know of. -- carol 13:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- I dont like to be a opinion maker ;-)) About analyze and post-porn ? (and thank you for straining your brain :)) .. I am not shure but there is a term which only a scientist is able to know ... Asking Lycaon is an absolute must here. --Richard Bartz 14:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
The process of oviposition
1 Tapping with her antennae the wasp listens for the vibrations that indicate a host is present.
2 With the longer ovipositor, the Wasp drills a hole through the bark.
3 The Wasp inserts the ovipositor into the cavity which contains the host larva.
4 Making corrections.
5 Depositing her eggs.
6 Depositing her eggs.
7 Not pictured here is the male who just taps around looking for females.
Not copyrighted. -- carol 20:22, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Good, thank you very much <3 --Richard Bartz 21:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Ovipositing[edit]
Hi Richie. I'm a bit short of time at the moment (too much work -> reporting deadlines). So just a quick link or two...
...and a little bit of (copyrighted!) text: Species attacking wood-boring larvae must penetrate considerable depth of wood to oviposit, and have attained an extreme length of this organ. This requires an involved process of manipulation to attain the required position for drilling and to exert the force necessary for penetration. Riley (1888) gave an extended account of the manner of oviposition of Megarhyssa lunator F. In this species the hind legs are used to bring the ovipositor into a vertical position. The sheaths of Megarhyssa are arched dorsally over the abdomen and serve to guide the ovipositor proper, but they do not penetrate the wood. In the early phases of the act, the forcing of the basal portion of the ovipositor into a coil in a membranous intersegmental "sac" between two of the abdominal segments permits the terminal portion to be brought into a perpendicular position for the beginning of the drilling process. This provision for manipulating an ovipositor of exceptional length is also found in Leucospis in the Chalcidoidea. Abbot (1934) described in detail the mechanics of oviposition, and Cheeseman (1922) described the oviposition of Rhyssa persuasoria L., and Brocher (1926) discussed the manner in which it was accomplished by Perithous mediator Grav.. Cheers, Lycaon 19:58, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for taking the time --Richard Bartz 22:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Zikomo kwambiri[edit]
Natotela sana mukwai. Lycaon 00:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Teleconverter[edit]
The make a 2x teleconverter for the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Lens? I was under the impression that the Canon teleconverters only work on the L series lenses. Calibas 17:44, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
- I would prefer the Kenko 1,4 Teleconverter --Richard Bartz 11:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
English caption[edit]
This nice picture has a strange english caption, with the name of se species (Philaethria hecale), and a discussion about another genus, heliconius. Is that an error?--Berru 20:46, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- definitely a error --Richard Bartz 22:28, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Wrong image replaced[edit]
You replaced Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak - modified.jpg accidently with an image aimed for Image:Biandintz eta zaldiak - modified2.jpg. Please undo that. --Niabot 15:32, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- schau auf deine Userseite ;) --Richard Bartz 19:58, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
- "Zwei Dumme, ein Gedanke"... passt hier vorzüglich. ;-) --Niabot 20:29, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Question: Do you only upload photographs here for the thrill of getting these templates pasted on them? -- carol 21:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I ask that because (not just wiki*) this world has the stench of a swag trap on many days for the last few years that I attempt to live in it. -- carol 21:33, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- quality is quality --00:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- German comedy -- nice! Well rendered even. I laughed.... -- carol 00:28, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- quality is quality --00:12, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Pizza ![edit]
Hi Richard,
I personnaly don't make any nodal point adjustement since I'm not equipped properly (I'd like to get something like a Nodal Ninja). It's OK if most of the elements are far enough from the camera since the parallax errors are then negligible, but more difficult for indoor panoramas. I've had parallax errors in my Image:MuseeOrsay 20070324.jpg and Image:Vitraux Cathedrale Metz.jpg but Enblend was able to keep mostly the parts which overlapped seamlessly. For the few remaining errors, I either let them or clone them out (they are usually very small, so it's very easy, and I did that only twice I think).
A tip when stitching pictures with parallax errors is to set the control points on the background elements in priority. I've found this gives the best results. If you use Enblend3 you can set the parameter "--fine-mask" which sometimes helps too. There's also the "last resort" trick to set an alpha mask yourself and give it to enblend (I did that once on a wedding pano with a lot of people moving).
Diliff says he uses smartblend in his user page.
Hope this help.
Since I'm here, here is a question of mine : do you get your butterflies while they are asleep ? at morning time ? Thanks ! Benh 19:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Image:Ptiluc_figurine_Le_Rat_1993_Richard_Bartz.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry on the Requests for Deletion page..
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!
GeorgHH • talk 23:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
re:clone war of sea anemones[edit]
Hi, Richard,
Thank you for you message. The images were taken with my underwater Olympus. It does not take raw images. Please let me know, if under "raw" you meant original image. Thank you. --Mbz1 19:29, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- I did, but please do not spend lots of your time with this. It's OK, if it is not to pass.--Mbz1 19:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Anaglyph images[edit]
Your anaglyph pictures are driving me insane! I haven't used one of those things in years, and I can't find mine... I'm just curious; do you use colored filters to make those pictures, or software? If you use software, how does it judge the distances to create the 3-D effect? Anyhow, I'm sure the pictures are spectacular. Just wish I could see them... Thegreenj 22:23, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Please tell me what you think[edit]
Hi Richard, once you have been kind enough to offer me your help in reviewing my images and telling me what you think about them passing FP nominations. Here are two images, which I like, but not sure, if they will pass:
Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 01:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you.--Mbz1 00:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi Richard, this is a neat image. :) First anaglyph FP? FYI I wrote about it here. cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 15:02, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Wow, great. Thanks ! --Richard Bartz 15:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
40D[edit]
Hallo Richard, hast du eine neue Kamera? Ich habe gesehen, dass du dieses Bild Image:Katta Lemur catta.jpg mit einer 40D gemacht hast. Ich bin momentan auch am überlegen mir dieses gute Stück zuzulegen. Kurze Frage: Das Bild von dem Lemur hast du mit iso1600 gemacht. Hast du da nachträglich noch viel noise reduction betrieben? Die 40D soll ja bzgl Rauschen nochmal einige Verbesserungen bringen. Wie bist du sonst so mit der 40D zufrieden?
Gruß --AngMoKio 12:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Nix entrauscht und nix nachgeschärft ... ein geiles Teil !! --Richard Bartz 17:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Wow super! Da wird die Vorfreude ja noch größer. Danke für die Info. --AngMoKio 17:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Das Ding ist einfach nur LECKER !!! :-) :-) Die Tonwertprio ist Gold wert !--Richard Bartz 17:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Wow super! Da wird die Vorfreude ja noch größer. Danke für die Info. --AngMoKio 17:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
English please :) I came over to ask what I think is a similar question? Did you just upgrade to a 40D, and if so how does it compare to your 400D? Do you have any pictures with the same subject and lens, but different bodies? I'm thinking of going to the 40D from my 350D, but I'm not sure if it's worth it, how big a change it will be in quality. The biggest pros are the focussing and better graphics processor I would imagine. Does it handle ISO better too? Thanks, --Dori - Talk 20:55, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- You should rent/borrow and test ... and maybe test with the new 450d, too in april. Superficial changes/improvements : slight lower noise, tonal value priority, live view, overall speed, changable focusing screen as 1d, larger and brighter mirror reflex finder, bigger batteries, more comprehensive editing menues, better body. Mine was a present of my employer as i need it to make tons of textures and hdri backgrounds for 3d models, where i need live view for more efficiency. --Richard Bartz 10:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Synchiropus splendidus 1 Luc Viatour (answer)[edit]
do not do my raw, I am too and it takes up too much space (26Mo 1 raw 14bit!). Once I made jpg removes the raw. --Luc Viatour 06:58, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Swan pic[edit]
Could you have at look over at en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/swan and tell where the picture is shot and if the swan is landing or taking off? Nice photos btw. 81.235.186.15 18:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
QIC[edit]
Hey Richard! Hast Du eigentlich einfach per cut and paste mein Datum/Timestamp fuer Deine QIC Nominierungen geklaut? :-) Hast Du Javascript in deinem Browser deaktiviert? Sonst loesch doch mal den Cache, dann kannst Du auch normal mit vier Tilden unterschreiben. --Dschwen`
- Okay :-) --Richard Bartz 17:18, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Valued image candidate test reviews[edit]
Hallo Richard! I passed by the München stadium some days ago on the Autobahn while heading for Salzburg. I did not get the best view as I also had to keep my eyes on the road, but anyway, an unusual and eye-catching piece of architecture, much well represented by your recent photo thereof. Anyway, that is really a side-issue. The reason why I am contacting you is because I would like to hear if you would be interested in test reviewing some of the macro photographs presently on test review as Valued Image candidates (VICs)? Reviewing VICs is IMO a little more demanding than reviewing FPCs and QICs and it requires some specific domain knowledge of the subject and some more willingness to look for related, competing material on Commons. Therefore it is quite important to have reviewers available with diverse backgrounds in order to do competent reviews. As I see it you could be one the reviewers the project is looking for, especially when it comes to macro photography and critters, and your assistance would be very much appreciated. With anaglyph-depleted grüsse, and best wishes -- Slaunger 06:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- Your oviposition images, which I just saw on WP:FPC would also be a nice candidate for a Valued Image Set! It would be interesting if you would test nominate them (otherwise I'll probably nominate them, if you do not object). -- Slaunger 15:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
- With some delay I have (test) nominated your set of oviposition images. The review page is here for your reference. I hope you do not find that I use some of your images to test the concept. -- Slaunger 19:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- It would be real cool if you'd geocode the images, and, alternatively, if you do not want to reveal the exact location, add some info on a regional level of where you observed this in the image pages. Cheers, -- Slaunger 20:01, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- With some delay I have (test) nominated your set of oviposition images. The review page is here for your reference. I hope you do not find that I use some of your images to test the concept. -- Slaunger 19:58, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: anaglyphs[edit]
Neat. :) However as someone who doesn't actually own 3D glasses, the image with the match head is more interesting to me. ;) When I pick some up I will go over all your fine work. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 04:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Humboldt penguin 5080 edit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Question: do you think it would be "fun" or good for commons to not acknowledge Dori as photographer of this image? -- carol 02:30, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
excellent![edit]
Hallo Richard, ich bin beim Kategorisieren auf deine Bilder gestossen und wollte dir einfach mal danken für dein grossartiger fotografischer Beitrag her! Respekt. Lieber Gruss --Ikiwaner 18:20, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Anaglyphs[edit]
Hi Richard,
It's been a while since I last tried anaglyphs, but what I do is, I believe, more or less the same as you, at least on the first steps. I first take two pictures, one for each eye, and then merge them with Photoshop. Now the problem I encounter is how to make one picture visible for one eye while the other one is not. If I recall correctly, I used to delete the red channel of the left-eye's image and the blue and green channels of the right-eye's image (or maybe it's the other way, don't quite remember). But I only got black and white images, I lost all information of the rest of the colors. How do you do to preserve colors? I'm almost able to see your images correctly and comfortably without 3d-glasses!
PS: I have some awesome anaglyphs of Mars made by the ESA. If I can (correct licenses, etc.) I'll upload them here :-) - Keta 15:53, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- It worked, thanks! - Keta 16:50, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
QI sorting[edit]
Hallo Richard,
Glückwunsch zum mal wieder echt super Bild. Leider bin ich damit mal wieder etwas überfordert mit der Einordnung in die richtige QI Galerie. Kannst du mir da kurz aushelfen die recently promoted images wieder sauber zu kriegen. Vielen Dank.
Gruß --AngMoKio 20:35, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Habs einsortiert --Richard Bartz 20:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
FPC on Turkish Wiki[edit]
FP on Turkish Wiki - Alvesgaspar 22:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Vielen Dank[edit]
Es passiert sehr selten, dass meine Bilder von anderen nominiert werden - hat mich sehr gefreut. :-) --AngMoKio 21:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Diapause[edit]
This word is not in the wordnet dictionary nor in Webster 1913; that in itself is not a bad thing but I have some problems with some of the words that are not there but are in the dictionary.com collection of definitions. I read a scathing review of that dictionary recently, one which I tend to agree with. The entry for the word at en.wikipedia was great though and the sentence that you authored here is very eloquent. The dict server did suggest another word which is similar and to be found in both Webster 1913 and wordnet -- diapason and I really preferred the 1913 definition. -- carol 01:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- So then i tune my organ and sing a little song:
"Diapause oh diapause, please make you done and gone .. diapause, bad diapause, please make you done and gone ... (refrain with a technobeat) My sensor is ready, my sensor is glowing ... my sensor is ready, my sensor is glowing ... You like my song ? --Richard Bartz 13:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Honestly, my dad had Kraftwerk on his reel to reel; the vinyl says it was released in 1974 here and I am not absolutely certain but strongly thinking that he had the reel to reel before 1974; I would prefer one bad singer with an out of tune acoustic guitar over poorly rendered german-techno. My parents threw me into this taint when I was quite young :) -- carol 14:21, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Diapause is a predictive strategy that is predetermined by an animal's genotype. Diapause is common in insects, allowing them to suspend development between autumn and spring, and in mammals such as the red deer, where a delay in attachment of the embryo to the uterine lining ensures that offspring are born in spring, when conditions are most favorable.
- Hibernation. I spent a couple of years studying the habits of a species of homosapien Linuxae europia; this species actually comes to life in that delay time perhaps living within the wombs of their computers -- and then disappearing when spring came. The farther north the species was living, the greater the effect. -- carol 14:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Master Photographer Project[edit]
Hi Richard and thanks for bringing it up, I was thinking about that for some time. I like your idea, but I feel that we need to bring a few things up and address some issues:
- The amount of FPs does not necessarily show how 'good' of a photographer you are - it just illustrates how:
- much you invested in your equipment (not that I have anything against it - I feel that a photographer should invest some money in his gear if he is dedicated or passionate enough, I'm just saying, how do we avoid spoiled kids whose parents bought them 5Ds and 24-105mm EFs for their birthday and who think are the best photographers in the world [yes, they exist])
- valuable the images are to Commons
- much the people liked it
Maybe another measure of the 'goodness' of the image is whether its a QI or not. What I suggest is that we should make the following assumptions:
- An FP is not the best way to judge, but it still is sometimes a good measure
- A QI is not the best way to judge a photographer, as it's often about the gear (yes, it depends on how you use the gear, too, but you can read about that in an hour online), but it also shows that the photographer is able to take good, solid images with nice composition and DOF
Hence, I think that:
- We should create a photographer's guild, but make a point/ranking system.
- Everyone applying would have to write an application to those who are already in it, asking to enter and explaining why they would want to enter.
- Those who are in it should receive some benefits, such as being part of the ranking system and maybe we would make an internal forum or something like that.
The point system would work on the basis that an FP is worth 1 point, a QI 0,5 points and a VI 0,5 points. The photographers would be arranged according to rating. Those are just some thoughts I have, please answer with what you think on my talk page. And also, voting for (or against) my FPC [2] would be much appreciated.
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Gamsleitenspitze.jpeg){kind=link}
Thanks,
Freedom to share 20:38, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your time .. will move this to the discussion page --Richard Bartz 20:44, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
I am almost certain the picture has not been identified correctly, it is not Heliconius hecale but Dryadula phaetusa.
See [3], [4] and [5] for Dryadula phaetusa underside. And [6], [7] for Heliconius hecale underside. Pro bug catcher 15:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
![[3]](http://www.funet.fi/pub/sci/bio/life/insecta/lepidoptera/ditrysia/papilionoidea/nymphalidae/heliconiinae/dryadula/phaetusa-1m.jpg){kind=link}
![[6]](http://www.ecology.org/ecophoto/insects/Thumbnails/PrimaryCatalog-6823.jpg){kind=link}
![[7]](http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/274080/2/istockphoto_274080_heliconius_hecale_on_leaf.jpg){kind=link}
- Thank you very much Pro bug catcher for your help. Next time i will ask you before. Do you often read your discussion page ? regards Richard
- No problem. No I don't read my discussion page on commons that often. But I do check my talk page on en:User_talk:Pro_bug_catcher a lot more often, leaving a message there is a better idea to contact me. This edit [8] by an unregistered user put me on the trail in this case. I'll be happy to check pictures when you ask me, but there are so many insects that I won't always know the answer. Regards. Pro bug catcher 18:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello, What exactly do you mean with "out of focus" I was extremely happy that I was able to get a (in my opinion) sharp photo of this bird. The background is of course not sharp, but the bird itself is very sharp. When I look at the pictures on your user page, I see exactly the same. Why not let people decide themselves whether they like this picture, instead of tagging it with a template. Magalhães 14:16, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I wanted 2 protect your picture against a battery of oppose votes .. i erased the fpx tag right now .. so you can see --Richard Bartz 15:07, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Ok. thanks for that. Perhaps I will nominate the picture for most valued photo, as suggested by one of the voters. I still so not understand why everybody feels it is out of focus. Do you mean the background? but when I look at the photo below. I see a completely blurry background? Magalhães 13:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- It is the foreground which is out of focus. Please compare with this one or this one. Plenty of other good examples here -- Alvesgaspar 14:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Your opinion please[edit]
Hi,I'd like your opinion on wether any of these images: 
is worthy of an FP nomination and capable of promotion.Thank you for your time! - Amog |Talk 14:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
- i would prefer the first one but keep in mind that sunsets are always difficult @ fp --Richard Bartz 16:54, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated the first one as a quality image candidate instead.Would you mind reviewing it?This is the link.Thank you very much.[Never mind,it has been declined :( ] Amog |Talk 06:20, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Maybe you might help?[edit]
Hello, Richard,
First of all I'd like to use the oportunity and to tank you one more time for everything.
I wonder, if IYO this image quality could be improved. I have a raw file. I guess what I meant to ask was, if you could improve it, if I send you a raw file. It is not for FP, but just to make it look better and for me to see what really could be done, if one has a raw file. I'm not good with photo shops at all. I sure will understand, if you do not have a time or not interested in working on the image. Thank you.--Mbz1 01:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oh my gosh ! The amount of noise is truly H E A V Y :-). Email me the RAW file and i will see what i can do 4 you. --Richard Bartz 14:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, Richard. What is your e-mail address?--Mbz1 15:24, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- richard at makrofreak dot de --Richard Bartz 15:27, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- I did, Thank you.--Mbz1 15:59, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Rauscht das?[edit]
Hallo Richard, kurze Frage wie sieht es mit diesem Bild aus...ist das nominierungsfähig oder muss man da auch nochmal entrauschen? Kann sein, dass mein Monitor mir das Rauschverhalten etwas zu positiv wiederspiegelt. Was RAW angeht muss ich zu meiner Schande gestehen, dass ich das bisher noch nicht betrieben habe. Evtl. sollte ich in das Thema mal einsteigen. Den Rausch-Unterschied zwischen mit und ohne Tonwert-Prio konnte ich noch nicht klar feststellen - zumindest bis 400 iso sehe ich keine Unterschiede. Hängt wohl sehr stark von den Lichtverhältnissen ab.
- "Rauschende Colts" -- Da ist noch üppig Color-Noise drin, gerade unten kann man das gut sehen. Die 40d zeichnet feiner und holt mehr Helligkeiten raus als die 400D, allerdings rauscht die kleine Saukiste dafür um so mehr. Bei der Tonwertprio kommt es mir so vor als ob er ein instant-hdr macht -- der DIGIG-Prozessor holt dann die Lichter hoch, allerdings zu Gunsten des ätzenden Rauschens. Appropos RAW - du solltest auf jeden Fall RAW's benutzen. Da kannst du noch so viel rausholen .. ich hab auch lange gebraucht das einzuführen ;-)
- Also ich komme ja von der 350D und da ist die 40D in jeglicher Hinsicht ein Traum. Schärfe, Rauschen, allg. Bedienbarkeit, Haptik, Geschwindigkeit, Sensorreinigung....das sind schon tolle Sachen. Der obere Adler ist ISO 640 + Tonwert-Prio, dafür ist das Rauschen auch akzeptabel. Ich habe mal in einer Kirche ein "ISO 1600"-Testbild mit 1/10s (ohne Tonwertprio)gemacht und war da vom Rauschverhalten der 40D mehr als begeistert. Ich sehe natürlich ein, dass im Rahmen von FPC schon genau hingeschaut wird. ;-)
- Was RAW angeht: Bringt da der PS eigentlich schon Bordmittel mit (und wenn ja ab welcher Version) oder hast du da Canon-SW im Einsatz?
- Der CS3 hat Camera Raw integriert .. ist fast identisch zu Lightroom daß ich gerne verwende. --Richard Bartz 15:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Bin jetzt seit ein paar Wochen 40d-Besitzer und bin sehr begeistert. Die Investition hat zwar weh getan aber zahlt sich meines Erachtens wirklich aus. ...ausserdem rauche und trinke ich nicht/kaum (irgendwie muss man es ja rechtfertigen). Es wäre toll wenn man ein Forum hier bei Commons hätte, wo man sich zu so Kamera-Themen etwas austauschen könnte. Man könnte sicherlich viel voneinander lernen. Das geht so in die Richtung von deinem Vorschlag (Master Photographer Project) letztens... --AngMoKio 09:52, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Rauchen/trinken ? Das gleiche habe ich auch gesagt als ich vor kurzem meinen neuen Bimmer bekam --- das hat dann genau 6 Wochen angehalten :-). --Richard Bartz 14:12, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Das Rauchen habe ich zum Glück nie angefangen - das rechtfertigt die 40D allemal. Problem könnte nur sein, dass ich die Rechtfertigung auch für andere Sachen zu häufig verwende. :-)--AngMoKio 15:39, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
So jetzt muss ich nochmal nachfragen - 2 Adler wurden entrauscht. Adler Nr.1 ist in der Nominierung und hier der 2te. Wäre Nr. 2 nun nominierbar?! Sei gnädig..hehe.. --AngMoKio 19:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- man kann alles nominieren .. kommt halt auf die kommentare an ... das rauschen ist noch sichtbar .. schmeiß doch einfach rauf das ding :-) --Richard Bartz 21:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi Richard. Could you geocode these images so they can be accepted as a valued image set? --MichaelMaggs 06:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ping. --MichaelMaggs 17:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
- 48.064927, 11.577154 --Richard Bartz 18:06, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
FP template[edit]
Hi Richard,
I think you might want to take a look at this discussion Alvesgaspar 22:09, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:FPC Notification[edit]
Congratulations! A picture you uploaded, w:Image:Nymphenburg Palace, has been nominated for Featured Picture status over at Wikipedia:Featured Picture Candidates. You can come to participate in the discussion and vote here. --NauticaShades 20:20, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
