User talk:A.Savin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

See also: User:A.Savin/Archive for old discussions.

It is possible to contact me via e-mail as well, but I will most likely reply if you write me straight here instead of using the e-mail form.

If you write me here on my talk page, I will normally reply here as well; so, if you expect an answer, please watch this page for a while.

Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img14 Chapman zebra.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img14 Chapman zebra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Brownie transparent.png Classical, but still... thank you for your work on Commons! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

The traditional greeting[edit]

Silesian - Moravian Beskids in winter 2014.JPG Dear friend
Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Flensburg 2015-08 img12 Jürgensby panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img12 Jürgensby panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img12 Red Admiral.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marzahn Gaerten der Welt 08-2015 img12 Red Admiral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training[edit]

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form--Touzrimounir (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Соловецкий монастырь.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Соловецкий монастырь.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Соловецкий монастырь.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

New Year trees vs. Christmas trees[edit]

Послушайте, остановитесь. Вы наверно являетесь поклонником рождественских ёлок. Но в России специально для них ёлки не ставятся.

Остановитесь, мне уже надоело свои правки восстанавливать по кругу. Давайте обсудим. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:29, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Так вы что, уклоняетесь от беседы? Тогда помогите лучше мне, удалите эти категории Category:Christmas trees in Russia и другие. Они созданы по ошибке, и не важно, что эта ошибка выявилась только сейчас. Средства вики позволяют сделать это. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Что значит остановитесь? Я сделал только две правки, и дальше не собираюсь. Какой ещё поклонник? Что это вообще за хамство такое? Вас не иначе как подменили, товарищ Братеевский? ;) --A.Savin 09:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
И вообще, посмотрите при случае в категорию Christmas trees in Russia. Будете удивлены, но увидите, что там тоже ни что иное как новогодние ёлки. Какая, по большому счёту, разница? Новый год в России - это традиция, аналогичная Рождеству в католическом мире, и связана с православным Рождеством, когда-то отмечавшимся 25 декабря. --A.Savin 09:37, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Две правки? Вообще-то вы удалили целую категорию, уничтожив часть моих трудов. Часть. Мне не хотелось бы терять остальное, поэтому я и написал на вашей СО в таком ключе. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
«Будете удивлены, но увидите, что там тоже ни что иное как новогодние ёлки. Какая, по большому счёту, разница?» — разница есть. В России, Белоруссии, Турции ёлки новогодние, а во всём мире рождественские. В России, Белоруссии и Турции ёлки устанавливаются к Новому году, а то что они стоят и 7 января — это просто властям лень их после 1 числа убирать. Это не повод новогодние ёлки категоризовать как Christmas trees in Russia на Викискладе (вот что я хочу донести)! Вообще говоря, такой категории просто не должно быть, её надо удалить, и вы, как администратор, можете мне в этом помочь. Поэтому я создаю категории «New Year trees ...». Викисклад позволяет сделать такую систему категорий, заодно и запад узнает, что в России всё по-другому. --Brateevsky {talk} 09:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
«Вас не иначе как подменили, товарищ Братеевский? ;)» — а я далеко не ангел. Вы наверно плохо меня знаете. :) --Brateevsky {talk} 09:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Я ничего не уничтожал, даже удалённый материал при необходимости можно восстановить... Я просто хочу, чтобы на Викискладе не было бардака с категориями России. Называйте вашу категорию хоть Putin's trees, но тогда будьте так добры перенесите туда действительно все фотки ёлочек... --A.Savin 09:52, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
Я перенесу, я тоже люблю порядок: и дома, и в компьютере, и на Викискладе. Но я не могу одномоментно перенести за полминуты все фотографии. Вот увидите, что после меня станет лучше. :) --Brateevsky {talk} 09:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abel Aganbegyan Jan2015 RT Moscow.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abel Aganbegyan Jan2015 RT Moscow.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Feb2015 Canon EOS 7D Mark II img2 - with Canon50.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feb2015 Canon EOS 7D Mark II img2 - with Canon50.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Spb Metro token front and rear macro.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spb Metro token front and rear macro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

View Berlin TV Tower Jan2015 img4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View Berlin TV Tower Jan2015 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Altes Finanzamt B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Finanzamt B-Steglitz 04-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

PESA tram at Shchukinskaya 06-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PESA tram at Shchukinskaya 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Hallo[edit]

Hallo und frohes neues Jahr erstmal. Mit Verweis auf unseren letzten Austausch [1] möchte ich den Hinweis geben, dass Messina in der deutschen WP nun von einem Admin unbeschränkt gesperrt wurde. Bei dieser Sperre wird es wohl bleiben (auch aufgrund der darauf erfolgten Sperrumgehungen). Es gab doch mal irgendwo das Verfahren Messina global sperren zu lassen, was aber aus Rücksicht auf die deutsche WP dann ausgesetzt wurde. Wo war das denn nochmal? MfG Seader (talk) 19:17, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Nachtrag:Ich habe den alten Antrag gefunden und die Information auf der Diskussion hinterlassen [2]. MfG Seader (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Weiterer Nachtrag FYI: Global Ban request for Messina. MfG Seader (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

miste nate[edit]

OLA BOA NOITE POSSO SABER O MOTIVO QUE TE FEZ MI BLOQUEIAR POR FAVOR??

Du hast Editierverbot auf meiner Seite[edit]

und das seit viele Jahren. Kapiert!! Falls etwas unklar ist, das gilt für den Rest deiner Zeit. --Hubertl 15:53, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Hubertl, deine Machtbesessenheit wird immer amüsanter. Jetzt hast du nicht den ursprünglichen Beitrag wiederhergestellt, sondern in "abgemilderter" Form, was an sich OK ist. Sag mal: Denkst du wirklich, dass ich mich von dir mit deinen elenden Machtspielchen unterkriegen lasse? Seit ich in der Deutschen Wiki unterwegs war, hat sich in der Tat einiges geändert und ich habe unter anderem eine Menge dazu gelernt wie man mit solchen Idioten wie dir umgeht! Und wenn man bedenkt, dass du ja mich nicht blind revertiert hast, dann ist zu vermuten, dass du dir zumindest eines bewusst bist: Beleidigungen und Belästigungen ähnlich wie in der deutschen Wiki werden hier nicht geduldet! Übrigens suggeriert ja deine Aussage "...für den Rest deiner Zeit", dass du insgeheim hoffst, dass ich von hier womöglich nur im Sarge getragen werde. Also, wenn man deine permanente negative Einstellung und den blinden Hass auf sämtliche Andersdenkenden in Betracht zieht, dann ist es noch die große Frage, wer als Erstes seinen goldenen Löffel an die Wikimedia Deutschland abgeben wird, damit diese eben schnell noch ein Objektiv anschafft ;-) Mfg --A.Savin 16:43, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Siehe hier --Hubertl 16:55, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Anstatt sofort zur Mama zu rennen und mich fürs geklaute Schäufelchen zu verpetzen, Hubertl, hättest du doch vernünftigerweise erläutern können, wieso du deine Unterstellungen für angemessen hältst! Du hast offensichtlich fotografische Fähigkeiten und es ist schade, dass du sie nicht auf eine weise Art und Weise (sorry für doppeltgemoppelt) zu nutzen gedenkst. Oder glaubst du, dadurch Sozialkapital zu schlagen, das dir Immunität bringen würde? Tut mir leid, aber auf Commons gibt es keine "Premiumautoren"! Insofern denke ich, dass dein "Schreibverbot", auf dem du so konsequent beharrst, nutzlos und eigentlich nur ein Produkt deiner Fantasie ist... --A.Savin 18:07, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yevgeny Satanovsky in Moscow Feb2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yevgeny Satanovsky in Moscow Feb2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow Cathedral Mosque 01-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Cathedral Mosque 01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Moscow building[edit]

Thank you so much for getting that building! It's the head office of the en:Interstate Aviation Committee and can be seen on its homepage. It's very important since this agency investigates plane crashes in the former Soviet Union. Would it be okay if you note that in Russian on the file description page? (I did so in English already) WhisperToMe (talk) 15:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

WhisperToMe, ✓ Done, thanks --A.Savin 15:50, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 02:42, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Просьба на создание фотографий[edit]

Здравствуйте.
Вижу что вы хорошо фотографируете.
И в связи с этим у меня есть просьба сфотографировать в Москве несколько объектов. Звучит это несколько удивительно, но факт остаётся фактом. В огромном мегаполисе не нашлось ни одного фотографа кто бы сфотографировал и загрузил на Викисклад снимки нижеприведённых мест:

  1. из украинкой вики стало известно что в Москве, в Политехническом музее есть модель СЭС-5. Сфотографируйте её пожалуйста. Кроме того в музее возможно есть экспонаты Советских ЭВМ. Было бы интересно их увидеть;
  2. ЦБ РФ (единственная картинка центрального входа в Банк размерами 800 × 860);
  3. Ампирный фонтан в центре Театральной площади, желательно с разных сторон. Сейчас есть только один снимок File:Old Fountain Moscow Russia.jpg;
  4. Высотное административное здание «НИИ Дельта»;
  5. Офис Космотрас в Москве. Категория на улицы где расположен офис на Викискладе;
  6. Ломоносов (суперкомпьютер) разумеется речь идёт о наружной системе охлаждения. Что бы было хоть что-то для иллюстрации статьи;
  7. Магазин Apple Store в Москве (31 июля 2015 открылся в ЦУМе). Сейчас есть только один снимок File:First Apple Center shop in Russia.JPG и тот, как я понял, закрытого магазина;
  8. Офис Astra Linux в Москве. Варшавское шоссе, дом 36;

Ну и ещё немного статей где не хватает картинок:

  1. ЛЗОС;
  2. Тушинский машиностроительный завод;
  3. Тинькофф банк - сейчас есть только фото офиса изнутри, а снаружи нет;
  4. Завод Ангстрем.

Разумеется я не настаиваю. Но если вы будете где-то в тех местах, то сфотографируйте их.
Вот такая просьба, заранее большое спасибо. С уважением Донор () 21 января 2016

Донор,
я этот ваш список возьму на заметку, когда буду в Москве в сл. раз (правда, не совсем представляю, как сфотографировать суперкомпьютер).
Возможно, другие коллеги из Москвы тоже пожелают внести свой вклад и даже смогут сделать это более оперативно, чем я: @Brateevsky: @Retired electrician: @Dmitry Ivanov: @Ludvig14: @Max Ryazanov: --A.Savin 01:05, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Спасибо. Хорошо что вы упомянули других участников, они получат оповещения и прочитают заявку на фотографии. Честно говоря не знаю почему, но я был почему то уверен что вы из Москвы. Ну да ладно. А по поводу суперкомпьютера, я точно помню что смотрел какое то видео, в котором были показыны большие охлаждающие установки на улице. Если мне не изменяет память, им же необходимо куда то отводить 3 МВт тепла! Поэтому радиаторы на улице представляют собой внушительную конструкцию. Донор () 22 января 2016

Что бы не создавать новую тему добавлю маленький вопрос по поводу ценных изображений. Вы луше меня разбираетесь в фотографии, поэтому скажите пожалуйста стоит ли номинировать три нижеприведённых снимка как Ценные изображения?
File:Панорама затопленной площади Суворова.jpg
File:Панорама затопленной площади Суворова (от памятника Суворову).jpg
File:Панорама затопленной площади Суворова (от кафе Прохлада).jpg
Я понимаю что по качеству они могут и не пройти, но их ценность в редкости. Дело в том что такое сильное наводнение у нас бывает крайне редко. До 2008 года подобное наводнение было в 60-х или в 70-х гг. Вот такой вопрос. Донор () 22 января 2016

Вы имеете в виду COM:VIC? Несколько лет назад, когда выяснилось, что качество фотографии для них не играет никакой роли, а scope можно придумать почти какой угодно, – я потерял к тому проекту всякий интерес и с тех пор не заглядываю туда. К сожалению, ничего не могу посоветовать. А из Москвы я действительно, просто очень часто в отъезде.--A.Savin 15:34, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Courtyards of SPB 03.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Courtyards of SPB 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Courtyards of SPB 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

KosyginaStreet Moscow view to Khamovniki 06-2015 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KosyginaStreet Moscow view to Khamovniki 06-2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img1 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img1 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img3 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img3 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quarzwerk Frechen Tagebau 09-2015 Aussicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quarzwerk Frechen Tagebau 09-2015 Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM the atrium after renewal 2015 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM the atrium after renewal 2015 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valentina Tereshkova in Moscow 06-2015 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valentina Tereshkova in Moscow 06-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nagatinsky Zaton NovinkiStreet with bus 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatinsky Zaton NovinkiStreet with bus 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img14 Hector Berlioz Park Grey heron.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img14 Hector Berlioz Park Grey heron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Finsterwalde May2015 img4 Wasserturm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img4 Wasserturm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Finsterwalde May2015 img6 Bahnhof.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Finsterwalde May2015 img6 Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krasnogorsk near Myakinino - footbridge over Moskva 06-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasnogorsk near Myakinino - footbridge over Moskva 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM exterior after renewal 2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM exterior after renewal 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img2 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatino-Sadovniki tram on NagatinskayaStreet img2 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Просьба на создание фото + помощь в дополнении шаблона[edit]

Здравствуйте.
1) я создал категорию Users in Transnistria, потом содал шаблон User Transnistria.
Но только я не пойму как написать текст Участник из Приднестровья что бы он автоматичеки, для англоязычных пользователей, выглядел так: This user comes from Transnistria. Ну или что-то типа того. Надеюсь вы понимаете. Т.е. если я сейчас просто напишу Участник из Приднестровья, то оно так и будет отображаться для всех языковых груп. А мне бы хотелось сделать более продуманное решение. Или может быть сделаете побразцу Users in Russia - два шаблона? А то я запутался, немного.

2) Раньше я уже просил кое что сфотографировать в Москве. И вот сейчас вижу что нет на Викискладе фотографии огромного радиотелескопа из Центра космической связи «Медвежьи озёра». А ведь там радиотелескоп диаметром 64 метра. Анаголичная модель установлена в Калязинской радиоастрономической обсерватории. Между прочим, когда я смотрел картинки Калязинской радиоастрономической обсерватории то мне на глаза попался вот этот снимок.

Если у вас получится сделать качественную аналогичную фотографию, то это будет просто бомба! Ведь где ещё можно в один кадр поймать и радиотелескоп, и колокольню, да ещё и затопленную. Совершенно сюрреалистичный пейзаж!

А также можно дополнить фотографиями:

  1. ФГУП «Космическая связь». Между прочим классный снимок File:RSCC.jpg, хоть и 1200 пикселей;
  2. офис Rosa Linux в Москове;
  3. ресторан Dolkabar Сергея Доли в Москове;
  4. наверняка в Москве постоянно проводятся интересные выставки, возмём для примера Ганноверскую CeBIT, поэтому можно было бы посетить аналогичное мероприятие и сделать массу интереснейших снимков.

3) Churches in Moscow Eparchy - огромная категория! Может быть стоит сгруппировать цекрви по городам? Т.е. будет вместо 234 категорий скажем 50 категорий городов в который есть церкви. Например: Orthodox churches in Dubna, а уже в этой категории подкатегории (Церковь Всех Святых в Земле Русской Просиявших и т.д.).

Вот такая просьба, заранее большое спасибо. С уважением Донор () 3 февраля 2016

@Донор:
1) Кажется, для этого есть шаблон {{LangSwitch}}. Но я лично его сам никогда не использовал. Если будут с ним трудности - спросите лучше в форуме.
2) Спасибо, взял на заметку.
3) Кажется, Stolbovsky как раз этим занимается, но следует иметь в виду, что православные храмы - не обязательно храмы Московского патриархата. Если есть сомнения в наименовании категорий, то лучше оставить всё как есть, а не создавать лишний геморрой. Тем более делать и без того есть что.
--A.Savin 14:13, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lubyanka CDM the atrium after renewal 2015 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM the atrium after renewal 2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Vnukovo 05-15 VQ-BTS of PobedaAirlines.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vnukovo 05-15 VQ-BTS of PobedaAirlines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tverskaya13 Moscow 06-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tverskaya13 Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MosMetro Cherkizovskaya platform 01-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MosMetro Cherkizovskaya platform 01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

KosyginaStreet Moscow view to Khamovniki 06-2015 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KosyginaStreet Moscow view to Khamovniki 06-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

May2015 Volgograd img01 Gumrak Airport.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img01 Gumrak Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img23 Gumrak Airport.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img23 Gumrak Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img04 MamaevKurgan train stop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img04 MamaevKurgan train stop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Flensburg 2015-08 img02 Katholische Marienkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img02 Katholische Marienkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flensburg 2015-08 img13 jellyfish in bay water.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img13 jellyfish in bay water.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flensburg 2015-08 img05 View from Schlosswall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img05 View from Schlosswall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flensburg 2015-08 img10 View from Schlosswall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img10 View from Schlosswall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Flensburg 2015-08 img11 View from Schlosswall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flensburg 2015-08 img11 View from Schlosswall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img07 View from Mamaev Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img07 View from Mamaev Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img18 Central station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img18 Central station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MosMetro Aeroport platform 01-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MosMetro Aeroport platform 01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Salagou Lake, Liausson 15.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Salagou Lake, Liausson 15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salagou Lake, Liausson 15.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nagatinsky Zaton SudostroitelnayaStreet with tram 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nagatinsky Zaton SudostroitelnayaStreet with tram 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Petrovsky Passage exterior from Petrovka 06-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petrovsky Passage exterior from Petrovka 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sadovnicheskaya Embankment in Moscow - view from Ozerkovskaya Embankment 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

May2015 Volgograd img02 Gumrak Airport.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img02 Gumrak Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img11 Profsoyuznaya metrotram station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img11 Profsoyuznaya metrotram station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marushkino in New Moscow - aerial view 05-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marushkino in New Moscow - aerial view 05-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

May2015 Volgograd img19 Central station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img19 Central station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Removal of uploader credit[edit]

Hello, you are being contacted as a user who has previously [or currently] included "* Uploaded by Example" in your file uploads. A bot task has been approved to remove this specific phrase from files because it can be misleading when attempting to attribute the file creator. As an alternative, RileyBot is willing to tag your uploads with a user category instead. Please respond stating if you opt-in and if you have any specific requests (addition of user category, etc); if there is no response within two weeks, consent will be implied. Please note, this message has been left by an automated bot, however, a user will be tracking your response. RileyBot (talk) 01:17, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Which uploads are concerned and what exactly is wrong with them? @Riley Huntley:? --A.Savin 01:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
I think those uploads are those with "Uploaded by A.Savin" in the source. Also, if we include "Uploaded by Example", then there would be misattribution issues. For example, you uploaded a file from Flickr, and the source has "Uploaded by A.Savin". Then the "real" author of the Flickr file is for example, Mark Gomez. And a website wants to use the photo. The website, attributed you (A.Savin) instead of Mark Gomez. Then there is a misattribution. You can opt-out if you want, but please consider this. Poké95 01:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
@Pokéfan95: Thanks for explanation. You (or the bot) can remove the "uploaded by..." remark, it is perfectly fine with me, but please do not create a category "Uploaded by A.Savin" or anything like that. --A.Savin 02:08, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Beautiful explanation, Pokéfan, you beat me too it! Cheers, A.Savin, will do as instructed. :) Riley Huntley (talk) 05:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img18 Oelberggruppe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img18 Oelberggruppe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img13 Hector Berlioz Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img13 Hector Berlioz Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img50 Dostoevsky statue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img50 Dostoevsky statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img20 Leopoldsplatz Haus Victoria.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img20 Leopoldsplatz Haus Victoria.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lubyanka CDM view from Panoramic view point 05-2015 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow Planetarium 01-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Planetarium 01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Schepkina Street Moscow 01-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schepkina Street Moscow 01-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Solyakov PV.jpg[edit]

Извините, обращаюсь к Вам. Мне кажется, что файл размещён некорректно. Откуда сведения, что автор умер более 70 лет назад, если он неизвестен? Вполне допускаю, что он умер позже и 70-летний срок не прошёл.--Semenov.m7 (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Ну, вы уже спросили загрузившего. Не ответит - удалим. --A.Savin 14:21, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Deine Beiträge[edit]

zeigen einen erschreckenden Mangel an Kenntnis der Regularien - vielleicht solltest du dich auch daran halten, ich habe darauf hingewiesen. Es ist ja nicht das erste Mal, dass du unangenehm auffällst. Extrawurscht gibts für dich keine. Wenn nach 48 Stunden keine Entscheidung getroffen wurde (Diskussion), wird Consensual Review geschlossen. Aber du kannst ja gerne etwas sinnvolles tun und den gesamten Bereich des CR selbst beackern. Aber bitte erst dann, wenn du die Regeln verinnerlicht hast. Und wenn, dann nicht nur wenn du Lust hast sondern wirklich jeden Tag. --Hubertl 14:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Lupinmobile[edit]

Здравствуйте, коллега. Не посоветуете, как реагировать на такой вклад? Sealle (talk) 14:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Здравствуйте. Насколько я понял, никак. Отслеживанием виртуалов Руссавиа занимается фонд, нам на это тратить время не имеет смысла. --A.Savin 14:52, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img1 Jagdschloss.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GrossSchönebeck 07-2015 img1 Jagdschloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

HeiligKreuzKirche B-Kreuzberg 07-2015.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HeiligKreuzKirche B-Kreuzberg 07-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Westhafen Berlin Aussicht von Beusselstr 04-2015 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westhafen Berlin Aussicht von Beusselstr 04-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buckow Maerkische Schweiz 08-2015 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Niederlausitz Bf Calau 07-2015 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niederlausitz Bf Calau 07-2015 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img02 View from Merkur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img02 View from Merkur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img07 View from Merkur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img07 View from Merkur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img15 view to Merkur.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img15 view to Merkur.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img24 Stiftskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img24 Stiftskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img17 Roman well.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img17 Roman well.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

May2015 Volgograd img06 View from Mamaev Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! May2015 Volgograd img06 View from Mamaev Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Molotowrec[edit]

File:1449593818 skriptonit-rhyme-2015-intervyu.jpg

Файл не является собственной работой автора, это скриншот из Ютьюба. --Esetok (talk) 18:50, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! AviaPark Moscow 01-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

English Court in Varvarka Street 01-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! English Court in Varvarka Street 01-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

English Court in Varvarka Street 01-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! English Court in Varvarka Street 01-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nikon D7200 01-2016 img1 body front.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon D7200 01-2016 img1 body front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nikon D7200 01-2016 img2 body front.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon D7200 01-2016 img2 body front.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nikon D7200 01-2016 img3 body rear.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon D7200 01-2016 img3 body rear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nikon D7200 01-2016 img4 with Nikon 18-105.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon D7200 01-2016 img4 with Nikon 18-105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Mitteilung[edit]

hEREBY i WILL INFORM YOU; THAT THE jOURNAL dURLACHER wOCHENJOURNAL will bring a text for the event in the evangelischen Stadtkirche Durlach. Also we will bring a foto from you.

kind regards Siegfried König

Frage zu Bildqualität[edit]

Hallo Alexander,

ich habe eine Frage zur Bildqualität dieses Fotos:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poste_indicador_GR25_Ganalto_02.jpg

Du sagst hier, dass die BQ nicht ausreichend ist, weil es eine "clipped cloud" gibt. Ich verstehe hier nicht ganz, was Du damit meinst. Klar, da ist eine Wolke. Und oft wird irgendeine Wolke mal abgeschnitten, aber in diesem Fall ist mir das nicht ganz klar.

Wohlgemerkt: Ich frage nicht, weil ich wegen der BQ herumdiskutieren will, sondern weil ich dazulernen möchte. Es wäre nett, wenn Du mir antworten würdest.

Vielen Dank im Voraus!

--Basotxerri (talk) 17:16, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Hallo @Basotxerri: Sorry, habe mich wohl unverständlich ausgedrückt. Ich meinte, dass die Wolke überbelichtet bzw. ausgefressen ist. Bei einem QI sollten generell keine über- oder unterbelichteten Bereiche auftreten. MfG --A.Savin 17:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
OK, jetzt ist das klar. Beim Hochladen habe ich mich gar nicht auf den Hintergrund konzentriert. Ich habe mir das gerade noch einmal in Lightroom angesehen, die Highlights sind tatsächlich irreparabel ausgefressen. Ich versuche, beim nächsten Mal besser darauf zu achten. Danke für die Antwort! --Basotxerri (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img25 Stourdza Chapel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img25 Stourdza Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img21 Spitalkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img21 Spitalkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img41 Pump house.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img41 Pump house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img02 Markhor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img02 Markhor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img09 Indian rhinoceros.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img09 Indian rhinoceros.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img12 African elephant.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img12 African elephant.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img18 Indian lion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img18 Indian lion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img26 Indochinese tiger.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Tierpark Friedrichsfelde 12-2015 img26 Indochinese tiger.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img47 Ebersteinburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img47 Ebersteinburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Borisovo[edit]

diff. Зачем? Станция уникальная, она фактически находится внутри района. Я ещё могу понять добавление категории Brateyevsky Passage (южный выход выходит к проезду), но добавление других двух категорий спорно. Если мы добавляем другие две категории, мы декларируем, что метро находится на этих улицах, а это в реальности совершенно не так. Улицы, указанные на указателях для северного вестибюля, просто сделаны для ориентирования, чтобы народ понимал, примерно куда он выходит (в случае северного вестибюля). Пока отменил эту правку. --Brateevsky {talk} 17:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Здравствуйте! Хотел бы попросить вас как русскоязычного администратора оценить оправданность существования на моей СОУ сего предупреждения ещё полугодовой давности и по возможности снять его/подвести итог. Это при том, что в итоге в описании этого файла, о котором, собственно, и шла речь, после обращения к админам и обсуждения на СОУ участника сохранилась именно внесённая мной и названная в предупреждении «вандализмом» правка. С уважением, Chaotic Good (talk) 18:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Не понимаю, в чём проблема. Это фотка явно только для страницы участника создана, никакого противозаконного контента там нет. Мы будем из-за единственной буквы на некачественной фотографии незначимой персоны базар устраивать? Надо только переместить ее в Category:User page images, что я и сделаю --A.Savin 20:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Базар устроила сама незначимая персона. А проблема в том, что меня не устраивает висящее на моей странице хамское неправомерное «предупреждение», удалить которое я не имею права. Chaotic Good (talk) 20:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Имеете-имеете, здесь не русская википедия. --A.Savin 21:00, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Ну тогда благодарю за консультацию. Всего хорошего! Chaotic Good (talk) 21:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Cathedral Mosque interior 01-2016 img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Bakhchysarai 04-14 img09 Palace Divan Hall.jpg[edit]

hello! we are working on a paper edition of WLM 2015 photo album (a kind of anyway). and we want to use this photo of yours: File:Bakhchysarai 04-14 img09 Palace Divan Hall.jpg. we are going to mention you as the author of the picture in a caption under the picture and on the last page with the link to the photo on Wikimedia Commons, like this:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/?curid=32407106 © A.Savin, CC-BY-SA-3.0

is it okay with you? --アンタナナ 17:10, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

@Antanana: Yes, of course. All my photos are CC-BY-SA and available to use with attribution. --A.Savin 01:03, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
oh, I am well aware of that :) but there is a desired procedure described here: User:A.Savin/Photo :) and you ask to credit you like this:
place the notice «© A.Savin, Wikimedia Commons» either below the photo, or the way it is visible after clicking on the photo
we wanted to make sure that you are okay with our way of doing it:) and we wanted to inform you that we plan to use your photo in a printed medium :) --アンタナナ 09:04, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
@Antanana: OK, fine with me. --A.Savin 11:26, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img32 Bernharduskirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img32 Bernharduskirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img37 Pump house.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img37 Pump house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img39 Museum Frieder Burda.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img39 Museum Frieder Burda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img48 Ebersteinburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img48 Ebersteinburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Baden-Baden 10-2015 img49 Ebersteinburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baden-Baden 10-2015 img49 Ebersteinburg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Восстановление файлов[edit]

Здравствуйте. У меня просьба. Восстановите, пожалуйста, два этих файла вместе с описанием. Можно не здесь, а просто выслать на почту. Я хочу использовать их в Рувики как файр.

File:Bruce Dickinson - Live in Sao Pablo 1997.jpg File:Bruce Dickinson 1974.JPG

Спасибо. --Алый Король (talk) 11:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Хорошо, на какой адрес высылать? --A.Savin 11:53, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
pamyat@list.ru и описание, если есть. --Алый Король (talk) 12:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! StClement Church Moscow 01-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Умуталипов Гайни[edit]

Здравствуйте! Все фотографии, загруженные этим участником, стырены из интернета. --Esetok (talk) 17:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Breaking the comment[edit]

Whoops! My bad. Thanks for fixing. Natuur12 (talk) 19:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Hallo Alexander,[edit]

könnte bitte jemand, falls es rechtlich möglich ist, ru:Файл:А.ВРозен.jpg auf Commons hochladen. Ich möchte das Bild bitte in de:Anna Wassiljewna von Rosen einbauen. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Erledigt siehe File:А.ВРозен.jpg --A.Savin 19:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Hallo Alexander, vielen Dank; ich freue mich über die gute Kooperation. Fall erledigt. Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 07:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Noch einmal: Hallo Alexander![edit]

Na sowas! Gerade bin ich auf die gleiche Idee gekommen, da Du der Einzige bist, den ich aus der de:WP kenne mit muttersprachlichem Sprachniveau des Russischen und Du mir als Fotograf in Erinnerung bist. Daher möchte ich Dich auch um eine Übertragung eines Fotos aus der russischen WP nach Commons bitten; sofern das möglich ist. Es geht um einen ehemaligen sowjetischen Botschafter in der BRD; Juli Alexandrowitsch Kwizinski und um dieses Foto. Es ist bisher nur im russischen Artikel; der deutschsprachige und der polnische sind ohne Bild. Besten Dank im Voraus & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 19:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Das ist ein unfreies Foto aus ca. 1980er-Jahre, leider ist keine Übertragung nach Commons möglich. MfG --A.Savin 23:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
Sehr schade. Danke & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 06:03, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 12 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 12 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 01 Vile Parle station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 01 Vile Parle station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 04 Santacruz station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 04 Santacruz station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 23 Hanging Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 23 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Троллинг после вандализма[edit]

Уважаемый Александр! Участник русской Википедии Мартин Мягер был заблокирован на сутки за шестикратное размещение в статье о Солженицыне фотографии бабуина. Разумеется, иллюстрацию поставили на удаление. Но участник, видимо, успокаиваться не собирается и на странице удаления занялся откровенным троллингом. Мне кажется, это надо прекратить как можно быстрее. С уважением, Alexey Tourbaevsky, — cheloVechek / talk 18:12, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 34 Prince of Wales Museum dome.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 34 Prince of Wales Museum dome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 05 Santacruz station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 05 Santacruz station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 09 skyline of Lotus Colony.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 09 skyline of Lotus Colony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 27 skyline at Marine Drive.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 27 skyline at Marine Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Why I reverted your "add categories"[edit]

Have left you a reply on User talk:SAplants. --SAplants (talk) 08:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 49 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 49 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 56 Sewri station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 56 Sewri station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 06 Khar Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 06 Khar Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 08 MCentral Regional Transport Office.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 08 MCentral Regional Transport Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 40 Bombay High Court.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 40 Bombay High Court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 22 Hanging Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 22 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 30 Gateway of India.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 30 Gateway of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 61 Masjid station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 61 Masjid station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 54 Kings Circle station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 54 Kings Circle station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Your opinion ?[edit]

Hi, do you think that this picture meets criteria for QI ? Since I've proposed 3 pictures whose eligibility is actually debated, I'm a little hesitant ^^. If no, what do I need to correct? Thanks Archi38 (talk) 11:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

@Archi38: No, it doesn't. Too unsharp, noise, and blown white at highlighted areas. A reprocess of the RAW file (if available) might significantly improve the picture, but still unlikely so far that it would then become enough for QI. --A.Savin 11:30, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 55 Vadala Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 55 Vadala Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 68 Victoria Terminus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 68 Victoria Terminus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 47 Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 47 Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 07 MCentralLocal station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 07 MCentralLocal station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 45 sunset at Marine Drive.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 45 sunset at Marine Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 19 Antilia Tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 19 Antilia Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 15 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 15 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Shakatak[edit]

Siehe hier

Hallo,

sind in der russischen Sprachversion keine aktuellen Bilder dieser Band gewünscht? Da ich kein Wort russisch kann, kannst du vielleicht vermitteln ... --Atamari (talk) 16:59, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

@Atamari: Ich denke auch, für so einen kleinen Artikel ist es ausreichend, ein Foto in der Box zu haben. Kannst du mir sagen, welches der aktuellen Fotos du für geeignet hältst? Ich ersetze es gerne im Artikel, ggf. mit einer Beschreibung auf Russisch. Mfg --A.Savin 03:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
So viel Herzblut habe ich daran nicht, aber ich hatte gadacht - das es nicht schlecht wäre auch andere Sprachversionen zu "versorgen". Ich hatte versucht ein Bild der ganzen Gruppe mit den aktuellen Auftritt und die einzelnen Mitglieder (dieser Tour) in den Artikel zu stellen. --Atamari (talk) 07:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
@Atamari: Ich habe einfach dein 2014 Foto in die Box eingesetzt und das Foto von 1982 darunter geschoben. [3] --A.Savin 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 26 Hanging Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 26 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 20 Kemps Corner.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 20 Kemps Corner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 80 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 80 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 84 Elphinstone Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 84 Elphinstone Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 44 Marine Drive.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 44 Marine Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 36 Mahatma Gandhi Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 36 Mahatma Gandhi Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 58 Cotton Green station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 58 Cotton Green station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 59 Dockyard Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 59 Dockyard Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 69 Victoria Terminus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 69 Victoria Terminus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 11 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 11 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Urheberrechtsverletzung[edit]

Hallo.

Die Alternative für Deutschland benutzt auf ihrer Facebook-Seite eine deiner Fotografien von Heiko Mass, die ausdrücklich keine Lizenz für Facebook hat.

https://www.facebook.com/alternativefuerde/posts/1123240614372943 --> https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Heiko_Maas_Berlin_2015-08-29.jpg

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 79 Dadar Beach.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 79 Dadar Beach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 74 Marine Lines station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 74 Marine Lines station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 17 Warden Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 17 Warden Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 60 Sandhurst Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 60 Sandhurst Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 72 Flora Fountain.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mumbai 03-2016 72 Flora Fountain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mumbai 03-2016 72 Flora Fountain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 86 Grant Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 86 Grant Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 37 University.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 37 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 82 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 82 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 38 University.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 38 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Plastic chess pieces.jpg[edit]

Hi there, while I will not contest your declining the promotion of File:Plastic chess pieces.jpg since I know such things are pointless, I'm simply curious what jpeg artifacts you are referring to. The picture was not processed in-camera at all and the post processing of the raw material was only to trim it and remove the color. The chess pieces themselves however have a grainy structure, maybe that is what you mistook for jpeg artifacts. Best, w.carter-Talk 09:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Maybe you're right, anyway there are serious quality issues at 100% view so that the picture fails the review for me. --A.Savin 10:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Ok, no problem, as long as I know what's what. :) w.carter-Talk 11:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 50 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 50 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 28 Kamla Nehru Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 28 Kamla Nehru Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 33 Maharashtra Police building detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 33 Maharashtra Police building detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 85 Parel station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 85 Parel station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

History of Russia[edit]

Hi! What do you think about removing these files: File:RussianHistory1.ogg, File:RussianHistory2.ogg? Since they are not used more in the article w:History of Russia, because I recorded several years ago new version for the Intro of the article.

I don't like these recordings (it was a reason for me to create new version of audio) and Wikimedia Commons is not a hosting service :)-- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 03:26, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 02 Vile Parle station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 02 Vile Parle station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 63 Dhobi Talao Chowk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 63 Dhobi Talao Chowk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 65 BMC Building.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 65 BMC Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 18 Jindal Mansion.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 18 Jindal Mansion.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 21 Saifee Hospital.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 21 Saifee Hospital.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 42 Central Telegraph Office.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 42 Central Telegraph Office.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 67 Victoria Terminus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 67 Victoria Terminus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 75 Charni Road station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 75 Charni Road station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 77 sunset at Marine Drive.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 77 sunset at Marine Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 05 Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 05 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 09 beach in Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 09 beach in Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 07 view to Mormugao Harbour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 07 view to Mormugao Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 03 Santacruz station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 03 Santacruz station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 48 bus in Mahim.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 48 bus in Mahim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 32 monument to Swami Vivekananda.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 32 monument to Swami Vivekananda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 13 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 13 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 24 Hanging Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 24 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 51 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 51 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 35 Prince of Wales Museum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 35 Prince of Wales Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 70 Asiatic Society Library.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 70 Asiatic Society Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 02 Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 02 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 10 skyline of Lotus Colony.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 10 skyline of Lotus Colony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 46 evening at Marine Drive.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 46 evening at Marine Drive.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 62 Jama Mosque.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 62 Jama Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 78 Dadar station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 78 Dadar station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mumbai 03-2016 52 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 71 Veer Nariman Road.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 71 Veer Nariman Road.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 43 The Ambassador detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 43 The Ambassador detail.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 76 BJPC Institute.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 76 BJPC Institute.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 83 Mahim mill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 83 Mahim mill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 03 Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 03 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 72 Flora Fountain.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 72 Flora Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 64 Dhobi Talao Chowk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 64 Dhobi Talao Chowk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 14 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 14 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 01 railway station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 01 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 04 Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 04 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 06 Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 06 Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 11 beach in Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 11 beach in Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 12 Dabolim Airport.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 12 Dabolim Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Photo usage[edit]

Greetings, I am writing to make sure I comply with usage of photos taken by you. I have used a number of photos in a music video involving a song about Tula Russia. I have included attribution, but since it is for a client, I wanted to double check it was okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.179.3.87 (talk • contribs)

If you provide a link to your video, I can maybe help you. --A.Savin 19:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Here is a link to the page https://www.youtube.com/----- Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Contributingauthor (talk • contribs)

Feel free to use the tram photo; all others in this video are not by me. --A.Savin 18:52, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Thanks!

Sensordreck[edit]

Wie bemerkst du solche unauffälligen Sensorflecken? Ich habe schon einen recht guten Monitor, bemerke aber trotzdem nicht alles. Wenn ich die Tonwerte total runterdrehe, sehe ich dann auch die Flecken, die du bemängelst. Ist aber recht mühsam. Hast du einen Trick? --Ralf Roleček 20:47, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img03 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img03 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img35 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img35 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img28 view from Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img28 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img23 Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img23 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img13 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img13 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img04 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img04 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img18 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img18 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img22 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img22 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img15 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img15 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Possible FP[edit]

Hi, Alexander. This looks to me like a likely FP if nominated. I'd certainly vote for it.

All the best,

Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi @Ikan Kekek: Thank you a lot for the interest, feel free to nominate :) --A.Savin 11:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
I'll certainly consider doing that when I can. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gurudwara Bangla Sahib in New Delhi 03-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 08 view to Mormugao Harbour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 08 view to Mormugao Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Goa-Vasco 03-2016 10 beach in Vaddem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goa-Vasco 03-2016 10 beach in Vaddem.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Invalid block[edit]

You have blocked me (Laberkiste) for 3 days for alleged Intimidation/Harassment, just because I discussed the application of the AGF policy with a user on his talk page, after he got edgy on AN/U. What is harassment about this? Sure, I was not too polite, but this was totally OK given what he wrote to me before. Or is this just another case of Commons admins wanting copyright infringement to occur? --91.1.55.201 13:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Use {{Unblock}} on your talk page. --A.Savin 13:08, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img01 Mumbai Harbour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img01 Mumbai Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img02 Mumbai Harbour.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img02 Mumbai Harbour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img07 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img07 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img14 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img14 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img26 view from Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img26 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 16 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 16 Haji Ali Dargah.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 31 Gateway of India.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 31 Gateway of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 53 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 53 Dharavi near Mahim Junction.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 57 Sewri station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 57 Sewri station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img08 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img08 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img09 docks at Jawahar Dweep.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img09 docks at Jawahar Dweep.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 88 Omkareshwar Temple in Borivali East.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 88 Omkareshwar Temple in Borivali East.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 101 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 101 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Imperial Academy of Arts Panorama.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:03, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05a Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05a Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 114 Airport international terminal interior.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 114 Airport international terminal interior.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img29 Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img29 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img30 abandoned ferry.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img30 abandoned ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 29 Kamla Nehru Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 29 Kamla Nehru Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 25 Hanging Garden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 25 Hanging Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img36 ferry near Gateway of India.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img36 ferry near Gateway of India.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 87 Borivali station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 87 Borivali station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 91 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 91 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 105 Bandra station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 105 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img05 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img31 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img31 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 99 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 99 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 109 Western Express Highway near Bandra.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 109 Western Express Highway near Bandra.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Special:ListFiles/Cherus[edit]

Добрый день, коллега. Хотел бы узнать Ваше мнение - может ли этот сонм ogg-файлов соответствовать COM:PS. В любом случае - на доступных мне компьютерах не хватает оперативной памяти даже чтобы открыть в VFC этот объём, не то что вынести их на обсуждение удаления. Sealle (talk) 03:56, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@Sealle: Почему бы и нет, для викисловаря например. Другое дело, что реально файлы не используются да и категоризация оставляет желать лучшего. --A.Savin 11:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img06 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img06 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img21 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img21 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img24 Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img24 Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 89 scene in Sanjay Gandhi National Park.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 89 scene in Sanjay Gandhi National Park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 92 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 92 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 96 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 96 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 102 Teenmurti Temple.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 102 Teenmurti Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 103 Teenmurti Temple.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 103 Teenmurti Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Музей МГУ[edit]

Добрый день, а ваши фото из "Геологического музея в МГУ" - это тоже, что и "Музей землеведения МГУ", верно? Если так, то подкорректирую.// Stolbovsky (talk) 09:15, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Судя по всему, имеется в виду именно этот музей, но название "Музей землеведения МГУ" мне не знакомо. --A.Savin 11:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img11 Port in Navi Mumbai.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img11 Port in Navi Mumbai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img25 view from Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img25 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img10 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img10 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 93 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 93 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 104 Bandra station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 104 Bandra station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 107 Bandra station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 107 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 111 Masjid station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 111 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img20 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img20 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sabz Burj in Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabz Burj in Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rajpath in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rajpath in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lotus Temple in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus Temple in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 94 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 94 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 39 University.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 39 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img33 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img33 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 110 Masjid station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 110 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 100 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 100 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Purana Qila in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Qutub Minar in Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Qutub Minar in Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

India Gate in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! India Gate in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img12 Elephanta Island ferry.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img12 Elephanta Island ferry.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img27 view from Cannon Hill.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img27 view from Cannon Hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img16 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img16 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img17 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img17 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img19 Elephanta Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img19 Elephanta Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 81 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 81 Dadar Beach view of the SeaLink.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img32 flying gull.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 06:41, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mumbai 03-2016 108 Bandra station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 108 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 97 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 97 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Not a work by a wikimedian[edit]

  • В данном случае, действительно, композиция полного кадра и нажатие на кнопку сделано не мною. Зато кадрирование и вся обработка сделана мною. Всё равно это not a work by a wikimedian? -- PereslavlFoto (User talk:PereslavlFoto) 14:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Два вопроса[edit]

Коллега, я к Вам с двумя разными вопросами.

1[edit]

Вокруг этого файла в избранной статье рувики развязалась война правок, приведшая к запросу на ЗКА и блокировкам. Поясните, пожалуйста, с точки зрения фотографа - имеются ли у данного изображения неустранимые недостатки, позволяющие настаивать на его невключении в карточку профильной статьи. Sealle (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

2[edit]

См. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG и User talk:Roo mate#You have been blocked for a duration of 1 week. Меня вовлёк в эту историю администратор рувики, с которым у нас единое мнение по данному вопросу, и, будь он целиком в рамках русского раздела, разрешился бы иначе. А именно: удаление контента, не нарушающего правил проекта, находящегося в его рамках и активно используемого (а так и было), по запросу автора / загрузившего не допускается. Есть ли на Commons какие-то правила, которые позволяют толковать данную ситуацию иначе? Sealle (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)

Мне в данный момент там слишком много текста и некогда разбираться, но я правильно ли понимаю, что речь об этой номинации? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG Если вкратце, то мы не обязаны удалять контент только потому, что автору "расхотелось", тем паче если контент активно используется. Про дискуссию о кривой панораме я в курсе, постараюсь прокомментировать... --A.Savin 18:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Да, именно эту ссылку я указал в начале вопроса. Courtesy deletion мне попадалось, но построить на нём аргументацию я не счёл возможным, поскольку оно не является действующим правилом. Sealle (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Сорри, проглядел вашу ссылку. В общем, если фотка в самом деле использовалась в статьях, то удалять не надо было. Советую результат обжаловать. --A.Savin 03:46, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fatehpur Sikri near Agra 2016-03 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 41 Bombay High Court.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 41 Bombay High Court.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 95 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 95 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 01 Jaigarh Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 01 Jaigarh Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 113 Chinchpokli station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 113 Chinchpokli station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 10 textile printing.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 10 textile printing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 24 City Palace complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 24 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 30 Jaipur railway station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 30 Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 02 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 08 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 08 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 16 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 16 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 22 City Palace complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 22 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 36 Jaipur Metro.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 36 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 90 Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 90 Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 98 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 98 surroundings of Kanheri Caves.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img34 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thane Creek and Elephanta Island 03-2016 - img34 Ships on Thane Creek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 106 Bandra station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 106 Bandra station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mumbai 03-2016 112 Masjid station surroundings.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mumbai 03-2016 112 Masjid station surroundings.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 09 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 09 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 15 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 15 Jaleb Chowk at City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 25 Hawa Mahal Road at the City Palace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 25 Hawa Mahal Road at the City Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 32 Jaipur railway station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 32 Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 33 surroundings of Jaipur railway station.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 33 surroundings of Jaipur railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Sankt Petersburg-Aufnahmen[edit]

Hallo, ich habe noch einige Aufnahmen aus St.Petersburg (gefertigt im September 2010), die ich nur schwer verorten kann. Kennst Du Dich dort einigermaßen aus? Kannst Du beispielsweise dieses Gebäude 2010-09-20 Russia Saint Petersburg.jpg zuordnen und entsprechend kategorisieren? Falls nicht - kennst Du jemanden, der das womöglich tun würde? Eine russischsprachige Beschriftung wäre auch hilfreich. Besten Dank & Gruß --Sir James (talk) 08:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Das ist Newski-Prospekt Ecke Fontanka, Category:Nevskiy 68. --A.Savin 12:25, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Prima; Danke! Gruß --Sir James (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jaipur 03-2016 05 Amber Fort.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 34 Jaipur Metro.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 34 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 39 Jal Mahal - Water Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 03 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 03 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 19 City Palace complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 19 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red Fort in Delhi 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 23 City Palace complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 23 City Palace complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 12 textile printing.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 12 textile printing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 27 Hawa Mahal - Palace of the Winds.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 27 Hawa Mahal - Palace of the Winds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 38 Garh Ganesh Temple.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 38 Garh Ganesh Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Kräne in Mitte[edit]

Siehe hier: File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako (retouched).jpg. Ein wenig tricky wegen der Bäume, aber ich denke, das ist ok so. Was meinst Du? Gruß, --Code (talk) 12:48, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

@Code: Dort ist am Himmel neben dem Dom ein Fleck übrig geblieben, den ich entfernen würde (z.B. mit Pinsel), ansonsten sieht gut aus für mich. Ich würde die alte Version überschreiben --A.Savin 13:29, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Ok, danke, habs nochmal ganz neu gemacht. Habe die ursprüngliche Datei damit überschrieben. Könntest Du bitte File:Berliner Dom, Ostseite, 160402, ako (retouched).jpg unbürokratisch schnelllöschen oder muss ich da jetzt nen aufwändigen Antrag schreiben? --Code (talk) 16:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Ja. Erledigt --A.Savin 16:26, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kann für FPC nominiert werden, denke ich, kann auch in einigen Artikeln das Foto vom Berliner Dom ersetzen. --A.Savin 16:28, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Danke! --Code (talk) 17:12, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Agra 03-2016 09 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 09 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 12 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 12 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 13 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 13 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 15 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 15 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 29 auto-rikshaw meter.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 29 auto-rikshaw meter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rajasthan Bharatpur District brick kiln.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rajasthan Bharatpur District brick kiln.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 07 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 07 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 06 Taj Mahal complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 06 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Agra 03-2016 08 Taj Mahal complex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 08 Taj Mahal complex.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 04 Taj Mahal from Mehtab Bagh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 04 Taj Mahal from Mehtab Bagh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 14 Kale Hanuman Ji Temple.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 14 Kale Hanuman Ji Temple.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jaipur 03-2016 35 Jaipur Metro.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 35 Jaipur Metro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 01 Itmad-Ud-Daulah riverside.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 01 Itmad-Ud-Daulah riverside.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 02 view from Mehtab Bagh.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 02 view from Mehtab Bagh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 28 Albert Hall Museum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 28 Albert Hall Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 13 Jorawar Singh Gate.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 13 Jorawar Singh Gate.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Agra 03-2016 10 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 10 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 11 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 11 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 14 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 14 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Agra 03-2016 16 Agra Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agra 03-2016 16 Agra Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

New Delhi government block 03-2016 img1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

New Delhi government block 03-2016 img3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

New Delhi government block 03-2016 img4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! New Delhi government block 03-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sacred Heart Cathedral in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sacred Heart Cathedral in New Delhi 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaipur 03-2016 04 Amber Fort.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaipur 03-2016 04 Amber Fort.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.